From editor@telecom-digest.org Mon Oct  4 20:39:47 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) id i950dlZ14800;
	Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:39:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:39:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200410050039.i950dlZ14800@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #469

TELECOM Digest     Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:38:00 EDT    Volume 23 : Issue 469

Inside This Issue:                            Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    SBC Has One-Stop Message Service (Jack Decker - VOIP News)
    Broadvox Lowers Monthly Subscription Fee (Jack Decker - VOIP News)   
    Cascading Hubs (Gordon S. Hlavanka)
    Voice PRI T1 vs CAS (jaarons)
    Switching to Lingo as VOIP Provider, Chapter 2 (Ted Koppel)
    Re: Toll Free Number Registry? (Judith Oppenheimer)
    Re: Voicepulse Disconnects Remote Computers When Phone Used (D Garland)
    Re: More on "Social Activists" and Public Utilities (Paul Vader)
    Re: Cell Phone Attracts Lightning? (Truth)
    Re: The Technologist Who Has Michael Powell's Ear (Truth)
    Oklahoma State University Changes Requirements for Telecom (Chas Gray)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Jack Decker <jack-yahoogroups@VOIP News>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 09:09:40 -0400
Subject: SBC Has One-Stop Message Service
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.freep.com/money/business/sbc4e_20041004.htm

Mailbox holds faxes, e-mail, voice mail

BY ALEJANDRO BODIPO-MEMBA
FREE PRESS BUSINESS WRITER

Residential and small business customers of SBC Communications Inc. in
Flint, Ann Arbor and metro Detroit can now access their home and
wireless voice mail as well as e-mail accounts and faxes from one
point with a new Internet product.

Starting today, San Antonio-based SBC plans to offer the Unified
Communications package to some Michigan customers. The new service
brings together voice messages, faxes and e-mails into one mailbox,
which is accessible through the phone or online.

The technology uses Internet Protocol, which allows voice data to be
sent from one computer to another.

Full story at:
http://www.freep.com/money/business/sbc4e_20041004.htm

How to Distribute VoIP Throughout a Home:
http://michigantelephone.mi.org/distribute.html

If you live in Michigan, subscribe to the MI-Telecom group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MI-Telecom/
 
------------------------------

From: Jack Decker <jack-yahoogroups@workbench.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 12:20:55 -0400
Subject: Broadvox Lowers Monthly Subscription of Unlimited Residential
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/10-04-2004/0002264941&EDATE=

Broadvox Lowers Monthly Subscription of Unlimited Residential Plus
Plan by Thirty Percent
 
Plan Offers Subscribers Superior Service and Reliability, Unlimited
       Calling and Advanced Features for Just $19.95 per Month

    CLEVELAND, Oct. 4 /PRNewswire/ -- Broadvox Direct announced today
that it has lowered the price of its Unlimited Residential Plus
calling plan to $19.95 per month from $29.95 per month. The new
pricing became effective on September 30th at midnight.  "We are very
conscious of the great confusion in the marketplace about calling
plans -- and Broadvox wants to take the lead in combating this problem
by streamlining its offerings. This new strategy is designed to make
things as clear and simple as possible for our subscribers," said
Jeffery Williams, Chief Information Officer at Broadvox. 

"The Unlimited Residential Plus Plan is designed to give callers
unlimited local, regional and domestic long-distance calls, as well as
a broad variety of convenience and productivity features, at one low
and affordable price."  The Unlimited Residential Plus plan includes a
number of popular features that enhance the usability and efficiency
of the system. The company's unique Friends and Family program allows
plan subscribers to receive a phone number in a specified calling area
that will ring on their primary Broadvox line. The number can be used
by a friend or family member without any usage charge to either the
calling party or the subscriber. Meanwhile, the Find Me Follow Me
option lets subscribers create multiple specialized call forwarding
instructions, which are specific to each pre-established
call-group. 

The call forwarding feature will automatically try up to four
different phone numbers before sending the caller to voicemail.
Subscribers can also us the Click to Call feature to make calls
through Broadvox Direct's online portal while they are way from home
in order to avoid expensive pay phone charges and to take advantage of
the service's low rates at any time. Subscribers also have the option
of automatically forwarding voice messages to their email account as a
sound (.wav) file for easy access while on the road. In addition,
faxes may be sent to the subscriber's phone and then automatically
forwarded to email as a graphic (.tif) to allow for quick access to
the documents without a fax machine.  Broadvox Direct offers more than
25 standard features such as call waiting, caller ID, call forwarding,
voicemail and three-way calling, all free of charge with any service
plan. 

The company is the only carrier of its kind that runs entirely
over its own facilities-based network for superior voice quality and
service continuity.  Broadvox services are delivered over the
subscriber's cable or DSL Internet connection, and can be accessed
using a corded or cordless analog phone fitted with the supplied
adapter that converts digital voice packets into an analog signal.
The adapter, which is supplied by Broadvox at no charge to the
subscriber, can be used for all the phones in the home or office, and
for up to two distinct lines.  The company has also eliminated its
Regional Plan, which offered users unlimited local and regional calls
and 300 minutes of non-regional long distance calls for $19.99.
Current subscribers to the Regional Plan have been migrated to the
Unlimited Plan, in order to provide them with extended services for
the same price. The new rates will be reflected on the invoices of
current subscribers immediately.

    About Broadvox Direct

    Broadvox Direct provides residential and small office/home office
telecommunications services over broadband Internet connections.  The
company is a subsidiary of Broadvox, llc, the market's largest
privately held Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) carrier, which has
been providing broadband Internet phone service to enterprise and
carrier customers since early 2002.  The privately held company is
headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio; which locations throughout the
United States and Canada.  For more information, visit
http://www.BroadvoxDirect.com .

SOURCE Broadvox Direct
Web Site: http://www.BroadvoxDirect.com 

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:21:39 -0500
From: Gordon S. Hlavenka <nospam@crashelex.com>
Reply-To: nospam@crashelex.com
Organization: Crash Electronics
Subject: Cascading Hubs (was Re: Voicepulse Disconnects Remote Computers)


> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Does anyone know how to patch two 
> routers together if four holes is not enough?  Or is that even
> possible?  PAT]

You don't need two routers, all you need is one router plus a hub or
switch.  Plug one of the four "holes" in the router into one of the
holes on the hub, then plug additional devices in the other holes.

Read the little booklet that comes with the hub as there are some 
caveats about which holes you should use ("uplink," for instance) and 
these may vary somewhat depending on whose hub you buy.  There are also 
limits on how deep you can cascade hubs.

Note that most routers incorporate "switches" which are different.
You can cascade switches without getting into trouble, although
latency accumulates as you stack them deeper.  In a SOHO environment
you won't have anything to worry about, though.

A hub works at the most basic level of connection (OSI layer 1) and so
it is fast but usually less efficient.  A hub takes any data received
on any port and immediately transmits it to all ports.  Whereas a
switch operates on a higher level (OSI layer 2 or 3) and examines the
data passing through it.  Switches connect ports on-the-fly based on
MAC or IP addresses, and so they can allow much more efficient use of
your LAN wiring.  But since they have to look at every packet to see
where it goes, they can't transmit the packet until they've received
and parsed a good chunk of it -- thus the latency.  Gamers generally
prefer hubs (better ping times).


Gordon S. Hlavenka           http://www.crashelectronics.com
           "If we imagined he could _find_ the car,
        we could pretend it might be fixed." - Calvin

------------------------------

From: jaarons@hotmail.com (jaarons)
Subject: Voice PRI T1 vs CAS
Date: 4 Oct 2004 15:20:34 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Is there a price difference between a Voice PRI T1 (ESF/B8ZS/23
channels) and a Voice PRI CAS (24 channels D4/AMI, Wink).  About 8-10
years ago a telco voice PRI was billed at a higher rate.  I don't
think PRIs are charged premium rates anymore.  Can anyone attest to
this?

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:12:56 -0400
From: Ted Koppel <tkoppel@adelphia.net>
Subject: Switching to Lingo as VOIP Provider, Chapter 2


Some may remember that I described my early experiment with switching
to Lingo for VOIP back in late July.  I have now had the service for a
little over 2 months.  Here's what I have to report.

- I originally asked for my local number to be ported from Verizon to 
Lingo.  I filled out the form, faxed it to Lingo, who sent it to Verizon 
around August.  And I waited. and waited. and waited.  Lingo has been 
excellent (customer service wise) in trying to pursue the porting, but it 
is clear to me that Verizon is stalling.  There is no earthly reason why it 
should take 2 months (40 business days) to handle a simple request.

- So, today I called Verizon to disconnect (i.e. forget about porting,
it's not that major a problem for me).  Attendant's first question was
"why are you disconnecting" -- and I told her it is because Verizon
was screwing me on the porting and I was tired of doing business with
that type of company.  She didn't even try to talk me out of it.

- Lingo assigned me a permanent number, which will take effect in 4-5
days, at which time the temporary number they assigned in July will
cease to be operative.

- Service and pricing have been consistently high.  Can't beat the
price, quality has been excellent under normal use; occasionally some
warbling when I have a voice conversation at the same time as a
serious download.  But that's not really an issue.

- Lingo appears to be phasing out their English speaking Indian
support staff -- the last two calls I made (related to the porting) I
spoke to (a) Reston, VA, and (b) Winnipeg, Canada.  This by itself is
a *major* improvement.

So far, so good.

Ted

------------------------------

Reply-To: <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>
From: <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>
Subject: Re: Toll Free Number Registry?
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:57:43 -0400
Organization: ICB Inc./WhoSells800.com


dcs@mail.myacc.net (CrowT) wrote to ask about Toll Free Number Registry?
on 2 Oct 2004 06:42:14 -0700:

> Is there a central registry where I can find out who owns
> certain 800 number?

No, there isn't.  Feel free to contact me. 

Judith Oppenheimer
joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com
212 684-7210

------------------------------

From: Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com>
Subject: Re: Voicepulse Disconnects Remote Computers When Phone is Used
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 15:29:12 -0500
Organization: Wizard Information


It was a dark and stormy night when PAT wrote:

> Does anyone know how to patch two routers together if four holes is
> not enough?  Or is that even possible?

You don't want another router, you want either a hub or a switch (in
your usage, it doesn't really matter which, you can get a cheap switch
for $20, a hub, which is less sophisticated, should be even less).  Your
router apparently has a 4-port one built in.  The new one will need
either a crossover cable to connect it to the router, or often the last
port is (or can be set to be) a crossover port, in which case you can
use a regular patch cord.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: This is the second suggestion. The
first suggestion, in the last issue of the Digest, was to make sure
the DHCP on one of the routers was turned off. I will ask at Radio
Shack when I go downtown tomorrow about hubs and switches. I am not
sure what the difference is between a 'hub' and a 'switch' and why
one of those would be better than using another router but 'with the
DHCP turned off on it'. Still a third suggestion which was made to me
in a conversation a few minutes ago was to get one or two more wireless 
cards and use those instead, making certain of course to have them on
separate channels and telling the NetGear router to only respond to 
instructions from the (names of those PCMCIA wireless cards). After
all, the wireless router I have now can handle DHCP assignments from
 .2 through .51 (.1 is the gateway, the router itself) and I am only
using at present .2 through .6 (.2 through .5 are the four ports or
holes on the back of the box and .6 is my sole existing wireless card.)

And speaking of wireless routers and cards: I was priding myself on
probably being the only person in my immediate neighborhood with such 
a card, thus not to worry about people driving down the street deciding
they wanted to stop and 'check their email'. And Hotwire and other
directory services of public wi-fi has nothing listed for zip code
67301 which is all of Independence. The nearest *public* wi-fi is in
Wichita (110 miles northwest) or Tulsa (80 miles south). So yesterday,
Sunday, I was out and about on my block, in front of my house sitting
on the cement ledge there when I finally lost my signal (I think I
mentioned how a couple of mods got me up to speed: I put up a little
tin foil reflector behind my single rubber ducky antenna, and I 
re-installed the router software and told it I was in *Asia* instead
of in the USA, presto I can now get over all my house and into my back
yard.) But I tried it yesterday in front of my house on the street
and the sidewalk out there. I finally lost my own signal, but when I 
looked at 'site survey' I found a neighbor listed!   hahahahaha, and
giving almost as much of a push power-wise as mine started giving once
I moved to *Asia* and constructed my flimsy little EZ-10 tin foil and
cardboard reflector. 

I tracked the signal down to being right across the street from me
(because *he* had not told his base unit to 'not broadcast your name'
but he had told his base unit to encrypt everything). *His* unit uses
the name '2WIRE895' which sounded very much to me like a default name
or phrase, and like cockroaches, where you find one default, chances
are there are other defaults hanging around. I tried to connect with
'2WIRE895' and kept getting told 'if you want to join, then turn on
your encryption'.  I lost 2WIRE895 when I got back on the sidewalk on
my side of the street, and my router took over once again. I came back
inside and tried Googling 2WIRE895 and found it one place only, a list
of statistics on someone's Earthlink site but no where in this part
of the country. I was hoping I would find it as some router's brand
name or something, but no such luck. However I did learn an important
lesson: don't ever assume no one is not close enough to spy on you. I
also told *my* base unit to use encryption and to only respond to my 
MAC address and to not broadcast its name. 

So even my one-volt, frequently overloaded and burned out deseased
brain is capable of grasping some new facts each day or three.  Like
the cartoon which illustrates 'this is your brain on drugs' my brain 
is much the same way post-aneurysm.  PAT]

------------------------------

From: pv+usenet@pobox.com (Paul Vader)
Subject: Re: More on "Social Activists" and Public Utilities
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 20:48:08 -0000
Organization: Inline Software Creations


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (Lisa Hancock) writes:

> As mentioned, my experiences with social activists left a very
> unpleasant impression with me.  In short, they are incompetent, have
> hidden agendas, and do more harm than good for the people.

This is called a 'sweeping generalization', and should be avoided. *

* PV   something like badgers--something like lizards--and something
       like corkscrews.

------------------------------

From: Truth <yenc@sucks.com>
Organization: http://www.x.com
Subject: Re: Cell Phone Attracts Lightning?
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 21:27:51 GMT


> What do people think about this?

Forget what people "think" about it.  It doesn't work like that, it
did not happen like that.


> On 15th September a lightning killed a person while in excursion at
> high altitude on Etna.

HIGH ALTITUDE is the key here.  Also, the person being the highest
point in relation to everything around him.  The cellphone had nothing
to do with it.

Go in your basement and hold a cellphone during a lightning storm and
you will not get hit.

> He was a mountain expert

He was an IDIOT.

> Mobile telephone could be reason he was hit by a lightning.

Nonsense!

If he was holding a carrot, the same thing would have happened.

------------------------------

From: Truth <yenc@sucks.com>
Organization: http://www.x.com
Subject: Re: The Technologist Who Has Michael Powell's Ear
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 21:30:46 GMT


Mike Powell is Colin Powell's son.

Thus, when Bush wants BPL so that US citizens can no longer listen to
unbiased news via international shortwave that will be jammed via BPL,
Mike Powell does as commanded and approves BPL no matter how much the
ARRL shows and proves of the disaster in interference BPL causes every
time it is tested.

------------------------------

Subject: Oklahoma State University Simplified Admission Requirements
From: Charles G Gray <graycg@okstate.edu>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 10:38:20 -0500


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: This is a repeat of a message here
 from earlier Monday telling about changes in admission policy at
Oklahoma State University Telecom program. OSU is a regular
sponsor of TELECOM Digest.   PAT]

Pat, we would appreciate it if you would post the following update on
the MSTM Program.

In an effort to simplify the admission requirements, Oklahoma State
University has made the following revisions in requirements for
candidates for the Master of Science in Telecommunications Management
(MSTM) Program.

The requirement for GRE or GMAT examination is waived for part-time 
student applicants who meet the following criteria:
        - Two or more years experience in telecommunications
        - Have a technically-oriented undergraduate degree with a 3.2 (out 
of 4.0) or higher GPA.

Details may be obtained at 
http://www.mstm.okstate.edu/prospective_stu/admission_requirements.htm. 
See also the MSTM sponsorship note toward the end of each issue of the 
Digest.

The purpose of these changes is to attract more working professionals
into the MSTM program.  The MSTM degree program requires 35 credit
hours, all of which may be obtained via distance learning.  All class
materials are posted to the respective class web sites, and lectures
are delivered via streaming video, DVD or VCR tape.  Currently,
students are enrolled from Virginia to California, and recent students
have completed internships (the "Practicum" requirement) in Germany,
Guatemala, and Botswana - as well as in Tulsa and Oklahoma City.

Regards.

Charles G. Gray
Senior Lecturer, Telecommunications
Oklahoma State University - Tulsa
(918)594-8433

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #469
******************************
