Re: Hypothetical SxS Question |
---|
Wesrock@aol.com Thu, 8 Dec 2005 19:58:04 EST
|
|
In a message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:12:00 -0600, Neal McLain <nmclain@annsgarden.com> writes:
> Advantage: This plan avoids two SxS taboos: subscriber numbers beginning
> - Initial 0 is taboo because "experience has shown that in a single-
> - Initial 1 is taboo because an SxS (or any other rotary-dial) switch
> Disadvantage: It's not possible to match subscriber numbers to apartment
> [1] Kempster B. Miller. "Telephone Theory and Practice" vol. 3
> Neal McLain
The 1933 citation you mention, which I read in the 1940s, was really
However, the 1 as initial digit taboo was reserched thoroughly when
I forget how many million actually live calls were studied to
There were none. Zero. Conventional wisdom was wrong.
Wes Leatherock
[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I used to know someone who worked his |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Robert Bonomi: "Re: Hypothetical SxS Question" | |
Go to Previous message: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Re: Hanging up on the New Ma Bell" | |
May be in reply to: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Hypothetical SxS Question" | |
Next in thread: Robert Bonomi: "Re: Hypothetical SxS Question" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |