Re: Caution: Unidentified Callers Ahead |
---|
Thor Lancelot Simon (tls@panix.com) Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:08:30 +0000 (UTC)
|
|
In article <telecom25.261.8@telecom-digest.org>, Rick Merrill <rick0.merrill@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> I suspect from the way current VoIP calls are structured that it would be
This is all false. Why do we have this same discussion over and over
Networks should not mark calling party identification received from
The FCC could require this at the drop of a hat, and it could be
Network operators should be required to disconnect customers who feed
Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com
"We cannot usually in social life pursue a single value or a single moral |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Clark W. Griswold, Jr.: "Re: Navy Probes Data Leak on 100,000 Sailors, Marines" | |
Go to Previous message: DevilsPGD: "Re: Caller ID Scammers Plan to do a Number on You" | |
May be in reply to: Monty Solomon: "Caution: Unidentified Callers Ahead" | |
Next in thread: Rick Merrill: "Re: Caution: Unidentified Callers Ahead" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |