TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Court Okays Look at NY Times Phone Records

Court Okays Look at NY Times Phone Records

David B. Caruso (
Tue, 01 Aug 2006 23:36:04 -0500


Federal prosecutors investigating a leak about a terrorism funding
probe can see the phone records of two New York Times reporters, a
federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.

A panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned on a 2-1
vote a lower court's ruling that the records were off limits unless
prosecutors could show they had exhausted all other means of finding
out who spoke to the newspaper.

The judges said a grand jury investigation of the disclosures wasn't
likely to go anywhere without help from the reporters or access to
their records.

"There is simply no substitute for the evidence they have," Judge
Ralph K. Winter wrote.

The newspaper was considering an appeal, its lawyers said.

The case involved stories written in 2001 by Times reporters Judith
Miller and Philip Shenon that revealed the government's plans to
freeze the assets of two Islamic charities, the Holy Land Foundation
and the Global Relief Foundation.

Prosecutors claimed the reporters' phone calls to the charities
seeking comment had tipped the organizations off about the government

U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald asked the Times for information about
the source of the reports in 2002, then threatened to subpoena phone
company billing records in 2004.

The newspaper sued to block any such effort, saying prosecutors might
use the records to fish for information about the Times' sources for a
long list of stories.

In February 2005, the newspaper appeared to achieve a victory when
U.S. District Judge Robert Sweet ruled that the government had failed
to prove that it had exhausted all other methods.

Tuesday's decision to overturn the lower court ruling prompted a
dissent by Judge Robert D. Sack, who said prosecutors had made little
effort to assure the court that the information was unavailable from
any other source.

He noted, however, that the majority opinion contained at least two
victories for journalists: It held that reporters do have a right, in
some circumstances, to protect the identities of people they speak to,
and government investigators may not simply bypass an uncooperative
reporter by seizing records from a phone company.

"Without such protection," Sack wrote, "prosecutors, limited only by
their own self-restraint, could obtain records that identify
journalists' confidential sources in gross and virtually at will.

"Reporters might find themselves, as a matter of practical necessity,
contacting sources the way I understand drug dealers reach theirs - by
use of clandestine cell phones and meetings in darkened doorways."

Times attorney Floyd Abrams said the closeness of the vote illustrates
a disagreement within the courts about whether reporters have a
limited privilege to protect their sources.

"Not until the U.S. Supreme Court takes one of these cases and decides
it will we really know where we are," Abrams said.

It is unclear whether prosecutors already have the Times' phone
records. Fitzgerald's office has refused to say whether it received
the records before the Times sued.

A spokesman for Fitzgerald declined to comment.

Fitzgerald had Miller jailed last year for refusing to tell a grand
jury about conversations she had with the vice president's chief of
staff regarding CIA operative Valerie Plame.

Copyright 2006 Associated Press.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at (or)

For more news and headlines, please go to:

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Monty Solomon: "Honda Owner Manual Lists Talk Line"
Go to Previous message: Chicago Tribune News Wire: "Not Much Interest in Cell Phone Gadgets"
Next in thread: "Re: Court Okays Look at NY Times Phone Records"
May be reply: "Re: Court Okays Look at NY Times Phone Records"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page