TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Re: What Happened To Channel 1

Re: What Happened To Channel 1

Tony P. (
Tue, 22 Mar 2005 22:43:33 -0500

In article <>, bonomi@host122.r- says:

> What science can take away, science can put back. Those traps did _not_
> *completely* eliminate the signal getting into the customer premises, they
> just made it so weak that a conventional TV set couldn't amplify it enough
> to make a decent picture. A decent high-gain single-channel pre-amp, on
> the other hand, installed 'in front of' the TV receiver, could do a
> surprisingly good job of resurrecting the 'killed' signal. <grin>

Sort of how the FCC has pretty much admitted that anyone with a
modicum of technical knowledge will be able to defeat the broadcast

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Brad Houser: "Re: What Happened To Channel 1"
Go to Previous message: Neal McLain: "Re: What happened to Channel 1?"
May be in reply to: davisdynasty83: "What Happened To Channel 1"
Next in thread: Brad Houser: "Re: What Happened To Channel 1"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page