Image of early Candlestick Phone

The Telecom Digest
Monday, May 8, 2023

Image of Modern Desktop Phone
Copyright © 2023 E. William Horne. All Rights Reserved.
Volume 42 Table of Contents Issue 128
Re: More FCC pirate crackdowns
Recent Court Decision Examines Multiple Aspects Of TCPA Litigation
TCPA Lawsuits Continue To Mount Throughout The Country
Message-ID: <u36b6s$gqj$1@panix2.panix.com> Date: 6 May 2023 19:53:00 -0000 From: "Scott Dorsey" <kludge@panix.com> Subject: Re: More FCC pirate crackdowns Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org> wrote: > No indication yet as to whether this aggressive approach is actually > having an effect. The law requires the FCC's Enforcement Bureau to > make an annual list of the pirate-broadcasting hotspots and report to > Congress on its enforcement efforts there. Pirate broadcasting isn't really a serious issue in this country. There are a few places where it's a problem such as the Haitian community in Brooklyn where legitimate broadcasters have been interfered with, but really the FCC goes up against broadcast pirates because it's an easy win and they get a lot of publicity for a minimal effort. At the same time we have folks like the 7200 gang on the 40M amateur radio band who seem to be totally immune to FCC enforcement because the FCC does not seem to think it's worth their time. We have Christian networks using noncommercial FM licenses and broadcasting commercials and program sponsorships. We have absolute and total lack of Part 15 enforcement on consumer products; walk into a Wal-Mart with a spectrum analyzer and take a peek at the electronics section, plenty of spurious emissions from all over. But the FCC doesn't care, they're more interested in going after broadcast pirates because it gets them into the news. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Message-ID: <20230507014306.GA231944@telecomdigest.us> Date: 6 May 2023 21:43:06 -0400 From: "The Telecom Digest" <submissions@telecom-digest.org> Subject: Recent Court Decision Examines Multiple Aspects Of TCPA Litigation by David O. Klein Last month, a magistrate judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida issued an informative report and recommendation in Zononi v. CHW Grp., Inc ("CHW"). Plaintiff sued CHW for allegedly sending him multiple commercial text messages without his consent. Plaintiff alleges that these text messages violated both the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") and the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act ("FTSA"). In turn, defendant filed a motion to dismiss the action. The TCPA is a federal statute designed to protect consumer privacy by restricting certain types of telemarketing communications. The FTSA, colloquially known as a Mini-TCPA, is Florida's own set of telemarketing laws designed to regulate the delivery of intrastate telemarketing communications. Every day, numerous decisions are rendered in TCPA litigation across the country. The Zononi decision is notable because of the careful and detailed analysis of defendant's motion undertaken by the Court. https://www.mondaq.com/article/news/1309354?q=1803232&n=775&tp=7&tlk=15&lk=61
Message-ID: <20230507014813.GA231981@telecomdigest.us> Date: 6 May 2023 21:48:13 -0400 From: "The Telecom Digest" <submissions@telecom-digest.org> Subject: TCPA Lawsuits Continue To Mount Throughout The Country by David O. Klein Connor v. First Choice Media LLC, et al., On April 10, 2023, Mr. Jay Connor, a pro se plaintiff, filed a Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") lawsuit against First Choice Media LLC, et al., in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. Pro se plaintiffs are individuals who choose to represent themselves in TCPA lawsuits instead of hiring an attorney. The complaint alleges that Plaintiff received "multiple anonymous, unsolicited calls" in violation of both the TCPA and the South Carolina Telephone Privacy Protection Act ("SCTPPA"). Specifically, the complaint alleges that the caller falsely purported to be with the National Do Not Call Registry ("DNC") and stated that because Plaintiff's number was listed on the DNC, he must consent "to receive shipments of covid 19 testing kits." Absent consenting to same, he would continue to receive unwanted telemarketing calls. Although Plaintiff proceeded to provide consent, he, nonetheless, continued to receive calls from Defendants. https://www.mondaq.com/article/news/1309360?q=1803232&n=775&tp=7&tlk=16&lk=62
End of The Telecom Digest for Mon, 8 May, 2023
Helpful Links
Telecom Digest Archives The Telecom Digest FAQ