Robert Bonomi (bonomi@host122.r-bonomni.com) Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:07:54 -0000

Review Index Sorted By: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Steve Sobol: "Re: AT&T Billing Us For MDNS Account Closed Three Years Ago" Previous message: radiodude: "Re: Cell Phone Extenders?" TELECOM Digest: Home Page

In article <telecom25.24.7@telecom-digest.org>, <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote: [[.. sneck ..]] > For some reason, very few people today use the "fine" setting on > fax machines which makes a much clearer transmission at very little > increase in time. They still use "regular" which comes out so fuzzy. > A fax of a fax is almost unreadable. In point of fact, 'fine' mode requires *double* the transmission time of 'standard' mode. 'Standard' mode is 100 scan-lines/inch, with 1728 dots per line, employing RLL encoding on the data in a single line. "Fine" mode is _200_ scan-lines/inch, with the same 1728 dots/line, again with RLL encoding of the data in a single line. Unfortunately, in neither setting is there any compression in the 'vertical' direction.

Post Followup Article	Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Steve Sobol: "Re: AT&T Billing Us For MDNS Account Closed Three Years Ago"
Go to Previous message: radiodude: "Re: Cell Phone Extenders?"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page