From editor@telecom-digest.org Thu Jul  1 00:44:30 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.3) id i614iT717612;
	Thu, 1 Jul 2004 00:44:30 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 00:44:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200407010444.i614iT717612@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #311

TELECOM Digest     Thu, 1 Jul 2004 00:44:00 EDT    Volume 23 : Issue 311

Inside This Issue:                            Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Verizon Wireless TXT Traffic Alert Service (Monty Solomon)
    Linksys Adds 5-Port Switch to Its Wireless-G Ethernet Bridge (M Solomon)
    Linksys Introduces a 10/100 4-Port VPN Router for Small Business (Solomon)
    EFFector 17.24: Action Alert - The Induce Act: Innovation (Monty Solomon)
    Re: MCI Layoffs (Shadowday144)
    Re: Internet Phone Service For Every Home Not Far Off (Gordon S. Hlavenka)
    Re: Who Got the Message? There's a Way to Know (Sin Nombre)
    Ted Forstmann's Naked Defense (Eric Friedebach)
    Re: Domain Registration Recommendations (SELLCOM Tech support)
    Re: Domain Registration Recommendations (John Smith)
    Latest Norvergence News (Barry B.)
    Intrado Extends Presence in VoIP 9-1-1 Market (VOIP News)
    Voice Over Internet Challenges Telephone (VOIP News)
    Audits May Improve 911 Reliability (VOIP News)
    Vonage(R) Wins Preliminary Injunction Against New York PSC (VOIP News)
    Vonage Beats Back New York Ruling (VOIP News)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:29:02 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Verizon Wireless TXT Traffic Alert Service


     Beat the Traffic this Fourth of July Weekend with Verizon
     Wireless' New TXT Traffic Alert Service Powered by Autodesk
     - Jun 30, 2004 08:28 AM (PR Newswire)

Verizon Wireless Customers Get Free Personalized, Timely Traffic
         Information from July 2nd through July 6th

BEDMINSTER, N.J. and SAN RAFAEL, Calif., June 30 /PRNewswire/ --
Verizon Wireless, the nation's leading wireless provider and operator
of the nation's most reliable wireless network, today announced that
its customers planning to hit the road this July 4th weekend can sign
up to receive free TXT alerts about traffic conditions on their TXT
Messaging-capable phones from Autodesk Location Services, a division
of Autodesk, Inc. (Nasdaq: ADSK).  Travelers using the new Verizon
Wireless TXT Traffic Alert Service can choose their preferred routes
and designate which times of day they would like to receive traffic
update alerts.  With Verizon Wireless TXT Traffic Alert Service,
customers can save time, gas costs, and frustration this holiday
weekend by staying informed of changing traffic information.

To register, Verizon Wireless customers simply login to
http://www.vtext.com , Verizon Wireless' TXT Messaging companion Web
site, and select which traffic alerts they wish to receive.  The
service is being offered at no cost to Verizon Wireless customers
during the July 4th Holiday Weekend (July 2nd - July 6th, 2004).
Beginning July 7th, 2004, Verizon Wireless customers can pay as they
go for TXT Traffic Alerts, which are just $0.02 for each message
received, or select from several bundled plans, including $2.99 per
month for 100 messages, $4.99 per month for 250 messages and $9.99 per
month for 1,000 messages sent or received.


     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=42256789

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:26:33 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Linksys Adds 5-Port Switch to Its Wireless-G Ethernet Bridge


Wireless-G Bridge With Integrated 5-port Switch Ideal for Small
Businesses With Remote Network Environments

IRVINE, Calif., June 30 /PRNewswire/ -- Linksys(R), a division of
Cisco Systems, Inc., the leading provider of broadband, wireless and
networking hardware for the consumer and Small Office/Home Office
(SOHO) markets, today announced its Wireless-G Ethernet Bridge with
5-port Switch (WET54GS5).  The Wireless Bridge with 5-port Switch
provides high-speed cable-free bridging between remote networks within
an office and connects wired devices to a wireless network.  Equipped
with enhanced security, easy to use Setup Wizard and a number of
advanced features help provide the technology needed to network a
small business simply and affordably.

At the request of resellers and network installers, Linksys has
developed the new wireless bridge with a switch to solve connectivity
issues associated with multiple workgroup networks, offices not
capable of being wired with Ethernet cables and connecting up to five
wired devices to an 802.11b (wireless-B) or 802.11g (wireless-g)
network from other areas in the office.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=42255809

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:27:04 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Linksys Introduces a 10/100 4-Port VPN Router for Small Businesses


IRVINE, Calif., June 30 /PRNewswire/ -- Linksys(R), a division of
Cisco Systems, Inc., the leading provider of broadband, wireless and
networking hardware for the consumer and Small Office/Home Office
(SOHO) markets, today announced the immediate availability of its new
10/100 4-Port VPN Router (RV042).  For a complete Internet-sharing
network solution, the RV042 is ideal for small businesses with mobile
employees.

Situated at the heart of a small office network, the 10/100 4-port
wired VPN router lets multiple office computers share an Internet
connection, files and other resources on the network.  This 10/100
4-port VPN Router features 30 VPN endpoints, SPI firewall, and dual
Internet ports for load balancing and connection redundancy.  The
RV042 lets users connect a second Cable or DSL Internet line as a
backup to ensure the connection will not be disconnected.  Or, use
both Internet ports at the same time, and let the router balance all
the user requirements between them for maximum bandwidth efficiency.


     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=42255830

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:29:47 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: EFFector 17.24: Action Alert - The Induce Act: Innovation


EFFector    Vol. 17, No. 24    June 28, 2004          donna@eff.org

A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation  ISSN 1062-9424
In the 296th Issue of EFFector:

  * Action Alert - The Induce Act: Innovation Under Attack 
  * Will the Inducing Infringement Act Kill the iPod? 
  * EFF Partners with No Starch Press
  * MiniLinks (11): Interview with a DMCA Reformer
  * Staff Calendar: 07.30.04 - 08.01.04 - Kevin Bankston, Annalee 
    Newitz, Seth Schoen, and Wendy Seltzer speak at Defcon 12,
    Las Vegas, NV 
  * Administrivia


http://www.eff.org/effector/17/24.php 

------------------------------

From: shadowday144@cs.com (Shadowday144)
Subject: Re: MCI Layoffs
Date: 29 Jun 2004 22:04:18 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


rlm2174@yahoo.com (r8989) wrote in message
news:<telecom23.306.7@telecom-digest.org>:

> Has anyone seen anything on layoff this week?

Not on MCI but I did see this on another telecom company.

http://www.ssorg.com/jobloss/

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:46:58 -0500
From: Gordon S. Hlavenka <nospam@crashelex.com>
Reply-To: nospam@crashelex.com
Organization: Crash Electronics
Subject: Re: Internet Phone Service For Every Home Not Far Off


VOIP News <voip news> wrote:

>> http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2004/06/27/News/244994.html

>> LITTLE ROCK - Local phone service in Arkansas and the rest of the
>> nation is nearing a big evolution, experts say, meaning that terms
>> like WiFi, telephony and FTTH (fiber-to-the-home) will soon become
>> part of our everyday language.

Justin Time wrote:

> And Fiber to the curb was to be the NEXT big things of the late 80's
> if I remember right.

> Have they solved the problem of who is going to pay for all that
> bandwidth?  That's not to mention the cost of the local loop.

My parents live in a very rural area of Arkansas (870-269-xxxx) -- the
road in front of their house was just paved for the first time a few
years ago and they're adjusting to their new "city water".  While the
trench was open to lay pipe for the water system, an extra conduit was
dropped in and populated with fiber.  So far the fiber is still dark,
but it's right in their front yard as soon as somebody decides to
light it up.

OTOH I live in the Chicago suburbs and the nearest fiber is almost a 
mile away.

My dad has 384Kbs DSL at the moment -- not too bad considering he's on 
top of a freakin' mountain in the Ozarks -- but it's a shame he can't 
tap that fiber.


Gordon S. Hlavenka           http://www.crashelectronics.com
           "If we imagined he could _find_ the car,
        we could pretend it might be fixed." - Calvin

------------------------------

From: sin nombre <me@privacy.net>
Subject: Re: Who Got the Message? There's a Way to Know
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:18:42 GMT
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net


On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 04:57:31 -0500, Gary Breuckman <puma@catbox.com> wrote:

> In article <telecom23.279.10@telecom-digest.org>, Tony P.
> <kd1s@nospamplease.verizon.reallynospam.net> wrote:

>> In article <telecom23.278.3@telecom-digest.org>, monty@roscom.com says:

>>> outgoing messages have been opened. But DidTheyReadIt is the first such
>>> service to keep itself a secret from the recipient, as well as the
>>> first to report on where the message was read.

>> Easy enough to defeat. Just put a new rule on the firewall that doesn't
>> let it get back. Who would have thought it, or prevent viewing HTML in
>> Eudora or Outlook -- that can be done too.

> You can't defeat these new services, they don't work like that.

> They way they work is they hold the email on their server, and send 
> the recipient a 'new' email that just contains a link to their server.
> When you open the link to read the mail, they know.

> But the only way to avoid notifying the sender is not to open the link,
> and then you don't get to read the mail.

> -- Gary Breuckman

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Can't you browse to the server holding 
> the mail on your own (manually copy only the pertinite parts of the
> URL **less the cookie data** ) and get to it that way?   PAT]

That method lets them tell if it has been read, but not by whom it has
been read. A person could read the message URL through http proxy
servers on 3 or 4 different continents. I'll bet that would confuse
someone.

------------------------------

From: friedebach@yahoo.com (Eric Friedebach)
Subject: Ted Forstmann's Naked Defense
Date: 30 Jun 2004 10:33:44 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Daniel Fisher, 06.30.04, Forbes.com

ROCKVILLE, CONN. - In a 1998 Forbes interview, dealmaker Theodore
"Ted" Forstmann explained his investment philosophy: Avoid risky
assets like junk bonds and never, ever get involved in a bidding war.

"I would sooner take my pants off in public," said the founder of
Forstmann, Little & Co. "I tell the seller, 'This is the deal. If you
want it, say yes by 5 P.M.'"

A different Ted Forstmann was on display during a four-week trial that
concluded Tuesday in the central Connecticut town of Rockville. In a
lawsuit filed in 2002, the state of Connecticut accused Forstmann and
his firm of engaging in a sort of bait-and-switch, luring the state to
invest $200 million based on the old strategy but pouring most of the
money into risky, overpriced telecom ventures.

http://www.forbes.com/services/2004/06/30/cz_df_0630forstmann.html


Eric Friedebach
/We Grill Kittens/

------------------------------

From: SELLCOM Tech support <support@sellcom.com>
Subject: Re: Domain Registration Recommendations
Organization: www.sellcom.com
Reply-To: support@sellcom.com
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:21:23 GMT


Thanks to everyone!  We have ended up becoming a reseller ourselves
http://www.wwwdomain.biz

Now, to be fair to buydomains, they have revised their email system to
prevent spam.  I will admit their original concept was done with good
intentions but technically flawed.  It is rare to see a company react
so FAST regarding a problem and revising a whole system.

Steve at SELLCOM

http://www.sellcom.com
Discount multihandset cordless phones by Siemens, AT&T, Panasonic, Motorola
Vtech 5.8Ghz; TMC ET4000 4line Epic phone, OnHoldPlus, Beamer, Watchguard!
Brick wall "non MOV" surge protection. Mini-Splitter log splitter!
If you sit at a desk www.ergochair.biz you owe it to yourself.

------------------------------

From: John Smith <no-one-at-all@not-real.not>
Subject: Re: Domain Registration Recommendations
Date: 30 Jun 2004 12:01:08 -0500
Reply-To: None <posttothegroup@kill-spammer.nul>


On 28 Jun 2004 13:14:04 -0700, rayta@msn.com (Ray Normandeau) wrote:

> GoDaddy.com

> Read their anti-spam policy.

> They are serious.

No they aren't. They're all talk and very little action. I've notified
them of numerous major spammers (using domains registered through Go
Daddy), using their proper reporting procedures. They have, in all
cases, done exactly NOTHING. So, spammers can disregard all that
marketing bullshit, and continue to get their cheap spamming domains
at Go Daddy, without any serious fear that ANY action AT ALL will be
taken.  If someone is aware of a recent case where Go Daddy has
actually taken action against one of their spamming registrants by
canceling their domain, I'd like to hear about it.

Secondly, since we're on the subject, Go Daddy has absolutely pathetic
customer service. It wasn't always this way mind you, but their
popularity and relentless pandering to the low-priced domain market has
not been handled well by them internally. 

Bob Parsons may be a fine individual, but his company is now out of
control, and infested with stupid loads and other incompetents. While
they still DO answer the phone and their e-mails, resolving certain
problems is another thing. In short, the Go Daddy of today sucks. I
would stay way clear of them.

Becoming a so-called "reseller" (JOKE) using Go Daddy's "Wild West
Domains" would be a formula for misery. In the event of a problem, I
would be put in between my customer and a non-responsive registrar. No
thanks.

> Domains start at $4.95

Price isn't everything. This will become clear to Go Daddy customers
after the first time you have a problem there that needs resolution.

My opinion only, based on personal experience.


John Smith

------------------------------

From: "BarryB" <barryb@simlab.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 11:32 AM
Subject: Latest Norvergence News


Greetings:

        I was informed by Qwest that Norvergence agreed to pay
$8,000,000 today in past due invoices;  If they don't pay Qwest will
disconnect all Norvergence T1 and long distance
services PERMANENTLY by the end of the week..

        There is another article today on News 12 NJ discussing
Norvergence paychecks bouncing, and laid off employees not getting
their final paychecks.

        I assume the Salzano brothers have their exit plans in place.

Barry Bellin

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:54:25 -0400
Subject: Intrado Extends Presence in VoIP 9-1-1 Market
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20040629005256&newsLang=en

Intrado Extends Presence in VoIP 9-1-1 Market; Signs Agreement with
Primus Telecommunications, Inc. for Intrado VoIP Emergency Calling
Service

LONGMONT, Colo.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 29, 2004--

Intrado Continues to Lead in U.S. VoIP 9-1-1 Deployments    

Intrado Inc. (Nasdaq:TRDO), North America's leading provider of 9-1-1
infrastructure systems and services, and experts in dynamic
communications solutions, today announced an agreement to provide
Primus Telecommunications, Inc. (PRIMUS) with 9-1-1 services for its
VoIP subscribers. PRIMUS joins a growing list of providers using
Intrado(R) VoIP Emergency Calling Service to provide their subscribers
with access to critical 9-1-1 services.

Full press release at:

http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20040629005256&newsLang=en


How to Distribute VoIP Throughout a Home:
http://michigantelephone.mi.org/distribute.html

If you live in Michigan, subscribe to the MI-Telecom group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MI-Telecom/

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:50:09 -0400
Subject: Voice Over Internet Challenges Telephone
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.mcall.com/business/local/all-voipjun27,0,3374606.story?coll=all-businesslocal-hed

 From The Morning Call -- June 27, 2004

Voice over Internet challenges telephone Agere taking part in
technology's rollout. U.S. is slow to adopt.

By Jeanne Bonner
Of The Morning Call

Experts have long predicted the death of traditional home telephone
service, in large part because of the deployment of wireless services
such as the cell phone.

Plain old telephone service, as it is known in the industry, will
die. But it turns out its executioner will more likely be Voice over
Internet Protocol, rather than the cell phone.

VoIP is finally beginning to gather steam in the United States. The
technology uses a high-speed broadband Internet connection to make
telephone calls. The calls travel at least part of the way on an
Internet protocol network rather than the public switches that make up
the telephone infrastructure.

[..... snip .....]

"It will probably be the biggest transformation in telecom in 100
years," said Verizon spokeswoman Briana Gowing. "There have been
enhancements over the years but this is really shaking things up."

This summer, Verizon will offer its digital subscriber line (DSL)
customers a converter box with an adapter that will allow customers to
make IP-based calls. The box converts the telephone's analog signals
to digital. The adapter will connect a consumer's telephone with a
computer modem that will send calls out over the Internet. Verizon has
not said how much the box will cost. The company will be offering new
VoIP calling plans with the boxes.

Full story at:

http://www.mcall.com/business/local/all-voipjun27,0,3374606.story?coll=all-businesslocal-hed

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:33:07 -0400
Subject: Audits May Improve 911 Reliability
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


This is from the Post-Crescent in Applerton, Wisconsin.  First is an
excerpt from the main article, then the text of a sidebar that
summarizes the issue.  This article may have implications for VoIP
users because "Intrado Inc., the Longmont, Colo., company that
subcontracts with SBC to manage 911 databases" [a quote from the
article] is also the company that is used by some VoIP providers (such
as Vonage and Primus) to offer 911 service to their customers.

http://www.wisinfo.com/postcrescent/news/archive/local_16562601.shtml

P-C inquiry shows oversight of phone databases lags 

By Duke Behnke 
Post-Crescent staff writer 

Neither the state nor area counties demand an audit of 911 databases
to determine the accuracy of records used to dispatch emergency
personnel, The Post-Crescent has learned.

But, industry experts said, such a requirement may be the only
feasible way to bring public accountability and oversight to a system
managed by phone companies that carry no legal liability for the
information.

And one area sheriff said he wants to build an audit requirement into
his county's contract with the phone company, after being told by
The P-C of such arrangements elsewhere.

"There is no liability requirement for the telephone companies on the
part of these databases," said David Sleeter, first vice president
of the Wisconsin chapter of the National Emergency Number Association
(NENA), an industry advisory group. "There is no guarantee of
accuracy and completeness. None."

[Sidebar:] About the issue

In light of two mix-ups in 911 dispatches this year in Winnebago
County, The Post-Crescent began investigating area enhanced-911
emergency systems. In one of the incidents, involving the death of a
Neenah man, paramedics mistakenly were sent to Menasha. Among other
things, The P-C has found that:

  Mix-ups stem from incorrect data supplied to the county by the
  telephone company.

  Such data errors are discovered regularly in area counties.

  Regular audits of the data are not required.

Full story at:
http://www.wisinfo.com/postcrescent/news/archive/local_16562601.shtml

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:18:15 -0400
Subject: Vonage(R) Wins Preliminary Injunction Against New York PSC
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/06-30-2004/0002203167&EDATE=

    EDISON, N.J., June 30 /PRNewswire/ -- Today, Magistrate Judge
Douglas F.  Eaton, United States District Court (Southern District of
New York) announced his intention to enjoin the New York Public
Service Commission (PSC) from regulating Vonage as a telecommuni-
cations carrier. The written order is expected shortly.  The judge
will consider the merits of a permanent injunction in January 2005.

    Reinforcing Minnesota District Judge Davis' October 2003 order
enjoining a similar attempt by that state to regulate Vonage, the
preliminary injunction will preclude the State of New York from
asserting its jurisdiction over Vonage.

    "We are satisfied with the court's decision and believe this is a
positive step forward for New Yorkers and the industry," said Jeffrey
A. Citron, chairman and CEO of Vonage Holdings Corporation. "Vonage
remains eager and committed to working with the states, Congress and
the FCC to create a national framework for this emerging industry."
Chairman Powell's clear leadership on this issue was instrumental in
today's decision -- the court recognized the ongoing work of the
IP-enabled NPRM and workshops furthering the national policy
development. Vonage plans to continue to participate in the ongoing
dialogue with the FCC and the states which brings clarity to the
policies for VoIP services.

Full press release at:

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/06-30-2004/0002203167&EDATE=

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:22:04 -0400
Subject: Vonage Beats Back New York Ruling
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1103_2-5253841.html
 
By Ben Charny 
CNET News.com
 
The New York State Public Service Commission can no longer require
Vonage to file for a telephone operator's license, possibly
foreshadowing an important regulatory win for the Net phone industry.

U.S. District Court Judge Douglas Eaton's decision is temporary and he
scheduled a January hearing to decide whether his ruling should become
permanent.

"I guess he did get the memo from Minnesota," a Vonage spokeswoman
said Wednesday, referring to a U.S. District Court judge issuance of a
similar order now under appeal. She said that Vonage never acted on
the New York request, made in May.

Judge Eaton made his decision from the bench during a regularly
scheduled hearing. He's expected to put his order, and thoughts
supporting it, in writing in the next few days.
 
Full story at:
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1103_2-5253841.html

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. If you donate at least fifty dollars
per year we will send you our two-CD set of the entire Telecom
Archives; this is every word published in this Digest since our
beginning in 1981.

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #311
******************************
