Re: Payphone Surcharges (was: Unanswered Cellphones) |
---|
hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com 29 Dec 2005 07:35:01 -0800
|
|
DevilsPGD wrote:
> Unless the owner of the payphone is threatening or inflicting harm
In terms of the letter of the law you are correct. But when someone
Indeed, there was a risk of physical harm -- to my mother -- if I
> Feel free to contact your AG or a local ADA and see if you can get
In any event, it is certianly deceptive fraudulent behavior.
> If you're paying too much, get a better calling card -- There are tons
I was using a calling card and the pay phone used the long distance
Do you think a supermarket could get away with advertising a big
> Making a payphone call is not a right. Your "need" to make a call
Interesting how you put it. Let's be clear about something. Until |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: AES: "Re: Payphone Surcharges (was: Unanswered Cellphones)" | |
Go to Previous message: DevilsPGD: "Re: Payphone Surcharges (was: Unanswered Cellphones)" | |
May be in reply to: Anthony Bellanga: "Payphone Surcharges (was: Unanswered Cellphones)" | |
Next in thread: AES: "Re: Payphone Surcharges (was: Unanswered Cellphones)" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |