TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Re: Historical Rules About Private Line Services?

Re: Historical Rules About Private Line Services?
Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:07:26 EST

There were many types of private line circuits, from dry loops (no
battery on them) used for burglar alarm and other signaling services
up to the highest bandwith of all, the broadcast television channels
used to send programs to affiliated stations across the country.

Telegraph and teletypewriter circuits were very common and vast
networks served wire services, newspapers, stock brokers and others.
They came in 50-, 80-, 75- and 100-wpms speeds. Some ran with
customer-owned teletypewrtiers, some ran with Bell Teletypes.

One particular circuit I was familiar with caused a great deal of
annoyance to the New York control bureau when Edinburg, Texas, broke
to send. Such channels ran on all kinds of physical, carrier,
microwave and coax circuits, and by the time the various relays and
other hardware along the way did its thing New York would be several
lines into the next message before the "break" signal from Edinburg
reached New York.

Another circuit from New York to the West Coast and south to Mexico
City often had trouble south of Laredo on the Mexican side. The
regulations in Mexico required the channels in Mexico be provided by
the government telegraph administion, not the telephone come, and it
was not unusual for the telco board in Laredo to have to "blind"
Mexico City (make the circuit one-way southbound because so many
transients interfering with the U.S.A. part of the circuit).

Higher-bandwidth channels came in various bandwiths, some of the most
common being voice (telephone)-grade and broadcast-grade, and others. As
other have reported, many, many companies had both local and wide-ranging
networks, some of them national or even international.

In general, connecting private line circuits with switched service was
prohibited, with exceptions for the military services and
"right-of-way companies," firms that had their own right-of-way such
as railroads and pipeline companies.

At the peak were the television broadcast channels, which had very
high quality and reliability standards and were continually monitored
in TOCs (Television Operating Centers) all along the way. Another
interesting provision of the TV broadcast channel tariff was that
there always had to be a hot spare channel available along the entire
route to switch almost instantly in case of failure. This was also
the only class of service that provided rebates for loss of service
more than either 15 minutes or 30 minutes, I forget which..

It should also be noted that there were differences in intrastate and
interstate rates for all private line servicess, interstate being
cheaper than intrastate as was customary in those days, so it was
advantageous to customers to seek to make intrastate circuits segments
of interstate circuits rather than stand-alone intrastate circuits.

Along the lines of some of the other reminisences, I remember the
downtown Montgomery Ward store in Oklahoma City had the Automatic
Electric sets on an isolated (customer-owned) PBX with only Bell
phones in a few locations.

One very large industrial customer on the Texas Gulf Coast (it had to
be located there becaust seawater was part of the process or
feedstock) told the telco how many thousand of dollars they could save
(monthly or yearly) with an isolated customer-owned PBX but went with
Bell because of the Bell System's ability to restore service along
that hurricane-frequented coast. (This concern also prompted them, in
the days of much more rudimentary National Weather Service coverage)
to maintain their own network of coastal radars from the Louisiana
line to the Mexican border.

Wes Leatherock

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Carl Navarro: "Re: Historical Rules About Private Line Services?"
Go to Previous message: communicationsdirect: "CommunicationsDirect News Daily Update - February 06, 2007"
May be in reply to: "Historical Rules About Private Line Services?"
Next in thread: Carl Navarro: "Re: Historical Rules About Private Line Services?"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page