From editor@telecom-digest.org Fri Apr 23 20:32:04 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p2/8.11.3) id i3O0W3g06316;
	Fri, 23 Apr 2004 20:32:04 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 20:32:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200404240032.i3O0W3g06316@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #203

TELECOM Digest     Fri, 23 Apr 2004 20:31:00 EDT    Volume 23 : Issue 203

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Re: Paying For Incoming Mobile Phone Calls (Monty Solomon)
    In a Fast-Moving Web World, Some Prefer the Dial-Up Lane (Monty Solomon)
    Cheaper Than TiVo: Souping Up Your Computer (Monty Solomon)
    Dogging Craze Has Brits in Heat/Brits at It Tooth and Nail (M Solomon)
    The GMail Saga (Monty Solomon)
    Re: Honesty from Earthlink (Barry Margolin)
    Re: Lots of Virii Out Being Sent by 'me' (Barry Margolin)
    Re: Factory Flaws Yield Headaches For Chip Makers (Justin Time)
    Re: FCC Rejects AT&T VOIP Petition (Justin Time)
    Every Business In The World Will Soon Be Webcasting (Press Release)
    Re: VoIP Problem With Alcatel OmniPCX 4400 (Scott)
    Model 820 Control Unit (JaBrIoL)
    Re: Toll Free (1-800) Line ANI Delivery Question (Keith)
    Motorola Introduces New Cable Modems Designed for Wireless (VOIP News)
    China VOIP Operator Could Face Years in Jail (VOIP News)
    Jeff Pulver's Blog: IP-MoU: Getting Started (VOIP News)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:02:31 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Re: Paying For Incoming Mobile Phone Calls


> My question is: Do all mobile phone rate plans in the U.S.A. charge
> talk-time for the incoming calls? If Yes, then why isn't anybody
> demanding that incoming calls be free for the mobile phones there?

Nextel offers various plans that include unlimited incoming calls.

Thy also offer a rate plan which has everything unlimited ...

Nextel National Unlimited NDC Plus Plan -- New -- Everything is 
unlimited including Nationwide Direct Connect! Includes unlimited 
incoming, outgoing, Domestic Long Distance, Direct Connect and 
Nationwide Direct Connect calls. Also includes unlimited AOL 
Instant Messenger, unlimited Two-Way Messaging and Mobile Email with 
the Nextel Full Service Package.

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:05:41 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: In a Fast-Moving Web World, Some Prefer the Dial-Up Lane


By MATT RICHTEL

SAN FRANCISCO, April 18 - High-speed Internet access is being adopted
by millions of Americans each year, growing as quickly as any modern
technology. So what makes Dana Jenkins think she can resist?

In fact, she is part of another big group, the tens of millions of 
Americans seemingly immune to the lure of more speed and satisfied 
with dial-up services. A majority of Americans who surf the Internet 
still do so by dialing in on regular telephone lines, despite the 
rapidly narrowing price gap between high-speed and dial-up 
connections.

People like Ms. Jenkins are neither Luddites nor laggards, but 
consumers content to pay for a service that is less than optimal, and 
at times even frustratingly slow, because they say greater speed is 
not worth the trouble of starting over with a new telecommunications 
provider and getting a new e-mail address, even if the added cost is 
small.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/19/technology/19DIAL.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:14:03 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Cheaper Than TiVo: Souping Up Your Computer


By WALTER S. MOSSBERG

The coolest, trendiest way to watch television today is by using a 
digital video recorder, or DVR. With a DVR system, you can pause or 
rewind live TV. And, more important, you can record any program for 
viewing later without enduring the twin hassles of videotape 
recording: complicated programming and the need to keep blank tapes 
handy. That's because DVRs record TV shows to a large hard disk, and 
you pick the shows to record by just clicking their names in an 
onscreen program guide.

But buying a DVR can be costly. The most popular options are high-end 
set-top boxes containing technology from TiVo, or its rival, Replay 
TV, which require a fee-based service; or, high-end Media Center PCs, 
that use a PC's internal hard disk as a DVR.

If your budget is limited, and you have a plain old Windows PC, 
however, you can turn it into a DVR by using a new product from 
SnapStream Media, a small company from Houston. SnapStream's Beyond 
TV 3 includes DVR software for Windows, and is bundled with the 
necessary hardware -- an external TV tuner from Hauppauge Computer 
Works that plugs into the computer with a simple USB cable. This 
bundle is sold on the SnapStream.com Web site for $229.99. No service 
fee is charged.

My assistant Katie Boehret and I tested Beyond TV this week. It 
worked, but in two separate tests, we were tempted to rename it 
Beyond Patience. We found setting up the product to be frustrating 
and difficult, and concluded that it is more suitable for techies 
than for mainstream users.

http://ptech.wsj.com/archive/solution-20040414.html

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:18:41 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Dogging Craze Has Brits in Heat / Brits Going at It Tooth and Nail


Dogging Craze Has Brits in Heat

http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,62718,00.html

Brits Going at It Tooth and Nail

http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,62687,00.html


"Toothing" latest hi-tech sex craze
http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=495183&section=news

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:46:08 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: The GMail Saga


by Brad Templeton

Much has been written about the new Google GMail trial, which is an
e-mail service that offers a gigabyte of archiving, Google search of
your mail archives and a nice interface. It's free, because while you
read your mail, Google ads will be displayed based on keywords found
in the mail you are reading (just as the Google Adsense program shows
ads like the ones you see on the right based on words found in this
document.)

GMail created a surprising storm for a product that hasn't yet been
released. A coalition of privacy groups asked Google to hold back on
releasing it. A California state senator proposed a law to ban the
advertising function. Editorials and blog entries left and right have
condemned it and praised it.

I come to this problem from two sides. One, I'm a fan of Google, and
have been friends with Google's management since they started the
company. I've also consulted for Google on other matters and make
surprising revenue from their Adsense program on my web site.

I'm also a privacy advocate and Chairman of the Electronic Frontier
Foundation, well regarded as one of the top civil rights advocates in
cyberspace. The EFF has issued some statements of privacy concern
over GMail, though we declined joining the coalition against it. (I'm
writing this as my own essay, though with some advice from the EFF
team.) I've also had a chance to talk at length with Google President
Larry Page about some of the issues.

Here's a summary of some of my conclusions

http://www.templetons.com/brad/gmail.html

------------------------------

From: Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Honesty from Earthlink
Organization: Looking for work
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:55:09 -0400


In article <telecom23.201.11@telecom-digest.org>, Edson C. Hendricks
<mit@edh.net> wrote:

> Ed.H: All right, I can see you have no more answers. Thank you very
> much for your attention, although I must tell in closing that your
> explanation doesn't satisfy me, and I doubt it would satisfy
> practically any objective reader.

Let's say you're right, and they're deliberately not fixing the
opt-out mechanism.  Did you really expect a customer support rep to
admit that they're blatantly lying to customers?  More likely, they're
keeping it a secret from the CSRs as well.


Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***

------------------------------

From: Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Lots of Virii Out Being Sent by 'me'.
Organization: Looking for work
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 00:57:47 -0400


In article <telecom23.202.9@telecom-digest.org>,
ptownson@telecom-digest.org wrote:

> A large number of virii are being sent to Digest readers from "me" 
> via Denmark.  

Pat, many types of worms and viruses pick a random address from the
sender's address book and use this to forge the From address when
propagating themselves.  Your address is in lots of address books, so
naturally it gets used alot.

Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I know that. We discussed it before. All
I am trying to do now is warn *everyone* not to open any attachments
sent by me. (a) I do not send attachments, and (b) people tend to open
and read what I do send out and (c) I do not want to see any guys get
hurt or their computers garbaged out and *think* it was on account of
me. Most readers here are 'far too sophisticated' and knowledgeable to
fall for the 'read this atttachment' gag any longer. I was NOT saying 
what I did because it was some surprise to me; the difficulty is I see
many, many guys using computers who do not have the brains that God
gave a goose. No offense intended, really none, but picture, if you
will some young guy who saved up his money, or got some money for his
birthday or Christmas and went out and bought his very first computer 
in the last few months. Now he or she is learning how to use email and
the internet. Forget about the more esoteric aspects of networking;
just learning how to send/receive email from friends and family. First
day the new email account is turned on, a hundred pieces of spam with 
a virus or two thrown in. Or consider my mother for example: she has
had her Walmart-style Mail Station for about a year now and *still*
almost has a heart attack each day when she goes to read her email. 
'mailstation.com' is an alias which points at Earthlink. At one point
she was actually trying to write back to all the spammers asking them
'how did my email address get on your list?' and trying to be cordial
and polite in getting removed. People like her and the newer, inexper-
ienced guys just getting started are the ones I am concerned about. 
Its a rotten time to be getting into computers for the first time.  PAT]

------------------------------

From: a_user2000@yahoo.com (Justin Time)
Subject: Re: Factory Flaws Yield Headaches For Chip Makers
Date: 23 Apr 2004 05:38:22 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (Lisa Hancock) wrote in message
news:<telecom23.202.8@telecom-digest.org>:

> Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> wrote 

>> SAN FRANCISCO, April 21 (Reuters) - For chip makers, problems on the
>> factory floor are increasingly turning into big headaches in the
>> executive suite.  Some of the world's biggest chip makers have lost
>> both money and time straightening out the extraordinarily complex
>> process of turning microchip designs and discs of silicon into
>> working electronics.

> This is nothing new and goes back 55 years.

> When IBM began building electronic computers using radio tubes,
> they found that minute imperfections -- that weren't noticed in
> radio usage -- resulted in errors in computing.  IBM worked hard
> to define requirements for computer tubes and get tube makers
> to mfr them per those specs.

> It took at least ten years after the invention of the transistor to
> get them into computers for the reasons above.  Until that point,
> transistors cost _more_ than tubes despite being simpler and smaller.
> Making quality transistors in volume was a very difficult challenge.

> For every new solid state technology, manufacturing in volume was
> tough.  IBM and others spent millions building new plants, and
> sometimes stuff still failed.  IBM's S/360, introduced 40 years ago
> and used early integrated circuitry, was delayed on account of
> component problems.

Ahhh -- I thought they had problems with the units so their field
engineers could subsist on a diet of Coca-Cola and Toastee-Cheese
crackers while the drove from site to site in the new Cadillacs they
bought with their overtime!

My wife still marvels at how I could take a phone call at 3:00 in the
morning and start asking the person what lights were on, what switches
were in what position and other basic (at that time) troubleshooting
questions when I had just gotten to bed an hour before.  But Cadillacs
fail -- almost as fast as the body subsisting on the "Field Engineer's
Lunch."  Believe me -- dial tone is easier on the body.

Rodgers Platt

------------------------------

From: a_user2000@yahoo.com (Justin Time)
Subject: Re: FCC Rejects AT&T VOIP Petition
Date: 23 Apr 2004 05:40:58 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


VOIP News <voip news> wrote in message
news:<telecom23.202.2@telecom-digest.org>:

> http://www.itworld.com/Man/2697/040422fccatt/

> IDG News Service 4/22/04

> Grant Gross, IDG News Service, Washington Bureau 

> The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has rejected a
> petition from AT&T Corp. that would have allowed the company to avoid
> paying its telecommunications competitors access charges on telephone
> calls partly carried on IP (Internet Protocol) networks.

> Late Wednesday, the FCC announced its decision that traditional
> telephone calls that start and end on the public switched telephone
> network (PSTN), but are carried part of the time on AT&T's Internet
> backbone, are classified as telecommunications service. Those calls
> are subject to the access charges that are exchanged when a telephone
> call made through one carrier ends on another carrier's network.

> AT&T had asked the FCC for clarification on whether these phone calls
> should be classified as information services, like most other
> Internet-based traffic, and free from most FCC regulation. In
> February, the FCC decided that another voice over IP (VOIP) service,
> Free World Dialup, was exempt from most telecommunications
> regulations. Free World Dialup, a free service, allows members to talk
> to each other through software installed on their computers. The
> service does not allow members to place voice calls to nonmembers.

> But the FCC said AT&T's service fit squarely into the definitions of a
> telecommunications service because the phone calls start and end on
> the PSTN. "Today's decision is correctly decided on very narrow
> grounds," FCC Chairman Michael Powell said in a statement "A
> straightforward application of existing law places the long distance
> telephone service, as it is factually described by AT&T, squarely in
> the category of a telecommunications service."

> Full story at:
> http://www.itworld.com/Man/2697/040422fccatt/

Hmmm -- If I have a DSL circuit connected to Vonage or one of the
others, would they then be in the telecommunications business as the
beginning and end of the call travel over the PSTN?


Rodgers Platt

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:54:37 +0400
From: Editor <editor@pressreleasenetwork.com>
Subject: Every Business In The World Will Soon Be Webcasting Says


http://www.pressreleasenetwork.com
				
Every Business In The World Will Soon Be Webcasting Says Edmonton-Based 
Webcast Leader Worldprofit, Inc.

Alberta, Canada - April 23, 2004 (PRN): Consider this. Your business
has multiple locations. You want to keep in touch with your employees
but the travel is expensive, time-consuming and exhausting.

Solution? Webcast.

Sit down at your computer and deliver your remarks live and in living
color to everyone you need to speak to.

Cost for them to attend? Nothing!

How about this? You're a consultant, trainer, author and deliver
programs and services. Since 9/11 you've watched your markets dry up
because people don't want to fly and aren't attending so many
conferences. How do you reach your prospects? Easy! You webcast --
without ever leaving your home or office!

Got a product or service? Growing a network marketing organization?
Need to speak regularly with prospects, customers, decision makers?

Then sit down at your computer and WEBCAST.

Webcasting, programs delivered online, is the next huge wave from the
Internet. And Worldprofit, Inc. at www.worldprofit.com is the hands
down industry leader.

Worldprofit, Inc. is the first to offer a completely web based online
conference system that requires no specialized equipment, downloads,
or sophisticated technical knowledge to set-up, use and
operate. Worldprofit's LIVE Seminar and Conference Center allows for
the delivery of full video presentations accessible by simply
accessing a web site address.

Now speakers on any subject, in any business, can talk live with
incredibly clear audio and video to hundreds of participants anywhere
in the world!  Got customers in China, Bolivia, Germany or anywhere
else? You can talk to them LIVE 24 hours a day, and it never costs
them a penny!

The only equipment required by the speaker is a web camera (about $50)
and an Internet connection. The audience requires only an Internet
connection.  Speakers see and hear the LIVE or recorded presentations
from the comfort of their home or office.

This cutting-edge technology allows for the delivery of formal or
informal presentations complete with audience interaction, guest
speakers, and Slide Shows. The technology also allows the business or
organization to offer seminars free to participants or as paid events.

Businesses worldwide are applauding this astonishing, years-ahead-of-
the-pack technology developed in Alberta - based Worldprofit, Inc. by
Director of Technology George Kosch, as the way all business will be
conducted online in the future! It's easy to see why.

Earlier versions of webcast conferencing required long downloads,
special equipment installations, and then delivered only mediocre and
choppy reception.  Worldprofit's system is being heralded as
incredibly easy to use even by non-techies and astounding in the
quality of the presentations.  Bandwidth issues were also a problem in
previous attempts at webcasting, but Worldprofit's LIVE Seminar and
Conference Studio uses technology that virtually eliminates the
bandwidth issues of the past. Even VOICE OVER IP technology cannot
compete with the simplicity and superior results of Worldprofit's LIVE
Seminar and Conference system.

Selling ANY product, service, business opportunity?  Got distributors
or employees in multiple locations?  Anxious to connect with prospects
and customers worldwide?  Running a nonprofit organization with donors
and supporters you'd like to communicate with?

These are all common applications for Worldprofit's superior LIVE Seminar 
and Conference system.

For an interview with George Kosch, the software developer, call (780) 
444-7477 ext 222, or email customerservice@worldprofit.com

To register for the next live event and see a LIVE demonstration go to: 
http://worldprofit.com/webcast/register

For more information, contact:

George Kosch
Director of Technology
Worldprofit Inc.
17505  107 Ave, #205
Edmonton, AB. T5S 1E5
Tel: 780-444-7477
Fax: 780-483-8672
Email: customerservice@worldprofit.com
http://www.worldprofit.com

Information from Press Release Network may be freely distributed to any 
publication. Wherever applicable, please cite Press Release Network as the 
news source.

DISCLAIMER: The content of each press release is the responsibility of
the publishing organization and is not vetted or approved by Press
Release Network prior to publication. Press Release Network is not
liable directly or indirectly for any direct or consequential loss,
damage or expense resulting from the material disseminated and
published on the site.  Subscribers are advised to check the accuracy
of all press releases and to obtain their own professional advice in
relation to such information.

editor@pressreleasenetwork.com
http://www.pressreleasenetwork.com

------------------------------

From: sdgreymont@yahoo.com (Scott)
Subject: Re: VoIP Problem With Alcatel OmniPCX 4400
Date: 23 Apr 2004 05:56:34 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


We are experiencing a similar issue where the end party using a VOIP
phone cannot hear the second party.  Have you had any success on this
problem?

------------------------------

From: Jabriol@excite.com (JaBrIoL)
Subject: Model 820 Control Unit
Date: 23 Apr 2004 06:33:36 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


All,

Good morning,

I have a Model 820 control Unit. I've notice that I can not use a
power module 338E for the Unit that I have. It only works with the
power module 338A.

I need a Control Unit that works with the 338E.

Does anyone know the comcode number for the Control Unit that function
with the 338E. Does anyone have it?

------------------------------

From: Keith <NOkmonSPAM@adelphia.net>
Subject: Re: Toll Free (1-800) Line ANI Delivery Question
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:39:42 -0400


news.sbcglobal.net <myreceiver@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:telecom23.199.4@telecom-digest.org:

> Is it true that ANI is a guarantee service for the PRI 800 service
> line and ANI cannot be blocked?

I can't help you on the bulk of your question, but I can answer this
part.

In most cases, ANI should be guaranteed, and should work, but there
are some exceptions.  There are(were?) ways to force an ANI failure.
One method is to have an operator place the 800 call for you.  Dial
your local operator, or long distance operator, and ask her to place
the call for you.  It seems that since the call apparently originates
from her position, ANI simply isn't forwarded at all, or in some cases
only the area code is transmitted.

This can be tested with an 800 ANI verification service.

Keith

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: But the operator always sees *your*
number, and just as with calls to '911' which go through the operator
(who does not dial '911' usually but the seven-digit number 911
translates into [i.e. in Chicago for example, '911' = 312-787-0000])
the operator *theoretically* announces calls (to 911 or 800-whatever)
by passing the calling number to the called party. I say 'theoreticlly*
because many operators are lazy; others are too busy to hold up the
calling party's line for a ring-back as needed. Keith, your system
will work as long as the operator is not an eager-beaver perfectionist, 
which most of them are not. Most do not even know how to put a 'shoe'
on the line to keep it 'up' until they decide to release it.   PAT]

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:38:03 -0400
Subject: Motorola Introduces New Cable Modems Designed for Wireless
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.motorola.com/mediacenter/news/detail/0,,4117_3474_23,00.html

Motorola Introduces New Cable Modems Designed for Wireless Home
Networking and Internet Telephony

Motorola extends its market leadership in the broadband-powered
connected home with two new products for customers worldwide.

HORSHAM, Pa., 22 April 2004 Motorola, Inc. (NYSE: MOT) today unveiled
two powerful new cable modems for the connected home,  the Motorola 
SBV5120 and the Motorola SBG940. Both products are compliant
with the latest industry standards and extend the feature set of the
company's proven platform for IP services, integrating capabilities
such as voice-over-IP (VoIP) telephony or wireless home networking.

The Motorola SBV5120 'Integrated Solution for Telephony and Data':

The Motorola SBV5120 is the newest member of Motorola's family of
telephony cable modems, providing an integrated solution for voice
telephony services and high-speed Internet access. The product
combines a multimedia telephony adapter with a PacketCableTM-compliant
cable modem which was recently certified for DOCSISŪ 2.0 and 1.1
(CW28), and Euro-DOCSIS 2.0.

The Motorola SBV5120 allows consumers to use their existing home
telephone wiring to power two lines of voice service, and supports all
class features including:

Basic call functionality 
Three-way calling 
Caller ID 
Call forwarding 
Voicemail messaging 
Optional battery back-up

The Motorola SBG940 'Simplifying Wireless Home Networks'

The Motorola SBG940 simplifies the process of building a wireless home
network. By bringing together two of Motorola's inherent strengths
its worldwide leadership in wireless communications and its
technology expertise in building broadband networks,  the Motorola
SBG940 saves consumers from the headache of integrating multiple
devices when building a robust home network.

The SBG940 also offers enhanced features, including:

Integrated 802.11g Wireless Access Point
Integrated DOCSIS 2.0-certified / Euro-DOCSIS 2.0-certified Cable Modem
Recently CableHome 1.0 certified (CW28)
Integrated four port 10/100 Ethernet Switch
Integrated Advanced firewall protection
USB port for a PC connection

Motorola will demonstrate DOCSIS 2.0-certified versions of these
products at the NCTA 2004 trade show (2-5 May, New Orleans, Ernest
N. Morial Convention Center) at the company's booth #3323. In
addition, Motorola's wireless gateway technology is being used at
NCTA to enable wireless Internet access in the shows designated
Wi-Fi area.

The company will also demonstrate Euro-DOCSIS 2.0-certified versions
of these products, the SBV5120E and SBG940E at ANGA Cable
2004, (11-13 May 2004, Kln, Germany) at Motorola stand B4, Hall
13.1.

How to Distribute VoIP Throughout a Home:
http://michigantelephone.mi.org/distribute.html

If you live in Michigan, subscribe to the MI-Telecom group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MI-Telecom/

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 11:41:12 -0400
Subject: China VOIP Operator Could Face Years in Jail
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.idg.com.hk/cw/readstory.asp?aid=20040423002

By Martyn Williams
IDG News Service, Tokyo Bureau
 
A man suspected of managing an illegal voice-over-IP (VOIP) telephone
service in China faces a prison sentence of at least five years if
convicted, according to a China Daily report.

The man, identified only by his surname Zou [cq] and home town of
Qingdao in eastern China, was arrested in March this year after police
and telecommunication officials found a number of facilities including
an illegal Internet gateway, said the report. The police investigation
apparently began in February when Zou was advertising his cheaper call
service to foreign companies, it said.
 
Full story at:
http://www.idg.com.hk/cw/readstory.asp?aid=20040423002

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:04:01 -0400
Subject: Jeff Pulver's Blog: IP-MoU: Getting Started
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://192.246.69.231/jeff/personal/index.html

The Jeff Pulver Blog
Notes, comments and observations 
April 23, 2004 
IP-MoU: Getting Started

The IP-MoU ["Internet Protocol Memorandum of Understanding"] website
<http://www.ip-mou.org/> launched earlier this week and the momentum
surrounding this activity is starting to grow.

The IP-MoU is an international consortium of IP-based service and
application providers intent on quickly realizing the promise of
interconnecting ubiquitous IP communications. The IP-MoU will adopt
and implement common principles designed to promote three primary
objectives:

Promote the interoperability, interconnection and ubiquity of IP-based
service and applications.

Establish processes to ensure that IP-based services and applications
comply with local, national and international laws and social
objectives such as: Emergency Response; Law enforcement; Access by
persons with disabilities.

Ensure that consumers worldwide are assured basic rights as users of
IP communications:

- Freedom to Access Content: Consumers should have access to their
  choice of legal content;

- Freedom to Use Applications: Consumers should be able to run
  applications of their choice;

- Freedom to Attach Personal Devices: Consumers should be permitted to
  attach any devices they choose to the connection in their homes;

- Freedom to Obtain Service Plan Information: Consumers should receive
  meaningful information regarding their service plans; and Protection
  of Consumer Privacy: Consumers should know that their personal
  information is safeguarded, except to the extent necessary to abide by
  law enforcement obligations.

The next meeting will be taking place on April 26th.

Posted by jeff at 07:19 AM

The Jeff Pulver Blog:
http://192.246.69.231/jeff/personal/index.html

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************


   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. If you donate at least fifty dollars
per year we will send you our two-CD set of the entire Telecom
Archives; this is every word published in this Digest since our
beginning in 1981.

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #203
******************************
