From editor@telecom-digest.org Fri Jul 30 21:27:33 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.3) id i6V1RWD00607;
	Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:27:33 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:27:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200407310127.i6V1RWD00607@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #357

TELECOM Digest     Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:28:00 EDT    Volume 23 : Issue 357

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Jeff Pulver's Planned Opening Remarks For Panel I of FCC (VOIP News)
    Gatekeeper to Gatekeeper in Linux (kelvinkmk)
    Re: History of TV (was Bare-Bones DNC Coverage) (Paul Coxwell)
    Re: Last Laugh! Interesting Origins - Ship High In Transit (Ted Klugman)
    Re: Last Laugh! Interesting Origins  (Paul Vader)
    Re: Last Laugh! Interesting Origins (Charles Cryderman)
    Re: PayPal Notice of Pendency of Class Action (William Robison)
    Re: PayPal Notice of Pendency of Class Action (K9TOOLS@aol.com)
    Money Tranfer, was Re: PayPal Notice of Pendency (Del9L@aol.com)
    Re: Any Good Simple Home Phone Systems? (John)
    Experience of a New Primus VoIP Customer (Ted Koppel)
    For Sale: Cisco VoIP Gateways, Gatekeepers, IP Phones (Frank Kim)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: VOIP News <Voip News>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:50:05 -0400
Subject: Jeff Pulver's Planned Opening Remarks for Panel I of FCC Forum
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


This is from The Jeff Pulver Blog at:
http://192.246.69.231/jeff/personal/index.html

July 30, 2004 

My Testimony at the FCC Global Forum: Panel I - July 30, 2004

The following are my planned opening remarks for panel I of the FCC
Global Forum taking place later today at the FCC in Washington, D.C.

The entire event will be available for viewing via the FCC webcast.
             
               ------------------------

Thank you for inviting me to participate today in the Commission's
Global IP Forum.

I'm Jeff Pulver. As the President and CEO of pulver.com, I oversee
about 20 operating companies, each of which is involved, in one way or
another, in promoting IP communications. 

I manufacture IP communications devices, both wireless and wireline; I
produce software to help facilitate IP communications; I publish VON
Magazine, a magazine devoted to exploring the issues surrounding Voice
on the Net.

I also host the Voice on the Net Conferences. Each VON Conference
draws thousands of attendees from dozens of countries and hundreds of
companies around the world.

I like to think that, through the VON Conferences, pulver.com has
helped to spur the growth of IP communications and has provided
essential thought leadership for the emerging industry, spurring
innovation and more rapid adoption of IP communications.

I became a full-time VoIP hobbyist in 1995, combining my passion for
community and technology and connecting my Ham Radio to the Internet
to communicate with people around the world. This overall perspective
drives my passion for Free World Dialup, which over the years has
evolved into a peer-to-peer IP communications application. Today Free
World Dialup provides IP-based communications services to more than a
quarter-million Internet enthusiasts in some 185 countries around the
world. Free World Dialup was, in fact, the subject of the Commission's
first order, and perhaps the world's first positive regulatory
statement, on IP communications. I applaud this Commission for its
timely adoption of the pulver Order. If other countries would follow
the lead established by the pulver Order, I am optimistic about the
future and possibilities that IP communications affords.

I, however, am concerned that many countries might not follow the lead
established by this Commission. Frankly, I am even concerned that this
country might backtrack from the forward-looking thinking that
inspired the pulver Order. I see Canada's CRTC taking a critical
looking at VoIP and suggesting that some carriers should not be
allowed to take full advantage of IP technology to provide innovative
services. I see the European Union suggesting that VoIP services might
be subjected to onerous regulatory restriction. A similar proceeding
has been opened in Australia and more will follow around the world.

And now there are rumblings here in the United States, both at the
state and Federal level, that the nascent industry should be subject
to archaic telecom regulations that never contemplated the empowering
capabilities of IP communications. Just last week, in a bizarre
last-minute procedural maneuver, an amendment was attached to what was
intended to be the Sununu VoIP Freedom Bill, that would, arguably,
subject even X-Boxers to paying into the universal service and
intercarrier compensation support systems, simply because X-Box
utilizes a voice application. This certainly runs counter to the logic
of the pulver Order, and will only serve to stifle the growth of IP
communications. This leaves me in the position to lead the charge
against the bill if it were to be put up to vote as amended. I expect
the 2005/2006 season to be a pivotal one for IP Communication
regulation around the world.

Finally, I want to mention at the outset of this discussion, that I
have established the Global IP Alliance, an international consortium
of IP-based communications providers committed to realizing the
promise of interconnecting IP-based communications. Among other
things, the Global IP Alliance is committed to establishing
industry-based solutions to the operational hurdles and social issues
confronting the emerging IP communications industry. It is my hope
that regulators around the World will look to the Global IP Alliance
and recognize that the IP industry is capable of self-governance and
will not feel compelled to intercede before a clear demonstration of a
problem that cannot be fixed by industry and competitive market
forces.

Thank you for allowing me to participate here today. I look forward to
your questions and this discussion.

Posted by jeff at 07:03 AM


How to Distribute VoIP Throughout a Home:
http://michigantelephone.mi.org/distribute.html

If you live in Michigan, subscribe to the MI-Telecom group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MI-Telecom/

------------------------------

From: kevinkmk@hotmail.com (kelvinkmk)
Subject: Gatekeeper to Gatekeeper in Linux
Date: 30 Jul 2004 03:30:27 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Dear all,

I have two gatekeepers (GNUGK) running on Linux in different
locations.  And now I want to connect both two so that both gatekeeprs
can talk and divert calls to respective zones. I dunno how to
configure the gatekeeper. The only one related parameter I can find is
Gatekeeper in [Endpoint]. However, I have no idea how to configure it
properly.Hope someone can give me a hand.

Thanks.

Regards,

Kelvin

------------------------------

From: Paul Coxwell <paulcoxwell@tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Re: History of TV (was Bare-Bones DNC Coverage Draws Lower Ratings)
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:55:13 +0100


I find it fascimating to read about the history of radio and TV
broadcasting.  It's interesting enough here in Britain, but obviously
much more restricted due to very tight state-control that existed
then.  American broadcast history has so many more interesting turns
to investigate thanks to the multitude of companies and networks that
were operating.

> Chicago Tribune is and always was the (W)orld's (G)reatest (N)ews-
> paper. No one would hear of Channel 11 -PBS- (W)indow (T)o (T)he
> (W)orld for a few more years, until it went on the air about 1955 as
> an exhibit at the Museum of Science and Industry, broadcasting five or
> six hours from the auditorium of the museum Monday through Friday.

Presumably WTTW-TV was an independent station for the museum at that
time. Didn't PBS start sometime around the late 1960s?

> When Channel 11 first started broadcasting they were on Monday to
> Friday only, I think a few hours each afternoon with classroom lessons
> for school kids. They were dark -- off the air -- on weekends with
> the exception of Sunday evening from 7:55 PM to 9:05 PM. They would
> turn on their power at 7:55 PM, play the National Anthem, and the
> announcer would give their call sign and say, "Now, this weeks program
> from Chicago Sunday Evening Club at Orchestra Hall." After that
> religious service ended at 9 PM, the same announcer would come back
> on and sign the station off the air with the obligitory announcements
> about station, owner, frequency, power, etc and again the National
> Anthem. They stayed at Museum of Science and Industry until the early

What exactly were the FCC rules regarding required announcements in
those days?  Obviously stations had to announce their call signs at
appropriate times (a practice which still leaves many British tourists
not used to U.S.  broadcasting somewhat confused!), but what about
other details?  Were station, power etc. required at regular
intervals, or just at start-up and closedown?


Paul

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I do not know the history of PBS/NPR
(the later is the radio version of PBS. PBS = public television and
NPR = public radio.), but I know it has changed a lot over the years
also. Maybe someone who knows PBS/NPR history better than I could
comment? I *think* WTTW, Channel 11 began as a project of the Museum
of Science and Industry, as an endowed exhibit. At some point or
another ownership transferred to PBS.  I cannot say for sure, but I
think PBS in Chicago got started as the result of a gift from Mr.
Ryerson. What was called WBOE (as in Board of Education [of the City
of Chicago]) became an NPR affiliate about the same time in the 
late 1960's. I do know that the earliest PBS stuff was black and
white (like all television) and even when they moved into the Ryerson
Televison Center they still had only limited hours of operation.

In the late 1950's when WTTW, Channel 11 broke away from their almost
constant schedule of classroom teaching programs (very, very dull IMO)
and 'remote' broadcasting was still relatively a new concept, WTTW did
three or four 'remote' programs each week, almost exclusively from
Orchestra Hall, Michigan and Adams Sts. in downtown Chicago. They did
the Symphony every Thursday night; the 'Allied Arts' piano recitals
every Sunday afternoon, and the Sunday Evening Club programs, which
were all at the Hall. 

You always knew they were going to do some live broadcast from the
Hall, because in the alley behind Michigan Avenue between Adams and
Jackson Blvd. every Thursday evening and most of the day on Sunday you
would always see the rather humongous trailer truck with 'Illinois
Bell Telephone Company' on its side, and the very thick (like your
wrist) cable come snaking out the stage door of Orchestra Hall into
the trailer truck, then out of the trailer truck and down into a
manhole on Adams Street. Somewhere in the same alley was always a
truck which said 'WTTW, Window to the World' on its side as well, also
with cables running from it to the 'remote' cameras they had installed
in two 'boxes' (formerly patron seating areas) in the mezzanine
area. No cameramen around, the units were run remotely from the truck
in the alley. 

Regards station ID and such, the rules have changed some also, and I
do not know exactly how it works, but at least once per day when they
are broadcasting, stations have to give details about themselves and
at other regular intervals they need to say their call signs, etc.  PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:49:50 +0000 (GMT)
From: Ted Klugman <tedklugman@yahoo.com.nospam>
Subject: Re: Last Laugh! Interesting Origins - Ship High In Transit
Organization: Optimum Online


On 29 Jul 2004 11:58:09 -0700, adamsjac@telcordia.com (Jack Adams)
wrote:

> Yet another interesting origin of a phrase, this time as reported in
> Harry Newton's Telecommunication Dictionary:

> ....labeling used on the bails was Ship High In Transit, which became
> S.H.I.T., which became ....

Bogus. http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/shit.asp

> Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:<telecom23.355.13@telecom-digest.org>:

>> ....literally, "Cold enough to freeze the balls off a brass monkey." (All
>> this time, you thought that was an improper expression, didn't you.)

Also bogus. http://www.snopes.com/language/stories/brass.htm

------------------------------

From: pv+usenet@pobox.com (Paul Vader)
Subject: Re: Last Laugh! Interesting Origins 
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:17:17 -0000
Organization: Inline Software Creations


Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com> writes:

> However, if this plate were made of iron, the iron balls would quickly
> rust to it. The solution to the rusting problem was to make "Brass
> Monkeys."  Few landlubbers realize that brass contracts much more and

At least this one is a definite urban legend, as has been amply
researched on the net. Beware pithy origin stories - most of them are
complete fabrications. 

adamsjac@telcordia.com (Jack Adams) writes:

> Yet another interesting origin of a phrase, this time as reported in
> Harry Newton's Telecommunication Dictionary:

There's this little icon on your desktop that runs an internet browser.
Check it out!

> In the 16th and 17th centuries, most things were shipped by boat.

The word in question, which I won't use to avoid content filters, has
it's origins in English at least 300 years earlier than that. Research
people, research! 

* -- * PV something like badgers--something like lizards--and
something like corkscrews.

------------------------------

From: Cryderman, Charles <Charles.Cryderman@globalcrossing.com>
Subject: Re: Last Laugh! Interesting Origins
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:42:08 -0400


Another acronym from days of old that is now considered a word:

In England many years ago to procreate you had to have the permission
of the King. Once received you placed a sign on the door of your
dwelling:

"Fornication Under Consent of King."

I am sure you can figure out what the word used today is.

Chip Cryderman

------------------------------

From: William Robison <william-robison@uiowa.edu.com>
Subject: Re: PayPal Notice of Pendency of Class Action; Proposed Settlement
Organization: Universitry of Iowa
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:50:44 GMT


On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 07:27:19 -0700, Joseph <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:39:43 -0400, Telecom Digest Editor noted in
> response to Monty Solomon's posting:

>> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I strongly recommend everyone with a
>> PayPal account review this class action settlement file.  You might
>> very well wind up with **fifty dollars** credited to your Paypal
>> account, if you get to that site and can make certain statements
>> about your dealings with PalPal or PayPal Debit/Credit cards, etc. PAT]

> And as in other class action suits you can bet your bippy that the
> lawyers will buy a new Lexus with what *they* get.  Class action suits
> only put a hardship on companies.  The end "user" usually gets close
> to bupkes (zero.)

   Putting a "hardship" on the offending company is EXACTLY what the
lawsuit is intended to do.  We don't enter into these suits to
recover our trivial lost funds, but to encourage the defendant to
avoid and eliminate the offensive behaviour (from what I've seen
of PayPal, the judgement is well deserved).


-Willy

------------------------------

From: K9TOOLS@aol.com
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:38:36 EDT
Subject: Re: Paypal Settlement


It is impossible for me to fill out a claim form if I can not fill out
the forms. It says there is an error in finding the web site.
 
Michelle

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Trouble is, Michelle, the web site is
**totally swamped** most times in these early days of the settlement.
They have responded to your complaint (and that of many other users)
on their web site today saying you do not have to submit the claim
until sometime late in September and you are invited to try sometime
next week or maybe early morning, etc after the traffic has slowed
down a little bit.   PAT]

------------------------------

From: Del9L@aol.com
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:49:42 EDT
Subject: Money Transfer via Paypal


I don't know if I am at the right place but I had a problem with the
money transfer with Paypal where I was charged double. How do I get
info on the class action settlement?

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Follow the crowds to the Paypal
settlement site. Use Google and type in 'PayPal Settlement' and
as explained to Michelle in the other message in this issue on it,
allow *lots of time* to get through to them where you fill out a 
form, etc.   PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 01:15:10 GMT
From: John <dejolaNOSPAM@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: Any Good Simple Home Phone Systems?
Organization: Optimum Online


Thanks for the info, Steve. Looks a lot like the AT&T 954, but
probably better. I'll keep it in mind as I continue my research.

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:17:12 GMT, SELLCOM Tech support
<support@sellcom.com> wrote:

> John <dejolaNOSPAM@optonline.net> posted on that vast internet
> thingie:

>> I'd like to learn about any good and simple telephone systems for my
>> home. Looking for one that is user-friendly and that won't require a
>> service call for every little problem. Looking for a system up to
>> maybe 3 x 10.

> A very popular system for us has been the TMC ET4000 system.  It has
> optional modules to add features like a cordless phone port and other
> optional addons.  It has very nice intercom and paging built in.  You
> can have 16 devices in the system.

> http://www.sellcom.com/tmc.html

> Steve at SELLCOM

> http://www.sellcom.com
> Discount multihandset cordless phones by Siemens AT&T Panasonic, Motorola
> Vtech 5.8Ghz; TMC ET4000 4line Epic phone, OnHoldPlus, Beamer, Watchguard!
> Brick wall "non MOV" surge protection. Mini-Splitter log splitter!
> If you sit at a desk www.ergochair.biz you owe it to yourself.

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:35:36 -0400
From: Ted Koppel <tkoppel@adelphia.net>
Subject: Experience of a New Primus VoIP Customer


Did my homework and narrowed down my choices to the only two VOIP
retailers who (a) could service area code 540 (b) would let me port my
old phone number and (c) weren't ridiculously priced for benefits
received (as in, no Verizon and no AT&T).  I chose Primus.

I filled out the new customer form on their web site last Saturday
night.  Had an email within 24 hours *as well as* a phone call
confirming the particulars.  Had an email with a number porting PDF
document (for signature and faxing) on Tuesday.  Was given access to
customer web site on Tuesday was well (in order to check on order
status and billing).  Was sent email Wednesday morning with UPS
tracking number.

ATA Adapter arrived Thursday (next day, but then I live only about 50
miles from their office!).  Plugged in the adapter behind my router.
Waited for adapter to synch and get assigned an address - it took 4
seconds.  (Primus instructions say to wait as long as 15 minutes).

Dial tone.  Piece of cake.  Works like a charm.  No hassle on outgoing 
calls, can't complain about voice quality.  Have made several phone calls; 
they immediately post to the Primus web site for examination.  FUnctionally 
just fine.

Minor complaints/problems:

a. Nowhere do their instructions say how to pick up voice mail.  That took 
   a phone call.

b. Outgoing calls do not carry callerID information (mixed blessing, I want 
mine to do so.)

c. Incoming calls only carry caller ID numbers not names

d. Once (so far) incoming call was diverted to voice mail despite phone 
being on hook.  Unplugged adapter, it reset OK.  My suspicion is that the 
adapter and my router are somehow failing to communicate.  I may experiment 
with putting the adapter in front of the router or increasing the router's 
DHCP lease periods for its ports.

None of these are major issues yet.

Still to be established:

a. do all the other features (call wait, call forward, etc., work)?

b. What does the "LINE" phone jack on the back of the adapter actually 
   do?  (There is a PHONE 1 jack, a PHONE 2 jack, and a LINE jack)

SO, after 24 hours, the important stuff works and there are a few
things to be figured out.

Ted

------------------------------

Subject: For Sale:  Cisco VoIP Gateways, Gatekeepers, IP phones
From: frank@loudpacket.com (Frank Kim)
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:49:38 GMT


For Sale:  Cisco VoIP Gateways, Gatekeepers, IP phones


All prices are negotiable. If you need other items that are not on
this list, let me know so I can send you a quote.

These AS5350, AS5400 and AS5400HPx gateways are in stock, ready to
ship.  Our CCIE VoIP Guru will configure these gateways for you for
FREE to get you running right away.
 
Also, we will give you these equipment in exchange for termination
minutes.  For example, if you have Cuba, Thailand, Jamaica, Costa Rica
and so on, let us pump those minutes and we will ship you any of these
equipment that has parallel monetary value.

## in stock, ready to ship

(5) Cisco CP-7935 IP phone $700/each  (NEW)
(25) ATA186-I1   $145/each (NEW)

## These will arrive in two weeks.


(50) CP-7960G $285/each (NEW)
(50) CP-7940G $235  (NEW)
(25) CP-7912G $185 (NEW)

###Perfect for Gatekeepers and edge-routers$$$$$$


Cisco 7204VXR NPE300
IO-FE controller with Fast Ethernet
Single AC power supply
256meg dram, 128meg flash
12.2 ios enterprise
Rackmount kit and cables
Condition: Brand new with accessories
Price: $5250/each

Cisco 7204VXR NPE400

I/O-2FE controller
Single AC power supply
256meg dram, 128meg flash
12.2 ios enterprise
Rackmount kit and cables
Condition: Brand new with accessories
Price: $8150/each
Cisco 7204VXR NPE-G1
Single AC power supply
256meg dram, 64meg flash
12.2 ios enterprise
Rackmount kit and cables
Condition: Brand new with accessories

Price: $11,950/each

### Two weeks lead time on these$$$$

Cisco 7206VXR NPE300
IO-FE controller with Fast Ethernet
Single AC power supply
256meg dram, 128meg flash
12.2 ios enterprise
Rackmount kit and cables
Condition: Brand new with accessories
Price: $5650/each

Cisco 7206VXR NPE400

I/O-2FE controller
Single AC power supply
256meg dram, 128meg flash
12.2 ios enterprise
Rackmount kit and cables
Condition: Brand new with accessories
Price: $9150/each

Cisco 7206VXR NPE-G1
Single AC power supply
256meg dram, 64meg flash
12.2 ios enterprise
Rackmount kit and cables
Condition: Brand new with accessories
Price: $12,450/each

(2) NPE-225 w/ 128meg dram, $1500/each  (new pulls)

### Used with 90 days warranty****

(1) PA-MC-2T3+  $7000/each
(2) CISCO3662, DUAL AC,  $5000/each
 

**DC power supplies are optional.**
**We can upgrade you to dual power supplies for AC or DC.**

AS535-2T1-48-AC-V  With 2T1 And 48 Voice Channels 
128mb Of  DRAM, 32mb Of  Flash
(1) AS5350-AC=
(1) AS535-DFC-2CT1=
(1) AS535-DFC-60NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $7,500.00 
 

AS535-4T1-96-AC-V  With 4T1 And 96 Voice Channels 

128mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5350-AC=
(2) AS535-DFC-2CT1=
(1) AS535-DFC-108NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $12,500.00 
 

AS535-8T1-192-AC-V  With 8T1 And 192 Voice Channels
128mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5350-AC=
(1) AS535-DFC-8CT1=
(2) AS535-DFC-108NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories

Price: $21,500.00 

AS535-2E1-60-AC-V  With 2E1 And 60 Voice Channels 
128mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5350-AC=
(1) AS535-DFC-2CE1=
(1) AS535-DFC-60NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $7,750.00 

 
AS535-4E1-120-AC-V  With 4E1 And 120 Voice Channels 
128mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5350-AC=
(1) AS535-DFC-4CE1=
(2) AS535-DFC-60NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $12,950.00 

 
AS535-8E1-210-AC-V  With 8E1 And 216 Voice Channels 
128mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5350-AC=
(1) AS535-DFC-8CE1=
(2) AS535-DFC-108NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $22,000.00 

AS54-8T1-192-AC  With 8T1 And 192 Voice Channels
256mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5400-AC=
(1) AS54-DFC-8CT1=
(2) AS54-DFC-108NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $24,500.00   

AS54-12T1 288 AC  With 12 T1 And 288 Voice Channels  

256mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5400-AC=
(1) AS54-DFC-8CT1=
(1) AS54-DFC-4CT1=
(5) AS54-DFC-60NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $30,500.00  
 

AS54-16T1-384-AC  With 16T1 And 384 Voice Channels
256mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5400-AC
(2) AS54-DFC-8CT1=
(3) AS54-DFC-108NP
(1) AS54-DFC-60NP
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $35,500.00 
 

AS54-8E1-240-AC With 8E1 And 240 Voice Channels
256mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5400-AC=
(1) AS54-DFC-8CE1=
(4) AS54-DFC-60NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $26,500.00  

AS54-8E1-240-AC  With 8E1 And 240 Voice Channels
256mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5400-AC=
(1) AS54-DFC-8CE1=
(2) AS54-DFC-108NP=
(1) AS54-DFC-60NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $27,500.00  


AS54-16E1-480-AC  With 16E1 And 480 Voice Channels 
256mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5400-AC=
(2) AS54-DFC-8CE1=
(4) AS54-DFC-108NP=
(1) AS54-DFC-60NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $39,500.00 

AS54-CT3-648-AC  With Channelized T3 And 648 Voice Channels 
256mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5400-AC=
(1) AS54-DFC-CT3=
(6) AS54-DFC-108NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $42,500.00 

AS54HPX-8E1-240-AC  With 8E1 And 240 Voice Channels
256mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5400HPX-AC=
(1) AS54-DFC-8CE1=
(4) AS54-DFC-60NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $31,500.00  

AS54HPX-8E1-240-AC  With 8E1 And 240 Voice Channels
256mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5400HPX-AC=
(1) AS54-DFC-8CE1=
(2) AS54-DFC-108NP=
(1) AS54-DFC-60NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $32,500.00  

AS54HPX-10E1-300-AC  With 10E1 And 300 Voice Channels
256mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5400HPX-AC=
(1) AS54-DFC-8CE1=
(1) AS54-DFC-2CE1=
(5) AS54-DFC-60NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $30,500.00  

AS54HPX-16E1-480-AC  With 16E1 And 480 Voice Channels 

256mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5400HPX-AC=
(2) AS54-DFC-8CE1=
(4) AS54-DFC-108NP=
(1) AS54-DFC-60NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $44,500.00  

 
Cisco AS5400HPX (High Performance) Series Voice Gateways  - (T1 Options):
AS54HPX-8T1-192-AC  With 8T1 And 192 Voice Channels  
256mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5400HPX-AC=
(1) AS54-DFC-8CT1=
(2) AS54-DFC-108NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $28,500.00  


AS54HPX-12T1 288 AC  With 12 T1 And 288 Voice Channels  
256mb Of DRAM, 32mb Of Flash
(1) AS5400HPX-AC=
(1) AS54-DFC-8CT1=
(1) AS54-DFC-4CT1=
(5) AS54-DFC-60NP=
Condition:  Brand New In Cisco Box With Accessories
Price: $32,500.00  

Cheers,
 
Frank Kim
Loud Packet, Inc. / TelePacket, Inc.
27455 Tierra Alta Way, Suite A.
Temecula, CA 92590
Mobile:  909-757-2248   [Note: new number ]
Direct:   714-263-9099
Fax:      909-494-4425
Email:  frank@loudpacket.com
           frank@telepacket.com
Web:       http://www.loudpacket.com
           http://www.telepacket.com
 
***Free 5mbps tier 1 internet bandwidth at One Wilshire, Los Angeles*** 
http://www.telepacket.com/docs/Free_Internet.doc
 
 
### Discussion for VoIP related topics ###
*** http://www.VoIP-Forums.com ***
*** http://www.SIP-Forums.com **

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. If you donate at least fifty dollars
per year we will send you our two-CD set of the entire Telecom
Archives; this is every word published in this Digest since our
beginning in 1981.

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #357
******************************
