Re: VoIP Plays Big Role in Presidential Election Turnout |
---|
Fred Goldstein (SeeSigForEmail@wn6.wn.net) Thu, 04 Nov 2004 10:46:00 -0500
|
|
> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I have a question about the election. > On AP News Wednesday afternoon, Senator Kerry said in order to save the > country the kind of debacle which occurred in 2000 when Mr. Bush was > eventually declared the winner, he was going to concede the election > to Bush, which he did. But later in the day Wednesday officials said > they were still going to closely audit all the votes from Ohio. Now > just suppose the Ohio audit showed the Kerry *had* won that state > (although he and others said it was quite unlikely). But let's say > it turned out he did win *that state's electoral votes*. In that case > he might have won the election; but he has already conceded to Bush. > What would happen in that case? Has a 'winner' of a presidential > election ever conceded it to someone else? Just curious. PAT]
The concession speech means nothing, legally. If Ohio turns out to go |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Rick Merrill: "Re: VoIP Plays Big Role in Presidential Election Turnout" | |
Go to Previous message: Clark W. Griswold, Jr.: "Re: VoIP Plays Big Role in Presidential Election Turnout" | |
May be in reply to: Lisa Minter: "VoIP Plays Big Role in Presidential Election Turnout" | |
Next in thread: Rick Merrill: "Re: VoIP Plays Big Role in Presidential Election Turnout" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |