| Re: Verizon Plans to Offer "Naked DSL" on 4/5 of its Wirelines | 
|---|
|  David Clayton (dcstar@XYZ.myrealbox.com) Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:11:20 +1100 
 | 
| 
 | 
| On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 22:40 -0800, Steve Sobol wrote: 
> R Collinge wrote: 
>> "Verizon expects "that in the not-too-distant future that you will be 
> Bull. 
> It's a marketing issue. It's a monopolistic 
In Australia there is (in theory) a way of getting ADSL from one 
There is also the "Unconditioned Local Loop" (ULL) where the incumbent 
I don't think there has been too much take up as yet of these 
There are some links to FAQ's and technical info here for anyone 
http://www.telstrawholesale.com/products/access.htm 
 
Regards, 
David Clayton, e-mail: dcstar@XYZ.myrealbox.com 
Dilbert's words of wisdom #18: Never argue with an idiot. They drag you | 
| Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply | 
| Go to Next message: Michael D. Sullivan: "Re: Verizon Plans to Offer "Naked DSL" on 4/5 of its Wirelines" | |
| Go to Previous message: Clark W. Griswold, Jr.: "Re: Verizon Plans to Offer "Naked DSL" on 4/5 of its Wirelines" | |
| May be in reply to: Charles Cryderman: "Verizon Plans to Offer "Naked DSL" on 4/5 of its Wirelines" | |
| Next in thread: Michael D. Sullivan: "Re: Verizon Plans to Offer "Naked DSL" on 4/5 of its Wirelines" | |
| TELECOM Digest: Home Page | |