From editor@telecom-digest.org Wed Mar 31 00:00:35 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p2/8.11.3) id i2V50Y616168;
	Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:00:35 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:00:35 -0500 (EST)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200403310500.i2V50Y616168@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #152

TELECOM Digest     Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:59:00 EST    Volume 23 : Issue 152

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Manchester, UK Exchange Fire (Jim Burks)  <<================
    More Fire News from Manchester, UK Fire (TELECOM Editor) <<==========
    Re: Western Union Clocks (Wesrock@aol.com)
    Cellular Tower Leases (Roy)
    Re: HDTV - Looking at an All-Digital World (jmayson@nyx.net)
    San Francisco ballpark becomes WiFi Internet hub (Monty Solomon)
    Re: "Virtual" Call Forwarding (Sammy@nospam.biz)
    Re: A Better Way To Squelch Spam? (jmayson@nyx.net)
    VOIP Seeks Its FCC Level (VOIP News)
    Vonage Sues AT&T for Trademark Infringement (VOIP News)
    VoIP Reaches Out, Wirelessly (VOIP News)
    SPA-3000 Unveiled by Sipura Technology at the Spring VON (VOIP News)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Jim Burks <jbburks@hotmail.com>
Subject: Manchester, UK Exchange Fire
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 03:14:47 GMT
Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com


A fire damaged a major BT cable tunnel in central Manchester, UK early
Monday morning. This seems to be their equivalent of the Hinsdale, IL
fire of the '80s in the US (see TELECOM Digest archives for
details). Significant disruption of the phone network at least 100
miles from Manchester in some areas. Estimates are 150,000 lines
affected, including the city ambulance dispatch radios, a number of
call centres and web hosting centres.

My company's high capacity leased lines in the area are still down as of
Tuesday evening.

News links:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/5/36645.html
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/5/36652.html
http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/news/stories/Detail_LinkStory=85790.html
http://www.cybertrn.demon.co.uk/guardian/

Jim Burks
Collierville, TN
jburks2 (et) midsouth.rr.com

------------------------------

From: Editor <ptownson@telecom-digest.org
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:00:00
Subject: More Fire Details from Manchester


   EMERGENCY   services,  homes  and  businesses  were  hit  after  an
   underground fire in Manchester city centre cut 130,000 phone lines.
   The  blaze,  in  a  tunnel  by  the  junction  of George Street and
   Princess  Street,  destroyed cables connected to the national phone
   network.

   Traffic  was  at  a standstill in parts of the city centre as roads
   were closed so that the fire could be tackled.
   Greater  Manchester  Ambulance Service control centre was forced to
   rely on mobile phones to contact emergency crews.

   A  spokeswoman  for  the  service  said  they  were  under "extreme
   pressure"  because  of  the disruption and she urged people to only
   dial 999 in a real emergency.
   People  in parts of Greater Manchester, Cheshire, the High Peak and
   Derbyshire were unable to phone police. Homes and businesses across
   the region were also hit by the network damage.
   The  impact  was felt across the country as BT re-routed calls away
   from the damaged part of the network.

   The  fire,  which  started  at 3.20am, was brought under control by
   9am.
   The  most  damage  was  caused  to phone lines which have the codes
   0161-200 and 0161-244, which are mainly city centre numbers.
   This  made  it impossible for people with such numbers to call each
   other,  although  calls  to  those  numbers  from  elsewhere in the
   country might be possible.

   Patrols

   The  cables damaged form a central part of the network, which feeds
   regional  exchanges  in  places  such  as  Salford,  Stockport  and
   Cheshire.  As  a  result,  many  numbers  in  these  areas found it
   impossible  to  make  calls this morning. The problem also extended
   into   the   High   Peak   and  Derbyshire,  where  police  mounted
   high-visibility  patrols  and  drafted in extra officers from other
   areas to give support.

   The  affected areas there are believed to be Buxton, Whaley Bridge,
   Chapel-en-le-Frith, Glossop, New Mills, Tideswell and Hartington.
   BT  engineers  were  unclear  about the exact nature of the fire as
   they waited to hear more details from the fire brigade.
   A  BT  spokesman  said:  "We  have 130,000 homes and business whose
   numbers  are affected and we have very widespread disruption to the
   phone  network  in  and  around  Manchester.  But there is also the
   problem  of  having to reroute all calls away from the damaged part
   of the network.

   "It  is  like  trying to put all the traffic on one motorway and we
   have  very severe congestion. At this stage we cannot sway how long
   it will take to put right, as it is difficult to determine just how
   bad the damage is.

   Problems were reported in Cheshire, with people on the east side of
   the county unable to phone police on landlines.
   A fire brigade spokesman said that the source of the fire seemed to
   be  in  a  tunnel  about  50 metres from the George Street-Princess
   Street  junction.  It  is  not  being  treated as suspicious as the
   source of the fire is almost impossible for anyone to reach.
   The fire spokesman said: "It is not a huge fire but it is in a very
   difficult place to reach. It seems that there has been some sort of
   electrical  problem that has affected the cabling but it has been a
   question of pinpointing the exact location and then reaching it.

   "We  have  had  more than 50 firefighters using breathing apparatus
   who  have  had  to  gain access at George Street and Chapel Street.
   They've  then  had  to inch their way along the tunnel to where the
   fire is. The fire is in a tunnel 30 metres below ground."

   The  BT  cable  fire  has  disrupted some Greater Manchester Weekly
   Newspapers  phone  lines. The following emergency numbers have been
   set  up - Tameside Advertiser editorial 07930 901090; Estate Agents
   07919  300  008  or 07919 300 040; Advertising Agencies - 07766 441
   528 or 07799 132 496.


                    ---------------------------

   An  underground  blaze in Manchester city centre damaged BT cables,
   leaving  homes  and  companies  without  phone  lines  and  hitting
   emergency services.

   BT  engineers  were  only  allowed into the tunnel, 30 metres below
   ground  by  the junction of George Street and Princess Street, just
   before midnight.

   They  were  given  the go-ahead after firefighters took air samples
   which  showed  it  was  safe  for  them  to enter without breathing
   apparatus.

   A  team of 34 engineers, escorted by firefighters, has been working
   throughout  the  night  to  try  to  repair  damage  and  reconnect
   customers.

   Reconnected

   They  can only go down in groups of up to 20 because of the limited
   space  in  the tunnel. It is expected to be days and possibly weeks
   before everyone is reconnected to the national phone network.

   BT  today  issued  200  mobile  phones  to  people  cut  off and in
   desperate need to communicate.

   A  spokesman  said:  "We are working with social services to ensure
   they  are  given  to  those people who need them most. Top priority
   will  be  given  to people who are on kidney dialysis, the sick and
   the housebound."

   BT has also set up banks of mobile pay phone kiosks at Macclesfield
   Road, Prestbury, and Jordan Gate, Macclesfield, for customers whose
   home phone lines are down.

   There  was  traffic  chaos  yesterday  as roads were shut while the
   tunnel  fire  was  dealt  with.  Metrolink  was  also  affected and
   commuters suffered severe delays.

   Today,  Metrolink  was  only  running  half  the number of trams it
   should be, with services every 12 minutes instead of six.

   Mobile phones

   Consultant,  Chris  Tulloch,  who advises the government and banks,
   insisted  the  crisis  had  been  an  "accident waiting to happen''
   because of the reliance on telecommunications.

   Greater  Manchester Police are keeping their stations at Longsight,
   Grey Mare Lane, Collyhurst, Elizabeth Slinger Road, Ashton, Salford
   Crescent,  Stockport,  Oldham,  Stalybridge,  Hazel Grove, Brownley
   Road,  Cheadle Hulme, Marple and Sale open to the public 24 hours a
   day to make it easier for people to contact them.

   Ambulance  and  police  stations  have had to rely on mobile phones
   since yesterday to keep in touch with colleagues.

   The  ambulance  service  is  urging  people  to only dial 999 in an
   emergency.

   In  Derbyshire,  70 extra police were put on patrol and all special
   constables  were  called in as all landlines and mobile phones were
   not working in Buxton and surrounding areas.

   Millions

   More  than  30  banks  in the city centre had to close as they were
   faced  with  computers which did not work. Credit card transactions
   were frozen, cashpoints failed and store cards could not be used in
   shops.

   At the BBC in Oxford Road 800 staff were without working phones.
   The  collapse  of  the  telephone network will have cost businesses
   millions of pounds and Manchester Chamber of Commerce has predicted
   a  rash  of  compensation  claims.  Manchester  is  regarded as the
   country's call centre capital.

   A  BT  spokesman  said it would consider the issue of compensation.
   But he stressed the priority was to repair the damaged cables which
   caused then chaos.

   By  late yesterday, the worst affected areas had been identified as
   south  and  east  Manchester,  Blackfriars, Wythenshawe, Stockport,
   Tameside,  east Cheshire and areas off the A6 in Derbyshire such as
   New Mills and Chapel-en-le-Frith.

   The cause of the chaos is thought to be an electrical fault.

   Were you affected by the network collapse? Let us know.


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S.  Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, in this instance, Manchester Guardian.

For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

------------------------------

From: Wesrock@aol.com
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 19:48:11 EST
Subject: Re: Western Union Clocks


In a message dated Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:13:47 -0600, J Kelly
<jkelly@newsguy.com> writes:

> Participating PBS stations transmit the time signal on Line 21 of the
> Vertical Blanking Interval.  

> My Sony VCR sets itself withing about 5 minutes.  I doesn't make the
> DST changes until I cycle the power for some reason.

      My (Panasonic) doesn't make any changes until you cycle the
power.  A couple of months ago my power was off for a time and when it
came back on it was totally confused.  Finally I got the manual out
and discovered that was document ... except it seemed to me the power
going off and then coming back on at some later time *was* cycling the
power.

      I cycled the power off and on manually and the time came up very
promptly.


Wes Leatherock
wesrock@aol.com

------------------------------

From: roy.inc@verizon.net (Roy)
Subject: Cellular Tower Leases
Date: 30 Mar 2004 17:27:06 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com


I want to buy cellular tower leases, is there a directory of cell
tower lease owners?  Thanks.

------------------------------

From: jmayson@nyx.net
Subject: Re: HDTV - Looking at an All-Digital World
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 01:53:18 GMT
Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com


> The digital television (DTV) transition is moving into more American
> homes via over-the-air broadcasting, cable TV, satellite and other
> formats. Nearly 7 million U.S. households have bought digital TV
> monitors and other display devices to take advantage of this
> opportunity. Another 11 million homes are expected to buy DTV
> equipment this year, and the number will grow to about 34 million
> households by the end of 2006. To discuss the opportunities and
> challenges, Vision spoke with a true DTV pioneer, Peter Fannon, vice
> president, technology policy and regulatory affairs,
> Panasonic/Matsushita Electric Corp. of America.

I just don't get it.  They expect Americans to pay a steep price for
clearer mind-numbing crap?

Quoting from TurnOffYourTV.com:

"The whole point of DTV and HDTV (high definition television) is to
offer a clearer TV signal -- at a price. And the price will be steep
in two ways: First, the actual cost to the consumer for the new DTV
products. And second, the cost to the environment as thousands of
perfectly useable televisions are rendered useless and placed in trash
heaps. The point of the TurnOffYourTV.com web site is for people to
unplug from the tube, get rid of their television sets and replace
them with books, exercise and rewarding interpersonal activities --
not to trash the television and replace it with a more expensive one."

http://www.turnoffyourtv.com/commentary/digitaltv/digitaltv.html

I'd just as soon let all of the analog stations go dark and forget the
medium ever existed.  But I'm the only one in my house who has this
opinion.  :-/


John Mayson <jmayson@nyx.net>
Austin, Texas, USA

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 21:00:34 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: San Francisco Ballpark Becomes WiFi Internet Hub


SAN FRANCISCO, March 30 (Reuters) - The old ballgame is
getting some new technology.

Baseball fans bored by the slow pace of a game or wanting more
statistics and information will be able to connect computer devices
via wireless computer networking, or WiFi, at San Francisco Giants
home games this year, the team announced on Tuesday. The Giants'
stadium is, after all, called SBC Park, for telecommunications giant
SBC Communications Inc.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=40967313

------------------------------

From: Sammy@nospam.biz
Subject: Re: "Virtual" Call Forwarding
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 18:14:54 -0800
Organization: Cox Communications


_William_ wrote:

> Question:
> =================

> Does anyone know of a company that allows me to "port" (using the new
> number portability capabilities) my existing landline phone number to
> them and then allows me to forward that to a different number without
> having to maintain an actual phoneline.

Interesting question.

The LECs have offered a feature since the early 1980s called "Remote
Call Forwarding," which is only a logical presence in an area where
you want a local presence.  But, that would mean having a local number
in the remote area forwarded to your physical number.

Since number porting is local, I doubt what you are seeking would fall
under the local number portability rules.

------------------------------

From: jmayson@nyx.net
Subject: Re: A Better Way To Squelch Spam?
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 02:01:12 GMT
Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com


> Here's a way to do it.  Let anybody issue money stamps.  Let the
> issuer keep the money.  Let them use the money to build the necessary
> server infrastructure, and if it's profitable, fine.  A "stampette"
> is, in effect, a one-time certificate, and the issuer is a certificate
> authority whose certificates can't be cached.  I'm estimating a price
> of few thousand stampettes per dollar.

I shouldn't have to pay even a penny because of spammers.  I believe
any system constructed to "stop spam" will get bypassed and abused.  I
don't understand why Internet users can't take it upon themselves to
stop spam.  I figure if *I* can do it, anyone can.


John Mayson <jmayson@nyx.net>
Austin, Texas, USA

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:51:13 -0500
Subject: VOIP Seeks Its FCC Level
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?site=lightreading&doc_id=50174

The regulatory status of voice over IP (VOIP) is still undecided, even
after one service's victory with the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC), according to speakers at the Voice Over the Net (VON)
conference.

Kicking off a day-long session [ed. note: a mighty long session, that]
on policy and regulation, speakers reiterated the argument that VOIP
is fundamentally different from telephone service and should be
regulated differently.

The FCC has agreed -- for now. VOIP service Free World Dialup (FWD)
was granted a February petition to be considered a data service rather
than a telecommunications service (see VOIP to Star at FCC ). That
puts FWD, and anything looking just like it, under Title I regulation
for information services, as opposed to the more restrictive Title II
for telephone service. (FWD is offered by Pulver.com, the same company
that organizes VON).

But that's no reason for proponents of easily accessible VOIP to
celebrate yet, said Blair Levin, managing director of Legg Mason
Inc. who was chief of staff to former FCC commissioner Reed Hundt.

Full story at:

http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?site=lightreading&doc_id=50174

----------------------------------------
How to Distribute VoIP Throughout a Home:
http://michigantelephone.mi.org/distribute.html

If you live in Michigan, subscribe to the MI-Telecom group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MI-Telecom/

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:04:57 -0500
Subject: Vonage Sues AT&T for Trademark Infringement
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


My comments follow the excerpt ...

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/business/national/8309500.htm

By Martha McKay, The Record, Hackensack, N.J. Knight Ridder/Tribune
Business News

Mar. 30 - Vonage says AT&T is taking advantage.

The Edison-based Internet telephone start-up claims AT&T stepped on
its cyber-turf when AT&T named its new Internet phone service
"CallVantage" and registered some Web site names that sound close to
Vonage's name.

Vonage makes its claims in a lawsuit filed last week in U.S. District
Court in Trenton. The suit accuses AT&T of trademark infringement,
among other things.

"It's about the brand name," said Vonage spokeswoman Brooke
Schulz. "We're concerned that our brand is being infringed upon and
we're concerned there will be confusion in the marketplace."

AT&T introduced "CallVantage," a service similar to Vonage's broadband
phone service, in December and began selling service in New Jersey and
Texas this month.

AT&T chose the name CallVantage "with the intent of causing confusion,
mistake, and deception as to the source of its products and services,
and with the intent to present its products and services as emanating
from, or being associated with, Vonage," the lawsuit said.

AT&T spokesman Gary Morgenstern would not comment on the case except
to say: "We think the lawsuit is totally without merit and we think
we'll prevail in court."  

Vonage's additional claim against AT&T involves the practice
by companies of purchasing the rights to Web site domain names with
similar spellings to their own. Experts say companies may do this to
ensure that potential customers who incorrectly type a Web site name
will either be redirected to the correct site, or get an error
message.

Full story at:

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/business/national/8309500.htm

Comment: First the standard disclaimer - I am not a lawyer, and what
follows is my personal opinion only.  Having said that, and
disregarding the domain name issue for the moment, on the face of it
this appears to be one of the dumbest trademark infringement lawsuits
I've ever heard of.  Not only is there very little similarity between
"Vonage" and "CallVantage", but the folks at Vonage surely must
realize that AT&T is not some small company that can be easily bullied
into changing their product's name.

I can think of a lot of company names that are a lot more similar than
this.  For example, first there was VoicePulse, then a few weeks
later, VoiceGlo.  There is a company called Broadvox, and more
recently a company called Broadvoice (those last two are so similar
that someone commented that maybe one of them should buy a blimp, so
we can tell them apart!).  But, in my opinion, the only way someone
could confuse "CallVantage" with "Vonage" is if they were really drunk
or something.

Now, the practice of purchasing a misspelled version of a competitor's
trade name is probably much more questionable, and if that were the
sole issue I would not be making these comments.  But somehow, I
really doubt that Vonage is going to be able to force AT&T to change
its product's name.

(For those outside the U.S. who may not understand the blimp reference
 -- there are two U.S. tire manufacturers that have had similar names
for decades.  One, Goodyear, has a blimp (actually I think more than
one) that's often used for aerial video shots at sporting events,
etc., and is probably one of the more recognized icons of the
advertising world.  The other one, Goodrich, once ran an advertising
campaign that mentioned the blimp and said, "We're the OTHER guys.")

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:19:58 -0500
Subject: VoIP Reaches Out, Wirelessly
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1557451,00.asp

By Sebastian Rupley 

The talk at the VON (Voice On the Net) conference this week in Silicon
Valley is not just about Voice over IP (VoIP) technology, but the
coming convergence of Wi-Fi wireless LAN technology and VoIP
services. That melding is already leading to the development of new
products and services, with many more expected later this year.

VoIP is already in the middle of a major comeback, and most observers
think that's because widespread broadband adoption and other more
reliable high-data-rate technologies have finally made sound quality
and ease of use good enough for phone calls placed over the
Internet. VoIP is saving businesses and consumers money, and is also
raising sticky issues, such as whether the Federal Communications
Commission should levy tariffs on VoIP players. According to Arizona
research firm In-Stat/MDR, over 5 million people will subscribe to
VoIP services by 2007 five times more than there were in 2002, a
trend which could represent a trouble spot for other kinds of
telecommunications companies.

Full story at:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1557451,00.asp

------------------------------

From: VOIP News <voip news>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:17:01 -0500
Subject: SPA-3000 Unveiled by Sipura Technology at the Spring VON
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.sipura.com/Documents/SipuraPressRelease005.pdf

SPA-3000 Unveiled by Sipura Technology at the Spring VON Conference

VoIP Phone Adapter + PSTN Gateway Functionality Combines Advanced
Media Gateway with Sophisticated Call Routing and Authentication in an
Ultra Compact Design

SAN JOSE, CA. March 30, 2004 Expanding on the phenomenally successful
SPA-2000 and the just released SPA-1000 Voice over IP telephone
adapters, the SPA-3000 continues to deliver on Sipura Technology's
mission to provide market leading, best-in-class VoIP end points
providing freedom and opportunity to service providers and end users.

The SPA-3000 will feature VoIP adapter functionality found in the
SPA-2000 and SPA-1000 with the additional benefit of an integral
connection for legacy telephone network hop-on, hop-off
applications.  SPA-3000 users will be able to leverage their broadband
phone service connections more than ever by automatically routing
local calls from cell phones and land lines to a VoIP service provider
and vice versa.

A typical user calling from a land line or mobile phone will be able
to reduce and even eliminate international and long distance telephone
charges by first calling their SPA-3000 via a local phone number or by
using a telephone connected directly to the unit. The advanced
authentication and call routing intelligence programmed into the
SPA-3000 will connect the caller via the Internet to the far end
destination with security and ease.

At the far end, calls can be answered immediately or further processed
as a local call to any legacy land line or mobile phone allowed by the
SPA-3000 dial plan. By combining the all features and
functionality of a Sipura phone adapter with the power of a land line
connection, the SPA-3000 is a welcome addition to our growing line of
voice over IP endpoints, said Jan Fandrianto, Sipura president and
CEO.

The SPA-3000 may also be used for life line applications. For example,
depending on the service provider's set-up, callers who dial 911 can
be automatically routed via the IP or legacy telephone network.  If
power is lost to the unit or the VoIP service is down, calls will
still be sent to a traditional carrier via the FXO interface. Sipura
is currently working with several service providers to further define
requirements for life line support in products such as the SPA-3000.

In addition to the hundreds of programmable features available with
VoIP phone adapter functionality, the SPA-3000 will provide specific
features to allow calls to be routed to and from the FXO
interface. Some of the features available on the SPA-3000 include:

- Multiple, Configurable Dial Plans Activated for Individual or Groups
  of Users

- Single and Dual Stage Dialing
- FXO / VoIP Line Sharing

The SPA-3000 will be available in North America in May 2004, from
Internet telephony service providers and authorized Sipura Technology
distributors. Beginning in April, a paid beta and evaluation program
will be offered to customers via Sipura Technology's web site. The
list price of the SPA-3000 is $169.95

About Sipura Technology:

Sipura Technology, Inc., located in San Jose, California, delivers
products that are economically and functionally designed for
large-scale global Voice over IP deployments. By providing exceptional
value, Sipura Technology offers customers high quality products that
support rapid service adoption with secure and sustainable growth. Web
address: http://www.sipura.com

Contact: Name: Sherman Scholten Company: Sipura Technology Phone:
(408) 572-5674 Email: sherman@sipura.com ###

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. If you donate at least fifty dollars
per year we will send you our two-CD set of the entire Telecom
Archives; this is every word published in this Digest since our
beginning in 1981.

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #152
******************************
