Re: Spam Surge Drives Net Crime Spree |
---|
Dan Lanciani (ddl@danlan.com) Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:08:37 -0500 (EST)
|
|
tom.horsley@att.net (Tom Horsley) wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:54:57 EST Dan Lanciani <ddl@danlan.com> wrote:
>> I assume that a message with an image from someone I
> People who "bounce" messages only make the volume of traffic higher
No, a delivery error message is not spam. And it is not sent "to the
> The universe would be a much nicer place if all bounces stopped
No, it would not. Lack of an indication that mail has failed to be
> dannyb@panix.com (Danny Burstein) wrote:
> In <telecom25.428.5@telecom-digest.org> Dan Lanciani <ddl@danlan.com>
>> Interesting. I assume that a message with an image from someone I
> Unless you're doing this at the initial SMTP server contact, please
Of course I'm doing it at the initial SMTP server contact. I'm lucky
> If you're making the bounces based on the reply-to or return or
Oh, good, then SPF is the solution. (ducks)
Dan Lanciani |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Robin Colleen Moore: "Re: Why is Motorola USB not Blackberry USB?" | |
Go to Previous message: mc: "Re: Robots Will Get Same Rights as Humans" | |
May be in reply to: Mark Ward, BBC: "Spam Surge Drives Net Crime Spree" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |