TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Re: Walkie Talkie

Re: Walkie Talkie

Justin Time (a_user2000@yahoo.com)
13 Apr 2005 05:19:08 -0700

Pat,

I see two things in Jason's post. The first was the statement it was a
simple walkie-talkie while the second had to do with engineering and
physics. The reason is also two-fold; one - to keep it simple, and
second; because not physics, but cost drove the engineering.

Rodgers Platt

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Tim@Backhome.org: "Re: Looking For Old Dialite Video"
Go to Previous message: Alan Burkitt-Gray: "Why Must a Cordless Phone be Away From Electronic Devices?"
May be in reply to: Jason: "Walkie Talkie"
Next in thread: Jason: "Re: Walkie Talkie"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page