Re: British TV License (was America the Worst For Cell Rates |
---|
Tony P. (kd1s@nospamplease.cox.reallynospam.net) Wed, 2 Feb 2005 18:16:07 -0500
|
|
In article <telecom24.49.11@telecom-digest.org>, MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU says:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, David Clayton wrote:
>> I think the original point many have been to say that a lot of PAL TV
> Perhaps the term "a lot" means something different in Australia than
> That is not the case with PAL televisions in North America. Almost no
> Nor is there any demand for it. DVDs and video tapes are much cheaper
> The technical advantage that PAL once enjoyed over NTSC vanished in
Indeed. The reason we still have the black and white carriers is because
Now there's very good synchronization between the carrier and luminance |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Joseph: "Re: Time Warner Cable to Offer Free AOL" | |
Go to Previous message: ranck@vt.edu: "Re: Supermarket: Let Your Fingers do the Paying" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |