From editor@telecom-digest.org Fri Mar 26 19:38:50 2004
Received: (from ptownson@localhost)
	by massis.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.6p2/8.11.3) id i2R0coH02932;
	Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:38:50 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:38:50 -0500 (EST)
From: editor@telecom-digest.org
Message-Id: <200403270038.i2R0coH02932@massis.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: massis.lcs.mit.edu: ptownson set sender to editor@telecom-digest.org using -f
To: ptownson
Approved: patsnewlist
Subject: TELECOM Digest V23 #142

TELECOM Digest     Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:39:00 EST    Volume 23 : Issue 142

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    AT&T Steps Up Biz VoIP Activities (VOIP News)
    FCC Chief Wants 'Light Regulatory Touch' on VOIP (VOIP News)
    Wi-Fi and VoIP: Do Them Together or Not at All (VOIP News)
    VoIP Related Topics in Communications Law Bulletin (VOIP News)
    Pulver Hopes .tel Will Promote ENUM, VoIP (VOIP News)
    Has Covad Changed The VoIP Rules? (VOIP News)
    Re: 110 V Cord and USB Cable Standards? (Johnnie Leung)
    Re: 110 V Cord and USB Cable Standards? (Clark W. Griswold, Jr.)
    Re: 110 V Cord and USB Cable Standards? (Ben Ficus)
    Re: Telephone Switchbox (Will)
    Re: Western Union Clocks (Al Gillis)
    Vonage Cisco a t a Internal Voice (Paul Migliorelli)
    Fast Pass at Airport Security (Monty Solomon)
    DirecTV Takes Stand On Costs (Monty Solomon)
    GMAC Customers' Data Put At Risk By Laptop Theft (Monty Solomon)

All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the
individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: VOIP News
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:13:20 -0500
Subject: AT&T Steps Up Biz VoIP Activities
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.phoneplusmag.com/hotnews/43h2581254.html

AT&T this week announced a variety of new business VoIP activities,
which it says represent an acceleration of its strategy on this front.

That includes an equipment interoperability effort including three new
suppliers -- Alcatel, Nortel Networks and Siemens, making AT&T "the
first and only service provider committed to deliver interoperability
with the five leading IP PBX providers in the industry." AT&T
previously announced interoperability with Avaya and Cisco.

Full story at:
http://www.phoneplusmag.com/hotnews/43h2581254.html

How to Distribute VoIP Throughout a Home:
http://michigantelephone.mi.org/distribute.html

If you live in Michigan, subscribe to the MI-Telecom group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MI-Telecom/

------------------------------

From: VOIP News
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:55:25 -0500
Subject: FCC Chief Wants 'Light Regulatory Touch' on VOIP
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.detnews.com/2004/technology/0403/24/technology-99753.htm

Associated Press

ATLANTA -- Federal Communications Commission Chairman Michael Powell
called Monday for a "light regulatory touch" on Voice over Internet
Protocol technology.

"I think the government will take a hands-off approach to it," he
said, speaking to a crowd of several thousand wireless industry
professionals at the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet
Association's annual meeting.

Full story at:
http://www.detnews.com/2004/technology/0403/24/technology-99753.htm

------------------------------

From: VOIP News
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:26:44 -0500
Subject: Wi-Fi and VoIP: Do them together or not at all
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.silicon.com/networks/wifi/0,39024669,39119587,00.htm

Wi-Fi and VoIP: Do them together or not at all 
by Jo Best 
 
And stop banging on about how cheap it is, vendors told. 
 
While VoIP and Wi-Fi have been getting tech sellers and users alike
stirred up over the possibilities for converged communications, a new
report warns that promoting individual technologies rather than
collaborative technology could leave businesses wondering where the
benefits are.

There's no getting away from the advent of VoIP with previous security
and standards hurdles now largely overcome but vendors' short-sighted 
approach has gone down badly with users and may even be holding up
adoption, said Mark Blowers, senior research analyst at Butler Group.
 
"There's a tendency for vendors to focus on specific technology when
enterprises want solutions to problems not just to install some
technology ... This year was meant to be the year for VoIP and it's not
taken off as much as expected," he said.
 
Full story at:
http://www.silicon.com/networks/wifi/0,39024669,39119587,00.htm

------------------------------

From: VOIP News
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:37:33 -0500
Subject: VoIP related topics in Communications Law Bulletin-March 2004
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


It seems that the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP publishes a
monthly Communications Law Bulletin covering the United States.  This
months' bulletin is at the following URL, but you have to complete a
free registration process in order to read it.

http://www.mondaq.com/i_article.asp_Q_articleid_E_25137

Some of the subject headings in this issue are:

Joint Board Recommendation Would Limit Universal Service Support To
Primary Line

FCC Considers Regulation of IP-Enabled Services

Senate Asks Questions About VOIP

Inflexion Asks FCC to Exempt VOIP Companies Serving Underserved
Markets from Access Charges

U.K., Canada to Seek Input on VOIP Regulations

Law Enforcement's Request for Rulemaking on CALEA Issues Will Broadly
Impact Internet Telephony and Other Broadband Services [Comment: If
you don't read anything else in this issue, please at least read this
section - you need to know what our government is trying to do!]

The entire bulletin can be found at:
http://www.mondaq.com/i_article.asp_Q_articleid_E_25137

------------------------------

From: VOIP News
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:24:49 -0500
Subject: Pulver Hopes .tel Will Promote ENUM, VoIP
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.cbronline.com/currentnews/2b1266009386af4580256e6300385741

By Kevin Murphy

Pulver.com Inc wants to market voice over IP services using a new
internet domain, but it first must be given the okay by the Internet
Corp for Assigned Names and Numbers and could face opposition from the
International Telecommunications Union.

Pulver.com last week applied to ICANN for the right to offer .tel
domain names to IP communications service providers using ENUM, a
standard for mapping telephone numbers into the internet domains name
system.

Pulver.com is an early leader in the PC-to-PC VoIP communications
space, and has been heavily involved in the VoIP regulatory debate in
the US. ENUM is expected to be the de facto standard for addressing
voice calls over the internet.

"We're trying to provide legs for ENUM," said Pulver.com CEO Jeff
Pulver. The ENUM standard has been around for a few years, and while
there are many test-beds underway, mostly in Europe, there are no
widespread commercial services based on it.

Full story at:
http://www.cbronline.com/currentnews/2b1266009386af4580256e6300385741

------------------------------

From: VOIP News
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:42:51 -0500
Subject: Has Covad Changed The VoIP Rules?
Reply-To: VoIPnews@yahoogroups.com


http://www.telecomweb.com/broadband/feature.htm

The first IP-based competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC) with a
nationwide reach is about to be born, an event that could change the
VoIP landscape.

Covad Communications Group [COVD] is buying VoIP provider GoBeam for
$48 million in stock. The deal is expected to close in about 60
days. The deal mates GoBeam's VoIP phone service and Covad's national
broadband network. That contrasts sharply with the current situation,
where just about every would-be VoIP player is forced to ride the
wires of an ILEC.

"For really the first time there's actually going to be a company
that's going to be able to provision all aspects of the VoIP business
over their own facilities," says Steve Lail, Covad's vice president of
voice deployment.

Moreover, Lail says Covad still is willing to accommodate competing
VoIP carriers, even though it will be a VoIP carrier itself. That
gives the VoIP industry an alternative to dealing with the
ILECs. That, in turn, has significant implications for the current
battle at the FCC and in the courts over whether ILECs should be
required to open up their newest broadband networks to VoIP
carriers. With Covad sitting as an alternative, it is reasonable to
assume that at least some of the ILECs may reconsider their refusal to
accommodate VoIP competitors, rather than see the revenue go to Covad.

Although it hasn't been offering VoIP services, Covad has been quietly
running some small VoIP trials for close to 18 months, Lail confirms.

Full story at:
http://www.telecomweb.com/broadband/feature.htm 

------------------------------

From: Johnnie Leung <jsleung@telecom-digest.zzn.com>
Subject: Re: 110 V Cord and USB Cable Standards?
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:50:17 -0800


Michael D. Sullivan <nospam@camsul.com> wrote in message
news:telecom23.141.9@telecom-digest.org:

> In article <telecom23.140.12@telecom-digest.org>, siegman@stanford.edu
> says:

>> Is this "mini-USB" connector also a general USB standard, used for
>> physically small devices?

> There are Type A and Type B standard USB connectors.  The wide ones are
> Type A, the mini ones are Type B.  Type B are typically used on cameras,
> scanners, etc.

Almost right.  There are actually two types of B connectors: the
garden-variety squarish type, and 'mini-B', which measures
approximately 7 mm by 3 mm.  He's talking about the mini type, which
is commonly used on portable devices such as digital cameras, MP3
players, NetMD Walkmans and 2.5-inch hard drive enclosures.


JL

------------------------------

From: Clark W. Griswold, Jr. <73115.1041@compuserve.com>
Subject: Re: 110 V Cord and USB Cable Standards?
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:44:55 -0700
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com


Michael D. Sullivan <nospam@camsul.com> wrote:

> There are Type A and Type B standard USB connectors.  The wide ones are 
> Type A, the mini ones are Type B.  Type B are typically used on cameras, 
> scanners, etc.

Well, yes, but I do not think that is what the OP was referring
to. Type A connectors are the classical rectangular USB ones. Type B
are square, about 1/4 the size of Type A, with two corners rounded
off.

The micro USB connector is even smaller than a Type B - maybe 1/2 the
size, and back to being a bit rectangular. There is a similar micro
Firewire connector -- they look similar, but are not interchangable.

The micro connectors are found on the newer digital camcorders.

------------------------------

From: benficus@hotmail.com (Ben Ficus)
Subject: Re: 110 V Cord and USB Cable Standards?
Date: 26 Mar 2004 10:51:03 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Speaking of which ...

Last time I was at Best Buy, they were telling me that I should buy
the expensive "gold" USB connector for my printer ... the other cable
will affect the quality of my prints.

Any thoughts, opinions?

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Radio Shack *used to* (maybe still 
does in some places) make that claim about the expensive gold-plated
connectors in almost all applications, coax connectors, etc. I have
never been able to figure out *why* the gold-plated versions of the
various size/type connectors are supposed to be better. Our local
Radio Shack store no longer makes that claim, however.  PAT]

------------------------------

From: mlliw@joimail.com (Will)
Subject: Re: Telephone Switchbox
Date: 25 Mar 2004 18:21:55 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com


I am a newbie to this type of thing. The OfficeLink Solo looks good,
but its a bit pricy for my budget. Could you please explain the
" > I setup DISA on a Samsung DCS." I don't really understand this.

Thanks

mlliw

P.S. The line I would be accessing would not be on a phone system,
just a direct line.

Tony P. <kd1s@nospamplease.verizon.reallynospam.net> wrote in message
news:<telecom23.134.10@telecom-digest.org>:

> In article <telecom23.132.13@telecom-digest.org>, cnavarro@wcnet.org 
> says:

>> On 19 Mar 2004 19:05:27 -0800, mlliw@joimail.com (Will) wrote:

>>> Is there a box that when called to normally, it sends through, but
>>> when a code such as #22, It brings the caller to a _dialtone_ on
>>> another line? I have seen several boxes that do this (for
>>> computer/fax/telephone) that when #22 is dialed, they send to a
>>> separate place, but they don't give a _dialtone_ on a separate
>>> line. Thanks!

>> It might depend on what type of phone system you have.  Some systems
>> have Direct System Inward Access (DISA) available.  Teltone used to
>> make a 106 box that was a bridging unit with amplifiers.  They still
>> make an Officelink Solo, but I bet it's a bit pricey.
>> http://www.teltone.com/products/remotevoice/solo/home.htm

>> One thing to keep in mind, DISA and the 106 is highly hackable.  A
>> teenager with a lot of time on his hands can key the universe of 3
>> digit numbers as a hobby to find out what makes it work.  The
>> Officelink is a callback device.

> I setup DISA on a Samsung DCS. It requires a seven digit passcode. So 
> that ups the possibilities. 

> The way the system was configured, the first digit had to be a 2 or 3, 
> the next six could be 0 thru 9. So 2x10x10x10x10x10x10 = 2,000,000 
> possible combinations.

------------------------------

From: Al Gillis <alg@aracnet.com>
Subject: Re: Western Union Clocks
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:59:41 -0800
Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com


DevilsPGD <lalalaNOSPAM@crazyhat.net> wrote in message
news:telecom23.134.14@telecom-digest.org:

> In message <<telecom23.133.4@telecom-digest.org>>
> hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (Lisa Hancock) did ramble:

>> I don't know why it's so hard to keep time coordinated.  In the
>> Philadelphia area, the transportation authority tells riders to use
>> Bell (Verizon) time, 215-846-1212, as a standardized source.  My $20
>> Casio "50M" watch is pretty reliable.  Bell has offered that service
>> since at least the 1960s (846 was TIme 6).

> This always confuses me.  One of my servers pulls from NTP sources on
> the next, the rest synch from there.  My phones all set themselves
> (Analog, via CID/CND data).  My bedroom clock not only has a backup
> battery, but it also receives over the air signals, and is able to set
> itself as well.

So who can explain this about time: Most modern DVD/VCR machines can
set the time based on signals from a TV station, most frequently a
public broadcasting stations (CPB?)  So how does that work? And why
does it take so long to set the time?  I'd guess there is some sort of
signal during the vertical retrace interval or something like that but
I've not been able to find any authorative referances to this feature.
Explain it, please!!

Thanks,

Al

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:37:40 -0700
From: Paul Migliorelli (+1 3 0 3 5 4 3 2 3 1 1) <paulmigs@migliorelli.org>
Subject: Vonage Cisco a t a Internal Voice


Hi all.  As a blind user, I've been curious about the voice in the
Vonage a t a.  Just wondering if it has any features that we are not
aware of.  I know you can push the button, hear the config menu; you
can enter 80 for the i p address.

Push anything else and it pronounces p a s s w d (Hmmm.  Wonder it
doesn't say password?)  Can the box enlighten us with anything else??
Talking caller i d would be cool, I figure, to save you having to add
on another peripheral.  Just curious.  It's always neat to find items
that speak.

[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Try pressing the button, listening to
the introduction then pressing 123 pound sign. It will then tell you
its name; mine says 'Cisco ATA 186' and the firmware version number.
I think the reason it spells out p a s s w d is because it reads and
has no actual word for those letters; I mean how would YOU pronounce
'passwd' in English?  When it is asking for a 'passwd' it expects you
to enter a code to override the lock that Vonage put on the firmware
if you wish to examine/change the value stashed there.

Paul, I sent you the e-coupon you requested for a month of free Vonage
service, and will do the same for any reader who asks me. Its actually
the *second* month of whatever type of service you wish to
purchase. Other readers can do like Paul did, and send email marked
'not for pub' to ptownson@telecom-digest.org PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:14:58 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Fast Pass at Airport Security


By Ryan Singel

Business travelers may soon have one more item to stuff in their
carry-on: a trusted-traveler card to speed them through security
lines.

The Transportation Security Administration plans to start testing a 
registered-traveler identification program in June, which will let 
those who volunteer for a background check avoid tight screening at 
the airport.

While civil liberties groups have questioned the plan's merits, travel
industry groups have welcomed it, calling the proposal a way to
expedite travel and increase security without the costs and privacy
concerns associated with CAPPS II, the TSA's ongoing attempt to create
a new computerized passenger-screening program.

Currently, passengers who book one-way flights, pay with cash or buy
their tickets close to their departure date are flagged by a
computerized passenger-screening system as potential terrorists.
Those passengers, along with a random selection of other travelers,
have the code "SSSS" printed on their boarding passes, which leads to
intensive scrutiny that can cause them to miss their flights.

http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,62777,00.html


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: My questions would be these: If in 
fact you miss your flight because of the stupidity of the screening
process, does the airline at least give you your money back or put
you on another plane leaving *soon* to your destination, or are you
just out of luck.  Question two: So with the 'trusted traveler'
plan, what is to prevent (not meaning to stereotype or stigmatize
any nationality) your 'typical' suicide bomber -- if there is such
a category of person -- from being on his best behavior long enough
to get one of those cards, *then* on one of his trips abroad or
wherever, smuggling in a gun and using it en-route?  The last time
I took an airplane anywhere was from Tulsa to Chicago in May, 2000,
and with conditions as they are now, I sincerely doubt I will ever
board a plane again. I *much prefer* riding a bus for long trips.  PAT]

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:32:11 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: DirecTV Takes Stand on Costs


By Michael McCarthy, USA TODAY

The angry 48-hour standoff between Viacom and EchoStar Communications
(DISH) that recently left more than 9 million Dish Network subscribers
without many channels could be just a warm-up for the main event.

News Corp.'s (NWS) DirecTV, the nation's largest satellite TV
operator, will hold the line on programming costs in 2004, accepting
only monthly price increases per subscriber that are roughly equal to
inflation, at a four-decade low of 1%.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2004-03-24-directv_x.htm

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:54:48 -0500
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: GMAC Customers' Data Put At Risk By Laptop Theft


By Paul McDougall, InformationWeek

A division of GMAC Financial Services has been quietly informing about
200,000 of its customers that their personal data may have been
compromised due to the theft of two laptop computers from an
employee's car at a regional office near Atlanta.

In a letter to its personal insurance customers, GMAC Insurance
indicates that "a random theft" of the laptops from a locked vehicle
may have left them vulnerable to identify theft. The letter --
obtained by InformationWeek --indicates that the stolen laptops
contained customers' names, addresses, dates of birth, Social
Security numbers, credit scores, marital status, and gender. "For
incidents like this, government regulatory agencies recommend that
you place a fraud alert on your credit file," the letter advises
customers. The letter was dated March 12. The theft took place on
Jan. 26.

http://www.internetwk.com/allStories/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=18402712

------------------------------

TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. If you donate at least fifty dollars
per year we will send you our two-CD set of the entire Telecom
Archives; this is every word published in this Digest since our
beginning in 1981.

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V23 #142
******************************
