From editor@telecom-digest.org Mon Sep  6 15:18:24 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) id i86JIO401947;
	Mon, 6 Sep 2004 15:18:24 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 15:18:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200409061918.i86JIO401947@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #418

TELECOM Digest     Mon, 6 Sep 2004 15:18:00 EDT    Volume 23 : Issue 418

Inside This Issue:                            Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    China Threatens Internet Porn Merchants with Life (Lisa Minter)
    Spam Makes Up Half of All Emails in China - Expert (Lisa Minter)
    Mr. Minister, Please Protect the Public's Interest (Monty Solomon)
    Re: Play DTMF Tones Over a Modem (Clarence Dold)
    Re: Play DTMF Tones Over a Modem (Tony P.)
    Re: Party Lines No More? (Tony P.)
    Re: Lingo (Jack Hobbs)
    One Alternative, Peaceful Perspective (Badnarik for President Committee)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com>
Subject: China Threatens Internet Porn Merchants with Life
Date: Mon,  6 Sep 2004 11:52:00 EDT


BEIJING (Reuters) -

China has intensified its battle against Internet and mobile phone
pornography by threatening distributors with life in prison, Xinhua
news agency said.

"Depending on the seriousness of the cases, the sentences range from
living under compulsory surveillance, detainmen t, taking into custody
by the police, to various terms of imprisonment and life
imprisonment," Xinhua said.

Beijing has stepped up its battle against smut in recent weeks, saying
it is worried that the easy access to such material on the Internet
and elsewhere will have a bad effect on youth and society.

Under the latest crackdown, which started in July, authorities have
shut down hundreds of Web sites and arrested more than 300 people.

The new penalties were laid out on Sunday in guidelines issued
by China's Supreme People's Court and the office of the country's top
prosecutor, Xinhua said.

A pornographic Web site that had been clicked on more than 250,000
times would be considered a "very severe" case that could warrant a
life sentence for its producers, Xinhua said.  It did not elaborate.

China's communist rulers have gradually relaxed the puritanical rule
they imposed when they swept to power in 1949, but sporadically try to
crack down on the sex industry and are particularly nervous about
pornography on the Internet.

*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S.  Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, in this instance Reuters News and Yahoo News..

For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

------------------------------

From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com> 
Reply-To: ptownson@cableone.net
Subject: Spam Makes Up Half of All Emails in China - Expert
Date: Mon,  6 Sep 2004 11:53:41 EDT


Experts say businesses and governments around the world will spend $36
billion this year to defend their computer systems against electronic
spam, named for a brand of processed luncheon meat made from ground
pork and ham.

"Half of the e-mails in your inbox could be messages you never wanted
to see," Jean-Jacques Sahel, director of international communications
at Britain's Department of Trade and Industry, told a technology
seminar in the Chinese capital.

"China's forthcoming spam law is a welcome development which I
understand is close to being finalized," he said.

Spam is expected to account for about 67 percent of all
e-mails worldwide this year, up several-fold from eight percent
in 2001, Sahel said, citing figures from the United Nations. 

Reading and deleting junk e-mail costs British firms 460 pounds per
worker per year in lost productivity, he said.

China is the world's third-largest spam producing country,
after the United States and South Korea, accounting for 11.62
percent of all unwanted messages, software firm Sophos says.

Some experts blame China, which cracks down on political dissent and
pornography on the Internet, for being a haven for "spammers" due to
neglect. Last year, the government blocked dozens of computer servers
believed to be sending spam.

Western governments are pondering laws to enable crackdowns on
Internet service providers, or ISPs, who allow spammers to use their
systems.  

The term spam originally comes from "spiced ham" made by U.S. canned
food giant Hormel Foods Corp.

*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S.  Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, in this instance Reuters News and Yahoo News.

For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 14:59:31 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Mr. Minister, Please Protect the Public Interest


Mr. Minister, please protect the public interest

As the former CEO of Canfor Corp., Canada's largest softwood lumber
producer, our new Industry Minister David Emerson developed a
well-earned reputation for defending Canadian interests against those
of the United States. Despite considerable political pressure, Emerson
did not hesitate to file a $250 million arbitration claim against the
U.S. over its treatment of Canadian softwood lumber nor to scuttle a
trade deal that he feared would result in too many lost Canadian jobs.

Once established as industry minister, Emerson wasted little time in
continuing to prioritize Canadian interests. He quickly raised the
prospect of tying Canadian energy exports to aggressive U.S. trade
policy, commenting, "I think the United States has to make some fairly
significant decisions about their relationship with Canada, just as we
have to continually assess our relationship with the United States."

Emerson's strong backbone will be tested in the months ahead as he
faces unrelenting U.S. pressure on two initiatives that would, if
adopted, provide broadcasters with unprecedented control over
television signals and severely curtail consumers' expectations with
regard to their rights and personal privacy.

While digital copyright reform frequently takes centre stage, the
Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), the leading U.S. motion
picture association, has been lobbying for two sets of broadcast
controls on a backstage. These include the creation of a new
international broadcasters rights treaty and the mandatory
implementation of new technological controls into every device that
can receive an over-the-air digital signal.

For the past year, U.S. broadcasters and the MPAA have actively
lobbied for the creation of the World Intellectual Property
Organization's Treaty for the Protection of Broadcasting
Organizations. This treaty would grant broadcasters increased powers
over who may control, transmit, or record broadcast signals. The U.S.
would even like to extend this power to Webcasts, which could be
interpreted to cover Internet downloads.

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1094422212715

------------------------------

From: dold@XReXXPlayX.usenet.us.com
Subject: Re: Play DTMF Tones Over a Modem
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 14:39:18 UTC
Organization: a2i network


Prospecting Sucks <action@xmission.com> wrote:

> Does anyone know of a program where I can point it to a TEXT file and
> have it play the telephone numbers over the modem? Basically just read
> the numbers using DTMF tones over the modem line?

What OS are you running?  There are several Windows programs that will
dial directly from a contact list.


Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA  38.8-122.5

------------------------------

From: Tony P. <kd1s@nospamplease.verizon.reallynospam.net>
Subject: Re: Play DTMF Tones Over a Modem
Organization: ATCC
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 15:57:34 GMT


In article <telecom23.417.9@telecom-digest.org>, action@xmission.com 
says:

> I use a voiceblast system which allows me to keep up to date with
> customers and clients. The problem I have is that I have to call into
> a toll-free number and then using my telephone keypad I need to key in
> the telephone numbers (with area-code) of the people I want to receive
> my voiceblast. After I input each telephone number I have to input the
> number "1" to confirm the telephone number.

> The problem I have is that I have hundreds of customers and it is very
> time consuming to have to key these numbers in each time.

> Does anyone know of a program where I can point it to a TEXT file and
> have it play the telephone numbers over the modem? Basically just read
> the numbers using DTMF tones over the modem line?

A properly configured VM system should allow group broadcasts. It's
all set up on the VM box and you just key in the group ID and everyone
gets it. Been that was on Octel and Intuity for years. I'd imagine
even telco VM is capable, for a fee of course.

You could always just use standard stop/start transfers from Procomm
or the like.

------------------------------

From: Tony P. <kd1s@nospamplease.verizon.reallynospam.net>
Subject: Re: Party Lines No More?
Organization: ATCC
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 15:51:52 GMT


In article <telecom23.417.5@telecom-digest.org>, mcharryj@bellsouth.net 
says:

> DevilsPGD wrote:

>> In message <telecom23.415.10@telecom-digest.org> John P. Dearing
>> <John.Dearing@VeriYOURPANTSzon.net> wrote:

>>> By the 1980's and 1990's so few people still had party lines that many
>>> of them were effectively single party lines. That is, they had no
>>> "mate" on the party line. Bell then started doing "party line
>>> reassociations" which is putting party lines back together. You'd look
>>> for a Ring party with no mate and find a Tip party with no mate. Put
>>> them together and you now have a party line again.

>> Any idea how much it cost them to put together parties onto party lines
>> again?

> In later years, they just bridged them in the CO. This made it easy to use
> "killer little old ladies" to drive away other party line subscribers. 

Unless of course you were to get a relentless bastard like myself. Give 
up something cheap? Never!

------------------------------

From: Jack Hobbs <jhobbs@chartermi.net>
Subject: Re: Lingo
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 12:23:57 -0400
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com


Michael Hynes <michaelhynes101@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:telecom23.359.3@telecom-digest.org:

> I would avoid Lingo at all costs.  The service never worked.  I called
> tech support at which they promised to call me back within 48 hours
> (48 hours!)  but in point of fact it took them 6 days days days to
> return my call.  I cancelled and sent everything back for a refund.
> Which I haven't recieved yet.  I've recontacted them about same.  No
> response.  I'll be contacting my credit card company next ... avoid
> them.  Oh -- PS -- my Vonage service hasn't exactly been great lately
> either ...

I'm responding because I think Lingo has taken an unfair beating on
the boards.  Not doubting your hardships, but my Lingo experience has
been near-perfect.  I signed up a week ago on Monday, and the Lingo
adaptor was here Thursday.  I had set my router so the DMZ was routed
to the IP that I dedicated to Lingo.  When the Lingo arrived, I just
plugged in the power, ethernet, and phone cables, and I had dial tone.
And, it sounded good when I called myself.  A slight delay, but
otherwise fine.

Voice quality is fair to excellent.  One call to The Netherlands had
an echo.  Some calls seem to have lower volume than normal.  But none
have been as bad as when I was experimenting with low cost
international carriers on POTS.

Jack

------------------------------

From: Badnarik For President Committee <badnarik.org>
Subject: One Alternative, Peaceful Perspective
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 12:49:57 -0500


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: This message has been supplied to 
the Internet by Badnarik for President, 2004. Since neither Bush
nor Kerry will allow him to particpate in their debates and
discussions, many Internet news groups will try to help him.  PAT]

  NewsAlert@Badnarik.org

How many times must a man look up
Before he can see the sky?
Yes, 'n' how many ears must one man have
Before he can hear people cry?
Yes, 'n' how many deaths will it take till he knows
That too many people have died?
The answer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind,
The answer is blowin' in the wind.

How many years can a mountain exist
Before it's washed to the sea?
Yes, 'n' how many years can some people exist
Before they're allowed to be free?
Yes, 'n' how many times can a man turn his head
Pretending he just doesn't see?
The answer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind,
The answer is blowin' in the wind.
-Bob Dylan

9/11 was a day which changed America -- forever.  Thanks to decades of
interventionist foreign policies by both the Republicans and the
Democrats, 2,752 people died in New York City and at the Pentagon in
this horrific attack -- the images of which will forever be etched in
our hearts and minds.

Our government's response has been to take it out on innocent
Americans as well as the rest of the world.  The Patriot Act directly
attacks our most fundamental rights.  This is the penalty our
government imposed upon us for our suffering as a direct result of the
9/11 tragedy.  Remember that Kerry voted for the Patriot Act, Bush
signed it into law -- and Michael Badnarik has pledged to repeal
enforcement of the Patriot Act on his first day of office.

Our government has decided to punish our youth, as well.  At this
moment, it is reported that 982 of our children have died because they
were sent into harm's way to risk their lives in order to protect the
interests of big government.  Remember that Kerry supported Bush's War
of Aggression -- while Michael Badnarik finds it both unconstitutional
and immoral.

Even more deplorable, we are taking out our aggression on the citizens
of Iraq.  While no clear death toll exists, it is estimated that
between 11,793 and 13,802 Iraqis have died as a result of our actions.
All of these needless deaths occurred, yet no WMDs or link between Al
Qaeda and Saddam Hussein was ever found.  While Bush and Kerry argue
about who will be the tougher war president, Michael Badnarik pledges
to be our peace president.

This is all being done by both Republicans and Democrats in your name,
and in mine.  It is critical that we send not just our elected
officials -- but the entire world -- the message that our government
does not reflect the will of the American people.

There are two very important ways in which you may help spread this
word -- and let the world know that aggressive, interventionist
activities are not being performed in your name.

1) On September 11, 2004, the Badnarik campaign will be holding its
monthly Meetup in cities across the United States.  As Meetups are
held in local coffeehouses, restaurants, and similar facilities, the
public will be aware of your local meeting.  As this Meetup falls on
the third anniversary of the tragedy in NYC, it is fitting for all of
us to wear something black at our local Meetup on September 11, 2004.

If you are not familiar with the Meetup concept, please check out
http://badnarik2004.meetup.com/ to find out more.  Then sign up at
http://badnarik2004.meetup.com/ in order to attend your Meetup.  There
are now 320 Badnarik2004 groups worldwide which will all be meeting at
the same time on 9/11.  Act now to help double that number over the
next six days!  Remember, it's free and it's local!

Make sure you pass this message to your friends and family to
encourage them to attend.  Feel free to invite members of your local
press to attend your meeting.  And don't forget to wear something
black to mourn the deaths of so many people, American and foreign, who
have died as a result of our policies.

2) Make a special memorial contribution to the Badnarik campaign
between now and September 11.  It does not matter how much you give --
just give what is in your heart.  But let's all do something special
this time.  Let's each provide some quantity where the amount ends
with $9.11.  If all you can afford is $100.00, please consider making
your contribution for $109.11.  If you are fortunate enough to be able
to afford a $1000.00 donation, by all means make it $1009.11.  Even if
all you can spare is $9.11, please visit https://badnarik.org/ to make
your voice heard.

We will be posting the contributions received that end with the digits
$9.11 on the website - so your voice will be heard!  It is not the
amount of the contribution that counts this time - but the total
amount of contributions made that end with $9.11.  The more of us who
donate in this special memorial contribution, the louder our voice
will be heard.  Please take the few seconds required to send your
message to the world by making your special donation at
https://badnarik.org/ today.

Friends, the world is watching and wondering whether Bush or Kerry
will be the next Warmonger-in-Chief of the United States.  By
attending your local Meeting wearing mourning colors, and by sending
in your $9.11 to $1909.11 contributions, you can tell the world that
most Americans approve of neither Bush nor Kerry, nor of their
policies.

After you sign up to attend the special 9/11 Meetup at
http://badnarik2004.meetup.com/ and make your special 9/11 donation at
https://badnarik.org/, please pass this message on to as many friends
and family members as possible.  Please encourage them, even if they
don't intend to vote for Michael Badnarik, to attend this special
Meetup, and to make a small 9/11 contribution -- so we can send our
message of non-aggression to our elected officials and begin to
apologize to the world for the actions done in our name.

In peace and prosperity,

Stephen P. Gordon

Paid for by Badnarik/Campagna 2004 and distributed on Usenet by 
participating newsgroups as a public service message. Please recall
that although Mr. Badnarik *was/is* eligible under law to participate
in the traditional 'presidential debates' process, both Mr. Bush and
Mr. Kerry refused to allow Libertarian Party participation.  

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #418
******************************
