| Re: Powell Rips FCC Delay on Connection Fee Reform | 
|---|
|  John Levine (johnl@iecc.com) 17 Feb 2005 01:39:17 -0000 
 | 
| 
 | 
| > Actually, the real battle involves the rapacious rural ILECs, who want > everything to subsidize them and they want it now. 
Yes, and we their customers thank you for it.  I agree that the 
> As to the CLEC settlement rules, the Bells didn't write them; the FCC 
Uh, negatory on that.  The Bells wanted high recip comp per minute 
 
Regards, 
John R. Levine, IECC, POB 727, Trumansburg NY 14886 +1 607 330 5711 | 
| Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply | 
| Go to Next message: Clark W. Griswold, Jr.: "Re: A Silly Question - 2-Line Phone With One Phone Number?" | |
| Go to Previous message: AES: "Re: Leading Zeros?" | |
| May be in reply to: Jack Decker: "Powell Rips FCC Delay on Connection Fee Reform" | |
| Next in thread: Michael D. Sullivan: "Re: Powell Rips FCC Delay on Connection Fee Reform" | |
| TELECOM Digest: Home Page | |