From editor@telecom-digest.org Thu Jul 15 21:38:00 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.3) id i6G1c0p09980;
	Thu, 15 Jul 2004 21:38:00 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 21:38:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200407160138.i6G1c0p09980@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #334

TELECOM Digest     Thu, 15 Jul 2004 21:37:00 EDT    Volume 23 : Issue 334

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Verizon Wireless Offers Consumer Tips for Area Code Split (M Solomon)
    Cingular, AT&T Wireless Top Consumer Complaints (Monty Solomon)
    Verizon's New 411 System: Is It a Live Operator, or 'Darby'? (M Solomon)
    Microsoft Research DRM talk (Monty Solomon)
    Re: Power of the Net in Next Election (ranck@vt.edu)
    Re: How to Untangle a Curly Telephone Receiver Cord (Mark Atwood)
    Re: How to Untangle a Curly Telephone Receiver Cord (Joseph)
    Re: How to Untangle a Curly Telephone Receiver Cord (SELLCOM Tech)
    Re: Norvergence Question (no one)
    Re: Norvergence Question (Billy Wickline)
    Norvergence Bulletin Board (Sarai Rueda)
    Re: Getting out of Norvergence Contracts (N. Rakeertu)
    Re: Virtual PBX Competitors (AFN)
    Re: Vonage(R) Activates 200,000th Line (AFN)
    Clearpath Communications and Easy411 Announce Partnership (VOIP News)
    AT&T Power Line Test May Aid Its VoIP Rollout (VOIP News)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:19:47 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Verizon Wireless Offers Consumer Tips for Area Code Split


     Verizon Wireless Offers Consumer Tips for Area Code Split in
     Riverside and San Bernardino Counties to Ease Transition
     - Jul 15, 2004 01:00 PM (PR Newswire)

Some California Wireless Users Must Take Steps to Help Ensure Their
Service is Not Interrupted; Calls to and From Southern California
Region are Affected

IRVINE, Calif., July 15 /PRNewswire/ -- Verizon Wireless, the nation's
leading wireless provider with 38 million customers, today announced
tips for consumers and businesses that are affected by the California
Public Utilities Commission's (CPUC) decision to split the 909 area
code into two area codes on July 17, 2004.  To help ensure that their
service isn't interrupted, wireless users need to know if their phone
number, based on its prefix, has been slated by the CPUC to be changed
to the new area code, 951, and whether or not their new phone number
can be programmed on their phone using over-the-air technology.  The
909 Area Code will be split generally along the San Bernardino/
Riverside County line resulting in a northern section, which keeps the
909 Area Code, and a southern section, which has been assigned the new
area code, 951.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=42521199

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:27:01 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Cingular, AT&T Wireless Top Consumer Complaints


NEW YORK, July 14 (Reuters) - AT&T Wireless Services Inc.  (NYSE:AWE)
and Cingular Wireless, which plan to merge, drew the most complaints
about their service in the second quarter, the Consumers Union
advocacy group said on Wednesday.

More than 70 of the 132 second-quarter complaints were about AT&T
Wireless and Cingular, Consumers Union analyst Janee Briesemeister
said. She added that many of the complaints were about how customers
were billed, as well as about cell phone network quality or service.

Complaints to the Consumers Union Escape Cell Hell Web site have
roughly halved since the first quarter. In the first quarter,
operators struggled with a rule change that let people keep their
mobile number while switching to a new service.

About 41 complaints were targeted at AT&T Wireless while 32 were about
Cingular Wireless, a venture of SBC Communications Inc. (NYSE:SBC) and
BellSouth Corp (NYSE:BLS), Briesemeister said.

Sprint (NYSE:FON) and Deutsche Telekom AG's (DE:DTEGn) T-Mobile USA
had 18 complaints each and Verizon Wireless had 15 complaints, while
Nextel Communications Inc. (NASDAQ:NXTL) had seven, according to
Briesemeister.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=42504244

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:28:08 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Verizon's New 411 System: Is It a Live Operator, or Is It 'Darby'?


Self-Service System Brings Latest Speech Recognition Tools to New York
to Better Serve Customers

NEW YORK, July 14 /PRNewswire/ -- The new voice on Verizon's 411
service is so expressive, and the listings "she" gives are so
effectively researched, that New Yorkers are about to befriend Darby,
the California voice-actress on the automated directory assistance
system being introduced in New York this month.

Verizon has enhanced its 411 directory assistance service, applying
advanced speech-recognition and Internet technologies to give
customers the kind of fast, accurate and automated information they
are accustomed to getting in their own Internet data searches. The
newest version of 411 begins in Manhattan and the outer boroughs
today, and follows introduction of the service on Long Island and in
Westchester, Syracuse, Albany, Buffalo and Binghamton in recent weeks.

Because the automated system is so effective, many customers do not
even realize that the voice they hear has been prerecorded, or that
the listing they receive was researched instantaneously without human
intervention.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=42489639

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:25:21 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Microsoft Research DRM talk


by Cory Doctorow

This talk was originally given to Microsoft's Research Group and other
interested parties from within the company at their Redmond offices on
June 17, 2004.

http://craphound.com/msftdrm.txt

------------------------------

From: ranck@vt.edu
Subject: Re: Power of the Net in Next Election
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:14:10 UTC
Organization: Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA


Charles Cryderman <Charles.Cryderman@globalcrossing.com> wrote:

> Bill Ranck placed before us:

>> "They have no legal standing to do so.  I know they are asking to
>> have a law passed to enable them, but they would need a
>> Constitutional amendment to actually be able to do this.  That
>> certainly isn't going to happen.  I doubt that Congress will even
>> consider the idea in a serious way."

> Well Bill I got bad news for you. The Constitution has nothing in it
> about holding elections. There are laws made by Congress and which
> Congress has the power to change or void. But a Constitutional
> amendment is not necessary. The only thing the Constitution specifies
> is that the "electors" cast their votes. Nothing about the people
> voting.

Yes, *Congress* can set the date of the choosing, and of the voting of
the electors, not some appointed board or other group.  I really can't
see Congress delegating that authority.  There is also the clause
which says the term of the President and Vice President is 4 years.
So that sort of limits how much even Congress could delay an election
if they don't want to start a real Constituional crisis.

Technically, the states get to choose electors in any manner the
state's legislature wants.  There is *no* requirement for a statewide
popular vote at all, and indeed until some time in the late 1800's
some state legislatures chose the electors for their state.  The only
requirements the Constitution places on the process is that the choice
of electors must happen on the same day in all states, and that all
the electors for all the states have to make their choice on the same
day.

Bill Ranck
Blacksburg, Va.


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Correct me if I am wrong: I believe
the term of office is 4 years but any given person can serve up to
two complete terms maximum. I believe this came about at the urging
of Republicans in 1950 when President Truman was in office, because
they (Republicans) were quite annoyed at President Roosevelt getting
*four* terms in office, even though he died about a year after getting
elected the fourth time. Since normally any changes voted into law
do not affect the incumbent but only his successors, Truman could
have theoretically been around for many more years. So the Republicans
got Eisenhower in office in 1952. He was an enormously popular
president and the Republicans were sorry (in 1960) when he wound up
having to leave office also because of those rules they (Republicans)
had passed several years before.  

I do believe in 1968 when President Johnson was finishing his term in
office, the Democrats were going to run him for a second (complete)
term (recall, he finished the final year of Kennedy's term) but they
would not let him do that, since if he *had* won (instead of Nixon)
his two complete terms *plus the extra time left over from Kennedy*
would have run him past the statuatory length of time allowed in
office, under the new rules.  PAT] 

------------------------------

Subject: Re: How to Untangle a Curly Telephone Receiver Cord
From: Mark Atwood <mra@pobox.com>
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 23:27:23 GMT


Don Saklad <dsaklad@nestle.csail.mit.edu> writes:

> What is the trick to untangling a curly cord from the telephone
> receiver to the base? ...
> There is a particular movement that does untangles when a telephone
> receiver cord gets curled in upon itself.

Hold the base up in the air, with the receiver dangling.
It will unwind itself.


Mark Atwood    |  When you do things right, people won't be sure
mra@pobox.com  |  you've done anything at all.
http://www.pobox.com/~mra  |  http://www.livejournal.com/users/fallenpegasus

------------------------------

From: Joseph <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: How to Untangle a Curly Telephone Receiver Cord
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:11:54 -0700
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Reply-To: JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.com


On 15 Jul 2004 11:15:49 -0400, Don Saklad
<dsaklad@nestle.csail.mit.edu> wrote:

> What is the trick to untangling a curly cord from the telephone
> receiver to the base? ...

> There is a particular movement that does untangles when a telephone
> receiver cord gets curled in upon itself.

If the handset cord is modular simply remove the cord at the "pinch"
plugs and let it untangle itself.  If the cord has "back" curls you
may have to undo that and bring it out to the end of the cord.  If the
cord has been very tightly tangled you may not be able to get it back
to "normal" but you should be able to at least undo the tangles.  If
the handset cord is "hard wired" the only way that I've determined to
do it is to just keep turning the handset til the curls are loosened.
If you have "back" curls you'll have to do the same as with just the
regular modular cord, but it will take a bit more work as you have to
turn the whole cord including the handset.

           remove NONO from .NONOcom to reply

------------------------------

From: SELLCOM Tech support <support@sellcom.com>
Subject: Re: How to Untangle a Curly Telephone Receiver Cord
Organization: www.sellcom.com
Reply-To: support@sellcom.com
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 21:51:18 GMT


Don Saklad <dsaklad@nestle.csail.mit.edu> posted on that vast internet
thingie:

> What is the trick to untangling a curly cord from the telephone
> receiver to the base? ...

> There is a particular movement that does untangles when a telephone
> receiver cord gets curled in upon itself.

Yes, you must hold the handset over your head and spin around in
the opposite direction from which you normally pace when conversing.

Steve at SELLCOM

http://www.sellcom.com
Discount multihandset cordless phones by Siemens, AT&T, Panasonic, Motorola
Vtech 5.8Ghz; TMC ET4000 4line Epic phone, OnHoldPlus, Beamer, Watchguard!
Brick wall "non MOV" surge protection. Mini-Splitter log splitter!
If you sit at a desk www.ergochair.biz you owe it to yourself.

------------------------------

From: no one <notgiven@nothere.com>
Subject: Re: Norvergence Question
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:47:54 -0400
Organization: NETPLEX Internet Services - http://www.ntplx.net/


On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 04:35:53 -0700, William Van Hefner
<postmaster@thedigest.com> wrote:

> If you'd like to see an example of the Norvergence contract, you can
> browse through http://www.thedigest.com/docs/norvergence . I'd be more
> likely to sign my own death warrant than sign a contract like this.

> William Van Hefner
> Editor - http://www.thedigest.com

One of the licenses on the page Hefner refers to says that you can
terminate the service (clause 7 of
http://www.thedigest.com/docs/norvergence/07122004-PelasEquipmentLeaseContract.pdf
or http://www.norvergence.com/PDFs/General_Terms_and_Conditions.pdf )


The SLA is at

http://www.norvergence.com/PDFs/ATM_Service_Level_Agreement.pdf and
says "Customer may terminate the Affected Services without penalty if,
in any single calendar month: (i) Network Downtime exists for at least
ninety-six (96) hours in the aggregate; or (ii) any single event
entitling Customer to credits under Network Availability exists for a
period of at least thirty-six (36) consecutive hours."  (there's some
other good stuff in there).

But that doesn't seem to terminate the equipment lease.  See section 5
of http://www.norvergence.com/PDFs/General_Terms_and_Conditions.pdf
"NorVergence is not a party to any hardware rental or lease contract
between customer and customer's financing bank. Hardware Rental or
Lease Agreements between Customers and their Lenders are
non-cancelable and not part of or affected by NorVergence Circuitry
Services in any way."

Some of the pricing is given in the documents on the page Hefner
refers to above <http://www.thedigest.com/docs/norvergence>.  The ones
I saw show the lion's share of the fees going to the leasing company.

------------------------------

Reply-To: <bwickline@aesduediligence.com>
From: Billy Wickline <bwickline@aesduediligence.com>
Subject: Re: Noververgence Question
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 14:33:25 -0700


Hi Pat,

I wanted to post a follow up for everyone. I appreciate the feedback
that everyone has given me. I think the company I work for will be
okay, and further calls will not be necessary. Thanks again for all
the advice, and I count our lucky stars that the box was never
installed!

---Billy Wickline

------------------------------

From: Sarai Rueda <sarai@AffordableTours.com>
Subject: Norvergence Bulletin Board
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:44:45 -0500


Share your experience with others at
http://www.norvergence-cit-fraud.com 

All those victimized by Norvergence including long distance customers,
past employees and others. The sole purpose of this bulletin board is
to allow the victims to unite in order to release themselves from the
malicious leasing contracts.
 
Sarai Rueda
sarai@affordabletours.com
866-265-2610 ext. 109

------------------------------

From: nrackeertu@cliornuwta.mailexpire.com (N. Rakeertu)
Subject: Re: Getting out of Norvergence Contracts
Date: 15 Jul 2004 10:58:04 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (Jeff nor Lisa) wrote in message 

>> The customers have plenty of defenses against Norvergence

> Why would they?  The company went broke.  Companies do that all the
> time and anyone who is owed money (customer or creditor) has to get in
> line at bankruptcy court and file a claim.

Because Norvergence didn't perform on its agreement to provide the
service for 5 years. So for instance if Norvergence had kept the
equipment rental agrements instead of unloading them to the finance
companies, the customers could argue that they didn't owe Norvergence
anything because Norvergence hadn't performed on the service part of
the deal. By assigning greatly inflated values to the equipment part
of the deal, and assigning the equipment stream of income to a third
party, Norvergence made it much harder for the customers to resist
payment to the third party assignees (because these assignees
supposedly take the assignment as purchasers for value with no actual
knowledge of customer defenses against Norvergence). That is why it is
so important for the customers to band together and take action on
their own behalf. It's almost certain that the financing companies
will try to enforce the leases even though Norvergence is BK, and it's
up to the customers to defend themselves (or continue to pay for
nearly worthless equipment and no phone service).

NR:>> What needs to happen here, in my view, is that the customers of
>> the various leasing companies ... need to band together and file
>> class action lawsuits against them.

JNL > It depends on the amount of individual losses.  For some, the
time, effort, aggravation, and legal fees wouldn't be worth it.  

Right. Individual losses, though substantial (most Norvergence
customers are probably looking at over $25,000 in payments over five
years, and some will owe much more than that) make it difficult to
justify a lawsuit, and it will be expensive to get the right amount of
discovery done to prove that the financing companies knew what was up,
at least at some point.  That's why the customers need to find each
other and take action. If they don't, the financing companies will
just pick them off one at a time and it will be difficult to resist.

JNL > In the event that actual fraud (intentional deception) is found,
> then the district attorney should be brought in.

Good point. It looks like Norvergence wasn't paying its telecom bills,
and I've read complaints from employees that they weren't being paid
their commissions due, so all that money from selling rental contracts
must have been going somewhere. I wonder where it all went?

N. Rackeertu


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Norvergence customers can find each
other through a web site  http://www.norvergence-cit-fraud.com set
up for them.   PAT]

------------------------------

From: AFN <DELETEnewsgroupCAPSaccount@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Virtual PBX Competitors
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:20:48 GMT
Organization: RoadRunner - West


Punch in "virtual pbx" at google and see the sponsor ads on the right.

John Bartley <johnbartley@email.com> wrote in message
news:telecom23.332.11@telecom-digest.org:

> Who are the major competitors to Virtual PBX, for folks who don't want
> to maintain their own phone switch?

> Anyone here have experience with the Virtual PBX service?

> Thank you kindly.

> John Bartley K7AAY

> Talk More, Pay Less with Net2Phone Direct(R), up to 1500 minutes free!
> http://www.net2phone.com/cgi-bin/link.cgi?143

------------------------------

From: AFN <DELETEnewsgroupCAPSaccount@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Vonage(R) Activates 200,000th Line
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:19:59 GMT
Organization: RoadRunner - West


Where are they getting most of their customers from?  They're not a
household name (yet).

VOIP News <voip news> wrote in message
news:telecom23.330.16@telecom-digest.org:

> http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/07-13-2004/0002209431&EDATE=

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:02:44 -0400
Subject: Clearpath Communications and Easy411 Announce Partnership to
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/7/prweb141354.htm

Clearpath Communications and Easy411 Announce Partnership to Provide
Low-Cost Directory Assistance to VOIP Customers

Clearpath Communications agreed today to provide the Easy411 service
to its VOIP customers, and to resell the Easy411 mobile service to
mobile phone users nationwide. Easy411 helps ease the sticker shock
many consumers see on their monthly mobile phone bills, offering the
same national Directory Assistance access provided by mobile phone
carriers, but at up to half the cost -- only 65 cents per call. By
comparison, mobile phone carriers charge up to $1.40 per call for
Directory Assistance.

BURLINGTON, MA (PRWEB) July 15, 2004 - Clearpath Communications of
West Bloomfield, MI today announced that it would provide the Easy411
Directory Assistance service to its VOIP customers, and to resell the
Easy411 mobile service to mobile phone users nationwide. Clearpath
will be connecting calls via a SIP connection into Easy411's
gateway, making the connection digital from end to end.
     
Michael Desmon, the President of Clearpath Communications, announced
the new arrangements by stating that "we were very impressed with
Easy411's commitment to customer service and the high quality of their
listings database. Since we're committed to VOIP it was important for
us to find a DA provider who would accept an SIP connection, and
Easy411 was able to meet this critical requirement."

Easy411 Directory Assistance is powered by LSSi, Inc., one of the
largest providers of Directory Assistance data in the world. LSSI's
database of more than 150 million U.S. listings is updated every 24
hours, and serves more than two billion requests each year. It was the
first telephone listings database to be certified as more than 98
percent accurate.

"We're excited about the opportunity to work with a
next-generation network company like Clearpath Communications,"
said Jon Spector, CEO, Easy411. "We also think this is a good
opportunity for Clearpath's customers to start realizing 50 percent
savings on their mobile phone calls to directory assistance." Calls
to Easy411 are only 65 cents for two listings, whereas most of the
major mobile carriers charge $1.25 or more per call.

The Easy411 service can be accessed from any registered phone number
by dialing 1-877-Easy411, or 1-877-327-9411. There's never a need
to log in or provide a user name or password; the system recognizes
registered callers automatically. Users can request up to two listings
per call, or can ask for one 'reverse listing,' which supplies
name and address based on the phone number given.

About Clearpath Communications

Clearpath Communications is an information technology and
telecommunications consulting firm based in West Bloomfield,
Michigan. The company provides objective professional guidance,
process management and implementation project management services for
a wide range of communications technology systems, services and
infrastructure. Its core business revolves around network
infrastructure services. Clearpath considers infrastructure to be the
foundation elements of the overall IT environment -- the voice systems,
network components and structured cabling systems that enable
organizations to communicate with internal and external
customers. Clearpath also markets wireless services to consumers and
businesses nationwide. www.clearpath1.com

About Easy411

Easy411 provides reduced-cost national Directory Assistance services,
at up to a 50 percent discount as compared to major telephone
carriers. Easy411 provides simple registration, never charges sign-up
fees and requires no monthly minimum. Easy411 can be accessed by
calling 1-877-Easy411, or by visiting www.Easy411.com ###

How to Distribute VoIP Throughout a Home:
http://michigantelephone.mi.org/distribute.html

If you live in Michigan, subscribe to the MI-Telecom group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MI-Telecom/
 
[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I want to mention that TELECOM Digest
is also a reseller of Easy411, and profits each time you use the 
service.  To sign up so that TELECOM Digest earns money on this
program, use the sign up form at http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest
or from the link on our home page at http://telecom-digest.org, and
you can enroll various phone numbers you normally would use to get
directory assistance. And the money would really help me!  Thanks!
PAT]

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:03:11 -0400
Subject: AT&T Power Line Test May Aid Its VoIP Rollout
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.techweb.com/wire/story/TWB20040715S0005

By W. David Gardner, TechWeb News 

AT&T has begun testing broadband over power lines (BPL) in hopes the
nascent technology will give it a means to circumvent the Regional
Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs) and cable companies.

In announcing a test of BPL with Pacific Gas and Electric, AT&T said,
however, that the technology is still a few years away from
implementation. AT&T and Pacific Gas reported Wednesday that about 100
residents in Menlo Park, Calif., will use the BPL technology in a
test.

Full story at:
http://www.techweb.com/wire/story/TWB20040715S0005

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. If you donate at least fifty dollars
per year we will send you our two-CD set of the entire Telecom
Archives; this is every word published in this Digest since our
beginning in 1981.

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #334
******************************
