Re: When Did 2L-5N Become Required in Los Angeles? |
---|
Steven Lichter (shlichter@sbcglobal.net) Wed, 19 Apr 2006 01:59:03 GMT
|
|
In article telecom25.147.10@telecom-digest.org, Steven Lichter at shlichter@sbcglobal.net wrote on 4/18/06 17:18:
> In article telecom25.146.5@telecom-digest.org, Stephen Greenfield at
>> Dear Patrick,
>> I've been trying to research the date a particular sign was posted on
>> My property was built in 1926. I'm guessing that Los Angeles switched
>> (I've been scanning old postings and digests, but haven't found anything
>> Best Regards,
>> Stephen Greenfield
>> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Perhaps some of our older readers who
> Having lived in the San Fernando Valley through 1972, I remember having our
> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Was the exchange name 'Dimond' or
Sorry about that; Diamond. I also seem to remember that this was a |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Re: When Did 2L-5N Become Required in Los Angeles?" | |
Go to Previous message: Cellular-News: "Cellular-News for Wednesday 19th April 2006" | |
May be in reply to: Stephen Greenfield: "When Did 2L-5N Become Required in Los Angeles?" | |
Next in thread: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Re: When Did 2L-5N Become Required in Los Angeles?" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |