Calif. Court Rules Against AT&T |
---|
Neal McLain (nmclain@annsgarden.com) Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:06:04 -0400
|
|
By Linda Haugsted 4/14/2006 12:14:00 PM Multichannel News
Cities are within their rights to demand a franchise of AT&T Inc. for
The judge, however, did not rule specifically on whether Internet-
The ruling is a blow to AT&T, which argued that its service -- which
The company has challenged any attempts at franchising, filing this
The dispute in this case arose when AT&T sought permits to place
AT&T's suit alleged pre-emption of the city action by federal law,
http://www.cabletv.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3&d=1145034866
Posted by Neal McLain with thanks to Jonathan Kramer of KramerFirm.com. |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: wenmang@yahoo.com: "VoIP via Verizon Down 780k/s up 135k/s DSL Line?" | |
Go to Previous message: Anick Jesdanun: "The Proposed new '.tel' Domain From ICANN" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |