Re: Challenge to Hospitality: The ID Check in the Lobby |
---|
AES (siegman@stanford.edu) Sun, 05 Feb 2006 07:46:54 -0800
|
|
In article <telecom25.53.6@telecom-digest.org>, snertking <snertking@snerts-r-us.org> wrote:
> hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
>> Herb Stein wrote:
>>> "NOT a public place" would imply that the no-smoking ban in NY is a crock.
>> I have no idea what the terms are of no-smoking ban which is a
> No smoking in "public places" -- which includes pretty much everywhere
Might or might not be.
However, government can probably nonetheless, in interest of public
In other words, owner of premises can indeed "decide to allow smoking
I used to think that health risks of second-hand smoke were probably |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Gerard Bok: "Re: Cell Phone Interceptions in Greece, Includes Prime Minister" | |
Go to Previous message: Robert Bonomi: "Re: Challenge to Hospitality: The ID Check in the Lobby" | |
May be in reply to: Monty Solomon: "Challenge to Hospitality: The ID Check in the Lobby" | |
Next in thread: Seth Breidbart: "Re: Challenge to Hospitality: The ID Check in the Lobby" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |