TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Government Defends 1998 Anti-Porn Law

Government Defends 1998 Anti-Porn Law

Maryclaire Dale, AP (
Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:14:34 -0500

By MARYCLAIRE DALE, Associated Press Writer

Eight years after Congress tried to criminalize material deemed
"harmful to children," free speech advocates and Web site publishers
took their challenge of the law to trial Monday., and other plaintiffs backed by the American Civil
Liberties Union are suing over the 1998 Child Online Protection Act.
They believe the law could restrict legitimate material they publish
online -- exposing them to fines or even jail time.

The Justice Department argues that it is easier to stop online
pornography at the source than to keep children from viewing it.

The law, signed by President Clinton, requires adults to use some
sort of access code, or perhaps a credit-card number, to view material
that may be considered "harmful to children." It would impose a $50,000
fine and six-month prison term on commercial Web site operators that
publish such content, which is to be defined by "contemporary community

It has yet to be enforced, however.

The U.S. Supreme Court has twice granted preliminary injunctions,
including one in June 2004 in which it ruled 5-4 that the plaintiffs
were likely to prevail.

The ACLU argues that filters are a more effective way of policing the
Internet. It notes that the law would not regulate any material posted

The government "will argue that parents are too stupid to use filters.
It's an insulting argument and it's wrong," ACLU attorney Chris Hansen
said in his opening statement Monday.

Eric Beane, a government attorney, acknowledged that it is tempting to
defer to families on the question of what is appropriate for children,
but said the patchwork of filters used by parents don't work.

"The evidence will show that a shocking amount of pornography slips
through to children," Beane said, noting "The internet is so full of
porn stuff these days.".

The nonjury trial in front of U.S. District Judge Lowell Reed is
expected to take about a month.

The plaintiffs, technology experts and even Supreme Court Justice
Anthony M. Kennedy have expressed concerns that the law has already
been surpassed by technology and the growth of the Internet. Kennedy
noted, for example, that filters can block Web material posted
offshore, but the law cannot control what foreigners post online.

In preparing for its defense of the law, the Justice Department sought
internal files from search engine companies and Internet service
providers. Google Inc. refused one such subpoena for 1 million sample
queries and 1 million Web addresses in its database, although it
primarily cited trade secrets, not privacy issues.

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at (or)

For more news and headlines, please go to:

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Reuters News Wire: "China Moves Toward "Real Name System" on Web"
Go to Previous message: Jenny Barchfield, AP: "Wanna Direct? Get Out Your Cell Phone"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page