| Re: Telephone Exchange Usage in Low-Volume States | 
|---|
|  John McHarry (jmcharry@comcast.net) Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:32:43 GMT 
 | 
| 
 | 
| On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 13:40:56 -0700, hancock4 wrote: 
> In many places in the U.S. the demand for telephone exchanges is very 
> But some states still only have one area code.  I understand some 
> Given the rural/low growth aspect of places in some of these states, I 
> 1) Traditional party line service, since it's not worth the cost to 
In almost all places single party lines have been cheaper for the 
> 2) Five digit dialing in some areas not well populated or served by 
Five digit dialing was a feature of old panel switches which could be 
> I believe everything is ESS nowadays, but that pays for itself by 
There are certainly CDOs still around in the boondocks. Many of those | 
| Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply | 
| Go to Next message: John McHarry: "Re: How Long Can a Telephone Extension Cord Be?" | |
| Go to Previous message: John Levine: "Re: Telephone Exchange Usage in Low-Volume States" | |
| May be in reply to: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Telephone Exchange Usage in Low-Volume States" | |
| Next in thread: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Re: Telephone Exchange Usage in Low-Volume States" | |
| TELECOM Digest: Home Page | |