In a wide-ranging, 30-page ruling on Wednesday, the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit found one MercExchange patent invalid
but reversed a lower court's rejection of MercExchange's motion for a
permanent injunction.
A federal judge in 2003 ordered eBay to pay Virginia-based
MercExchange $29.5 million for infringing a trio of e-commerce patents
that MercExchange charged were key to eBay's "Buy it Now" feature that
handles fixed-price sales.
Such sales accounted for about 31 percent of the total value of goods
sold on eBay in the fourth quarter of last year.
That lower court also denied MercExchange's request for a permanent
injunction against eBay.
EBay had appealed the initial judgment and was allowed to suspend
payment to MercExchange during appeal.
"Each side can claim partial victory in the appeal," Dennis nCrouch, a
patent attorney at McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff in Chicago,
wrote in an e-mail to Reuters.
Attorneys for MercExchange said the judgment on the invalidated patent
was equal to $4.5 million, meaning that $25 million of the earlier
judgment was affirmed.
"In this case, the district court did not provide any persuasive
reason to believe this case is sufficiently exceptional to justify the
denial of a permanent injunction," the appeals court said in its
ruling.
"We're going to go back the district court and ask for the permanent
injunction and ask for an additional two years of damages,"
MercExchange lawyer Scott Robertson, a partner at Hunton & Williams,
told Reuters.
"We believe that any injunction that might be issued by the district
court with respect to the other patent will not have an impact on our
business because of changes we have made following the District
Court's original verdict," eBay said in a statement.
The Web marketplace said it was pleased with the appeals court's
decision to invalidate one of MercExchange's patent, and as a result,
the related damages.
"We are confident in our position against MercExchange and do not
believe that these matters will have any impact on our business," said
eBay, which in 2003 booked a $30 million charge related to the
lawsuit.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is reexamining the validity of
MercExchange's patents upon eBay's request, the company said.
Crouch said the legal battle is far from over since the two other
patents in the suit will require more litigation in district court.
"There is only a small likelihood that eBay will allow its servers to
be shut-down rather than settle the case," Crouch said.
Shares of eBay, which finished down 59 cents to $36.48 on
the Nasdaq, slipped to $36.40 in after-hours trade.
NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily
media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra . Hundreds of new articles daily.
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, in this instance, Reuters Limited.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Lisa Minter (lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com)