From editor@telecom-digest.org Tue Jul  6 15:59:57 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.3) id i66JxvJ23449;
	Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:59:57 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:59:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200407061959.i66JxvJ23449@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #319

TELECOM Digest     Tue, 6 Jul 2004 16:00:00  EDT    Volume 23 : Issue 319

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    You've Got Mail (and Court Says Others Can Read It) (Monty Solomon)
    Voice Logic VP 206 Manual Addendum (Roger Jacobs)
    Entering the Push-to-Talk Market (Elena Colle)
    Re: Coca-Cola Cans as Security Threat (Al Gillis)
    Re: Internet Phone Service For Every Home Not Far Off (Jack Decker)
    Re: Software Has Some Seeing Red/Harvard Grad Gains Overnight (L Madison)
    Re: Comment re Norvergence and Another re Telecom Digest (Steven J Sobol)
    Re: Norvergence Offics Raided by FBI (Lisa Hancock)
    Norvergence - How do I Get Out (n-line@juno.com)
    Re: General Observation re: Norvergence (Jay Hennigan)
    Norvergence : Mob Affiliations? (Alessandra Di Maggio)
    Message Waiting Light Compatible IAD or Channel Bank? (Jay Hennigan)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 01:17:46 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: You've Got Mail (and Court Says Others Can Read It)


By SAUL HANSELL

When everything is working right, an e-mail message appears to zip
instantaneously from the sender to the recipient's inbox. But in
reality, most messages make several momentary stops as they are
processed by various computers en route to their destination.

Those short stops may make no difference to the users, but they make
an enormous difference to the privacy that e-mail is accorded under
federal law.

Last week a federal appeals court in Boston ruled that federal wiretap
laws do not apply to e-mail messages if they are stored, even for a
millisecond, on the computers of the Internet providers that process
them -- meaning that it can be legal for the government or others to
read such messages without a court order.

The ruling was a surprise to many people, because in 1986 Congress
specifically amended the wiretap laws to incorporate new technologies
like e-mail. Some argue that the ruling's implications could affect
emerging applications like Internet-based phone calls and Gmail,
Google's new e-mail service, which shows advertising based on the
content of a subscriber's e-mail messages.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/06/technology/06net.html

------------------------------

From: raj@lauhala.com (Roger Jacobs)
Subject: Voice Logic VP 206 Manual Addendum
Date: 6 Jul 2004 04:32:00 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


I bought a VP 206 on eBay and was pretty confused until I found this
very helpful manual addendum. It was in google cache and might not be
around for long, so I have reposted it here:

http://omnisphere.com/support-docs/voice-pro-manual-addendum.pdf

------------------------------

Subject: Entering the Push-to-Talk Market
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 14:50:36 +0100
From: Elena Colle <elena.colle@visiongain.com>


ENTERING THE PUSH-TO-TALK MARKET

Debating how to integrate Push-To-Talk services to the wireless offer
                 5th, 6th & 7th October 2004
               Hilton Kensington, Central London

The agenda is now complete - REQUEST YOUR BROCHURE TODAY

SPEAKERS and TOPICS ARE LISTED BELOW

Push-to-talk services look set to be the next 'killer app'. It has the
potential to increase revenues both to attract new customers and as a
value-added service for existing ones. This conference will gather
representatives of the wireless industry to discuss the potential and
challenges related to the deployment of PTT services.

Over the two days participants will be able to engage in the debate on
how best to integrate PTT services in operators' strategies by
adopting innovative marketing strategies and revenue-enhancing models.

BENEFITS OF ATTENDING:

**Debate challenges in PTT deployment with industry leaders in an
  interactive event 
**Discuss the compatibility issues relating to pre-standardised PTT solutions 
**Determine marketing strategies to attract varied customer group 
**Understand how to integrate PTT services to the wireless offer

CONFIRMED SPEAKERS INCLUDE:

**Asko Nuutinen, Technology Specialist, Research and Development, Elisa

**Charlie Henderson, Director, Push To Talk Over Cellular Group, EMEA
  Region, Motorola

**Markku Savusalo, Director Push To Talk, Nokia

**Dr. Eduard Scheiterer, Vice President Business Line Manager IMS/PoC, Siemens Mobile Networks

**James Tagg, European Managing Director, Fastmobile

**Niclas Medman, Senior Marketing Manager, Ericsson AB

**Wade Vesey, Chief Marketing Officer, Sonim Technologies

**Mark Horne, Managing Director, Mobile Tornado

**Gopan Madathil, Director Strategic Marketing OSS Division, Agilent
  Technologies

**Tony Cooper, Partner, Technology, Media and Telecommunications
  Group, Deloitte

**Craig Farrill, Chief Executive Officer, Kodiak Networks

WHO SHOULD/WILL ATTEND:

- VP/Director Product Innovation
- VP/Director Technology
- Heads of Strategy and Business Development
- Senior Product Manager 
- Director/Head of Voice Services 
- Director/Head of PTT Marketing
- Director/Head of PTT Pricing
- Director/Head of Messaging Products
- Head of Standards
- VP Sales & Marketing
- Product Manager
- PTT Engineer
- Consultants 

----------------------------------------------------------------- 
This event will also feature: Pre-conference Interactive Workshop
----------------------------------------------------------------- 
Pre-conference workshop, Tuesday 5th October
Delivering information to a mobile workforce
Led by Duncan Gerrard, APD Communications

This workshop is designed to provide an in-depth look into business
customers needs for mobile information management and how to offer
them the best solutions to meet their requirements.

It will include an overview of the current offer, and case studies on
mobile information management plans implemented by organisations in
the UK. The interactive format will provide the opportunity for all
participants to discuss how to offer business customers the best
mobile information solutions, and what PTT service providers can learn
from existing solutions.

Benefits of attending:

* Understand working practices to deliver efficient mobile information
  management 

* Discuss innovative ways to deliver adapted mobile solutions to
  varied organisations

Places at this event are limited, please call or email me now to secure your place

- PRICING -
Attend the:
** Conf. + pre conf. workshop GBP 1600.00 Plus VAT 
** Conference only Fee: GBP 1299.00 Plus VAT
** Pre conference workshop only Fee: GBP 650.00 Plus VAT 

- BOOKINGS -
Booking is easy, simply contact Elena Colle on:
Telephone: +44 (0)20 8767 6711
Fax: +44 (0)20 8767 5001
Email: mailto:elena.colle@visiongain.com
Terms and conditions apply - see below.

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Regards,
Elena Colle
Account Manager 
Visiongain b2b Conferences 
Tel: +44 (0) 20 8767 6711 
http://www.b2b-conferences.com

+++++++++++
FULL AGENDA
+++++++++++

DAY ONE
Wednesday 6 th October 2004

8:50 Registration and coffee

Conference Chair
Tony Cooper
Partner
Deloitte

9:20 Opening address from the Chair
PTT market overview: industry leaders, value chain and
revenue opportunities
* Historic of the Push To Talk offer: operators and services
  deployed in the original US market
* The evolution from the US to Europe and how the markets
  differ
* Revenue opportunities expected from PTT services

Tony Cooper, Partner
Deloitte

SCHEDULING DEPLOYMENT OF PTT SERVICES:
STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY REQUIREMENTS TO
ENTER THE MARKET

9:40 Implementing a PTT strategy with pre-standardised
solutions
* What is the experience of starting with pre-standard Push To Talk
  solution in GSM?
* How to guarantee successful Push To Talk services to start in
  2004
* How interoperability issues affect deployment of PTT services
* The way forward to the OMA standard solution

Markku Savusalo
Director Push To Talk
Nokia

10:20 How to deploy an IMS-based PoC solution for mass
market adoption
* What specific requirements does mass market imply and how to
  fulfil them?
* Identifying the reasons to select a standard-based push to talk
  solution
* Determining the keys to successfully introduce PTT over Cellular in
  a live network

Niclas Medman, Senior Marketing Manager
Ericsson

11:00 Coffee

11:20 Enabling revenue-enhancing PTT services with instant
wireless voice systems and applications
* Advanced voice systems with the Kodiak Real-Time Exchange
  (RTX) System
* Technology solutions to enhance user experience and increase
  operators' revenues
* Technology neutrality and interoperability
* Benefits and challenges for operators, device manufacturers,
  OS vendors

Craig Farrill, Chief Executive Officer
Kodiak Networks

12:00 Analysing the role of the handset offer in PTT take off
* Handset manufacturers' reactions to the risks of
  implementing PTT
* Determining the handset features that are reasonable to
  implement and at what incremental unit cost
* The PTT handset roadmap that make commercial sense to
  handset manufacturers?
* Key top-level technical issues to drive PTT handset time-to-market

Amir Rozenberg, PTT Product Manager
TTPCom Ltd.

12:30 Lunch

13:40 A genuine multi-modal instant communication service:
Elisa's trial of PTT
* Enabling a complete service: instant messaging, picture
  messaging and voice communication in one application
* Working with vendors to develop user-friendly and multi-standard
  compatible devices
* Determining the right time to launch PTT services
* Marketing strategies to maximise take-off

Asko Nuutinen
Technology Specialist
Elisa Research & Development

14:20 From Trials to Commercials - A vendor perspective on
Push to Talk
* Benefits and challenges in developing an end-to-end PoC
  solution, from mobile phones, middleware, and applications up
  to the infrastructure
* Expectations from the current PoC trials and results so far:
  how manageable is the solution and what are the perspectives
  in terms of product development
* Developing solutions with operators worldwide: what are their
  needs and how to work with them to develop an adapted
  solution
* Great expectations: are PTT services the biggest revenue-generator
  new product of 2004 and beyond?

Dr. Eduard Scheiterer
VP Business Line Manager IMS/PoC
Siemens Mobile Networks

15:00 PANEL DISCUSSION

Positioning PTT in the wireless offer
* Defining the uses of PTT for varied customer segments
* PTT's position vis-à-vis other services: SMS, Mobile Instant
  Messaging
* Advantages and disadvantages of bundling PTT services with
  other wireless services

Asko Nuutinen, Technology Specialist, Elisa R&D
Niclas Medman, Senior Marketing Manager, Ericsson
Markku Savusalo, Director Push To Talk, Nokia
Dr. Eduard Scheiterer, VP Business Line Manager IMS/PoC,Siemens Mobile Networks

15:40 Coffee

16:00 Is there a need for regulatory intervention in PTT
deployment?
* Overview of Push To Talk services in Israel
* The regulator's approach to the implementation of PTT
  standard and services
* Working with industry players and standards bodies to assess
  regulatory needs
* The regulator's approach to PTT pricing

Dr Assaf Cohen, Senior Deputy Director General for Economics
Israel Ministry of Communications

17:10 Close of Day One

DAY TWO 
Thursday 7 th October 2004

8:40 Registration and coffee

9:10 Opening remarks from the chair:
Tony Cooper, Partner, Deloitte

INTEGRATING PTT TO THE WIRELESS SERVICES OFFER TO
ENSURE REVENUES

9:20 Global trends and regional markets: offering PTT services
in varied markets
* Take up of PTT in the US and lessons to be learnt from the
  original market
* Opportunities in Europe: what adjustments need to be made to
  adapt to the European market
* Asia-Pacific: the challenges of the Chinese and Indian markets
* How to build partnerships with operators and services providers
  globally

James Tagg, European Managing Director
Fastmobile

10:00 Identifying the economic, technology and market
requirements to develop PTT services
* Building partnerships with solutions providers to enable PTT
  functionality on GPRS/3G wireless devices and networks
* Market shape and consumer behaviour aspects to take into
  account when devising and implementing a strategy to deploy
  PTT services
* Strategies to maximise take off of PTT services?
* How is PTT expected to be used and what revenues can it generate?
  
Operator to be confirmed

10:40 Strategic choices in deploying PoC to ensure ROI
* Planning the investment for PoC infrastructure and services
* Building partnerships along the value chain
* Determining the services to offer: applications, features, devices,
  pricing strategies for varied customer segments
* Marketing PTT services: integrating them in the operators' wireless
  offer, building consumer awareness, determining usage to attract
  varied user groups

Charlie Henderson
Director, PTT Over Cellular Group, EMEA Region
Motorola

11:10 Coffee

11:30 PTT services to enhance the Total Communications
experience
* A Push-to-Talk Solution supporting full interoperability across
  all networks
* Complementing existing operators offerings by adding PTT as
  a complementary service
* How PTT adds value with presence location and a visual
  interface
* Targeting varied user segments to increase revenue

Mark Horne, Managing Director
Mobile Tornado

12:00 PTT and the battle for the mobilised enterprise
* Push-to-talk: Blue collar or white collar application
* Incorporating packet voice into the enterprise network
* Extending enterprise instant messaging to voice
* The impact of latency on successful PTT
* PTT and VoIP: extending enterprise voice to the mobile network

Andrew Gilbert, General Manager EMEA
Flarion

12:30 Lunch

13:40 Requirements to maximise speed of take off for PTT services
* Ensuring quality and usability to provide end-user satisfaction: QoS,
  call set up, latency
* The role of the handset offer in take off of PTT: what is the current
  offer, what features are most likely to attract users to PTT
* Determining the customer segments to target and providing an
  adapted service
* Strategies to market PTT services to varied markets and segments
* PTT in the future: market expectations, future technologies, new
  services and applications

Wade Vesey, Chief Marketing Officer
Sonim Technologies

14:20 Gaining and retaining customers by ensuring quality PTT
network management
* How can network management solutions help build customer
  confidence and ensure growth: monitoring, troubleshooting
  and call-quality testing of SIP-based P2T services
* Helping operators provide best quality services: devising
  marketing and customer retention strategies with operators
* Targeting potential consumer groups and varied uses for PTT:
  how to approach varied customer segments
* Delivering applications to attract new customers: what aspects
  of PTT are attractive to what customers?

Gopan Madathil, Director Strategic Marketing OSS Division
Agilent Technologies

15:00 Coffee

15:15 Optimising the customer experience to provide quality
PTT services
* What do PTT users needs from their services and how to
  deliver it
* The problems that can affect the customer experience and
  troubleshooting solutions: call setup time and latency
* Delivering PTT functionality:
- to Nextel's nationwide wireless network
- to Verizon in their PTT service rolled out in 2003

Duncan Vardy, Head of Product Management
Actix

15:45 Building Profitable and Effective Charging Models for
Push-to-Talk
* The options for charging for PTT and how these apply
  differently:
- within different regions;
- within prepaid;
- within contract postpaid.
* How PTT can be deployed with no upgrades with existing data
  billing and prepaid systems
* What is needed to deliver the required session control, QoS, etc?

Carol Politi, Vice President of Marketing and Co-Founder
Megisto Systems

16:15 PANEL DISCUSSION: Marketing PTT services
* Targeting potential consumer groups and varied uses for PTT
* Combining PTT with multiple services: digital phone, text
  messaging, Internet access
* What groups are more likely to be attracted and how to
  approach them: business, youth, leisure
* Building strategic partnerships to offer advanced services
* Efficient marketing strategies for rapid take off

Charlie Henderson, Director, PoC Group, EMEA region, Motorola
Gopan Madathil, Director Strategic Marketing OSS Division,
Agilent Technologies
James Tagg, European Managing Director, Fastmobile

16:45 Closing remarks by chairman

Terms & Conditions

NB - Due to high demand, we do not 'reserve' or 'hold' places - a
request for an invoice to be raised will be treated as an official
booking and will be subject to the cancellation policy as outlined
below.  Cancellations/substitutions and name changes: All bookings
carry a 50% liability after the booking has been made, by post fax,
email or web. There will be no refunds for cancellations received on
or after one month before the start of the conference
(e.g. cancellation on or after 20th January for a conference starting
on 20th February). 

If you decide to cancel after this date the full invoice remains
payable. Conference notes, which are available on the day, will be
sent to you. Unfortunately we are not able to transfer places between
conferences and executive briefings. However if you are unable to
attend the event you may make a substitution/name change at any time
as long as we are informed in writing by e-mail, fax or post. Name
changes and substitutions must be from the same company and are not
transferable between companies or countries.

Indemnity: visiongain Ltd reserve the right to change the
conference/executive briefing content, timing, speakers or venue
without notice. The event may be postponed or cancelled due to acts of
terrorism, war, extreme weather conditions, industrial action, acts of
God or any event beyond the control of visiongain Ltd. If such a
situation arises we will endeavour to reschedule the event. However,
visiongain Ltd cannot be held responsible for any cost, damage or
expenses, which may be incurred by the customer as a consequence of
the event being postponed or cancelled. We therefore strongly advise
all customers to take out insurance to cover the cost of the
registration, travel and expenses.

------------------------------

From: Al Gillis <alg@aracnet.com>
Subject: Re: Coca-Cola Cans as Security Threat
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 19:34:14 -0700
Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com


John McHarry <mcharryj@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:telecom23.318.8@telecom-digest.org:

> Momo wrote:

>> I clipped this from comp.risks and thought it might be worth
>> discussion.  Mo

>>   Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:48:23 -0400
>>   From: "Dominey, Jack M, NEO" <dominey@att.com>
>>   Subject: Coca-Cola Cans as Security Threat

>> Following message forwarded by my boss.  I wonder what they think of
>> this at Coca Cola HQ?

>>  Subject: SCIF Security Advisory

>> Security Managers:

>> The Coca Cola Company has a summer game promotion running from 5/17 -
>> 7/12/04 in all 50 states and the District of Columbia that has the
>> capability to compromise classified information.

> They will probably call in Col. Bat Guano.

Good old Colonel Guano - "Peace is our Profession".  He was always worried
about his "precious bodily fluids" and how he withheld them from women!

Years ago, as an Airman Last Class I recall seeing that movie in the
Lackland AFB theatre.  Being right in the middle of the nonsense we called
Basic Training made it even more hilarious to us!

Al

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:59:25 -0400
From: Jack Decker <withheld on request>
Subject: Re: Internet Phone Service For Every Home Not Far Off


Pat, please conceal my e-mail address as always.

On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 02:52:54 -0000, ellis@no.spam wrote:

> In article <telecom23.309.2@telecom-digest.org>, Matt Simpson
> <news01@jmatt.net> wrote:

>> That's a crock.  We are still a very long way from "Internet Phone
>> Service For Every Home".  Before that can happen, we need broadband in
>> every home.  And that's a long way off.

My abilities at predicting the future are generally not very good at
all, but I would just remind Mr. Simpson that ten years ago people
were saying the same thing about Internet access in every home.  No,
we still don't have Internet access in EVERY home (but then, there are
probably still a few homes without running water!) but no one would
say the Internet is insignificant anymore.  At the same time, I grant
the point: Some technology writers definitely need to keep the hype in
check.

> The bigger crock is the claim that VoIP is somehow superior to circuit
> switched service. The biggest "virtue" of VoIP is its ability to
> circumvent regulations and that has nothing to do with technology.

I had to respond to this snarky comment.  The biggest virtue of VoIP
in my book is that it provides what our government more or less said
they wanted back in 1996, which is telephone service that doesn't use
or depend upon the facilities of the ILEC (on the subscriber's end).
When VoIP is provided via cable modem or other broadband service that
doesn't use the phone company's wires and cables, that's exactly what
it provides, and that's what scares the big phone companies.  Because,
finally, customers are discovering ways to cut them out of the loop
entirely.

I mean, if you think about it, for years the phone companies pretty
much had everyone over a barrel.  If you really wanted to be a fully
functioning member of society, especially starting in about the
1950's, you were expected to have a phone (I would submit that the
same may nearly be true today with regard to Internet access).  You
still need a way to communicate with others, but for the first time in
about half a century you can be without service from a traditional
phone company and not be something of a social outcast.  You can do
that by using either a wireless phone, or a VoIP service in lieu of a
standard phone line.

The regulations in question probably never should have existed in the
first place, because they set up the situation where phone companies
think it is their God-given right to gouge the public, even to the
point that they look upon fines as just a cost of doing business.  So
I would say that what is really happening is that VoIP is causing the
old system of regulations to be examined and debated.  If you are a
traditional phone company, or have stock in one, you probably won't
like that much, because those regulations have helped you make money
and impede competition (in fact, if you're a big phone company,
chances are your lawyers helped write some of those regulations).

Furthermore, no VoIP company could actually "circumvent" regulations
and get away with it for long -- that implies that they are doing
something illegal.  To be accurate, you should say that they are
operating in a "grey area" where either the current regulations don't
apply, or there is some doubt as to whether the regulations apply (and
it will be up to the courts and the regulators to decide).
Telecommunications law is very complex, and sometimes it's not so
cut-and-dried what you can and cannot do.  In such cases, some
businesses will choose to risk getting slapped down by the courts, but
hope that the courts will find in their favor.

To make an analogy, it's like putting new paneling in your living
room.  Does your local city or township require that you get a
building permit before doing so?  Maybe yes, maybe no.  Some people
will check the regulations, decide they are vague, and do the job
without getting the permit.  Some will decide that they don't care;
they'll do the job without the permit because the permit might not be
required, but even if it is, they know there's only a very small
chance they will ever be caught and fined.  A few will march right
down to city hall and request and pay for a permit, and then b*tch and
moan and get on their moral high horse when they find out that a
neighbor did a small remodeling job without a permit (IF they somehow
find that out).

A business has to be more careful what they do than a homeowner,
because any disgruntled employee might blow the whistle (a few
companies never seem to catch onto that fact until it's too late).  So
I would say that it's very unlikely that every VoIP company out there
is circumventing regulations. Certainly, the major phone companies
would like to put that spin on it (to buy them additional time to
prepare their own VoIP offerings) but the VoIP companies would say
that those regulations don't apply to them, thus they aren't
circumventing anything.  If a court later decides that the regulations
do apply (and that ruling sticks through the appeal process) then the
VoIP companies will have to deal with it.

Personally, I hope it's the regulations that go away -- at least those
that add all those extra charges to traditional phone bills.  The
Universal Service Charge particularly irks me -- this is just corporate
welfare for second-tier telephone companies.  Why should the
ratepayers at Verizon or SBC have to pay extra so that the
stockholders of CenturyTel or Frontier or other so-called "rural"
companies get higher returns?

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Software Has Some Seeing Red / Harvard Grad Gains Overnight
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:07:00 -0700
From: Linc Madison <lincmad@suespammers.org>
Reply-To: lincmad@suespammers.org
Organization: California resident; nospam; no unsolicited e-mail allowed


In article <telecom23.318.2@telecom-digest.org>, Monty Solomon
<monty@roscom.com> wrote:

> DidTheyReadIt allows users to track the e-mails they send, alerting
> them when a message is opened by its recipient -- and even reporting
> on how long the recipient looked at it, and offering a rough
> geographical guess about where he is located. The service is either
> subtle or surreptitious, depending on your point of view. It's nearly
> impossible to tell that an e-mail you've received is being tracked by
> DidTheyReadIt.

There's a gaping flaw in the business model. Very simply put, any
e-mail client that cooperates with DidTheyReadIt is also vulnerable to
all sorts of spam-tracking and viruses. There's nothing that
DidTheyReadIt uses, that people with far worse intentions can't
exploit.

My e-mail client -- and the e-mail client of anyone with a lick of
sense -- asks my permission before loading any content from the
Internet. That includes tracking information. (I also make sure that my
e-mail client will not auto-execute scripts or other content included
with the e-mail message itself.)

An e-mail client that automatically loads graphics from some unknown
web site is an open invitation to mischief.

And that's before we even get to the issue that many admins are
null-routing DidTheyReadIt's servers as a matter of policy.

Linc Madison  *  San Francisco, California  *  lincmad@suespammers.org
<http://www.LincMad.com> * primary e-mail: Telecom at LincMad dot com
All U.S. and California anti-spam laws apply, incl. CA BPC 17538.45(c)
This text constitutes actual notice as required in BPC 17538.45(f)(3).
DO NOT SEND UNSOLICITED E-MAIL TO THIS ADDRESS.  You have been warned.

------------------------------

From: Steven J Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net>
Subject: Re: Comment re Norvergence and Another re Telecom Digest
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 21:23:36 -0500


sin nombre <me@privacy.net> wrote:

> Re Norvergence: If they wrote NSF checks to employees, what do you
> suppose the odds are that they also wrote NSF checks for payroll tax
> deposits? I think this company will be providing work for many
> attorneys for many months, if not years.

> Re Telecom Digest: I've just read a post on the Norvergence topic
> which had little content other than to flame another poster. Pat, I
> trust your judgement; but that one getting through came as a surprise.

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Well sometimes I let those through
> because I want to give them enough rope to hang themselves with. Steve
> has been posting here for many years, and I trust his postings. Not
> necessarily so with his current antagonist.  PAT]

Won't happen again. I've said my peace, I apologize if I annoyed
anyone, and it won't happen again. I was trying to stick to providing
facts, and a few insults crept into that last post.


JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/ 
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
Apple Valley, California     Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (Lisa Hancock)
Subject: Re: Norvergence Offics Raided by FBI
Date: 6 Jul 2004 06:58:45 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


TELECOM Digest Editor noted in response to hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
(Lisa Hancock):

> Is Qwest now out of business with some other telco running phone
> service in the New Jersey area? 

I misread the news notice.  Apparently some of Qwest's wireless
customers were sold, see the following from the Qwest website.

http://www.qwest.com/about/media/pressroom/1,1720,1558_current,00.html

I couldn't find any news articles about Norvergence.  However, I did
see a commercial site (login required) that says it has info: (I did
not log on to it).

http://www.telecomagent.org/norvergence.htm

------------------------------

From: n-line@juno.com <n-line@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 14:13:16 GMT
Subject: Norvergence - How Do I Get Out


Well if all is true then Norvergence is out of business.  One thing
hasn't been addressed though ... what are the existing customers
supposed to do now?  We have signed lease agreements with banks for
equipment that won't work when Quest turns off the lines again.  How
do we get out of those?  Anyone have any ideas??

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I suggest simply ignoring those fraud-
ulent contracts the banks are holding. FREEZE ALL TELECOM PAYMENTS
IMMEDIATLY. If the bank wants to sue, that's okay. They *should* be
suing the remains of Norvergence, since Norvergence got the money
illegally, through trickery and fraud. Of course the bank will choose
to pick on the weaker party (yourself) because they assume they can
twist your arm easier. You'll hear threats about how you will get
sued, how your company credit will be ruined, etc, but pay no attention.
The bank knows it will be almost futile to try and sue Novergence,
so they will work on you instead if you let them, and sadly, many telecom
managers, company executives will be bullied into compliance with the
bank's demands for payment, etc. 

If the bank *does* choose to sue you (not at all certain, IMO) then 
your response should be to countersue the bank for harassment and
for being a party to the same fraud as Norvergence. The bank after all
*did* facilitate the fraud by paying Norvergence money, and they knew
or should have known that Norvergence had a worthless scheme going
on. The bank is equally (or more so) able to investigate the collateral
being put up for the money the bank advanced to Norvergence, the
'collateral' in this case being the promises of satisfied customers 
able and willing to pay. If you recall, we had that one message in the
Digest several months ago from the lady who said she worked for the
bank (which had been approached by Norvergence to handle their paper) 
and she was investigating if the bank should get involved or not. 

Now myself, being sort of weary about lawsuits and Norvergence's 
eagnerness to file same, I just printed her message here and said
nothing, or maybe just some generic, bland response, I do not remember.
In any event, the bank could have chosen to investigate if they
wished, prior to advancing money to Norvergence, or handing the
company's credit paper. That's not your problem. You were deceived
by a smooth talking salesman. Just ignore those invoices and let the
bank deal with it as they must.   PAT]

------------------------------

From: Jay Hennigan <jay@west.net>
Organization: Disgruntled Postal Workers Against Gun Control
Subject: Re: General Observation re: Norvergence
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 10:39:51 -0700


On Sun, 04 Jul 2004 09:31:35 -0700, Mark Crispin wrote:

> One of the leading earmarks of a scam is an organization that
> threatens litigation against ex-employees, disgruntled customers,
> etc. that publishes unfavorable information about the organization.
> Scams always have sleazy lawyers on the payroll whose sole function is
> to send threatening letters and at times file frivolous lawsuits.

> Reputable companies do not try to silence their critics.  Reputable
> companies do not demand that unfavorable opinions about that company
> be quashed.

Heh.  

See:  http://www.2600.com/news/view/article/322

------------------------------

From: shinecorp1@aol.com (Alessandra Di Maggio)
Subject: Norvergence : Mob Affiliations?
Date: 6 Jul 2004 10:25:54 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


As you all know, I am a former employee of Norvergence. I worked there
until early 2004. I saw right through them when I was hired, but I
really needed to make some quick cash ... and did ( I was taking home
over $7,000 a month- clean) . They (owners and management) were sleazy
and unprofessional and I hated their guts ... I would never defend
them under any circumstance ... but one thing I do want to clarify
 ...  I have read on certain postings that Norvergence has ties with the
Italian-American mob.

I can absolutely assure everyone that there is nothing further from
the truth. The Italian mob were very much made aware of Norvergence
and of it's scamming operations ... but they had no desire to get
involved. They knew the company was going to get busted by the Feds,
sooner or later, and thus they decided not to take a "piece of the
action". They wanted nothing to do with the company.  How do I know
this? This is first hand information. Believe it or not, the mob is
smart, won't take stupid risks or associate with individuals who's fate
is sealed. Salzano and Company are a bunch of money hungry corrupt
capitalists. There is a very distinct difference.

------------------------------

From: Jay Hennigan <jay@west.net>
Organization: Disgruntled Postal Workers Against Gun Control
Subject: Message Waiting Light Compatible IAD or Channel Bank?
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 11:41:00 -0700


I'm looking for a device to interface with an IP-based PBX (Asterisk)
that will connect to analog phones in a hotel/motel environment with
message-waiting lights.

These are neon lamps that are illuminated by increasing the on-hook
voltage from a nominal 48 volts to 90 volts.

Ideally an IAD that connects via ethernet and includes FXS interfaces,
or a channel bank that I can use with a PRI interface to the asterisk
box would be preferred.

Has anyone done this, or can you suggest a vendor? 


Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Administration - jay@west.net
WestNet:  Connecting you to the planet.  805 884-6323      WB6RDV
NetLojix Communications, Inc.  -  http://www.netlojix.com/

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. If you donate at least fifty dollars
per year we will send you our two-CD set of the entire Telecom
Archives; this is every word published in this Digest since our
beginning in 1981.

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #319
******************************
