TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Google Says Government Intrusions Is a Threat to Online Privacy

Google Says Government Intrusions Is a Threat to Online Privacy

Eric Auchard, Reuters (
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:34:28 -0500

Google sees privacy threats
By Eric Auchard

Web search leader Google Inc., which stores vast amounts of data on
the Web surfing habits of its users, sees government intrusions rather
than accidental public disclosures of data as the greatest threat to
online privacy, its chief executive said on Wednesday.

CEO Eric Schmidt told the Search Engine Strategies industry conference
here that Google had put all necessary safeguards in place to protect
its users' personal data from theft or accidental release. His remarks
followed last weekend's discovery by online privacy sleuths that AOL,
a key Google search customer, had mistakenly released personally
identifiable data on 20 million keyword searches by its users.

But Schmidt said a more serious threat to user privacy lay in
potential demands on Google by governments to make the company give up
data on its customer's surfing habits.

"You can never say never," Schmidt said during an onstage interview
with Web search industry analyst Danny Sullivan.

"The more interesting question is not an accidental error but
something where a government, not just the U.S. government but maybe a
non-U.S. government would try to get in (Google's computer systems),"
Schmidt said.

Google won kudos earlier this year from privacy advocates for going to
court to block a U.S. government request for data on Google users.
Schmidt warned that such intrusions could occur again.

Google operates one of the world's largest collections of computer
databases at its Mountain View, Calif. headquarters. It asks users for
permission to store personal data, which it uses to speed Web searches
to help advertisers target ads.

But Google also operates computer data centers in other countries,
including China, where its entry into the market earlier this year
stoked controversy over the risks of doing business under China's
censorship laws.

Sullivan asked Schmidt why Google does not purge its users' data from
its computers every month or two to guard against building up too much
history of any Web user's search habits.

"We have actually had that debate," Schmidt said, adding that security
protections Google has put in place would make it very difficult, if
not impossible, to steal customer data. He said keeping users' trust
was Google's most essential mission.

AOL, the online unit of media conglomerate Time Warner Inc. ,
apologized on Monday and said it had launched an internal probe into
how a research division of the company mistakenly released the data on
its Web site two weeks ago.

The trove of personal data continues to circulate on the Web, where it
can be downloaded and probed for details on user interests.

Release of the data on searches by about 658,000 anonymous AOL users
over a three-month period has provoked a firestorm of criticism over
the risks created by collecting vast stores of personal data as many
online companies do, including Google, Microsoft, Yahoo,

Even though the users' names are not attached to the data, they can be
identified by the personal nature of many Web searches.

"It is obviously a terrible thing," Schmidt said of the AOL data
breach. "The data that was released was obviously not anonymized

He said Google has very sophisticated security plans to protect its
databases. The federal Sarbanes-Oxley law also requires companies to
have demonstrable procedures for protecting against not just external
threats but also the risk that a company insider could release Google
data, he said.

Copyright 2006 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at (or)

For more news and headlines each day, please go to:

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Jane Wardell, AP: "Bet on Sports no Longer Doing US Business"
Go to Previous message: United Press International News Wire: "Army Signs New Deal With Verizon"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page