From editor@telecom-digest.org Sun Jul  4 19:07:26 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.3) id i64N7Pr00608;
	Sun, 4 Jul 2004 19:07:26 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 19:07:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200407042307.i64N7Pr00608@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #317

TELECOM Digest     Sun, 4 Jul 2004 19:07:00 EDT    Volume 23 : Issue 317

Inside This Issue:                            Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Coca-Cola Cans as Security Threat (momo)
    Cable FM (was WFMT, WCPE, YUSA Lose Satellite Carriage) (Neil Mmclain)
    E-Time System is Solutions Provider For Prepaid Wireless E-PIN (B Burke)
    Re: MOS Calculation From Objective Data (Hank Karl)
    Re: Norbergence Offics Raided by FBI (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Norbergence Offics Raided by FBI (Billy Bob)
    Re: Norbergence Offics Raided by FBI (Black Ninja)
    General Observation re: Norvergence (Mark Crispin)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Momo <quality_us@yahoo.com>
Subject: Coca-Cola Cans as Security Threat
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:55:04 GMT
Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com


I clipped this from comp.risks and thought it might be worth
discussion.  Mo

  Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:48:23 -0400
  From: "Dominey, Jack M, NEO" <dominey@att.com>
  Subject: Coca-Cola Cans as Security Threat

Following message forwarded by my boss.  I wonder what they think of
this at Coca Cola HQ?

 Subject: SCIF Security Advisory

Security Managers:

The Coca Cola Company has a summer game promotion running from 5/17 -
7/12/04 in all 50 states and the District of Columbia that has the
capability to compromise classified information.  The company has
intermixed approximately 120 Coca-Cola cans that actually contain GPS
locators equipped with a SIM card, keypad and GPS chip transponder so
it functions as a cell phone and GPS locator.  The cans are concealed
in specially marked 12, 18, 20, or 24 can multi-packs of Coca-Cola
Classic, Vanilla Coke, Cherry Coke and Caffeine Free Coke.  The
hi-tech Coke "Unexpected Summer" promotion can has a button,
microphone, and a tiny speaker on the outside of the can.  Pressing
the larger red button starts the game in process, thus activating the
GPS signal and a cell phone used by the customer to call a special
hotline.  Consumers who find these cans, activate the technology, and
call the hot line must agree to allow Coke "search teams" using the
GPS tracker (accurate to within 50 feet), to surprise them anyplace,
anytime within three weeks to deliver a valuable prize.

In accordance with DIA, no specific policy for this promotion will be
issued.  However, DISA employees with access to SCIFs should take a
common sense approach and if one of these cans are found inside a
SCIF, they should treat it as they would any two-way electronic device
in a SCIF and remove it immediately. Until such time as this sales
promotion ends and all 120 cans are accounted for, Coca-Cola packages
should be opened and inspected before taking them into any area marked
as a" Restricted Area" or classified meetings/discussions, etc. are in
progress or have the potential to occur at any time.

Scott Addis, Chief, SSO, Defense Information Systems Agency

RISKS submission from Jack Dominey, AT&T Network Disaster Recovery

------------------------------

Date: Sun,  4 Jul 2004 08:10:21 -0600
From: nmclain@annsgarden.com
Subject: Cable FM (was WFMT, WCPE, YUSA Lose Satellite Carriage)


Pat wrote:

> A question to those of you who know about FM radio carried on 
> cable: The tower is over on Oak Street, rather high. Exactly 
> *how* to they get in FM radio stations? The man told me they 
> have a crystal for 89.9 in a reciever there in the tower. Can 
> they only get what they have crystals for or is *any* station 
> on FM radio available over the cable (as far as improving its 
> reception is concerned, etc?)  PAT]

Apparently, CableOne uses "individually-processed" cable FM rather
than "allband FM," so they have a separate FM processor for each
station.  They can only get what they have processors for.

See <http://tinyurl.com/2nu93> and scroll down to THE RISE OF CABLE
FM.  The so-called "crystal" the man told you about is the FM
processor.  Although different manufacturers use different circuitry,
the processor probably includes two crystal-controlled local
oscillators (XCLO).  Assuming that the output frequency equals the
input frequency, one of the XCLOs (probably the output) is
phase-locked to the other.

      Input ----> Mixer ----> IF ----> Mixer ----> Output
      Filter        ^        strip       ^         Filter
                    |                    |
                   XCLO - - - - - - - - XCLO

Neal McLain
nmclain@annsgarden.com

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Thanks for that explanation. I know
that *prior to* CableOne moving into town we had Time Warner as our
cable provider here. Being as we are, 100 miles southeast of Wichita,
about 120 miles straight south of Topeka, 80 miles north of Tulsa, OK
and 90 miles west of Pittsburg, KS/Joplin, MO (all cities with some
semblance of television stations and radio signals) we had very little
here other than our own KIND (1010 AM/102.7 FM) and Coffeyville's KGGF
at 690 AM and their FM station to listen to. In other words, *vast*
amounts of open space on the FM band. Then Time Warner moved into town
and brought us 60 cable television channels, although Cox took over
(and still maintains) Coffeyville. Many of the cable channels
duplicated each other (in other words, the CBS affiliate on Wichita
and the CBS affiliate in Topeka many times of day had the same
programs on), but it was better than nothing.

City of Independence insisted on, and received three or four of those
channels for community use; i.e. a channel each for Independence High
School, the City Hall channel for council meetings, and a channel for
the college, plus a community service channel (channel 10). Time
Warner spread out their offerings on the rest of the cable: all three
major networks at least once or twice, Fox got a channel (cable
channel three from the Fox affiliate in Tulsa, but *not* the Fox
affiliate in Joplin, MO [although CBS/NBC/ABC each appear twice, once
each from variously Tulsa, Joplin, Topeka, Wichita]) and a few other
channels, including the 'Shopping' thing that seems to go on all the
time, the idiots on the 'Christian' [i.e. right wing conservative]
channel, Eternal Word Television channel, and a few movie channels,
Disney, cartoons, and whatnot. As I said, better than nothing, and
better than the very tall antennas some people had on their houses or
in the back yard in order to get *TWO* snowy, grainy channels. Then a
few years ago, some outfit moved in town with an FM radio station
licensed to Dearing, Kansas (wide spot in the road south of us with 
population about 250 people) but studios in Coffeyville. Very loud, 
very raucus acid rock around the clock, 98.5 FM I think. All the kids
love it; I hate it.  

Then Time Warner decided to sell their 'property' here, in the form of
a trade off with Cable One. Time Warner got some town they liked
better and Cable One got us. Same office on Penn Street downtown, same
people working there, same techs, etc. I was walking around downtown
one day and they were painting over the Time Warner sign outside with
a new sign saying Cable One. And the lady who works in the office
there told me "We will become Cable One as soon as the city council
has their meeting tomorrow and gives us that franchise instead. Time
Warner is on the way out." The Reporter newspaper the next day said
that city council had issued a franchise to Cable One of Phoenix, AZ
to take over cable service here. And the service has gotten
increasingly better ever since. Cable One added a couple hundred new
channels with HBO, ShowTime, all those formerly 'premium'
offerings. Plus cable internet (TW kept saying "maybe, sometime"),
plus a couple of PBS stations such as the one in Wichita and the one
in Topeka at Washburne University, plus a 24/7 classical music channel
(channel 938) with no commercials, plus 'cable radio' in the form of
the two NPR stations in Tulsa, OK (89.5) and Pittsburg,
KS. (89.9). The combination technical guy/installer/repairman had been
driving around town inspecting the wires, traps, etc in an old van
with a 'Cable One' sign on it covering up the old 'Time Warner' thing
painted on it; about a month ago I saw him in a new 2004 Ford van
which said 'Cable One', and had Cable One's new corporate design,
etc. He is the person who told me "In the tower out in the field over
on Oak Street we have 'crystals' to tune in 89.5 and 89.9" So, for a
town of 8000 people in a county with all of 25,000 people we have
*three* sources of classical music; better than many large cities is
it not?  PAT]

------------------------------

From: bruceb@etimesystem.com (Bruce Burke)
Subject: E-Time System is a Solutions Provider for Prepaid Wireless E-PIN
Date: 4 Jul 2004 08:44:05 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


E-Time System has launched its solution for e-pin delivery.  Utilizing
the E-Time System distributors and wholesalers can deliver pins for
prepaid wireless recharges, prepaid phone cards and accept bill
payments through retail and unmanned locations as well as turn-key
websites.  Deploying locations is simple as sending a url or exe to
retailers with a dialup or broadband connection.  The E-Time System
allows distributors to sell products through the following devices:
Cash Register Systems, Touch Screen or Keyboard Operated Kiosks
(self-serve or semi-self serve) Nurit Credit Card Terminals, Retail
Installed PC's (MS Windows, Mac, or Linux) and Private Labeled
E-Commerce sites IE: www.prepaidstar.com.

Distributors can deploy either a hosted solution or purchase a
complete E-Time System.  All variables of this system are private
labeled.  Distributors can deploy any or all of the retail solutions
from one single point of administration.  Interested parties should
contact Bruce Burke (bruceb@etimesystem.com) or phone 1-866-414-8463
for more information visit the E-Time Website @ www.etimesystem.com

------------------------------

From: Hank Karl <hk@ntplx.net>
Subject: Re: MOS Calculation From Objective Data
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 21:50:48 -0400
Organization: NETPLEX Internet Services - http://www.ntplx.net/


Yes.  Check out the IETF's RFC-3611 (RTCP-XR) and ETSI TS 101329-5
Annex E.

These specs are used in 

G.799.1 "Functionality and Interface Specifications for GSTN Transport
Network Equipment for Interconnecting GSTN and IP Networks"  (GSTN is
General Switched Telephone Network)

H.460.9 - H.323 metric calling out RFC 3611 metrics

H.248.30 - Megaco spec calling out RFC 3611

SIP RTCP-XR "event" standard in progress, uses RFC 3611.

SNMP MIB - work under way, uses RFC 3611.

More information can be found at http://www.telchemy.com/support.html
and at http://www.telchemy.com/news.html (see the conference
presentations)

If you'd like to discuss this in more detail, please contact me.


On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:10:17 -0500, Kalyan Sannedhi
<nospam@spamstopper.com> wrote:

> Dear all,

> Is there a way to calculate MOS from obejctive data such as delay,
> jitter, jitter standard deviation, packet loss, loss burst, etc? We
> would like like to get subjective scoring from the objective data for
> the voice quality. Any pointers in the right direction will be greatly
> appreciated.

> TIA

Hank Karl               Eastern Regional Manager
+1 (203)207-0047        www.nine-9s.com

Representing:
http://www.telchemy.com/ VQmon VoIP Quality Monitoring Software for OEMs
http://www.telesoft-intl.com/  ISDN, T1 RBS, E1 R2 CAS, Frame Relay, ML-PPP, X.25, ...
http://www.agoralabs.com/   elemedia H.323, Video Codecs, Audio Codecs
http://www.tntss.com/  dynamicsoft SIP stack

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (Lisa Hancock)
Subject: Re: Norvergence Offics Raided by FBI
Date: 4 Jul 2004 10:41:08 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


shinecorp1@aol.com (Alessandra Di Maggio) wrote:

> What exactly did Norvergence do in terms of products and services?
> Did they own any real plant or just lease line capacity from others?
> (I looked on their website but didn't understand it.)

How long were they in business?  Was Newark NJ their only
location?

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: 

> Norvergence ... had a large number of ex-cons and/or
> parolees on the payroll

Could you elaborate on their hiring of ex-offenders?  Was this by
design or chance?  (I'm not aware of any govt subsidized or encouraged
programs to employ such people.)

The failure to pay workers for two cycles and sudden bankruptcy is
discouraging.  A normal business tracks its cash flow in advance and
doesn't bounce checks (isn't that illegal?)

I wonder if Norv. had contracts with baby Bells for interconnect, and
if the baby Bells will get screwed as a result.  I sure hope not
because means the ratepayers -- you and me -- will get screwed since
we'll make it up by law.  I understand that the baby Bells -- by law
 -- must interconnect anyone who shows up regardless of their credit
worthiness or business integrity, which is why many consumers get
burned on phony long distance charges from sleazy LD outfits.

It bothers me a lot that since divesture -- which was supposed to
create a free market -- the market isn't really free.  Laws protect
sleazy outfits to come in and fleece other companies and the public
where in a true free market (knowledgeable customers!) this wouldn't
happen.  Pat, I wonder if this Norv. fits in that category.

When the Penn Central railroad filed for bankruptcy -- at the time
considered a terrible scandal but nothing by today's standards -- they
still had cash and never missed a payroll nor bounced a check.  They
filed because they saw that they had bonds coming due soon and they
did not have the cash to pay them off nor could get them rolled over.
It was a mess, but still an orderly one, and the railroad kept rolling
without a blink.

> It wouldn't surprise me to see the Solzano people come out of all this
> bright and shiny. They'll file bankruptcy, then Solzano will go sit
> down with his friends at Qwest and elsewhere, and start cutting some
> new deals.    PAT]

Who are the Solzano people?  I thought I recently read Qwest no longer
exists and was taken over by a RBOC.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Mr. Solzano (grep for his name in
earlier issues of the Digest and elsewhere on the net) had been forbidden
by the FCC to engage in owning/operating any 'telecom company' for a
few years because of other troubles he had with the way he maintained
those other companies. In fact, at Norvergence I believe he was 
the 'real owner' with others (puppets) acting and speaking for him. In
any event, about the time his 'probation' period (FCC oversight of his
activities) ended a couple years ago, he started Norvergence with the
'Norvergence Solution' and a way to cut back on your telecom expenses.
Readers who have more details on this, please write Lisa Hancock
direct with the sordid story. 

The reason telephone divestiture never really worked was because the
government *assumed* all Americans were sophisticated and would rush
to learn about the workings of the telephone and the network 'once
they had a chance to do so.' In actual practice, no one cares; most
people just take the telephone to be another utility service and sort
of boring at that. 

Is Qwest now out of business with some other telco running phone
service in the New Jersey area? That's news to me ... also, regards
the ex-offenders on the Norvergence payroll, most states give help
(in the form of tax reductions, etc) to business places who hire these
men and women to help them get rehabilitated. Maybe some reader could
also touch bases with Lisa on this with details. The name of the 
program in effect in New Jersey was mentioned here once, I do not 
remember what it was. And Norvergence had sales offices around the
country as Bill Justice tells us in the next message in this issue.
PAT]

------------------------------

From: bill.justice@earthlink.net (billy bob)
Subject: Re: Norbergence Offics Raided by FBI
Date: 4 Jul 2004 12:31:40 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


shinecorp1@aol.com (Alessandra Di Maggio) wrote in message
news:<telecom23.316.1@telecom-digest.org>:

> I have spoken again to friends I know at Norvergence. Officially they
> are closed down. The offices in Newark were raided by the FBI on July
> 1, 2004 with allegations by the FBI of fraud and embezzlement. No one
> received any pay for four weeks. (One month, two paydays). When
> employees were notified they were all fired and not getting paid after
> the fourth week in a row, they began destroying office equipment and
> computers, and police were called. All Norvergence customers are 
> totally cut off, unless they have made arrangements elswhere.  

> Shinecorp1@aol.com
> 
> Alessandra

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: This scene reminds me the fiasco at the 
> Diner's Club Credit Card office in 1962 when they were still owned by
> Alfred Bloomingdale's corporation and were located in New York
> City. The office had been getting increasingly more difficult to manage
> for a few years as the staff of about two thousand employees became
> increasingly diverse racially. Diners, in those days, had just come
> out of an all-manual system into the first year or two of computeriza-
> tion. Like Norvergence, Diners had a large number of ex-cons and/or
> parolees on the payroll; I guess the city and state of New York gave 
> them a lot of tax breaks for doing so, etc. But there were problems,
> so severe in fact that Diners Club verged on bankruptcy more than
> once.

> Diner's management decided to make a sneaky move out of town, and
> (in general) get all new employees, trained in the new computerized
> system. And since 'everyone' knows that white poople in semi-rural
> areas work harder and cheaper than racially diverse people in an
> 'inner city area' like New York City, they decided the office would be
> relocated in Denver, Colorado, at the time, 40 years ago, still very
> much a 'country type' of small town, in an area outside of town 
> called 'Tech Center'. It would be a whole new start for the company,
> and they really were hot to get out of New York City. In essence, *none*.
> of the employees were told about it, except a snall handful of supervisors
> and middle management people they intended to take along, and they
> were sworn to total secrecy. Diner's certainly did not intend to take
> along the vast assortment of riff-raff they had collected over the years
> in the form of posting/ledger clerks/bookeepers, etc; the vast majority
> of whom were either racially diverse or quite sympathetic to all the
> 'anti-everything' attitude of the Vietnam years. 

> Comes the day before Thanksgiving that year (Wednesday) with the usual
> four day holiday (Thu/Fri/Sat/Sun) many USA workers get, and Diners
> management lined up everyone, handed out the turkeys, wished them all
> a happy Thanksgiving holiday and said, "Oh by the way, don't come back
> on Monday, cause we won't be here." Unlike Norvergence, Diners did
> give out final paychecks and a reasonable severence check to everyone,
> but still, the place went up for grabs. Some employees went around
> smashing stuff up, and several went two or three floors up to the
> 'computer center' (all *those* employees had been invited to relocate,
> and most of them did), broke the door down, took two computer workers
> *hostage*, took two big reels of tape, shredded it all into confetti
> and tossed it out the window from the 15th floor of the building there
> on Columbus Circle. The shredded confetti-like tapes consisted of
> invoices merchants had been paid for, but had not yet been billed to
> Diner's customers **and they had not yet been microfilmed (or backed
> up).** 

> After the riot was over, police had arrested several hundred
> employees, freed the hostages, and cleared the place out. Very shocked
> management of Diner's Club wound up having to write off about three
> *million* dollars in recievables they could not reconstruct or bill
> for, even though Al Bloomingdale and others went out on Columbus
> Circle and picked up scraps of magnetic tape trying to put it all
> together again. It was close to a year later, located in Denver that
> Diner's finally realized the extent of the damage done by employees
> on the final day in New York City. And when the reality of the final
> write off that would have to be done hit them smack in the face, and
> many of Diners' *own creditors* were beginning to turn the screws on
> them for payment and many merchants had quit dealing with Diners
> because of how ineffecient they had become a year earlier in New York,
> Diners did decide to file bankruptcy. To their rescue came CNA Insurance,
> who bought into the action, and Amoco Oil who also bought a piece of
> the action and handed Diners a great deal: a list of a few million
> Amoco card holders who had been in 'phase 1' for a year or better,
> with no delinquencies in their oil company accounts. But because they
> are (or at least then were) not fools, Amoco said *we* will administer
> the whole thing and refer to it as 'Torch Club', and Diners, all you 
> have to do is get your merchants (what there was left of them) to go
> along with it and accept 'Torch Club' cards like they would any
> Diner's Club card.  

> It wouldn't surprise me to see the Solzano people come out of all this
> bright and shiny. They'll file bankruptcy, then Solzano will go sit
> down with his friends at Qwest and elsewhere, and start cutting some
> new deals.    PAT]

Hi, I am a former SM From SD CA I Heard the FBI also arrested some of
the upper management when they raided Norvergence. Have you heard any
news about anyone getting arrested at Norvrgence. Any info you may
have would be nice to know.

Billy Bob

San Diego, Ca

------------------------------

From: triple_des1544@yahoo.com (Black Ninja)
Subject: Re: Norbergence Offics Raided by FBI
Date: 4 Jul 2004 11:00:24 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


shinecorp1@aol.com (Alessandra Di Maggio) wrote in message
news:<telecom23.316.1@telecom-digest.org>:

> I HAVE JUST SPOKEN TO FRIENDS I KNOW AT NORVERGENCE. THE OFFICIAL WORD
> IS NORVERGENCE IS SHUT DOWN ! THE OFFICES IN NEWARK WERE RAIDED BY THE
> FBI ON JULY 1ST , 2004 FOLLOWING ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD. NO ONE HAS BEEN
> PAID IN 4 WEEKS ! EMPLOYEES BEGAN DESTROYING OFFICE EQUIPMENT &
> COMPUTERS  UPON BEING NOTIFIED THAT THEY WERE NOT GETTING PAID FOR THE
> 4TH WEEK IN A ROW !!!! ALL NORVERGENCE CUSTOMERS ARE SCREWED !!!!!!
> REMEMBER THAT SHINECORP1@AOL.COM WAS THE FIRST TO NOTIFY YOU ALL !!!!

Good scoop, Alessandra,  Too bad it's wrong.  Labor board shut them
down, not the FBI.  Don't worry, everybody will remember that
shinecorp1@aol.com told us this, if that will help you out in some
way.(?)

Steven J Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote in message
news:<telecom23.316.3@telecom-digest.org>:

> William Van Hefner <postmaster@thedigest.com> wrote:

>> The move comes after the carrier came under investigation earlier this
>> week by the New Jersey Labor Department for allegedly bouncing
>> employee paychecks. Over 1,300 employees at the company's Newark, NJ
>> office were told that they must leave immediately, and were escorted
>> out of the building by security. Newark police were called in to keep
>> the peace, as employees poured out onto the streets with their
>> belongings.

>> If and when the company's bankruptcy petition is filed, we will make
>> it available for free download via our website.

> Hey, Black Ninja. Any comments? This is all the customers' fault, right?

> JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/ 
> Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.JAK.HOLE (4638) / sjsobol@JustThe.net
> PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
> Apple Valley, California     Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.

Actually, yes, Loser, I do have a comment.  Why would this be the
customer's fault?  Why would this be the employees' fault?  If you
think that this is anybody's fault other than the top brass, then you
are sadly mistaken.  There are a lot of hard working, honest folks
that have spent years in telecom that are out of jobs because of these
unscrupulous people at the top.  This product worked, but the company
prevented it from working the way it should by not paying the vendors,
and hiring absolute idiots for a customer service dept.

My second comment is that Norvergence has absolutely nothing to do
with YOU.  The only reason that you are posting now is because you got
all butt-hurt when I slapped you down in another thread for chiming in
with completely incorrect info.  I see you post on other topics, and I
don't jump in with lame jabs.  But now you are on this hillarious
quest for vengeance.  Dude, get over it.  Chalk it up as a lesson. 
Next time you'll get your facts straight before you post.  If not,
well, then expect the same.

------------------------------

From: Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Subject: General Observation re: Norvergence
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 09:31:35 -0700
Organization: University of Washington


One of the leading earmarks of a scam is an organization that
threatens litigation against ex-employees, disgruntled customers,
etc. that publishes unfavorable information about the organization.
Scams always have sleazy lawyers on the payroll whose sole function is
to send threatening letters and at times file frivolous lawsuits.

Reputable companies do not try to silence their critics.  Reputable
companies do not demand that unfavorable opinions about that company
be quashed.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note:  Thank you!  You said all I could say.  PAT]

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. If you donate at least fifty dollars
per year we will send you our two-CD set of the entire Telecom
Archives; this is every word published in this Digest since our
beginning in 1981.

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #317
******************************
