From editor@telecom-digest.org Mon Jun  7 20:54:59 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p3/8.11.3) id i580sxJ04326;
	Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:54:59 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:54:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200406080054.i580sxJ04326@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #280

TELECOM Digest     Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:55:00 EDT    Volume 23 : Issue 280

Inside This Issue:                            Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Declan McCullagh: Why the FCC Should Die (VOIP News)
    Union Needs A Better Vision Of Telecom's Future (VOIP News)
    US Groups Lobby Over VoIP Regulation (VOIP News)
    Vonage CEO: States Will Hurt VoIP Start-Ups (VOIP News)
    Responses TO FCC Proceeding Clarify Battle Lines on VoIP (VOIP News)
    Enterprise Communications Association Urges FCC to Protect (VOIP News)
    Comcast Throws Its Weight Behind VoIP (VOIP News)
    Competing Against the Five Nines -- Supporting the VoIP (VOIP News)
    Frost & Sullivan Awards Voiceglo With Product Differentiation (VOIP News)
    PRIMUS Launches 'Lingo' High-Speed Internet Phone Service (VOIP News)
    Re: Public Copy Cost Unchanged (Barry Margolin)
    Re: Just Like High-Definition TV, but With Higher Definition (Scott Dorsey)
    Detective Story: Information for Hire (Monty Solomon)
    Sonos Digital Music System (Monty Solomon)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 13:08:17 -0400
Subject: Declan McCullagh: Why the FCC Should Die
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://news.com.com/Why+the+FCC+should+die/2010-1028_3-5226979.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=news

By Declan McCullagh 
 
It's time to abolish the Federal Communications Commission. 

The reason is simple. The venerable FCC, created in 1934, is no longer
necessary.

Its justification for existence was weak 70 years ago, but advances in
technology since then have eliminated whatever arguments remained. 
Central planning didn't work for the Soviet Union, and it's not
working for us. The FCC is now an agency that does more harm than
good.

Consider some examples of bureaucratic malfeasance that the FCC, with
the complicity of the U.S. Congress, has committed. The FCC rejected
long-distance telephone service competition in 1968, banned Americans
from buying their own non-Bell telephones in 1956, dragged its feet in
the 1970s when considering whether video telephones would be allowed
and did not grant modern cellular telephone licenses until 1981--about
four decades after Bell Labs invented the technology. Along the way,
the FCC has preserved monopolistic practices that would have otherwise
been illegal under antitrust law.

These technologically backward decisions have cost Americans tens of
billions of dollars.

More recently, the FCC has experienced a string of embarrassing
losses, when its grand telecommunications plans were repeatedly vetoed
by the courts. A majority of the commissioners want to force local
phone companies to pay government-mandated rates when long-distance
providers like AT&T and MCI use their phone lines. A federal appeals
court recently shot down that scheme and gave the Bush administration
until June 15 to appeal to the Supreme Court. There's already talk
about higher telephone bills becoming a campaign issue this fall.

Meanwhile, the FCC is hard at work, trying to figure out how to muzzle
Howard Stern and make a national example of Janet Jackson's right
breast. Commissioners are planning how to order voice-over-Internet
Protocol (VoIP) companies to comply with arguably unlawful wiretapping
requests from the FBI. There's already talk about higher telephone
bills becoming a campaign issue this fall.

In a sop to Hollywood, the FCC has decided that any device capable of
receiving digital television signals must follow a complicated set of
"broadcast flag" regulations. When those rules take effect in
mid-2005, they will put some PC tuner card makers out of business.

These signs warn of an agency that is overreaching. If the FCC had
been in charge of overseeing the Internet, we'd likely be waiting for
the Mosaic Web browser to receive preliminary approval from the
Wireline Competition Bureau. Instead, the Internet has transformed
from a research curiosity into a mainstay of the world's economy -- in
less time than it took the FCC to approve the first cell phone
licenses.

Full story at:
http://news.com.com/Why+the+FCC+should+die/2010-1028_3-5226979.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=news

How to Distribute VoIP Throughout a Home:
http://michigantelephone.mi.org/distribute.html

If you live in Michigan, subscribe to the MI-Telecom group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MI-Telecom/
 
------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:46:55 -0400
Subject: Union Needs A Better Vision Of Telecom's Future
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.networkingpipeline.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleId=21401342

Regulating VoIP won't save big telcos from having to move to an
IP-based future.  

By Paul Kapustka

When the Communications Workers of America union called for telecom
regulations for Voice over IP earlier this week, it cited consumer
protection as its motivating factor. But when you dig deeper into the
issue, it's pretty clear who the union is really trying to protect --
big telco companies, who employ most of the union's members.

It's an approach that is as short-sighted as it is predictable. And
ultimately, it ignores the future -- and perhaps more jobs at better
wages for its workers -- in favor of the status quo, a situation that
is already getting worse by the day. With big telcos laying off people
as fast as they can, CWA union members should be asking their leaders
to support, not oppose, VoIP and other advanced IP services, since
that is where the jobs of the future will be coming from.

Full story at:
http://www.networkingpipeline.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleId=21401342

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:48:34 -0400
Subject: US Groups Lobby Over VoIP Regulation
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/06/03/us_voip_fcc/

By Tim Richardson

An Internet telephony trade group has urged US authorities not to tie
up the fledgling VoIP industry in red tape.

The Voice on the Net (VON) coalition -- which includes AT&T, Intel,
MCI, Microsoft and Skype among others -- has called on the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) not to apply traditional telephone
regulations to Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) warning that if it
did, consumers would lose out.

In a latest round of lobbying, VON urged the FCC to classify VoIP and
other IP-enabled services as "unregulated information services"
subject exclusively to federal jurisdiction. The FCC is currently
looking at whether VoIP and other Internet enabled communications
services should continue to be unregulated Internet services.

VON believes policymakers should hold back from applying traditional
telecom regulation that could stifle VoIP.

Full story at:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/06/03/us_voip_fcc/

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:28:25 -0400
Subject: Vonage CEO: States Will Hurt VoIP Start-ups
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://industryclick.com/magazinearticle.asp?magazineid=7&releaseid=12300&magazinearticleid=199942&siteid=3

by Donny Jackson
Telephony, Jun 7, 2004
 
State regulation could undermine efforts by new VoIP entrants to make
business models work by wiping out venture capital funding in nascent
providers, according to Jeffrey Citron, CEO of Vonage, currently the
largest residential VoIP provider in the U.S.

Speaking at the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Citron
said a recent decision by the New York State Public Utilities
Commission declaring Vonage a telecom corporation proves that states
will regulate VoIP providers unless prohibited by the FCC or
Congress. New York made its ruling largely to ensure that the VoIP
provider meets 911 standards. A federal court in Minnesota last year
ruled that Vonage is an unregulated information service, but Citron
said he does not want to fight such battles in all 50 states.

While state litigation is costly, the Minnesota victory sparked $35
million in new funding for Vonage, Citron said. Such venture funding
for other VoIP start-ups likely will disappear in the wake of the
uncertainty created by the New York ruling, he said.

Full story at:
http://industryclick.com/magazinearticle.asp?magazineid=7&releaseid=12300&magazinearticleid=199942&siteid=3

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:24:42 -0400
Subject: Responses to FCC Proceeding Clarify Battle Lines on VoIP
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://industryclick.com/magazinearticle.asp?magazineid=7&releaseid=12300&magazinearticleid=199941&siteid=3

by Donny Jackson
Telephony, Jun 7, 2004

Comments filed with the FCC over the past several weeks in response to
the commission's voice-over-IP rule-making clarified the lines of
arguments various parties are expected to pursue vigorously before the
FCC takes action sometime in the next year.

Although the proceeding is designed to address all IP-enabled
services, the focus of comments submitted clearly was on
broadband-based VoIP, which is expected to hit a growth curve that
hasn't been predicted for any technology since the dawn of DSL (see
graphic).

Almost all comments generally called for VoIP providers to be subject
to light economic regulation but adhere to social policy goals
such as universal service, E911 and surveillance access by law
enforcement. But the manner in which these goals should be achieved
differed significantly in comments, offering varying barriers of entry
to newcomers.

Full story at:
http://industryclick.com/magazinearticle.asp?magazineid=7&releaseid=12300&magazinearticleid=199941&siteid=3 

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:13:10 -0400
Subject: Enterprise Communications Association Urges FCC to Protect
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/06-07-2004/0002188540&STORY&EDATE=

Enterprise Communications Association Urges FCC to Protect Competition
in VoIP Market by Ensuring Equal Access to ILEC Facilities
 
WASHINGTON, June 7 /PRNewswire/ -- In comments filed with the Federal
Communications Commission on May 28, 2004, the Enterprise
Communications Association (ECA) urged the FCC to minimize the
potential for anticompetitive behavior in the market for voice over
Internet Protocol (VoIP) and other Internet protocol (IP) services by
requiring incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) to grant equal
access to their broadband network facilities.  

ILECs remain the dominant providers of access facilities in most
markets and represent a potential bottleneck to all potential VoIP
competitors.  Therefore, "if IP providers cannot obtain access to the
network facilities needed to deliver services to their customers, all
of the Commission's efforts to fashion a regulatory environment that
otherwise encourages the development of IP services will be moot," ECA
said.  

In a Notice for Proposed Rulemaking in the matter of IP-enabled
services, the Commission is seeking comment on the appropriate
regulatory scheme for VoIP and other IP services.  ECA is the leading
trade association promoting the growth of markets and effective sales
channels for converged communications solutions deployed by enterprise
businesses.  ECA brings together a diverse membership base, including
manufacturers, distributors, network service providers, sales channel
companies, systems integrators, applications developers and
consultants.  ECA urged the FCC to require ILECs to adopt Comparably
Efficient Interconnection plans for all IP-enabled services and
disclose in a timely manner the network information that is relevant
to the provision of IP-enabled services and the design of related
equipment.  

To help customer premises equipment (CPE) manufacturers, channel
partners and integrators that are driving innovation in IP-enabled
services and applications to continue to flourish, ECA said the FCC
should restrict the ability of ILECs to bundle the sale of CPE with
their IP-enabled service offerings for a transition period.  Finally,
ECA recommended the FCC promote open systems principles for IP-
enabled 911 solutions.  ECA stated, "Because VoIP technology is just
emerging from infancy, there is significant potential for the
providers of local facilities to implement proprietary protocols,
engage in preferential routing of 911 calls, or employ discriminatory
data screening practices that favor their own VoIP systems and
services over those of competitors.  The potential for such
preferential and discriminatory practices exists in VoIP
communications generally; the consequences of such practices would be
especially harmful -- not only to competition, but to the public
safety, health and welfare -- if they are allowed to be pursued in the
area of emergency communications."

    ABOUT ECA

    The Enterprise Communications Association (ECA) promotes the
growth of healthy markets and effective sales channels for converged
voice, video and data communications solutions deployed in the
enterprise.  ECA programs for executives and technical personnel map
out how to profitably transform a voice or data distribution business
to pursue convergence markets.  For more information on ECA member
service, visit the ECA web site at http://www.encomm.org.  To view
ECA's full comments before the FCC in the matter of IP-enabled
services, visit http://www.encomm.org/fcc.htm.

      CONTACT:  Mary Bradshaw Executive Director of the Enterprise
Communications Association, +1-202-467-4868, or mary@encomm.org

      SOURCE Enterprise Communications Association
Web Site: http://www.encomm.org

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 11:20:07 -0400
Subject: Comcast Throws Its Weight Behind VoIP
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.tvweek.com/technology/060704comcast.html

Country's Biggest MSO to Begin Trials in Suburban Markets

By Daisy Whitney

When the big kid sits on the seesaw, all the weight teeters to that
end. Such is Comcast's effect on the cable industry.

The operator's formalization of its voice-over-Internet protocol plans
late last month raises the questions of how VoIP fits into the cable
fabric of the next three to five years, what Comcast's entrance means
for the industry and what it means for consumers now that the
country's biggest multiple system operator has bestowed its official
blessing on VoIP.

While Comcast's interest in VoIP was no secret, the operator had not
outlined specific details of its plans until late May, when it said
trials in suburban Philadelphia, Indianapolis and Springfield, Mass.,
would begin this year. The Philadelphia trial is an expansion of a
test that began there in 2003.

"We wanted to get through those trials and hone our provisioning,
order-taking, installation, customer service functions," said Robert
Smith, a Comcast spokesman.

Comcast plans to announce an additional schedule of launches later
this year as part of its plans to make 50 percent of its plant
VoIP-ready by the end of this year and 90 percent ready by the end of
next year. With Comcast's entrance, all the major cable operators are
on board now, backing the new technology.

Full story at:
http://www.tvweek.com/technology/060704comcast.html

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:07:13 -0400
Subject: Competing Against the Five Nines -- Supporting the VoIP Experience
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.convergedigest.com/blueprint/ttp04/z3supportsoft1.asp?ID=138&ctgy=3

by James Morehead, Senior Director, Product Marketing  

SupportSoft 

Led by the North American cable companies (MSOs), VoIP telephony
services are beginning to hit the mass market. In a May 2004 research
report, Juniper Research claims that VoIP will account for over 12% of
all telephony revenues by 2009, an indication that its revenue
potential for providers is growing along with consumer desire for the
service. Yet in order for VoIP to viably compete with traditional
telephony services the good old telephone VoIP needs to
ensure that it can stack up against the five nines of
reliability that telephone users receive: they can count on their
phone working for them 99.999% of the time. Service and support of the
VoIP experience directly influences the widespread adoption among
consumers and whether providers can profitably provide the service.

With competitive pressures from carriers and satellite vendors, the
MSOs have a significant revenue incentive to include telephony
services as part of their strategy to lock-in customers with a
triple play offering of digital video, broadband data and
telephony.

The MSOs are not alone, however. Knowing that their core access
business is at stake, Telcos are also building VoIP offerings;
some more quickly than others, such as AT&T with CallVantage. Their
strategy is to provide a broader approach that is services rich to
VoIP offerings than the MSOs and new entrants.

New entrants such as Vonage are attempting to leverage the rapidly
increasing growth of broadband Internet services by focusing on VoIP
services, not the enabling network.

The reason for all of these players to be aggressively pursuing this
approach is that VoIP has a proven to be a cost advantage and can
enable the rapid introduction of new value-added telephony services.

However, critical to the long-term success of VoIP is not simply
introducing a myriad of slick features or aggressive pricing,
but rather the ability of the service provider to profitably manage
the subscriber lifecycle. The VoIP provider will need to meet or
exceed what has become the benchmark for voice telephony services, it
is self-installable, auto-configured, and provides quality service at
99.999% reliability.

Full story at:
http://www.convergedigest.com/blueprint/ttp04/z3supportsoft1.asp?ID=138&ctgy=3

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 19:06:57 -0400
Subject: Frost & Sullivan Awards Voiceglo With Product Differentiation
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20040607005950&newsLang=en

Frost & Sullivan Awards Voiceglo with Product Differentiation
Innovation Award for Global Leadership in Residential VoIP Services
 
PALO ALTO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 7, 2004--Frost & Sullivan, a
global leader in growth consulting, has selected Voiceglo (OTCBB:TGLO)
for its 2004 Product Differentiation Innovation Award for outstanding
achievement in the global Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) market
in its recent analysis, "The North American Residential VoIP Market."

Frost & Sullivan acknowledged Voiceglo's unique product innovation,
the GloPhone (www.glophone.com), which has helped the company
effectively compete in a highly commoditized market where most VoIP
providers are lowering prices to gain market share. By offering
cost-effective technology bundled with calling feature-enriched
capabilities such as voice mail, call forwarding, call waiting, caller
ID, voice2email, buddy lists and many others, Voiceglo has
successfully launched the Glophone, a VoIP offering unique within the
industry. In a very short time, the Glophone has created high demand
among consumers seeking a lower cost alternative to traditional phone
service.

Glophone is the ultimate hybrid service, providing global peer-to-peer
VoIP calling, along with access to public switched telephone networks
(PSTN), resulting in a very cost-effective phone service
option. Moreover, while most other free or peer-to-peer services can
be accessed only when both parties are online, the GloPhone makes it
possible to place or receive calls from a landline or a cellular
phone.

Additionally, unlike other services that work only through high-speed
broadband, Voiceglo's GloPhone also works with dial-up services.

"Other services such as Skype and Free World Dialup, usually require the phone to be connected to a broadband interface, so the service is tied down to a physical connection," said Jon Arnold, VoIP Program Leader for Frost & Sullivan. "GloPhone, on the other hand, is a truly portable, Web-enabled browser service that can be accessed from any Internet-connected computer in the world." 

Another advantage of the GloPhone is that customers subscribing to the
service are provided with a North American phone number. This is
appealing to users from high tariff countries since international
calls originating in North America receive very favorable caller
rates. Also, calls made to North America are viewed as local
calls. Voiceglo has also shown innovation with a very flexible range
of payment options. As with other broadband VoIP providers,
subscribers pay through the convenience of credit cards. However,
Voiceglo does not require a North American billing address. Soon, the
company will offer alternate payment methods such as PayPal, making
their service available to those who do not use or have credit cards.

The Frost & Sullivan award also recognizes the company's ability to
cater to the economic capabilities of a wide range of end users. For
example, GloPhone Blue, the most basic service offered, caters to
customers who simply want to call other GloPhone customers worldwide
for free. For mid-level users, Voiceglo offers the GloPhone Green and
GloPhone Gold service plans, both notable for their cost efficiency,
as users can make and receive calls in the U.S. and Canada for 3.9
cents per minute and can also utilize numerous bundled
features. GloPhone Platinum is the most comprehensive of the offering
and targets high-end users with unlimited service and a much wider
range of features and services. GloPhone also supports numerous call
management features that enable subscribers to handle their voice
mail, initiate conferencing, forward calls to their landlines or
cellular phones and locate other members in the online directory and
buddy list.

Voiceglo's Glophone service was introduced in mid-February 2004, but
has made rapid gains in the VoIP market with a philosophy and business
model that differentiates them radically from their competitors. It is
the ultimate hybrid service, combining the allure of free, global
peer-to-peer broadband or dial-up VoIP, along with PSTN access for
very affordable calling to or from any conventional telephone or
wireless phone, anywhere in the world. For its success in accelerating
the global market growth of VoIP services through product
differentiation, as well as affordability, and ease of use, Voiceglo
has been selected as the recipient of the 2004 Frost & Sullivan
Product Differentiation Innovation Award.

Full story at:
http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20040607005950&newsLang=en

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 19:22:21 -0400
Subject: PRIMUS Launches 'Lingo' High-Speed Internet Phone Service
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/index.jsp?epi-content=GENERIC&newsId=20040607005101&newsLang=en&beanID=202776713&viewID=news_view

June 07, 2004 08:00 AM US Eastern Timezone 

MCLEAN, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 7, 2004--

"Lingo" Offers 3-Months Free, Unmatched $19.95 Monthly Rate For
Unlimited Local and Long-Distance Calling in U.S., Plus Unlimited
Calling to Canada and Western Europe

Primus Telecommunications, Inc. ("PRIMUS") today eclipsed existing
Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP) telecommunications companies in
the United States by introducing "Lingo," a VOIP service that offers
unmatched value and geographic coverage. Leveraging PRIMUS' global
presence, and a VOIP network that reaches over 150 countries, the new
Lingo service offers consumers free, unlimited calling to Western
Europe - something no other broadband phone service provides. Lingo
brings consumers with a broadband connection an alternative to their
traditional U.S. telephone company -- at savings of up to 80 percent.

Lingo is available free for a three-month period to consumers, and
includes unlimited local and long-distance calling in the U.S.,
unlimited international calling to Canada and Western Europe, and over
25 popular calling features at no additional charge. Consumers can
learn more about Lingo and sign up online for the service by visiting
http://www.Lingo.com.

The Lingo Offer 

After three-months free, the same Lingo service will cost $19.95 per
month, and be offered on a month-to-month basis without extended
contract requirements. The plan includes:

-- Unlimited local and long-distance calls in the U.S., and unlimited
   international calls to Canada and Western Europe

-- Very low rates to over 230 other top international locations 

-- The opportunity to keep your current phone number 

-- A free Lingo Analog Telephone Adapter ("ATA") 

-- Over 25 calling features at no charge 

-- Unlimited calls between Lingo customers 

"The Internet knows no geographical boundaries, so why should
telephone services?" said John Melick, co-president of PRIMUS. "As a
multi-national company, it is second nature for PRIMUS to provide
quality, unlimited domestic and international calling opportunities at
an inexpensive price. We are delighted to have Lingo customers join
millions of residential and business customers served by the PRIMUS
network here in the U.S., and around the globe."

How It Works 

All that customers need for the Lingo high-speed Internet phone
service is a broadband Internet connection -- either cable or digital
subscriber line (DSL) -- an analog telephone adapter (ATA) provided by
PRIMUS, and a standard telephone. Lingo customers may place calls and
simultaneously use the same broadband connection with PCs and other
devices.

Other Lingo Calling Plans and Features 

Lingo offers a series of calling plans to meet the needs of
residential and small/home-based businesses, ranging in price from
$14.95 to $99.95 per month.

All Lingo calling plans provide a variety of enhanced features at no
additional charge, including:

-- Online Web portal for customers to personalize their services, set
   features, and manage their account

-- Do Not Disturb, Call Forwarding, Call Blocking, and Caller ID services 

-- Voicemail to email delivery 

-- "Distinctive Ring" tones for each number, so the customer may
   distinguish between one phone number and another

-- "Simultaneous Ring," allowing important calls to be sent to several
   other telephone numbers at the same time (e.g., your cell phone)

-- Emergency Calling Service 

-- Anonymous Call Rejection, Redial, *69 

About PRIMUS 

PRIMUS is the principal U.S. subsidiary of Primus Telecommunications
Group, Incorporated (Nasdaq:PRTL), a Fortune 1000(R) global
telecommunications company with over $1.3 billion in annual
revenue. Headquartered in McLean, VA, and founded in 1994, the company
is among the largest international telecommunications concerns. PRIMUS
owns and operates an extensive global network, including a VOIP
"backbone" that reaches over 150 countries through 550
points-of-presence (POPs) throughout the world.

The company offers voice, Internet, voice-over-Internet protocol
(VOIP), digital subscriber line (DSL), and other data services to
corporate customers, small- and medium-sized businesses, residential
customers, and other communications carriers located throughout the
United States, Canada, Europe, Asia, and Australia.

The company first entered the VOIP market in 1999, and now carries
more than one billion minutes of VOIP traffic. This year, Primus was
the first communications company in Canada to roll out consumer
broadband telephone services, and, in 2002, brought VOIP-based
PC-to-phone service to the desktop through a partnership arrangement
with Microsoft MSN(R) Messenger.

Lingo is a trademark of PRIMUS. 

Microsoft Messenger and MSN are either registered trademarks or
trademarks of Microsoft Corp. in the United States and/or other
countries.

For more information about Lingo, visit: http://www.Lingo.com.
  
Contacts  
   
PRIMUS
Media & Industry Analyst Contact:
Gerry A. Simone, 703-394-4519 
gsimone@primustel.com
or
Investor Relations Contact: 
John F. DePodesta, 703-902-2800
IR@primustel.com 
 
Full press release at:
http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/index.jsp?epi-content=GENERIC&newsId=20040607005101&newsLang=en&beanID=202776713&viewID=news_view

------------------------------

From: Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Public Copy Cost Unchanged
Organization: Looking for work
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 17:56:13 -0400


In article <telecom23.278.12@telecom-digest.org>,
 hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (Lisa Hancock) wrote:

> I was at the library and used the public copying machine.  It was 
> 10 cents a copy.

> I realized this price is the same since I was a kid, back when a
> payphone call was a dime.  Bus fares, now $2.00 were 35 cents.

I remember copying machines going up from a nickel to a dime when I
was a kid, and I'm not yet eligible for Social Security.  But I agree
that it's remarkable that it has stayed the same for so long (around
30 years).

Pat suggested that the towns may be subsidizing this, but lots of
convenience stores, as well as chains like Staples and UPS Store,
offer self-serve copying.  I don't think they're still a dime, but
they're not much more expensive either.


Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***

------------------------------

From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Subject: Re: Just Like High-Definition TV, but With Higher Definition
Date: 7 Jun 2004 18:55:23 -0400
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)


Phil Earnhardt  <pae@dim.com> wrote:

> One comparison the reporter missed is to the Texas Instruments DLP
> system for cinemas ( www.dlp.com ). This is the digital projection
> system that George Lucas has been hyping and critics like Roger Ebert
> have been panning. Movies like "Star Wars Episode 1", "Star Wars
> Episode 2", and "Ice Age" were released on the DLP format. I was
> thoroughly unimpressed with this projection technique; there were
> lots of jaggies on the screen. AFAICT, the DLP system has a horizontal
> resolution of 2K, which would give it about 3.5 million pixels/frame.
> This is only marginally higher resolution than HDTV.

This is substantially higher resolution than HDTV.  Unfortunately,
it's still not anywhere near enough resolution for theatre
applications.

What distresses me is not the poor resolution, though, but the poor
grey scale.  The total range of tones isn't really any better than
conventional NTSC video, with very restricted shadows and highlights
that blow out far too easily.  It's nowhere near as good as I expect
in a theatrical presentation.

> The other comparison would be to the IMAX DMR technology. This system
> takes a 35mm film and does a computation-intensive frame-by-frame
> processing of the images to master a high-resolution release of the
> movie onto IMAX film. The third "Harry Potter" film is being released
> with this technology in about 50 IMAX theaters today.

> The DMR processing can produce stunning results. One of the first
> films to be re-released with this technology was "Apollo 13". If you
> recall, there are several scenes prominently featuring a
> black-and-white television in the middle of that film. The DMR image
> of that television cabinet was absolutely stunning. Scenes with a
> small depth-of-field have an amazing 3-D effect; they are sometimes so
> dramatic that I'm guessing that the DMR processing allows the
> technicians/artists doing to conversion to de-tune the effect.

Frankly, the DMR stuff doesn't look any better than 35mm projection
from a good EK print.  Where it wins is that it can be much brighter
(meaning it can be shown on a much larger screen and still get good
shadow detail), and that the prints are comparatively easy to make.

Making good prints directly off the camera negative is difficult and
results in substantial wear to the original elements, so most prints
in theatres are several generations down.  Resolution in the original
negative disappears after a couple generations of printer slip.  The
DMR prints make this much less of an issue because any number of
internegs can be struck from the digital intermediate.  Greyscale
still isn't what it ought to be, though.

> I have never heard estimates about the resolution of the DMR IMAX
> films. In general, I think it's a vastly superior technology to the TI
> DLP system.

That's not saying all that much.  

>> Add to that UHDV's beefed-up refresh rate of 60 frames per second
>> (twice that of conventional video), projected onto a 450-inch diagonal
>> screen with more than 20 channels of audio, and you've got an
>> impressive home theater on your hands.
>> Of course, UHDV's current dimensions make it impractical for most
>> homes. The NHK researchers are investigating how to squeeze all those
>> pixels onto smaller screens.

> The numbers are way overkill for a home system. OTOH, this system
> could hold promise for commercial cinemas. Hollywood should embrace
> systems that deliver stunningly higher performance in theaters than
> people can see at home. At this point in time (and IMHO), the DLP
> system has failed to deliver on its promise.

I dunno, I run 35mm at home and even on a little 12 foot screen here,
I can see _very_ clear differences between an archive EK print and a
typical theatrical print.  You can't have enough resolution or good
enough grey scale for any application.

--scott

"C'est un Nagra.  C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 02:46:35 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Detective Story: Information for Hire


ONLINE SHOPPER

By JAMES GORMAN

IT was a hot day, but it was cold inside, cold as an unplugged
computer at a San Jose server farm. I was at the keyboard, trying to
find a telephone number for someone who worked in bioinformatics.
Don't ask why.

Then I saw them, lurking in the corner of the screen like a come-on 
for cheap pharmaceuticals or expensive credit cards or unclothed 
women, or unclothed men or, well, you know what I'm talking about. 
There are all those advertisements that you always wonder about but 
don't want to click on because you know that sooner or later the 
F.B.I. will vacuum data from every hard drive you ever used and tell 
the world that you were a regular visitor to the Victoria's Secret 
site but never bought a thing.

Maybe because it was hot, or maybe because it was cold, or maybe 
because interviewing people about bioinformatics is not terrifically 
exciting, I figured I'd make an information buy, get some personal 
data on someone, just to pass the time. I wasn't going to start 
tracking down my old elementary school teachers, because they were 
nuns. You can't just plug Sister Kevin into a search engine and 
expect a whole lot. So I thought I'd pick someone better known, like, 
say, Brad Pitt.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/03/technology/circuits/03shop.html

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 18:45:23 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Sonos Digital Music System


Multi-Zone Digital Music System Renders the Traditional Black Stereo 
Rack Obsolete

CARLSBAD, CALIF., June 7, 2004 - Digital music fans can now listen to
rock in the garden, punk in the playroom and fusion in the bedroom,
with the launch of the Sonos Digital Music System, which is previewing
this week at the "D2: All Things Digital" conference in Carlsbad,
Calif. The Sonos offering is the first and only multi-zone digital
music system with a wireless, full-color LCD screen controller that
lets consumers play all their digital music, all over their home,
while controlling it all from the palm of their hand.

The Sonos Digital Music System is comprised of two stylish components:
the Sonos ZonePlayer, a networked audio player that distributes, plays
and amplifies music in any "zone" in the home, and the Sonos
Controller, a wireless handheld device with a full-color screen which
allows the user to access, customize and control the music anywhere-
from the bedroom to the backyard.

The ZonePlayer delivers great sound in every room through a powerful
and compact 50 Watts/channel amplifier with component-quality audio
specifications. The ZonePlayer can access and play a wide variety of
music formats, including MP3, WMA, AAC (MPEG4) and WAV, stored on a
PC, Mac or Network Attached Storage (NAS), and comes bundled with
customizable Internet Radio stations. Built-in wired and wireless
capabilities provide the consumer flexibility of installation at no
extra cost.

The intuitive Controller, designed with a full-color LCD screen and
touch-sensitive scroll wheel, provides consumers with simplicity -
pick a zone, pick a song and hit play - unrestricted by line of
sight. Consumers can play the same song synchronously in every room or
play different songs in different rooms, queue-up favorites for the
evening or rediscover their collection via random play; the options
are virtually unlimited. The high resolution LCD shows what is playing
in any zone at any time, including album art when available.

Network set-up is simple as the system automatically configures a
secure wireless mesh network that seamlessly links the consumer's
existing digital music library to the ZonePlayers and Controllers.
The systems modular design allows the user to decide upon the number
of ZonePlayers and Controllers needed based upon lay-out of the home
and personal needs.

http://sonos.com/news_and_reviews/press_releases/2004/pr_0606_launch.htm

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. If you donate at least fifty dollars
per year we will send you our two-CD set of the entire Telecom
Archives; this is every word published in this Digest since our
beginning in 1981.

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #280
******************************
