From editor@telecom-digest.org Wed Aug  4 18:45:39 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.3) id i74Mjcp26680;
	Wed, 4 Aug 2004 18:45:39 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 18:45:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200408042245.i74Mjcp26680@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #364

TELECOM Digest     Wed, 4 Aug 2004 18:46:00 EDT    Volume 23 : Issue 364

Inside This Issue:                            Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Net Phone calls Must be Able to be tapped - U.S. FCC (Monty Solomon)
    Cingular Wireless Can Now Help You 'Escape-A-Date' (Monty Solomon)
    Tivo Gets Nod For Users to Share Digital Shows (Monty Solomon)
    FCC Moves to Ban Spam on Mobile Phones (Monty Solomon)
    Internet Considered Crucial For Educational Success (Monty Solomon)
    U.S. FCC Deregulates Fiber Optics to Apartments (Monty Solomon)
    US Looks to be Master of Aussie IP (Monty Solomon)
    Re: Cheapest Incoming-Only Phone Service? (T. Sean Weintz)
    Re: SIP and TAPI (T. Sean Weintz)
    Socially Responsible Use of Your Cellphone Camera (David Blumenstein)
    Share Day, August 2003 (TELECOM Digest Editor)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:28:23 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Net Phone Calls Must be Able to be Tapped - U.S. FCC


WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Internet phone carriers such as Vonage
should set up their systems so U.S. law enforcers can monitor
suspicious calls, the Federal Communications Commission tentatively
ruled on Wednesday.

By a vote of 5-0, the FCC said "voice over Internet protocol," or
VoIP, providers should be subject to the 1994 Communications
Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, which ensures that law enforcers
will be able to keep up with changing communications technologies.

VoIP service is likely to replace much traditional phone service over
the coming years, the commission said.

The Justice Department, FBI and Drug Enforcement Administration have
argued that they must be able to monitor suspicious calls no matter
how they are made.

Technology advocates have worried that the fast-growing service, which
promises to slash costs by routing phone calls over the Internet,
could be harmed by excessive regulation.

The ruling does not affect other regulatory questions surrounding VoIP
service, such as how it should be taxed, FCC Chairman Michael Powell
said.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=42904448

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:34:05 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Cingular Wireless Can Now Help You 'Escape-A-Date'


New service gives daters the perfect alibi if things go sour.

DALLAS, Aug. 4 /PRNewswire/ -- Ever have a blind date where all your
hopes and dreams for the perfect match came crashing down at your
feet?  We've all been there at one time or another. The dilemma for
most "dates gone bad" is you have no choice but to endure the
situation until you can find an opportunity to call it a night.

Cingular Wireless has taken its Voice Connect service where no other
wireless carrier has dared to tread with "Escape-a-Date," one of
several new options that are part of the company's Voice Connect line
of information services.

"Escape-A-Date" is the perfect service to use when you are afraid that
your blind date may not be just right for you. This new service allows
you to schedule a "rescue" phone call at a pre-set time. That way,
you'll be called at the time you specify. The service tells you
exactly what to say to set the tone for a speedy escape. There are
eight randomly generated humorous scripts.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=42906692

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:35:36 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Tivo Gets Nod For Users to Share Digital Shows


By Jeremy Pelofsky

WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - TiVo Inc. (NASDAQ:TIVO), maker of
popular digital television recording devices, on Wednesday received
approval for technology that would permit users to send copies of
digital broadcast shows over the Internet to a few friends.

The Federal Communications Commission voted to certify digital
protections on TiVoToGo, which is not yet available but would enable a
user to record and send a digital broadcast television show to up to
nine other registered people who have a key allowing them to see it.

The approval came despite concerns by the Motion Picture Association
of America and the National Football League about the risks of
unfettered distribution of copyrighted shows and illegally airing
sports games outside of authorized markets.

The FCC last year adopted rules to limit distribution of digital,
over-the-air television programs over the Internet in an effort to
prevent mass illegal copying and sharing, a problem plaguing the music
industry.

Most current television shows are shown in an analog format and can
lose some quality when recorded. But recorded digital programs do not
suffer from that problem, leading to industry concerns about
unfettered mass redistribution on the Internet.

The FCC last November required companies to develop measures to
prevent consumers from indiscriminately distributing the higher
quality digital television shows over the Web.

In addition to approving TiVo's application, the FCC certified 11
other technologies proposed, including ones by software giant
Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ:MSFT), Sony Corp. (TOKYO:6758), and
RealNetworks Inc. (NASDAQ:RNWK) for protecting distribution of digital
television broadcasts.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=42905617

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:39:39 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: FCC Moves to Ban Spam on Mobile Phones


WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Communications
Commission said on Wednesday it would set up a list of Internet
domains used by mobile-phone carriers to help keep unwanted "spam"
messages off consumers' phones.

Marketers that don't want to run afoul of a national anti-spam law
will be able to check the list to make sure they're not sending
unsolicited messages to mobile phones, the FCC said in a rule that was
adopted by a unanimous vote.

Congress passed a law last year that prohibits spamming mobile phones
unless consumers have given permission first. The FCC was assigned to
figure out how to implement that law.

The Federal Trade Commission determined in June that a "do not e-mail"
list would only lead to an increase in spam, but the FCC said such a
list would work in the wireless world if it only consists of domain
names such as sprintpcs.com, and not the names of individual accounts,
such as customer@sprintpcs.com.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=42908363

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:45:33 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Internet Considered Crucial For Educational Success


     National Survey Finds Kids Give High Marks To High Speed;
     Internet Considered Crucial For Educational Success

SAN ANTONIO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 4, 2004--

     Students overwhelmingly turn to the Internet to find
     information not provided in school books; majority
    seek fast connections to complete homework assignments

          Children credit teachers for Internet knowledge,
                  teens think they know best

 From elementary to high school, the Internet has revolutionized how
and where kids learn, and enhanced their success rate in school.
According to a new survey of 6- to 17-year-old students, high-speed
Internet access has become a valuable and sought-after resource for
schoolwork, with nearly 90 percent of all school-aged children
considering a broadband connection like DSL either important or very
important for completing school assignments.

The national survey of 1,002 6- to 17-year-olds, conducted for SBC
Communications Inc. (NYSE:SBC) was designed to identify usage patterns
and attitudes about the Internet for educational purposes.  The survey
reveals changes in how the Internet is used throughout elementary to
high school, providing a unique and in-depth look at their Internet
habits and attitudes as they get older.

Internet Helps Kids Succeed in School

Across all age groups, students overwhelmingly believe that having
Internet access helps them succeed in school with more than 70 percent
of all kids surveyed saying it helps them make better grades and be
stronger students.

As children grow older, the Internet becomes even more integral for
schoolwork. The survey finds that nine in 10 teens use the Internet to
look for information for class assignments and more than 70 percent of
6- to 11-year-olds use it for that purpose.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=42905982

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:46:42 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: U.S. FCC Deregulates Fiber Optics to Apartments


WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Local U.S. telephone carriers may deploy
fiber optic networks for high-speed Internet services to residential
apartment complexes without having to share the connections with
rivals, U.S. regulators ruled on Wednesday.

The Federal Communications Commission voted to free fiber networks
built to predominantly residential buildings by carriers like Verizon
Communications (NYSE:VZ) from access requirements that apply to
existing copper telephone networks.

Carriers like Verizon hope to roll out fiber to residential buildings
to improve the reach of their high-speed Internet service and better
compete against cable companies, which already have made significant
inroads at apartment buildings.

Verizon and SBC Communications Inc. (NYSE:SBC), two of the four big
local telephone companies known as the Baby Bells, have said they plan
to spend several billions of dollars on building new fiber optic
networks across the country.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=42905274

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 17:19:58 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: US Looks to be Master of Aussie IP


By Ashlee Vance in Chicago

Australia has edged closer to embracing some of the least favorable
aspects of US intellectual property law, including the DMCA, by
agreeing to a trade agreement between the two countries.

Aussie Prime Minister John Howard and US President George Bush today
promoted the free trade pact that will remove tariffs on a number of
goods, affecting sales of manufactured products, medicine, film and
television and intellectual property Down Under. The IP issue is of
particular concern to some technophiles who do not want Australia to
be restricted by the DMCA, which is basically what the agreement
requires. It is, however, the pharmaceutical and media issues that
appear to have Australian legislators more concerned than the IP
measures.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/08/03/us_aussie_tradepact/

------------------------------

From: T. Sean Weintz <strap@hanh-ct.org>
Subject: Re: Cheapest Incoming-Only Phone Service? (Westchester, NY)
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 17:10:46 -0400
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com


T. Sean Weintz wrote:

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Mr. Weintz, are your tenants aware of
> just how insecure, how woefully lacking in security their downstairs
> front door is?  And who comes around to maintain it as needed?  PAT]

One of the things done under my watch (not my dept - I'm the IT guy,
but I like to think my input had something to do with it) was to rip
out the "option 3" type system and replace it with what Door King
calls their "no phone bill" system, basically a barebones PBX type
thing. There is a switch that sits between the pairs going up to each
apt and the telco demarc -- all calls from the front panel are handled
via that switch. If the tenant has phone service, the switch passes
the regular pots line thru when no call is coming for that apartment
from the panel. The switch has a call waiting type feature built in,
so that if a call comes from the panel and there is already a call in
progress on the pots lines, the tenant hears a call waiting tone and
can asnwer the panel, even if they do not subscribe to call waiting
from the local telco.

STILL not the system I'd have chosen, but it was a big improvement,
especially since in some of our buildings as many as 30% of the
tenants had no phone service. And an "option 3" type system won't work
for those tenants.

We also used to have issues with tenants getting their phone service
cut off and not telling us -- not THAT big a deal, until the telco
re-assigns the number to someone else (they seem to re-assign numbers
after only about three months or so here) -- One time this happened,
we didn't know about it, the number was still in the database of the
panel.  People would go to visit that tenant at some pretty odd hours
(ie: 3:00am - I think the tenant was likely a drug dealer), press the
number on the panel, and some poor sod on the other end who just
happens to have a new phone number gets woken up. That person who had
been re-assigned the number finally filed a complaint with the police,
who contacted us (because the calls of course were coming from our
phone line). HOWEVER the police refused to tell us the phone number of
the person complaining, so there was no way to know what number needed
to be deleted from the database.  250 tenants in the building and we
were supposed to figure out magically which one had had their service
cut and never bothered to tell us about it. Positively SCARY.


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Congratulations on your upgrade to what
is essentially Interphone service. Since you did not have Enterphone
(telco-style front door service) prior to 1983 you can't have it now.
Telco not permitted to be in that business any longer, but they do
have grandfathered customers around from more than twenty years ago.
(although I do not know why in one sense: Ameritech had (and still
has) a Security Alarm business as a separate subsidiary which guards
stores, etc via customer premise equipment. It is still around today,
even though the phone side has gone to SBC. I think it has something
to do with rules against subsidiary companies having access to central
office equipment, which is a no-no, since there could be 'unfair
competition' as a result. But Interphone, originally a Canadian
company (or whoever owns the name 'Interphone') does these things the
way they should be done, which is via the **house pairs** to each
apartment with no regard to the phone numbers. Up until 1983 or so,
when apartment buildings went with the 'competitor' Interphone instead
of telco's Enterphone Service, they naturally had to get an okay from
telco for bridging into the house pairs, which according to the law
in those days also belonged to telco. 

Sometime in the middle 1980's as divestiture was being slowly and
surely implemented in this very technical business, telco (in theory
at least) 'abandoned' the house pairs to the owner of the property who
then became responsible for maintaining them. But the precise spot
where the 'demarc' occurs in large apartment buildings has always been
a matter of debate. Is it the box on the wall in the tenant's
apartment (which is all the tenant really has control over) or is it a
(house inside terminal box) down the hall somewhere for all the phones
on that floor; or is it the big inside terminal box on the first floor
or the basement (which telco claims in recent years has now been wired
'straight through' on a permanent basis to all apartments, or where
Interphone has interjected their box in the basement to 'camp on to'
all the house pairs, or where? When apartment dwellers call to report
their phone out of order, some of the older (who are the only ones
with any brains) techs come out to the premises and are puttering 
around down in the basement of the building trying to unravel the 
spaghetti like bundles of wires and deciphering the ancient tags tied
onto pairs by other techs long since passed from this world.

I recall this **very old, very ancient** high rise apartment building
in Chicago where I used to live many years ago where I installed an
intercom (an old Melco PBX actually) to a friend nearby. In a phone
box on the first floor I found a cluster of pairs which disappeared
down through the floor with a little paper tag and a string tying
them all together. The tag had handwritten on it in old, elegant
early 1900's handwriting, a note saying "This fifty pairs services
the building switchboard at 7456 North Greenview" (a half block
away). The switchboard at that address had been gone for many years.
And the tagged note was dated 'January, 1922' and signed by a man
who I am sure had long since gone to telco-tech heaven. Obviously,
rules about 'before the demarc our problem, after the demarc your
problem' would not apply. But its a good testimony to the way Bell
System used to operate that 80 year old outside plant is still around
and in use many times. PAT]

------------------------------

From: T. Sean Weintz <strap@hanh-ct.org>
Subject: Re: SIP and TAPI
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 17:18:02 -0400
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com


JustSomeGuy wrote:

> I'm sorta new to the VoIP standards.

> I see there is SIP and H.323.  As I understood it H.323 was a video
> teleconfrencing standard.  Reading more I see that it can also be used
> to do an IP to PSTN session.  I have found Microsofts TAPI 3.0 and I
> am wondering if I need to study SIP in detail as well or is TAPI
> sufficient?

It depends on what you want to do. If you are only going to be working
in the Micro$oft Windoze world, TAPI may suffuce for a lot of
things. But TAPI is not a protocol, it's an API. If you are looking to
write VOIP software, TAPI won't do it for you.  You need to decide
whether your VOIP will use SIP or H.323, and learn one of those. MOST
emerging VOIP applications seem to be using SIP, but there are
exceptions. The Inter-tel PBX VOIP phone sitting on my desk right now,
for instance, uses H.323. More recent versions of the same phone,
however, offer a choice between h.323 and SIP.

------------------------------

From: david.blumenstein@gmail.com (David Blumenstein)
Subject: Socially Responsible Use of Your Cellphone Camera
Date: 4 Aug 2004 14:01:48 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Let me upfront about this. I make no money off of this. In conjunction
with YAHOO, there is an opportunity to possibly earn $10,000 in the
name of your favorite charity by taking pictures and uploading them
with your camera phone.

I have put a banner on my website: www.david.com  It links back to the
YAHOO information page with all of the necessary information.

This is a great use of mobile technology and an even greater idea.

Thank you for your indulgence.


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Are any cellular picture phones at the
point of producing good enough pictures yet to make them worthwhile?
Now I suppose if I was trying to sneak a few pictures out of a men's
locker room, I would take what I could get and be grateful for that
limited quality. But can even the newest and most expensive cell
phones with built in cameras produce decent digital photos  or .jpg
images as of yet? I have not seen one yet I was very impressed with.
PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 17:26:10 EDT
From: TELECOM Digest Editor <ptownson@csail.mit.edu>
Subject: Share Day, August 2003


I have recently been approached by Google asking me if I wanted to
participate in their cooperative advertising program. That is where
when you use our search engine at http://telecom-digest.org the
Google people put up 'appropriate' advertising for you to see. And
according to Google, I would make lots of money by giving them this
forum (Digest OnLine, and search engine) to use. I do not think I
want to do that, but it is tempting.

Instead of changing the Digest over to an advertising supported forum,
I have always elected to keep it as a user supported forum, and for
the most part keep it spam and virus free. I am *only* able to do this
because of financial support from readers here, and if you would
rather not see these messages every month, then please pitch in and
help now and then!  Consider it sort of like public radio, which goes
on for days at a time trying to raise money ... and maybe I should
adopt the same system. Turn over the entire Digest once or twice a
year to fund raising (entire issues, etc) and stop doing it when the
budget for the year has been raised. But for now, I will stick with 
the present system of devoting a few messages at the end of each 
month to raising money for the Digest publication expenses. Out of 
400-500 messages per month, in a spam, virus free environment, two
or three (only) devoted to fund raising. You know who you are; please
provide some help here financially.

You can use Pay Pal to donate with a credit/debit card by going to our
web site http://telecom-digest.org and at the bottom of the home page
look for the PayPal 'donate' button.  Or if you prefer, send a check
or money order to Patrick Townson/TELECOM, Post Office Box 50,
Independence, Kansas 67301-0050.  The amount you send is entirely up
to you.  You know best how much you can afford and whether or not this
Digest has any value for you.  Thank you very much.

Patrick Townson, Editor/Publisher
TELECOM Digest

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO     
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. If you donate at least fifty dollars
per year we will send you our two-CD set of the entire Telecom
Archives; this is every word published in this Digest since our
beginning in 1981.

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #364
******************************
