From editor@telecom-digest.org Tue Jun 15 20:56:40 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.3) id i5G0udY15880;
	Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:56:40 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:56:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200406160056.i5G0udY15880@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #292

TELECOM Digest     Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:56:00 EDT    Volume 23 : Issue 292

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Acacia Sues TV Cos. in Patent Dispute (Monty Solomon)
    Feds Decline to Create 'Do-Not-Spam' List (Monty Solomon)
    Yahoo, Google, Others Disrupted by Internet Attack (Monty Solomon)
    SBC DSL Recent Changes and Soho Watchguard (tcnolan)
    FTC Punts on a "Do Not Call" List For Spam (Danny Burstein)
    VoIP Regulation Status (sophialeii@yahoo.com)
    VoIP (Charles Cryderman)
    Re: Be Careful About Quoting Scanner Messages (Charles B. Wilber)
    Re: Be Careful About Quoting Scanner Messages (jmeissen@aracnet.com)
    Re: Job Openings? (Chip G)
    Re: More Memories of Illinois Bell (Lisa Hancock)
    Re: Need Expert Legal and Medical Testimony for Lawsuit (Paul Vader)
    Re: CLI via CSTA (Siemens HiPath 3000) (Matt Hall)
    Re: Office Telephone System Recommendations (SELLCOM Tech support)
    Typo: Letters Reversed (Carl Moore)
    Re: Ravings (Carl Moore)
    It May be Time to Answer Call of Voice Over Internet (VOIP News)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:40:07 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Acacia Sues TV Cos. in Patent Dispute


By GARY GENTILE AP Business Writer

LOS ANGELES (AP) -- A firm that says it holds the rights on technology
needed to power video-on-demand services and streaming video over the
Internet sued major cable and satellite TV companies Tuesday, alleging
patent infringement.

Acacia Media Technology Corp., a division of Newport Beach,
Calif.-based Acacia Research Corp., alleges that nine companies are
violating five of its patents, some of which date back to 1992, that
describe a method of transmitting audio/visual content.

The defendants include cable giants Comcast Corp., Cox Communications
Inc. and Charter Communications Inc., as well as satellite providers
DirecTV Group Inc. and Echostar Communications Corp. and some smaller
companies. The complaint was filed Tuesday in federal court in San
Francisco.

Charter spokesman David Anderson said the company had yet to see the
lawsuit but added, "We do not believe that Charter's services infringe
any intellectual property rights that Acacia may have."

Comcast spokeswoman Jenni Moyer said the company "vigorously disputes"
the allegations.

Other defendants said they couldn't comment because they hadn't seen
the complaint or do not discuss pending litigation.

The patents cover a method of transmitting content, such as movies or
video clips, that is stored in a library, as opposed to images of live
events.

The patents describe a method of breaking the content up into blocks,
placing time codes on them, compressing the size of the files, storing
the chunks of data and then transmitting and receiving them.

      - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=41981814

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:41:42 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Feds Decline to Create 'Do-Not-Spam' List


By TED BRIDIS AP Technology Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Bush administration said Tuesday it will not
create a national do-not-spam registry to discourage unwanted e-mail,
fearing it could backfire and become a target list for new victims.

The Federal Trade Commission told Congress that senders of unwanted
sales pitches might mine such a registry for names. Its chairman,
Timothy Muris, quipped that consumers "will be spammed if we do a
registry and spammed if we do not."

The commission was obligated by lawmakers to consider the proposal
under the "can spam" legislation that Bush signed in December, an idea
patterned after the FTC's enormously successful do-not-call registry
to limit telemarketing calls.

But the FTC concluded that on the Internet, unlike within the highly
regulated U.S. telephone network, regulators would be "largely
powerless to identify those responsible for misusing the registry."

Muris said that, given the risks of consumers adding their names to a
do-not-spam registry, "I wouldn't put my e-mail address on such a
list."

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., the leading supporter in Congress for a 
no-spam registry, said the FTC's decision was disappointing.

      - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=41980833

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:42:41 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Yahoo, Google, Others Disrupted by Internet Attack


NEW YORK, June 15 (Reuters) - A hacker attack on Internet services
company Akamai Technologies Inc. disrupted access to large Web sites
including those run by Yahoo Inc. (NASDAQ:YHOO), Google, and Microsoft
for up to 2 hours early on Tuesday, according to Web tracker Keynote
Systems Inc.

Starting at about 0830 EDT/1130 GMT today, a major "Internet
performance issue" was detected, according to Lloyd Taylor, vice
president of technology and operations for Keynote (NASDAQ:KEYN),
which tests and monitors Web sites.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=41979595

------------------------------

From: tcnolan@optonline.net (tcnolan)
Subject: SBC DSL Recent Changes and Soho Watchguard
Date: 15 Jun 2004 04:46:53 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Hi...

On Friday SBC announced that it was making DNS Server changes and to
"please make sure your DNS settings are "server assigned" or "use
DHCP.""

We are a small business and user a router/firewall to connect 10 pcs
to the DSL line.

As of yesterday, we could not stay connected to the internet for more
than 1 hour at the most.  If we reboot the firewall, everything is
fine again for a while but eventually we lose connectivity again.  We
called SBC but they say the line is fine so it must be the firewall
software.

And SBC would not say what specific changes they made.

We use Soho Watchguard 5.1.   I assume something in the firewall
settings needs to be changed because when we reboot the firewall, we
can connect again.

Is anyone familar with both SBC and Soho Watchguard that has any
thoughts on what to look at in the firewall configuration?

We called Soho also and they just recommend upgrading to their latest
product.

Thank you,

Terry

------------------------------

From: Danny Burstein <dannyb@panix.com>
Subject: FTC Punts on a "Do Not Call" List For Spam
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:33:36 -0400
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC


New System to Verify Origins of E-Mail Must Emerge Before 'Do Not Spam'
List Can Be Implemented, FTC Tells Congress

"The Federal Trade Commission today told Congress that, at the present
time, a National Do Not Email Registry would fail to reduce the amount
of spam consumers receive, might increase it, and could not be
enforced effectively. In a report filed in response to a statutory
mandate, the FTC also said that anti-spam efforts should focus on
creating a robust e-mail authentication system that would prevent
spammers from hiding their tracks and thereby evading Internet service
providers, anti-spam filters and law enforcement ...

[ snippety snip ]

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/06/canspam2.htm

_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the
		     dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

------------------------------

From: sophialeii@yahoo.com
Subject: VoIP Regulation Status
Date: 15 Jun 2004 14:23:35 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


What is the Voice over IP (VoIP) regulation policy in U.S? and in CA?

I have heard that it may depend on the type of call scenarios.

For example:

1. a PC phone to another PC phone 
2. a PC phone through Internet to a regular phone (in PSTN) 
3. a regular phone (in PSTN) through Interent to another regular phone
   (in PSTN)

Does FCC regulate all of the above or just one or two of them?

Thanks for your help in advance.

Sophia

------------------------------

From: Charles Cryderman <Charles.Cryderman@globalcrossing.com>
Subject: VoIP
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:19:00 -0400


Reader: nitoy69@hotmail.com (Nitoy) asked:

"Does anyone know if the senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation
sub-commitee hearings on S.2281 (to provide a clear and unambiguous
structure for the jurisdictional and regulatory treatment for the
offering or provision of voice-over-Internet-protocol applications)at
9:30 A.M. on June 16th will be broadcast (live or otherwise) on CSPAN
and if so on which channel (1, 2, or 3)and if so when the airtimes
are?"

Yes they are, go to http://commerce.senate.gov/. It is being webcasted.

Chip Cryderman

------------------------------

Date: 15 Jun 2004 09:12:20 EDT
From: Charles.B.Wilber@Dartmouth.EDU (Charles B. Wilber)
Subject: Re: Be Careful About Quoting Scanner Messages 


My point was simply that there are specific FCC regulations which
apply to "interception" of radio, telephone and other traffic that is
not intended for the person doing the intercepting. As a general rule,
even if listening to such traffic is not a crime, relaying its
contents to a third party is. I mentioned New Gingrich because his was
a very high-profile case with which most Americans became familiar due
to incessant media coverage. 

Speaker Gingrich did not violate any laws but he was seriously
inconvenienced -- and his career was ended -- as a direct result of
the actions of someone who did. I doubt that many people would
remember the name of the man (and his wife) who "accidentally" heard
Newt Gingrich's cellular phone call on their scanner while driving
around in their car. Even if people don't remember the facts, they
remember the severity with which the matter was treated. I could just
as easily have mentioned Bill Clinton and taped telephone
conversations.

Charlie Wilber
Dartmouth College

--- Mark Crispin wrote:
> You might want to be careful about repeating what you heard on the
> scanner to other parties. Newt Gingrich and others learned about some
> of the relevant state and federal statutes the hard way.

How quickly the facts are forgotten/distorted.

------------------------------

From: jmeissen@aracnet.com
Subject: Re: Be Careful About Quoting Scanner Messages
Date: 15 Jun 2004 20:17:57 GMT
Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com


In article <telecom23.291.7@telecom-digest.org>,

Mark Crispin  <MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Charles B. Wilber wrote:

> Attempts to have McDermott prosecuted went nowhere.  Laws don't apply
> to Democrats in Congress.  

Now, now ... let's not single out the Democrats. Laws don't apply to
Republicans, either, as Bush has shown us many times.


John Meissen                              jmeissen@aracnet.com

------------------------------

From: Chip G <NOSPAMchipg_98@ATyahoo.TODELETE.com>
Subject: Re: Job Openings?
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:40:33 GMT


Chris Boone <cboone@nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:telecom23.291.4@telecom-digest.org:

> Anyone know of any good telecom job openings anywhere? (PBX,
> microwave, fiber, etc?)  If so, please reply direct for more details.

> (Remove nospam from my address)

> Thanks.

There are quite a few jobs posted on various major players web sites
(Avaya, Cisco, SBC, Cingular, AT&T, Sprint, etc.). I would suggest
starting with those. I also find Monster to be a good source of
leads. If you are really open to relocating at your own cost, I am
confident that you will find a great job! It seems there just aren't
enough good people willing to relocate for these types of jobs. I
think very few companies are offering relocation assistance anymore
(except for senior executive type jobs) but if you can get yourself to
a place they need you and you have good credentials, then you will
find something with no problem.

Best wishes,

Chip

------------------------------

From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (Lisa Hancock)
Subject: Re: More Memories of Illinois Bell
Date: 15 Jun 2004 10:42:14 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


TELECOM Digest Editor <ptownson@telecom-digest.org> wrote: 

> You've all heard the expression that 'no good deed goes unpunished' or 
> perhaps how things you do come back to bite you on the ass later in life.
> ... In other words he was one of those guys who works
> during overnight hours, going out to **important, and critical** customers
> whose phone service is down, when it **really** matters to the community
> or at least the customer. 

I wonder in this post-divesture deregulated age if such critical
services would still be provided as described in your story.  I tend
to doubt it.  We have too many little vendors and manufacturers who
are way too small to accomodate the overhead of having "night people"
on duty to keep things running in emergencies.  Further, with
competition, companies must be "lean and mean" which means no excess
capacity or staff on standby not earning revenue.

It was the same thing in the computer business when it was dominated
by IBM.  IBM had so many customers and was so big and profitable it
could and would have backup personnel and equipment ready at all times
to help customers out of a jam.

Ironically, other industries that don't need to be so big, like
banking and retail, have merged into a few giant nationwide firms
eliminating competition.  If you have a VISA/MC, there's a good chance
it was issued by MBNA, a huge outfit that issues cards under other
names.

The recent big NE U.S. blackout apparently was initiated by problems
in a troubled Ohio utility.  I don't know about them, but I wonder if
years ago, before deregulation, if they were a modest, but stable
outfit.  Also, deregulation allowed for electric power sharing which
the national grid was not designed to accomodate and thus overloaded.
And of course there was the California power debacle a few years ago.

The real kicker is that all this deregulation hasn't saved me any
money.  My phone bills are higher than ever thanks to all the "fees"
added on, and all the fine print in the contracts.  (I did some comp-
arison shopping recently, and they ALL pull the same garbage -- a
low quoted rate in big bold type, but all sorts of exceptions/exclus-
ions/extras in microfine print that greatly increase your bill).

------------------------------

From: pv+usenet@pobox.com (Paul Vader)
Subject: Re: Need Expert Legal and Medical Testimony for Lawsuit
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:07:55 -0000
Organization: Inline Software Creations


John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> writes:

>>> 1-212-561-5483

> If you tell Google to search Usenet for that number, you find a copy
> of the same message in a spam report, and a different message last
> month from a guy who says he's in Missouri and is looking for a child
> he fathered 17 years ago.  Most peculiar.

It appears to be the same guy. The old message is signed 'Charles
Boyer', and the message that Pat forwarded is from someone with an
email address of "clb6969". Also, there's two other versions of Pat's
letter, one without the masonic handshakes.

Wasn't Charles Boyer an actor? The name definitely sounds familiar. *

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: So Paul, can you tell me a little more
> about these Masonic and Mormon passwords; why they exist and what is
> the meaning (of the passwords)?    PAT]

First off, I *wasn't* remembering my Sherlock Holmes properly. I was
thinking of an exchange during Jefferson Hope's story in "A Study in
Scarlet", but the password used there was not "So mote it be". That latter
phrase is actually another masonic thing. The wiccan religion also uses it
(in a similar manner to how christians use "amen"), but they probably
inherited it from masonic rites, via Alister Crowley. But anyway ...

"Will no one help the widow's son?" is a passphrase used by traveling Masons
in trouble trying to make contact with a local lodge brother. *

* PV   something like badgers--something like lizards--and something
       like corkscrews.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Charles Boyer (pronounced 'BOE-YAY'}
was a long ago star of the silver screen, both in silent movies and
in the early talkies.  To Christians, the phrase 'Amen' is taken to
mean 'so be it'.  PAT]

------------------------------

From: matt@autocab.com (Matt Hall)
Subject: Re: CLI via CSTA (Siemens HiPath 3000)
Date: 15 Jun 2004 09:12:14 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Hi Mike,

I do have the CSTA specification from Siemens, and I have managed to
extract the basic structure of the messages, however, I am finding it
difficult in recognising what each message means.

I am relatively inexperienced in using ASN.1, so the specification
from Siemens is less than clear to me. Additionally, I want to avoid
using an ASN.1 compiler, as I am only after a small subset of all the
messages output from the system, so implementing the full CSTA
specification is overkill for my needs.

All I am trying to do is extract the incoming phone number and the
extension number that answers the call either before or when the call
is answered.

Thanks for your help!


Matt

Mike Blake-Knox <mikebkdontspam@Intrex.net> wrote in message
news:<telecom23.288.6@telecom-digest.org>:

> In article <telecom23.286.10@telecom-digest.org>, Matt Hall wrote:

>> Has anyone else had any experience in decoding the ASN.1 encoded data, 
>> and recognising the semantics of the data once it has been decoded?

> The reference on ASN.1 and BER that I've used is "Abstract Syntax 
> Notation (ASN.1): The Tutorial and Reference" ISBN 1 871802 06 07.

>> I'm finding  it difficult to recognise the meanings of these strings

> Do you have a Siemen's spec and/or the ECMA standard? If so, what kind of 
> strings are you having problems with?

> Mike Blake-Knox

------------------------------

From: SELLCOM Tech support <support@sellcom.com>
Subject: Re: Office Telephone System Recommendations
Organization: www.sellcom.com
Reply-To: support@sellcom.com
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 22:25:25 GMT


eljainc@ameritech.net (Mike McWhinney) posted on that vast internet
thingie:

> We are currently shopping around for a office telephone system.  We do
> not need anything fancy (we have 4 lines, 8-10 phones). We're looking
> for something similar to the following:

You should check out the TMC ET4000 "epic phone".  It would also
allow you to easily add some cordless phones and music on hold.
Two year warranty and feature rich.

http://www.et4000.com

Steve at SELLCOM

http://www.sellcom.com
Discount multihandset cordless phones by Siemens, AT&T, Panasonic, Motorola
Vtech 5.8Ghz; TMC ET4000 4line Epic phone, OnHoldPlus, Beamer, Watchguard!
Brick wall "non MOV" surge protection. Mini-Splitter log splitter!
If you sit at a desk www.ergochair.biz you owe it to yourself.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:00:32 EDT
From: Carl Moore <cmoore@ARL.ARMY.MIL>
Subject: Typo Error: Letters Reversed


I noticed a case of KRPS and KPRS (notice 2 letters transposed)
in an excerpt (V22 #156) where TELECOM Digest Editor noted:

> My favorite station is KRPS in Pittsburg, Kansas at 89.9 FM, the
> classical music station from NPR at Pittsburg State University.
> Trouble is, Pittsburg is a *trip* from here, about 70-80 miles east,
> next to Joplin, MO and that distance is a bit far for most FM
> stations. I have a Bose radio/CD and when I put an external antenna on
> it I can get KPRS. They also have a repeater-translator at 102.7 FM in
> Bartlesville, OK but that one is run off the air by KIND the local
> station at 102.9. They also have a repeater in Iola, Kansas but that
> is farther away than even Joplin/Pittsburg, and the religion people
> here in town (91.9 FM American Family Association) run Iola away. And
> the PBS station in Tulsa is just to weak to come in here, and that is
> about 90 miles straight south. KPRS has a stereo signal, but I do not
> get stereo for it, just a mono signal, which seems to imply I am just
> getting 'wisps' of it that happen to get here. I know if I had a good
> rooftop antenna like many folks in town I could make the trip from
> Pittsburg quite easily.  PAT]

You were commenting on:
> Subject: Re: Radio Signals
> From: bonomi@c-ns (Robert Bonomi)
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 04:12:56 GMT

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: But things have improved here lately.
The correct call sign is KRPS, at 89.9 FM, Pittsburg, KS and it does
classical music almost all day except for repeating BBC during over-
night hours. Now KRPS (local residents who do not care for classical
music say that the call sign refers to KRaPpy Station is carried at
no charge on cable as a free offering by CableOne, our cable service
here. The classical music in Tulsa, OK is on 89.5 FM. CableOne has 
their tower over on Oak Street around 18th Street, and among their
other equipment there is a crystal controlled radio set for 88.5 and
88.9 FM. High in the air, feeding right into the cable head end. The
cable guy knows I listen to it, and he came over here one day with a
'cable/FM radio splitter' and put it on my (cable) line and attached
the cable to the back of the Bose radio in place of the external
antenna I had been using. Right away KRPS started screaming at me,
and by George, even the 'stereo' indicator lighted up, something I
had never seen it do on Pittsburg or Tulsa before.  PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:31:38 EDT
From: Carl Moore <cmoore@ARL.ARMY.MIL>
Subject: Re: Ravings


In V22 #157 of the digest (late November 2002), I have some
feedback about the Editor's Note.

I remember reading of March 25 (not 21) being New Year's in Britian &
its colonies (including the future U.S.) coming up to the year 1752.
I VAGUELY recall that March 25 was the spring equinox but it drifted
up to March 21 (due to pre-Julian errors?).  The Gregorian calendar
used March 21 or so as the spring equinox.  In either case, you may
have seen 11 Feb. 1731 as date of birth "old style" of George
Washington.

Memorial Day in the US is last (not 4th) Monday in May, so it
will fall between May 25 and May 31 inclusive.

Easter falls between March 22 and April 25 (not 15) inclusive.
It was April 23 in 2000.

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:12:10 -0400
Subject: It may be time to answer the call of Voice over Internet
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.suntimes.com/output/worktech/cst-fin-andy15.html

BY ANDY IHNATKO 
 
People ask me why I hate telephones so much. "They're just
so ... so ... analog!" I tell them, putting the same tone of revulsion in
my voice that you'd normally use when talking about eating a member of
one's own species.

But now I may have to change my attitude, or at least come up with a
new line. There's a new alternative to wireless and traditional
landline technologies: the Voice over Internet Protocol.

Before VoIP, you couldn't say "phone calls over the Internet" without
using air quotes. For convenience and practical utility, it resembled
a real phone call about as closely as a two-man horse costume
resembled Seabiscuit.

What makes VoIP technology so remarkable is the fact that it's not
remarkable at all. You pick up your phone, you hear a dial tone, you
dial a phone number, and a few seconds later, you're talking to your
great-aunt Eunice in Omaha. When someone calls you, the phone rings
and you pick it up.

Full story at:
http://www.suntimes.com/output/worktech/cst-fin-andy15.html

How to Distribute VoIP Throughout a Home:
http://michigantelephone.mi.org/distribute.html

If you live in Michigan, subscribe to the MI-Telecom group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MI-Telecom/

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. If you donate at least fifty dollars
per year we will send you our two-CD set of the entire Telecom
Archives; this is every word published in this Digest since our
beginning in 1981.

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #292
******************************
