TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Re: Beginning of the End for AT&T

Re: Beginning of the End for AT&T
27 Jun 2005 07:21:47 -0700

Lisa Minter wrote:

> DENVER -- AT&T's shareholders -- at what will probably be their last
> meeting -- are expected to approve a $16 billion merger with SBC
> Communications in Denver on Thursday, forming the largest
> telecommunications company in the nation.

While that might be the official "end" of AT&T, it's end started a
long time ago. AT&T planned to expand into new businesses after
divesture. It went after cable, wireless, and computers. None of
these worked out very well. That's the risks of business.

There aren't too many 100 year old businesses out there still intact.
Those that survived are usually very different than the businesses
they once were. US Steel, for example, was once an economic
powerhouse high up in the Fortune 500, but now it is much smaller.

IBM survived two crises in its life, first the transition to
electronic computers which it almost missed, and second the transition
to services rather than hardware which it now is doing. (Unisys, the
merger of two old once giant companies, is very small and is mostly
services now.)

> The deal, together with the upcoming Verizon-MCI merger,
> represents an unprecedented consolidation of the telecom industry.

I agree that it sure looks like rebuilding a single telecom monopoly
-- in some BUT NOT ALL ways. But I think the present trend is good
for customers.

The forced isolation of local Bell companies out of some fields only
raised prices and inconvenience for some consumers. When Verizon was
allowed to go into Long Distance, I switched over to them and saved a
lot of money and time over AT&T. I'm back to a single monthly check
and statement. (They even merged my wireless line into my regular
phone book which I like too).

Customers still have a choice of equipment suppliers, LD carriers,
local service, and a multitude of other options if they so chose.

Too bad nobody builds telephone sets the way Western Electric used to.
(I have had good service from one Panasonic set and also their
answering machines, but are they still in the phone business? I don't
seem to see any of their traditional consumer electronic products as I
used to.)

[public replies please]

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Steve Sobol: "Re: Objections to SBC Purchase of AT&T"
Go to Previous message: Robert Bonomi: "Re: Cardholders Kept in Dark After Breach"
May be in reply to: Lisa Minter: "Beginning of the End for AT&T"
Next in thread: Tony P.: "Re: Beginning of the End for AT&T"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page