http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/13/AR2006011301=
747.html
Iraqi Telecom Chief Seeks to Build From Scratch
Cell Phone Network Is Top Priority
By Arshad Mohammed
Washington Post Staff Writer
U.S. telecom regulation is not so different from Iraq's except for one
fundamental thing.
"As I was telling the FCC, if you refuse somebody a license, at least
they don't come and shoot at you," Siyamend Z. Othman, Iraq's top
telecommunications regulator, said in an interview in Washington this
week. "It comes with the job."
The European-educated Iraqi brings a wry sense of humor to the task
of building a phone system after years of insurgency, conflict and
neglect.
The Iraqi telecom system was one of the most rudimentary in the Middle
East under Saddam Hussein, with roughly 1 million land lines for a
population of about 26 million and no mobile-phone networks.
Today, the Iraqis are trying to leapfrog generations of technology by
going straight to an advanced wireless phone system under what might
seem the harshest possible conditions.
Already, by Othman's estimate, there are between 4 million and 4.5
million mobile-phone subscribers, up from zero when the U.S.-led
invasion began nearly three years ago. According to U.S. estimates,
the number of land lines, which fell by several hundred thousand
because of U.S. bombing, now slightly exceeds the prewar level.
Setting up cell towers is cheaper and easier than rolling phone lines
to every home in Iraq, which has three main mobile providers -- all
regional, rather than Western, companies -- working overtime.
One saving grace that the new telecom infrastructure has largely been
spared insurgent attacks for a simple reason: The terrorists want
phone service, too.
"Everybody needs a mobile phone, whether you are a terrorist, whether you
are a government official, or whether you are a member of the public,"
Othman said in an interview at the Watergate Hotel. "In fact, we know of a
number of anecdotes where mobile operators were threatened by terrorists
for not extending their network to their [the terrorists'] villages."
Othman was in Washington this week for talks with officials from the
Federal Communications Commission and the State and Commerce
departments. He also met with U.S. executives -- chiefly makers of
communications equipment, such as Motorola Corp. -- eager to do
business in what Othman called "one of the most lucrative markets" in
the Middle East.
Unlike many foreign visitors, the chief executive of the Iraq National
Communications and Media Commission is not looking for money.
His agency expects to raise millions for the Iraqi treasury when it
awards three long-term mobile-phone licenses later this year, making
money the least of his worries.
Othman said that what he needs most are trained professionals as the
government works to provide service to a population starved of
communications under Hussein.
In a line that drew laughter from American executives this week, he
ruefully said that "if you search the length and breadth of Iraq, you
can't find one telecom lawyer."
Recruiting workers was even harder when his agency was inside the
Green Zone, which houses top government officials and the U.S. embassy
in Baghdad, Othman said, saying half his staff quit after a suicide
bombing outside the compound.
Since moving out of the Green Zone last year, his new building has
been shot at twice and his chief of security has been kidnapped.
The violence aside, Iraq's telecom industry bears striking similarities
to the U.S. model, with fierce lobbying, government turf battles and
entrenched players who resist competition in a business that can bring
huge profits.
Othman said that one of his biggest challenges is maintaining the
independence of his agency against political interference, particularly
when it comes time to award the mobile-phone licenses this year.
"It's a big issue, and there is going to be interference -- I am under
no illusions -- from the political establishment," he said. Asked if
the politicians had ties to companies bidding for the licenses, he
replied: "It's not for me to say. But why else would they interfere?
You make your own deduction."
Othman said the interim Iraqi government that took over after the June
2004 handover of sovereignty adopted a "belligerent" stance toward his
agency, refusing to hand over vital radio-spectrum data.
Provincial governments also have resisted central control. In one
case, a small mobile-phone operator refused to acknowledge his
agency's authority and, with local officials' support, now operates as
a monopoly in parts of Northern Iraq, he said.
Othman said his approach has been to pursue gentle suasion, rather
than outright confrontation, with telecom companies -- something he
described as a necessity given the lack of state control in Iraq.
"In Iraq, we have serious enforcement problems. The state is weak," he
said.
In one case -- reminiscent of the U.S. telephone industry in the early
20th century -- Iraqi mobile networks refused to connect to each
other. As a result, people could call each other only if they had
service from the same company.
Othman brought the companies in and persuaded them to connect, at
least in theory, though calls do not always go through in practice.
"Let's say we made them an offer they couldn't refuse," he said,
without elaborating.
Copyright 2006 The Washington Post Company
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the use of
which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This
Internet discussion group is making it available without profit to group
members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information in their efforts to advance the understanding of literary,
educational, political, and economic issues, for non-profit research and
educational purposes only. I believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of
the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S.
Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner, in this instance, Washington Post Company.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Direct replies are unlikely to be read. To reply use the address below:
falco(underscore)md(atsign)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk
Marcus Didius Falco (falco_marcus_didius@yahoo.co.uk)