From editor@telecom-digest.org Fri Jan 23 03:05:04 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p2/8.11.3) id i0N853n25508;
	Fri, 23 Jan 2004 03:05:04 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 03:05:04 -0500 (EST)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200401230805.i0N853n25508@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #34

TELECOM Digest     Fri, 23 Jan 2004 03:05:00 EST    Volume 23 : Issue 34

Inside This Issue:                            Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    For Those in the Fast Lane, MSN Tries to Smooth the Way (Monty Solomon)
    The Electronic Verification Is in the Mail (Monty Solomon)
    Google Spawns Social Networking Service (Monty Solomon)
    Microsoft Quarterly Revenue Tops $10 Billion (Monty Solomon)
    Town Uses Website List to Shame Scofflaws (Monty Solomon)
    TI Technology Makes 802.11a/g Affordable for Consumers (Monty Solomon)
    One Phone Line and Multiple Extensions plus Vonage? (howard)
    Re: Habeas.com and Spam? (Dr. Joel M. Hoffman)
    Re: Phantom DSL Reprised (Gary Breuckman)
    Re: Wireless Home Networks (Gene S. Berkowitz)
    Re: Wireless Home Networks (sidd@situ.com)
    Norvergence (NorV) Information Confirmation Request (Dan Pham)
    Re: Is LD by the Minute Going the Way of the Dodo? (John David Galt)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk is definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:32:05 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: For Those in the Fast Lane, MSN Tries to Smooth the Way


By WILSON ROTHMAN

THE assumption of many providers of high-speed Internet service today
is that you are a power user; that is, you don't need any help. You
manage your e-mail with a free service like Hotmail or Yahoo , or know
how to set up a POP3 account in Outlook.

You already have software to protect you from hackers, viruses and
spyware. You have a working knowledge of Photoshop (or at least
Photoshop Elements) and you share pictures with family members at
Ofoto. Google is your research hub, you download movie trailers at
QuickTime.com, and you may even subscribe to a streaming music service
like Rhapsody. You're a Net veteran, and all you require of your
service provider is an always-on connection to a fat Internet
pipeline.

If you don't feel all that savvy, AOL and MSN sympathize with you.
They suggest that although you have graduated to broadband, you might
still need the full online-service software package you used in your
dial-up days. Both companies have introduced software-and-service
packages known as "bring your own access" - geared mainly toward
Windows users, and offered at a lower monthly fee than their dial-up
plans -- to complement high-speed Internet access.

 ...

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/22/technology/22stat.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:49:36 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: The Electronic Verification Is in the Mail


By MARK GLASSMAN
January 22, 2004

ENSURING the integrity of a Microsoft Word document can be tricky. 
Hackers and pranksters have made a hobby of exposing security flaws 
in the software, often altering what appear to be protected files. 
But a new service shores up security with an adage that is at once 
novel and old-fashioned: let the post office handle it.

The Postal Service, Microsoft and a technology company called 
Authentidate have developed a system called Electronic Postmark for 
verifying that a document's content is the same as when a user saved 
it. The service, introduced in October, is in some ways more a notary 
public's stamp than a postmark, intended particularly for those 
affixing their electronic signatures to documents relayed online.

After downloading a free add-on program, or plug-in, for Word, a user
can purchase Electronic Postmarks and insert them into any Word
document. The plug-in is compatible with Word XP and Word 2003. Once
the document is signed, the Postmark locks it down, preventing further
changes within Word.

 ...

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/22/technology/circuits/22post.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:51:31 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Google Spawns Social Networking Service


By Stefanie Olsen
Staff Writer, CNET News.com

Google tip-toed into the hot market of online social networks with 
the quiet launch of Orkut.com on Thursday.

The search company, which is expected to go public this year, is
flexing its power with its Internet fans by constantly offering new
services, including comparison shopping and news search. Orkut could
be the clearest signal that Google's aspirations don't end with
search.


http://news.com.com/2100-1026-5146006.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 22:31:12 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Microsoft Quarterly Revenue Tops $10 Billion


Launch of Office 2003 and Strength in PC Market Fuels Demand for Desktop
Software

REDMOND, Wash., Jan. 22 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Microsoft Corp.
(Nasdaq: MSFT) today announced record revenue of $10.15 billion for
the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2003, a 19% increase over $8.54 billion in
the prior year. Operating income for the second quarter was $1.48
billion, compared to $2.23 billion in the prior year. Net income and
diluted earnings per share for the second quarter were $1.55 billion
and $0.14 per share. These results include stock based compensation
expense of $2.17 billion (after-tax) or $0.20 per share, of which
$1.48 billion (after-tax) or $0.14 per share related to the completion
of the employee Stock Option Transfer Program. For the previous year,
net income and earnings per share for the second quarter were $1.87
billion and $0.17 per share, including stock based compensation
expense of $709 million (after-tax) or $0.07 per share, a $282 million
(after-tax) or $0.03 per share charge for investment impairments, a
$126 million or $0.01 per share tax benefit from the reversal of
previously accrued taxes, and $141 million (after-tax) or $0.01 per
share legal charge related to the state antitrust and unfair
competition class action lawsuits.


     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=40276969

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 22:43:05 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Town Uses Website List to Shame Scofflaws


By Mark Pothier, Globe Staff, 1/21/2004

Sabina Maziarz knew she would pay a penalty when a $400 check she
wrote in November to the Sharon School Department bounced, but did not
realize her name and address would be posted on the Internet for all
to see.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2004/01/21/town_uses_website_list_to_shame_scofflaws/


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I think they should take care doing
this. The Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (signed into law
during President Carter's administration *flatly prohibits* the
publication of debts. You are allowed to contact the person you claim
is the debtor, but you are not permitted to contact any third parties
for the purpose of collection. Skip tracers/bill collectors, for
example when calling me to find out your whereabouts, can ask me how
to locate you if I know, but they are *not* permitted to say WHY they
want to contact me other than 'I have some personal business I need
to speak with him about.' I am not permitted (if I were licensed in
the practice of debt collection) to run a printed announcement that
you owe me X dollars on account of a check that bounced for example.

One exception later passed was based on a decision that social good
takes precedence. For example, the landlord of an apartment building
with a master utility meter (gas or water as an example) becomes late
in paying his utility bill, and the gas service is scheduled for
cut off. Its obviously not the tenants' fault, yet they might well
suffer from the cutoff of utilities. So the utility companies *are*
permitted to 'post a building' (make a public announcement of cutoff)
to enable, under the law, tenants to withhold their rent money for
the purpose of paying the money for rent directly to the utility
company. I do not *think* there are any exceptions made for bounced
checks to municipalities, etc. In any event, I would be leary of 
making a public posting of someone with a bounced check for collection
purposes.   PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:50:10 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: TI Technology Makes 802.11a/g Affordable for Consumers


wONE(TM) Universal Router Technology Delivers Optimal Solution for
                     Multimedia Home Networking

DALLAS, Jan. 5 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Texas Instruments
Incorporated (NYSE:TXN) (TI) today unveiled wONE, a universal router
software technology that delivers simultaneous 802.11g and 802.11a
operation from a single chipset (CPU, MAC, baseband and RF). Until
now, most dual-band routers and access points (APs) were too expensive
for mass consumer adoption since they required two chipsets in order
to maintain simultaneous operation. With TI's wONE software,
manufacturers can offer dual-band routers at an affordable price to
the consumer market, making universal connectivity of 802.11a, 802.11g
and 802.11b in the home a reality. This all-in-one router solution
offers extreme flexibility and versatility to protect the end-users'
existing investments of 802.11b or 802.11g devices while
technology-proofing future network applications using 802.11a. (See
http://www.ti.com/wone .)

Together with TI's 802.11 silicon solutions, wONE allows manufacturers
to deliver the ideal router for multimedia home networking,
telecommuters, small business offices and small location hotspots. For
example, in a single household, the son can watch a streaming video
from an 802.11a-enabled media center or personal video recorder (PVR),
while the daughter uses an 802.11b PDA to instant message friends, and
at the same time Mom or Dad is using an 802.11g embedded mini-PCI card
in a laptop to check e-mails over the VPN.

http://finance.lycos.com/qc/news/story.aspx?story=200401051700_PRN__DAM009A

------------------------------

From: cscapella@yahoo.com (howard)
Subject: One phone line and multiple extensions + vonage?
Date: 22 Jan 2004 19:05:59 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Hello everyone,

I am about to start up a new office in which I plan on having about 4
phones, possibly more in the future.  My question is: Is it possible
to have only 1 phone line that can go to any extension and handle
multiple incoming or outgoing calls simultaneously and integrate with
Vonage?

Obviously I want to reduce my local phone company expenses.  Would I
be using a phone system like the ATT 4-Line KSU-less phone system to
tie it all together?

Thanks for you help,

Howard

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 03:31:04 GMT
From: joel@exc.com (Dr. Joel M. Hoffman)
Subject: Re: Habeas.com and Spam?
Organization: Excelsior Computer Services


> years.)  I'm on Habeas' nearly unpaid advisory board and I can report
> that the new management is well aware that their reputation is on the
> line in the current spam blast.

"on the line" is putting it mildly.  I had never heard of Habeas until
I started getting spam with their headers.  Now my only connection
with them is that I block allow anything with their headers.

-Joel

------------------------------

From: Gary Breuckman <puma@catbox.com>
Subject: Re: Phantom DSL Reprised
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 22:16:31 -0600
Organization: Puma's Lair - catbox.com


In article <telecom23.33.8@telecom-digest.org>, Nick Landsberg
<hukolau@att.net> wrote:

> Their web site also says that DSL not available for my phone number.
> Finally call COVAD.  Get a real person.  "No sir, residential DSL is not
> available from that CO."

> Ears perk!  ***RESIDENTIAL***(?) DSL!  There's a difference between
> residential DSL and business DSL, and it's the price they can charge for
> it!

> "Yes, sir.  We can provide business DSL at $159.95 per month."

> Out of my league, if I was running a business out of here, I might
> consider it, but I'm not, so I thanked the person and hung up.

> As I backtracked through the web pages I had visited, all of them had a
> seemingly innucuous set of buttons, "business" vs. "residential."  I
> didn't try the experiment, but I suspect that if I clicked "business" it
> would have shown that DSL was available, at a steep price.

> So, it seems, the providers are hoarding the DSL circuits in my CO so
> they can milk the businesses for $160 bucks a month before offering it
> to residential customers (going rate about $30 per month).  High speed
> access through the cable company is about $50.00 per month.

COVAD, at least here, offers business services only.  The difference
is that the business DSL is usually symmetric (SDSL) for example
768/768, as opposed to the typical telco residential DSL that might be
128/700 or 256/700.  Also, the 'business DSL' usually has static IP
addresses, perhaps a block of 8 (5 usable) at that price.

The assumption (perhaps not always valid) is that a business wants to 
run a server or other needs (like PCANYWERE or VPN) where they 
need static IP's, and need higher outgoing speeds than the usual
web-browsing residential user.

COVAD also obtains a separate pair for the DSL, unlike the telco
DSL which usually piggybacks on a voice circuit, which might help 
with the distance limitations.

I'm not saying that justifies the higher price, but at least part of it,
and explains it.


> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note:

> I think you should go ahead and press the button to order 'business DSL'
> service, then when the first bill shows up tell them you really meant to
> order residential service, and make them explain to you what makes
> 'business DSL' different than any regular DSL service.  PAT]

Well, as I said there are differences.   If I was the provider and you
did that, I would say "fine, we'll call it residential for you.  The
price is the same, and you've already signed the 3-year contract ..."


-- Gary Breuckman

------------------------------

From: Gene S. Berkowitz <first.last@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Wireless Home Networks
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:21:48 -0500


In article <telecom23.31.13@telecom-digest.org>, joey@telussucks.info 
says:

> Wednesday, January 21, 2004, 4:14:14 PM, editor wrote:

>> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Well my suggestion is that if you
>> find out who they are that you send them an *unsigned, anonymous*
>> email telling them about it. In fact if you can get into NetGear or
>> Linksys you can probably send them email in their own names using
>> their mail client.

> That's a rather large assumption, Pat.  Even if I find somebody's
> unprotected network, and they've got sharing turned on and are mostly
> unsecure, it's *HIGHLY* unlikely I'm going to be able to use their
> mail client unless:

> 1) They've installed some sort of Remote Desktop service, and

> 2) Have not secured it with a username/password (and most of them
>    won't let you run them that way).

> Only then will I be able to use THEIR mail client to do anything.

No need to use their mail at all.  If they've got file sharing on,
they probably have a printer available.  Just print a note letting
them know ... Nothing scares the s**t out of people faster than
when their equipment starts up on its own ...


--Gene

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Wireless Home Networks
From: sidd@situ.com ()
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 02:03:39 GMT
Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com


In article <telecom23.29.7@telecom-digest.org>, John Bartley
<johnbartley@email.com> wrote:

> 1. Make sure to change the network name from the default setting.
> 2. Turn on the highest level of security possible.
> 3. Turn the WAP/hub off every night and leave it off when not in use.
> 4. Manually generate the encryption keys.
> 5. Set up a VPN.

May I suggest, instead of the above ... haul some cat5 ?

------------------------------

From: csx130mph@yahoo.com (Dan Pham)
Subject: Norvergence (NorV) Information Confirmation Request
Date:  22 Jan 2004 21:27:13 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com


I am hoping to confirm the following or to get the truth from
individuals who have knowledge of it.

I was recently told that Mr. Jim Smith, the Vice President of Sales
for Norvergence, was fired on or about January 16, 2004. The supposed
reason behind his termination was because it cost Norvergence millions
of Dollars to hire and train many outside sales representatives; yet,
their retention of these sales reps as employees was very low. They
would usually resign or get terminated in a few months. Supposedly,
Norvergence blamed Mr. Jim Smith for all of this turnover at the
company.

Can anyone confirm that Jim Smith was fired? If so, are the reasons
above true? What is the retention percentage Norvergence has for it's
outside sales reps? If Jim Smith was fired, who actually fired him?
Who replaced him?

Norvergence seems to have a reputation for being unreasonably strict
on employees. Does it now want to be "kinder and gentler" to it's
employees?

------------------------------

From: John David Galt <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us>
Subject: Re: Is LD by the Minute Going the Way of the Dodo?
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 22:04:02 -0800
Organization: Diogenes the Cynic Hot-Tubbing Society


Paul wrote:

> Can anyone find a "gotcha" in the $20 plan?

The small print in their TV ads says "voice only".  Fax and modem
calls aren't allowed under the plan.

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-330-6774
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the second oldest e-zine/
mailing list on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2003 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. If you donate at least fifty dollars
per year we will send you our two-CD set of the entire Telecom
Archives; this is every word published in this Digest since our
beginning in 1981.

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #34
*****************************
