Message-ID: <20210623140517.5EB5C72B@telecom2018.csail.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 14:05:16 +0000 (UTC)
From: Moderator <telecomdigestsubmissions@remove-this.telecom-digest.org>
Subject: Colorado reaches 91% rural broadband coverage as efforts to
improve internet for Ute Tribes move forward
By Tamara Chuang
One look at Colorado's official broadband map and Bernadette Cuthair
will tell you it's wrong.
As the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe's director of planning & development,
Cuthair has been working to help her community access faster internet
service. But the current broadband map makes it seem like the
southwestern town of Towaoc, the base for the tribe, doesn't need
help. The map shows most of the town already has federally adequate
speeds of 25 megabits or faster.
https://coloradosun.com/2021/06/23/rural-broadband-ute-mountain-tribes-digital-divide/
Message-ID: <20210622165136.0873615F3FF5@ary.qy>
Date: 22 Jun 2021 12:51:35 -0400
From: "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
Subject: Re: The Supreme Court Decides That Compatible Sotware Is
Still Legal
It appears that Moderator
<telecomdigestsubmissions@remove-this.remove-this.telecom-digest.org> said:
>Back in the 1980s, everyone used the Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet on their
>Well, everyone except one guy in Hawaii.
>
>https://jl.ly/Copyright_Law/oragoog.html
>
>
>***** Moderator's Note *****
>
>Kudos to John for providing the most clear expanation for U.S. "Fair
>Use" that I have seen to date. ISTR that copyrights used to last for
>27 years, and could be renewed once, but I think that was changed at some
point.
>
>Please tell me what the current law allows. Thank you.
Back in the 1700s copyrights lasted for 14 years with one renewal, but since
then they've been extended past the point of absurdity. Since 1978 the rule
has been 70 years after the death of the author for works written by people,
or 95 years for works written by corporations and other legal entities. For
software, it might as well be forever.
R's,
John
Message-ID: <samnv3$i6u$1@shakotay.alphanet.ch>
Date: 20 Jun 2021 06:41:39 -0000
From: "Marc SCHAEFER" <schaefer@alphanet.ch>
Subject: Re: VOIP Issue
Fred Atkinson <fatkinson.remove-this@and-this-too.mishmash.com> wrote:
> The issue is that [when I answer an incoming call on one of my VOIP
> extensions] it takes fifteen to twenty seconds after I answer before I can
> hear the calling party. When this happens, the other extensions keep
ringing
> [even though I have answered the incoming call] until I can hear the caller.
Assuming SIP protocol:
If you could record the IP packets, for example with tcpdump or
Wireshark (available also on Microsoft software), you may see something
like this: an attempt to RE-INVITE the session on a private IP address.
If you have this option on your IP phone, try to disable reinvitation.
This may, or may not, be the problem, but a Wireshark capture (first a
simple PNG capture of the exchange, with sip in the filter area,
then sip || udp, would help).
> The same is true when I make an outgoing call, it is fifteen to
twenty
> seconds after the called party answers before they can hear me.
This looks like: SIP session establishment work, but the RTP / UDP audio
path does not work immediately.
What SIP phone do you use?
Did you try another SIP provider?
Do you have special SIP NAT traversal options on your router?
