For your convenience in reading: Subject lines are printed in RED and
Moderator replies when issued appear in BROWN.
Previous Issue (just one)
Classified Ads
TD Extra News
Add this Digest to your personal
or  
TELECOM Digest Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:16:00 EST Volume 24 : Issue 563 Inside This Issue: Editor: Patrick A. Townson Many Amazon.com Workers Sick From Food Poisoning (TELECOM Digest Editor) China on Track to Add 100M New Phone Users (USTelecom dailyLead) DirecTV to Pay $5.35 Million For Do-Not-Call Violations (Monty Solomon) Cellular-News For Wednesday 14th December 2005 (Cellular-News) Microsoft Warns of Critical Errors (Reuters News Wire) Attack Targets Mozilla Firefox (Robert McMillan) Bell System Service Standard 'Green Books'- What is Used Now? (L Hancock) IEC's Broadband World Forum Asia Presents IPTV Developments (Lisa Reyes) Re: Hypothetical SxS Question (DevilsPGD) Re: Parental Electronic Supervision of Teens - Good or Bad? (Scott Dorsey) Re: FTC Do Not Call List (hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com) Re: FTC Do Not Call List (jmeissen@aracnet.com) Re: FTC Do Not Call List (Charles Cryderman) Spam (was Re: FTC Do Not Call List) (Jim Haynes) Re: Spamming the Wrong Message (hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com) Re: Communications History (Charles Cryderman) Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using -any name or email address- included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the email. =========================== Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without explicit written consent. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome. We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. Geoffrey Welsh =========================== See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Scores of Amazon.com Workers Sickened From Apparent Food Poisoning Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:41:58 EST From: ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu (TELECOM Digest Editor) Several dozen amazon.com employes in the Coffeyville/Independence facility were stricken with apparent food poisoning early Tuesday morning after eating food provided to them by an Oklahoma catering company. The company normally provides food to employees working at night. Local and area hospitals were inudated with Amazon employees after the outbreak began about 1:30 AM Tuesday. The distribution center is located between Coffeyville and Independence in the Coffeyville Industrial Park. Emergency Medical Service paramedics and technicians from Independence, Coffeyville, Parsons, and Caney were alerted to the outbreak and began transporting victims to the Coffeyville Regional Medical Center, Mercy Hospital in Independence, and Labette County Medical Center in Parsons. Joanne Cox, director of Public Relations for Mercy Hospital said one woman was admitted, five others were treated and released. At CRMC, Susan Correll said 20 people were transported to that facility, and eight were admitted. At LCMC there were eight employees treated, then released, according to William Mahoney, CEO of the hospital. Amazon announced the closing of the facility during the early morning hours on Tuesday, but by the time for the day shift, the facility had re-opened. Word of the outbreak began shortly after midnight according to the Montgomery County Sheriff's Department. Deputy Todd Clark was making his routine rounds and noted a car on the side of the road at Paul Street and Walnut Street in Coffeyville. As is customary, the deputy stopped to inquire about the well-being of the passenger and notice a female occupant who was leaning out of the car window vomiting. He offered to help the woman or escort her to her destination. She told him she worked at amazon.com and had eaten some barbeque pork catered to the employees between the late evening and early morning shifts by Poritunes Food and Ale, an Oklahoma company which feeds employees at the facility. Cook advised his dispatcher about the situation and then about an hour later, at 1:16 AM the dispatcher advised him that Coffeyville EMS personnel were responding to Amazon where a woman with diabetes had become ill and was believed to be striken with food poisoning. Cook responded to the facility to assist the EMS workers and was told upon arrival that between 60 and 80 employees had become ill. At that point, Tony Lamb, an employee of Coffeyville EMS requested other emergency agencies in the area to assist in the evacuation and transport of the facility's employees, and that a public announcement be made asking everyone who had eaten the barbeque offered by the catering service (from the earlier shift, now mostly scattered and on their way home) to be alert to the problem and see their physician as needed. A general announcement was made over cable television in Independence and Coffeyville seeking amazon.com employees for this. Sharon Watson, director of public affairs for Kansas Department of Health and Evironment said three investigators had been assigned to work with Montgomery County health officials to detirmine the exact cause of the outbreak; They were joined by Oklahoma health officials (the catering firm is located in Oklahoma) in saying it was apparently 'tainted pork sausage' which was responsible. Samples of the pork sausage and samples from the patients were sent to the state laboratory in Topeka for futher examination. By Wednesday things were back to normal at the Amazon facility. Copyright 2005 Independence Reporter Publishing. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:46:45 EST From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com> Subject: China on track to add 100M new phone users in USTelecom dailyLead December 14, 2005 http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/zZBoatagCAASfBXSzN TODAY'S HEADLINES NEWS OF THE DAY * China on track to add 100M new phone users in '05 BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH * SureWest hits sweet spot with IPTV * AT&T debuts online security news channel * SES Global to buy rival New Skies * KT to raise investment 20% in 2006 * Verizon tests IMS solution from Nortel USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT * Learn how to implement IP video TECHNOLOGY TRENDS * Avaya unveils VPN remote software for IP phones * Intel eyes home-entertainment market with new chip * Companies test wireless payments via NFC network REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE * TWC seeks statewide franchise in Texas * DirecTV fined $5.3M for telemarketing Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others. http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/zZBoatagCAASfBXSzN ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 01:15:43 -0500 From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com> Subject: DirecTV to Pay $5.35 Million For Do-Not-Call Violations By Andrew Bridges, Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) -- DirecTV Inc. will pay $5.35 million to settle charges that its telemarketers called households listed on the national do-not-call registry to pitch satellite TV programming, Federal Trade Commission officials said Tuesday. The proposed settlement, if approved by a federal judge in Los Angeles, would be the FTC's largest civil penalty in a consumer protection case. The DirecTV complaint, filed by the Department of Justice at the FTC's request, named the company and five telemarketing firms it hired, as well as six principals of those firms. http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2005/12/13/directv_to_pay_535_million_for_do_not_call_violations/ ------------------------------ Subject: Cellular-News for Wednesday 14th December 2005 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 07:48:11 -0600 From: Cellular-News <dailydigest@cellular-news-mail.com> Cellular-News http://www.cellular-news.com [[ 3G ]] Malaysian 3G Coverage Expanded http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15225.php Malaysia's Maxis Communications has expanded its 3G service coverage to Penang. Since the launch of its 3G services on 1 July, Maxis has significantly increased its 3G coverage in the Klang Valley and will soon offer 3G services in Johor Bahru. To da... Temporary 3G Expansion in New Zealand http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15228.php Telecom New Zealand says that it is investing about $1.7 million in additional temporary mobile coverage to meet the demand at New Zealand's favourite holiday spots during the local summer. The extra mobile sites and increased capacity will cover the... CDMA Upgrade for Venezuela http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15231.php Venezuela's Movistar has announced the commercial launch of it's 3G CDMA2000 1xEV-DO network to serve the country's 26 main cities. Lucent upgraded Movistar's existing Lucent-supplied base stations and mobile switching center (MSC) to support CDMA200... [[ Financial ]] Vodafone Buys Telsim In Turkey For $4.55 Billion http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15215.php Vodafone Group said Tuesday that it has agreed to acquire Telsim, the number two mobile operator in Turkey, from the Turkish Savings Deposit and Investment Fund ("SDIF") for a consideration of US$4.55bn. ... Telefonica Moviles' Brazilian JV To Lower Capex In 06-07 http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15216.php Telesp Celular Participacoes, the largest company within the Brazilian joint venture of Telefonica Moviles and Portugal Telecom SA, plans to cut sharply capital expenditure in 2006 and 2007, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange... PRESS: VimpelCom's directors may block 2006 capex in Ukraine http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15218.php Three members of Russia's second-largest mobile operator VimpelCom's board of directors may vote against the company's investment program in Ukraine for 2006, Vedomosti business daily reported Tuesday, citing a letter sent to VimpelCom's Chairman D... Russia's MegaFon to bid for Uzbekistan's Buztel http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15220.php Russia's third largest mobile operator MegaFon plans to participate in the tender for Uzbekistan's mobile operator Buztel-GSM, MegaFon's Press Secretary Marina Belasheva told Prime-Tass Tuesday. She did not elaborate. ... SonyEricsson Increases Chinese Investment http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15227.php Sony Ericsson has received Chinese Ministry of Commerce approval to take control of Beijing Suohong Electronics (BSE), a Sony China controlled manufacturing facility, by raising its share holding to 74.5%. The BSE site, which is 60% dedicated to the ... Celtel Buys Madagascan Network http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15230.php The Pan-African GSM operator, Celtel International has reached an agreement to acquire a majority stake in Madagascar's mobile telecom operator, Madacom for an undisclosed amount. The agreement was reached with the current shareholders led by the Dis... [[ Handsets ]] Japan October Mobile Phone Shipments Up 32% On Year http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15211.php Japan's shipments of mobile phones, including personal handy-phone system devices, soared 32.0% in October from a year earlier to 3.17 million units, the Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association said Tuesday. ... Emblaze Mobile Buys Handset Distributor http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15224.php Israel's Emblaze Mobile says that it has acquired a strategic interest in the European handset distributor, Global Telecoms Distribution. GTD is one of Europe's leading distributors of multimedia handsets with a 3 year trading history and 100 staff... [[ Legal ]] EU Delays Review Of Telefonica Takeover Of UK's O2 http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15212.php The European Commission Tuesday delayed by two weeks its antitrust review of Spanish telecommunications company Telefonica's planned takeover of U.K. mobile communications company O2 PLC. ... Ericsson Employees Charged On Tax Crimes In Sweden http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15214.php The Swedish National Economic Crimes Bureau Tuesday charged four current and former employees at telecommunications equipment vendor L.M. Ericsson Telephone Co. with severe evasion of tax controls. ... Russia's Rezervspetsmet says MTS' buy of Bitel illegal http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15219.php The purchase of Kyrgyzstan's largest mobile operator Bitel by Russia's largest mobile operator Mobile TeleSystems (MTS) was illegal, little known Russian company Rezervspetsmet said in a statement Tuesday. ... [[ Mobile Content ]] Gambling Via Vodafone Live http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15221.php Austria's GSM network operator, A1 has launched a gambling service through the Vodafone live! portal. Mobile phone bets can even be placed while games are in progress. Every newly registered customer will also receive a gaming credit of EUR5.... Mobile Gamers Likely To Replace Handsets Twice a Year http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15223.php IGN Entertainment has released a new report which finds mobile gamers are key growth drivers for the mobile industry. The survey documents spending habits of mobile gamers, which shows more hardware buys per year, higher minute usage and bigger wirel... [[ Network Contracts ]] Vodafone To Invest $600 Million To Upgrade Telsim Radio Network http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15217.php Vodafone Group PLC said Tuesday that it will invest $600 million over three years in upgrading the radio network of Turkish mobile phone operator Telsim Mobil Telekomunikasyon. ... [[ Network Operators ]] Vodafone in a Strop, a FlexiStrop http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15229.php The Czech Republic GSM operator, Oskar Vodafone has launched a service that enables customers to impose limits on the cost of their monthly phone bill. Following the Smart Overview service, the operator is introducing FlexiStrop. With this free servi... [[ Personnel ]] Eva Lindqvist Appointed Senior Vice President of Mobile Business http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15222.php Eva Lindqvist has been appointed new Senior Vice President of Mobile Business at Marketing, Products & Services at TeliaSonera's Head Office as of January 1, 2006. She will have the strategic responsibility for the mobile business within the TeliaSon... [[ Regulatory ]] French Regulator Cuts Mobile Phone Tariffs http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15213.php France's telecommunications regulator said Tuesday it will force the country's mobile-phone companies to slash wholesale tariffs by 24% from 2006, a move that will cost the three network operators an estimated EUR900 million in sales. ... [[ Statistics ]] UK is the Music Download Capital of Europe http://www.cellular-news.com/story/15226.php Motorola have released a report into the attitudes of Britons towards new technologies. The MotoWithMe study reveals that Britons' attitudes have considerably matured since the millennium dawned. Five years ago the talk was of gimmicks like intellige... ------------------------------ From: Reuters News Wire <reuters@telecom-digest.org> Subject: Microsoft Warns of Critical Windows Security Flaws Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:30:55 -0600 Microsoft Corp. on Tuesday warned users of its Windows operating system of a "critical" security flaw in its software that could allow attackers to take complete control of a computer. The world's largest software maker issued a patch to fix the problem as part of its monthly security bulletin. The problem mainly affects the Windows operating system and Microsoft's Internet Explorer Web browser. Computer security experts and Microsoft urged users to download and install the patch available at www.microsoft.com/security. Microsoft said the vulnerability exists in its Internet Explorer Web browser, which an attacker could exploit to take over a PC by running software code after luring users to malicious Web pages. Microsoft also issued one other security warning it rated at its second-highest level of "important." A vulnerability defined as "important" is one where an outsider could break into a machine and gain access to confidential data but not replicate itself to other computers, Microsoft said. Microsoft defines a flaw as "critical" when the vulnerability could allow a damaging Internet worm to replicate without the user doing anything to the machine. The "critical" flaw affects Internet Explorer which is a part of Windows while the "important" flaw is a vulnerability in the fundamental code that the higher level functions of Windows are all based on. For more than three years, Microsoft has been working to improve the security and reliability of its software as more and more malicious software targets weaknesses in Windows and other Microsoft software. More than 90 percent of the world's personal computers run on the Windows operating system. Copyright 2005 Reuters Limited. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or) http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html ------------------------------ From: Robert McMillan <idg@telecom-digest.org> Subject: Attack Targets Mozilla Firefox Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:32:22 -0600 Robert McMillan, IDG News ServiceTue Dec 13,10:00 AM ET Computer users who have not upgraded to the latest version of Mozilla's Firefox browser may now have an extra incentive to do so, thanks to a hacker who has posted an exploit. Exploit Shown On Sunday, a hacker going by the name of Aviv Raff published sample code that could be used to take over the computers of Firefox users running version 1.0.4 or earlier of the browser. The exploit takes advantage of a known bug in the way Firefox processes the popular Javascript Web programming language. "I think it's been enough time for people to upgrade from v1.0.4. of Firefox. So, here is the PoC [proof of concept] exploit for the... vulnerability," he wrote on his blog. The bug was fixed in Mozilla version 1.0.5, which was released during the summer, and has also been fixed in version 1.7.9 of the Mozilla Suite, said Mike Schroepfer, vice president of engineering with Mozilla. "As long as users keep updated to the latest version, they're, in general, very safe." Similar to IE Flaw In some ways, this latest exploit is similar to highly publicized attack code that has been circulating for the Microsoft Internet Explorer browser, said Russ Cooper, editor of the NTBugtraq newslist and a scientist with security vendor Cybertrust. "It can install and run code of the attacker's choice if a victim visits a malicious Web site," he said of the IE bug in an interview via instant message. Users who are not already in the habit of frequently updating their browsers should change their ways, because browsers are "historically broken," Cooper said. "That means they have vulnerabilities regularly," he added. "You should keep them updated within 30 days of patches being made available, regardless of what the patch is for." The IE code, which was published in November, takes advantage of a Javascript problem that has not yet been patched. Many security experts expect Microsoft to patch its Javascript bug on Tuesday, but the Redmond, Washington, software giant has not confirmed that this will be the case. Copyright 2005 PC World Communications, Inc. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or) http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html ------------------------------ From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com Subject: Bell System Service Standard 'Green Books'- What is Used Now? Date: 14 Dec 2005 12:16:42 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com I understand until the end of the old Bell System, AT&T published service standard indexes in something called the "Green Book". This was a collection of indexes that quantified service and performance quality in a variety of ways (billing accuracy, dial tone time, etc.) Would anyone know if the baby Bells replaced that with anything? Do the non-traditional carriers (ie VOIP) have any such performance standards? Some standards may be obsolete due to replacement of expensive electro-mechanical equipment with ESS. I suspect today the local, intermediate, and long haul land-side networks have more capacity than in the past. For example, obviously we don't want long waits for dial tone. However, an instantaneous dial tone at all times for all customers would push the index too far into the opposite direction and in the old days that mean excessive expensive equipment was in use. On the other hand, incomplete call completion and call cutoffs remain a problem on wireless calls. [public replies, please] ------------------------------ From: Lisa Reyes <forums_@iec-mail.org> Subject: IEC's Broadband World Forum Asia Presents IPTV Developments Date: WED, 14 DEC 2005 15:16:11 -0600 Reply-To: lreyes@iec.org FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Lisa Reyes Phone: +1-312-559-3325 E-Mail: mailto:lreyes@iec.org IEC'S BROADBAND WORLD FORUM ASIA PRESENTS CUTTING-EDGE IPTV DEVELOPMENTS AT FIRST-EVER IPTV GLOBAL COMFORUM CHICAGO December 14, 2005 The International Engineering Consortium's (IEC) Broadband World Forum Asia 2006 will bring information technologies 15-18 May 2006 at the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre in Hong Kong, China, with PCCW as the official host sponsor. As Asia leads the world in broadband penetration and innovative services, telecommunications professionals will have the opportunity to learn from top-level executives at the forefront of quadruple-play profitability and real-world deployment. They will address issues such as content licensing, market realities, managing broadband services over IP/MPLS core, security environments, digital rights management, personalization and interactivity for the end user, and more. Chairperson of an IPTV workshop Mr. Jeffrey Soong, Chief Executive Officer, BNS Ltd., commented, "With content universally accepted as being the most important differentiator for an IPTV service, understanding the licensing and copyright environment is paramount for telecommunications operators' success. However, the content business is also a largely new territory for telcos. This workshop brings together a lineup of content industry specialists to give telco IPTV operators a fundamental understanding of the basic components of content licensing, negotiations, and copyright management, which are crucial to the success of an IPTV service." The Broadband World Forum Asiass first-ever IPTV Global ComForum focuses on communications service providers who must shift from a voice-centric revenue model to a broadband IP-centric model. The IPTV Global ComForum will also allow attendees to forge business relationships with key deal makers in the rapidly expanding Asian broadband market. Additionally, the IPTV Global ComForum will provide a unique experience to examine in detail access networks to services control, delivery to QoS and customer experience, content, and multimedia applications. Mr. Vince Pizzica, Chief Technology Officer, Alcatel Asia Pacific, further commented on another IPTV workshop: "The future of a more participatory, rewarding TV experience lies in how we creatively combine communication with entertainment. Triple play will "socialize" and at the same time "personalize" the TV experience. The key question, then, for telecom operators, is how to realize the power of merging triple-play components, as this represents unprecedented opportunity to differentiate themselves by creating a user-centric, interactive TV experience for viewers. The session will focus on exploring the market potential of interactive, personalized video services, and how different players in the ecosystem can exploit this new business opportunity." Key Speakers at both the Broadband World Forum Asia and its co-located IPTV Global ComForum include the following: Keynote speakers Alex Arena, Executive Director and Group Chief Financial Officer, PCCW, and Tadanbu Okada, Senior Vice President, Executive Director, Information Sharing Labs Group, NTT. Additional speakers include the following: Eric Li, Regional Sales Director, Asia Pacific, Microsoft TV; Paul Berriman, Head of Strategic Market Development, PCCW; Thorsten Heins, Member of the Group Board and Chief Technology Officer, Siemens Communications; Paolo Pastorino, Chief Technology Officer and Chief Business Officer, Home Gateway Initiative; Michelle Guthrie, Chief Executive Officer, STAR; and Jonathan Spink, Chief Executive Officer, HBO Asia. Broadband World Forum Asia 2006 will also feature a Wireless Broadband track, a Broadband Networking Technologies and Architectures track, and a Broadband Convergence track. Mr. Soong further commented, "The Broadband World Forum is a well-organized event which maintains a high-quality standard in terms of speakers and presentations. This ensures a well-attended and fruitful discussion platform for networking and learning about latest industry issues." Last year's Broadband World Forum Asia in Yokohama, Japan, drew more than 3,000 people to register, included more than 150 presentations, and presented more than 120 industry experts as speakers. A two-day technology exhibition accompanied the show, featuring the latest broadband services, solutions, and products by more than 40 of the world's leading manufacturers and producers. NTT served as the official host sponsor in the show's second year. This year's Broadband World Forum Asia 2006, hosted by PCCW, expects to grow on the exhibition floor as well as in attendee registration. Registration for the event is now open at http://www.iec.org/events/2006/bbwf_asia/register/. For more information, please visit http://www.iec.org/events/2006/bbwf_asia/ or contact Lisa Reyes at +1-312-559-3325 or mailto:lreyes@iec.org. ABOUT THE IEC A nonprofit organization, the IEC is dedicated to catalyzing technology and business progress worldwide in a range of high-technology industries and their university communities. Since 1944, the IEC has provided high-quality educational opportunities for industry professionals, academics, and students. In conjunction with industry-leading companies, the IEC has developed an extensive, free on-line educational program. The IEC conducts industry-university programs that have substantial impact on curricula. It also conducts research and develops publications, conferences, and technological exhibits that address major opportunities and challenges of the information age. More than 70 leading high-technology universities are IEC affiliates, and the IEC handles the affairs of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Heads Association and Eta Kappa Nu, the honor society for electrical and computer engineers. The IEC also manages the activities of the Enterprise Communications Consortium. Please visit www.iec.org. ------------------------------ From: DevilsPGD <spam_narf_spam@crazyhat.net> Subject: Re: Hypothetical SxS Question Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 01:59:32 -0700 Organization: Disorganized In message <telecom24.562.13@telecom-digest.org> hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote: > Joe Morris wrote: >> And I'm sure you remember the little "dial lock" gizmos that were >> clamped into the "1" fingerhole and were supposed to keep people from >> making outbound calls on an unattended office telephone? It seems >> that nobody ever thought about dialing with the switchhook -- or just >> banging away with ten or more pulses and asking the operator for >> assistance. > I think it was pretty difficult for most people to tap in accurately a > seven digit number. If you're timing was the least bit off any part > of the way you had to start over. You also risked discovery while > doing it. A little bit of experience and it wasn't too hard to do it correctly the majority of the time. The rest of the time you'd just apologize for misdialing. ------------------------------ From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) Subject: Re: Parental Electronic Supervision of Teens - Good or Bad? Date: 14 Dec 2005 11:24:22 -0500 Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000) Carl Navarro <cnavarro@wcnet.org> wrote: > If you have a 1970 Pinto you're probably safe from carjacking, but an > SUV or any Honda or sports car and you could be a victim. To be able > to go on the internet or call the law enforcement people and track > your stolen ride is a pretty reasonabe investment. I used to drive a sports car with a manual transmission and a second gearshift for the adjustable differential. I'd love to see a carjacker try and figure that out. Hell, I bet most of them can't even drive a manual.... --scott "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." ------------------------------ From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com Subject: Re: FTC Do Not Call List Date: 14 Dec 2005 07:07:28 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Wesrock@aol.com wrote: > This must not be a true statement, since otherwise there would be no > telemarketing calls, expecially. It is a labor intensive business and > must provide a sufficient return to the operators of such services to > make a profit. Otherwise they would go bankrupt. Would you have any figures? How much does a telemarketing campaign cost to run and what is its rate of return? Lately I've been innundated by political calls. How many recipients minds are changed and react as desired to the telephone request? (The calls lately aske me to call my congerssman in support or against some particular pending measure). > Spam is not nearly so expensive to originate, but it, too, has costs > and must provide a sufficient return that it is not true that ALL > consumers do not want it. Again, what are the costs and benefits? Spam is particularly odious because the sender's costs are very low and the recipients end up paying for them. In any event, people have always responded to socially undesirable antics. That doesn't mean we should accept or tolerate them. Most people think prostitution ought to remain illegal even though it has, is, and will be always well patronized. It doesn't mean we like it. > Actually, I have occasionally gotten e-mails, mostly spam, form > organizations or businesses with which I do have a legitimate business > relationship, which make offers that I have responded to favorably and > which, in at least one case, have saved me money. The emails you describe fall outside a strict definition of spam. Most people associate genital enlargement or NIgerian oil ministers or get rich quick schemes with spam. > Defining spam in some cases becomes very controversial. I don't think so. Mark Crispin wrote: > The general problem is the considerable cost in going after spammers. > It is almost impossible to recover more than a fraction of these > costs, even when there is complete success in prosecution and seizure > of the spammer's ill-gotten gains. Could you elaborate on this issue? There are two aspects of enforcement. One is via the criminal justice system, where a spammer is prosecuted for violating a law and upon conviction, sent to jail. The government assumes the cost of investigation and prosecution. The other is via the civil system, where a private party (or the government) initiates a civil lawsuit against another person in the hopes of collecting monetary damages. In some cases it is easier to win a civil case than a criminal case (note certain high profile murder cases recently), but "winning" a case is only part of it. The first part is winning your claim, that is, the court agreeing with your case. That in itself doesn't mean very much. The second part is the court awarding damages to you for your loss. You may be awarded only a nominal amount, ranging from literally $1.00 or a few hundred or thousand dollars (to a big corporation, this is meaningless). To the defendant, it is merely a cost of doing business and no big deal. The third part is the defendant's ability to pay. Even if you are awarded a large settlement, you must collect it from the defendant. Apparently some of these guys are pretty slimy and have their assets well hidden or declare bankruptcy. If there is ENOUGH willpower, the government can push aside those smokescreens, but it takes an enormous willpower not usually available. (In one rare case, a man claiming he is broke has been held in jail for ten years to force him to come up with the money the court believes he has hidden somewhere). >> I don't understand Internet message addressing, but it seems to me any >> initiated message should have a secured sender's address address. > Technically, this is impossible with the current mechanisms used by > Internet mail. Nothing short of a complete redesign from the ground > up will accomplish it. An effort to create a new Internet email > infrastructure would be extraordinarily expensive and complex. It > would make the conversion to TCP and SMTP in 1983 look trivial by > comparison. I'm not at all sure it would be as a complex process as you suggest. The internet is software driven, not hardware driven; that is, it's not like someone going out and physically rewiring every PC and server in the world. Rather, it is developing new software and downloading it. Very often I am offered upgrades for various Internet software compnents -- the PDF reader, basic browser, news reader, "flash player", basic PC operating system, etc. Actually I'm quite content with a bare bones system, but I've found that won't work. If you don't keep up, in a very short time your browser just won't work at all -- some site will simply reject you and tell you to get a new browser. My point is that with all these upgrades constantly going out it shouldn't be that big a deal to download new components. Must could be done on the gateway end. > The new email infrastructure will also give the world email postage > stamps. And this time, it won't be just governments who get a cut of the > profits. The biggest objection to SMTP in the SMTP vs. X.400 wars two > decades ago was that SMTP's fundamental design made it impossible to > impose email postage stamps. You can bet that the new redesigned Internet > email won't have that problem. Email and internet use is NOT "free". Someone is paying for the servers, routers, and lines and people who install and maintain them. For consumers, many pay an Internet Service Provider, such as an AOL, for that service. They say a very substantial amount of today's email traffic is spam. Reducing that traffic would reduce the need for routers and lines and that would save money. Maybe having email stamps isn't such a bad idea. Telephone service is offered in many grades and prices including many "unlimited" use plans for local and long distance, even overseas calls are offered at cheap package rates. There is no reason Internet service can't be offered on a similar pricing scale -- those who use it a lot would pay a lot. That is, after all, our social policy regarding communications -- pay for usage and costs. The concept of rate averaging and universal service was discarded as social policy at the time of Bell System divesture. > Be careful for what you wish. You may get it. And there are plenty of > people who are quite happy to provide it to you (*ka-ching*!). The costs of spam and fraud and high enough now, the cash register is going along quite nicely, except the thieves are getting the money. How many people, other than myself, are holding back from participating in e-commerce and communications because of mistrust of the system? [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Quite a few of us are holding back. Lisa. I order via the net when it is absolutely neccessary, or appears to me to be very good deal (and have been assured it is legitimate. Usually I just deal with the local stores however. PAT] ------------------------------ From: jmeissen@aracnet.com Subject: Re: FTC Do Not Call List Date: 14 Dec 2005 16:36:05 GMT Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com In article <telecom24.562.9@telecom-digest.org>, <jmeissen@aracnet.com> wrote: > > No, she and we are trying to dictate what people can talk about on OUR > phones. Big difference. My paying for a phone does not give someone > else license to unlimited use of it for THEIR purposes. > John Meissen jmeissen@aracnet.com >[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: That would also be true regarding >_your_ computer accounts would it not? Absolutely. > But finding the _legitimate, bonadide_ guilty party and chopping off > his fingers would not be so futile, would it? If you could find them, and if it were legal to do so. Maybe you could do that in Saudi Arabia, but the last time I checked, chopping off fingers was illegal here in the US. > But I have many readers here who consider me to be an imbicile and > unable to correctly idenfity spammers; apparently they do not know > how to geographically locate and match up IP numbers, and no, you do > _NOT_ rely upon what the "From:" has to say; you begin much further > up in the envelope. And you don't rely on the IP addresses, either. As has been repeatedly pointed out 90% or more of the spam we're subjected to is proxied through virus-infected home computers and compromised servers. The owners of those systems are no more responsible for sending spam than you would be of making phone calls to Columbia that came from someone tapping your line outside your house. You could TRY to make a claim about the websites the spam refers to, but those also are extremely short-lived, unauthorized servers often running on the same compromised systems. > Start with the "from " at the very top and carefully examine the > first two or three lines as well as paying close attention to the > path lines showing how the message got to you. Some of that stuff up > there is much harder (but not impossible!) to forge. Now, 'tis true > that dial-up IPs tend to be quite dynamic and almost useless, but > really serious spammers have a solid line all the time don't they? Yes, you can tell where the system is that the spam was sent through. But that doesn't tell you WHO sent the spam, only which compromised zombie system they used to relay it through. It won't tell you how to track down the sender, but you can use it to block further attempts. For instance, my system blocks based on sender IP address and hostname. I block anything that resolves to a hostname that looks like it came from a home system.. basically any hostname whose left-most portion contains 4 sets of numbers separated by '-', or contains any of the strings "client", "dhcp", "dsl", "pool", "ppp" and "user". I also block on a rather large list of IP ranges. > Please go look at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html > to see an example of something I am working on in cooperation with the > geobytes.com database. Testing the accuracy of my 'welcome to visitors' > line has thus far shown a high degree of positive results. Just go > look at those lines on that page. I don't care if you bother to listen > to the audio or read the AP newswire. Some of you are probably too > smart to bother with that anyway. If the 'welcome to visitors from' > line produces really gross inaccuracies in your instance, I would like > to know about it. In a day or three, I am going to present here an > HTML 'form' in which you can cut and paste the top half dozen or so > lines from your favorite spam. I hope you will give it an honest > review, and report your results to the Tin Hat imbicile. PAT] Yes, I'm sure it works. But there's a HUGE difference between legitimate web surfers and scum spammers. Web surfers don't tend to hide their activities. John Meissen jmeissen@aracnet.com [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: What you say is true, however if the top three or four(?) lines of the header -- let's call it the 'true From line' points at you, then you have a problem. Either you are the spammer or you are a spam-enabler (by virtue of proxies, open relays, etc.) You would not be up there in the top lines if you were neither a spammer nor an enabler, now would you? Either way, you need to have your ass kicked hard. Kicked harder for the spammer than for the enabler I guess, but kicked none the less. Anyone can be 'From:' anyone else, just as I could write a perfectly awful letter to our resident President Dubya and sign your name and address to it. But if the letter was postmarked "Independence 67301 KS" and _you_ disavowed any knowlege of it, most simpletons and brain diseased old Tin Hat fools would agree it _probably_ was not your doing. PAT] ------------------------------ Subject: Re: FTC Do Not Call List Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:49:21 -0500 From: Charles Cryderman <Charles.Cryderman@globalcrossing.com> Pat, An interesting note of this law. The main author of this law, US Congressman from Michigan, John Dingle (50 years in the House) hasn't even set his own telephone numbers on the list. (as told to JJ & Lynne, morning DJs WCSX 94.7 in Detroit) Chip Cryderman ------------------------------ Subject: Spam (was FTC Do Not Call List) Reply-To: jhaynes@alumni.uark.edu Organization: University of Arkansas Alumni From: haynes@alumni.uark.edu (Jim Haynes) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:50:52 GMT Another part of the general spam problem is that spam blockers do not keep spam off the network and do not cause the spammers any pain. Most of them block spam at your machine, or at one point upstream from your machine. So the spammers just try harder to get past them by sending more messages, and that further congests the network. One scheme that seemed to me to have some promise was to detect spam in the SMTP receiving program and deliberately delay its responses to the sending program. So that the transaction of sending a message is stretched out far longer than normal. jhhaynes at earthlink dot net ------------------------------ From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com Subject: Re: Spamming the Wrong Message Date: 14 Dec 2005 10:02:38 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Adam L. Penenberg wrote: > Indeed. Recently, DoubleClick reported that clickthrough rates on > e-mail were still at about 8 percent. Is he saying 8% of spam recipients respond and send money in response? I find that hard to believe. I am curious as to who actually responds to spam and why. Are people that stupid, greedy, or desperate? > He asks: "Do people trust TV less because of infomercials? Or mail > less because of annoying mortgage offers that disguise themselves as > bills? My guess is that these things annoy people, but they have > learned to compartmentalize their impact -- the mediums still > deliver value, so consumers are willing to put up with some > annoyances for the real benefits." Think about that the next time > you return from vacation and have to spend an hour deleting spam. Well, I for one have changed my habits. I immediately throw out mail that looks like an ad, and I have destroyed legitimate mail as a result. In one situation, when I called to get a replacement letter, the company acknowledged that their external printing on the envelope caused many people to do just as I did and they had to send out many replacements. So they can push this stuff, but only to a point and consumers will rebel. I rarely watch TV when it's broadcast because of heavy and annoying commercials. I tape everything then watch it later so I can fast fwd through the commercials. There are some shows, especially on cable TV, that are so commercial loaded I just don't bother watching them at all, indeed, I'm rethinking about my paying $60 a month for "basic" cable TV when I watch so little of it. I use email and e-commerce extremely sparingly solely because of spam and fraud. If it weren't for them, I'd freely give out my email address; today I just tell people I don't have one. In other words, the medium no longer delivers that "value" to justify putting up with the annoyances. There is a tipping point and consumers are reaching it. ------------------------------ Subject: Re:Communications History Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:00:46 -0500 From: Charles Cryderman <Charles.Cryderman@globalcrossing.com> Professor Gray enlightened us with: > In 1959 I was assigned to the US Army Signal Depot in Okinawa. I got > my uniform all spruced up and answered all of the questions from the > examining board correctly and won "soldier of the month". There were > three awards. One was a new Army Green uniform, which would have cost > me about half a month's pay out of my pocket. When I joined the Army in > 1957 they issued us one OD uniform and one green one. We were supposed > to buy the second green one ourselves. We got black shoes, > but we had to dye the brown boots black ourselves. > Another piece of the award was a three-minute phone call to the United > States -- which at the time would cost about US$36.00 (over a third of a > month's pay). As I recall it was handled by RCA Globecom from a phone > booth in Sukiran to Tulsa, OK. It was full duplex, so we didn't have to > do the "over" thing. I called my wife, who had just borne our first > son. I learned that he had been born via a Red Cross "health and > welfare" telegram, since my wife couldn't afford to call me. I'm glad > that the troops today have multiple methods of communicating, but in > 1958-59 I was severely restricted. My wife wrote every day, but we only > had that one single phone conversation in my 15 months overseas. At $12 > a minute, we could buy a lot of stamps. > The final part of the award was a trip to the northern part of Okinawaka > (on the general's helicopter) to have a look at the tropospheric scatter > radio site that was being installed. My memory is clouded by the fog of > time, but I think it was Philco doing the installation. Since I was a > radio repairman I got the "grand tour" of the whole site. The > helicopter ride was something special as well, since they were not > nearly as ubiquitous as they are today. Professor, As of 1987 (when I left Okinawa) the tropospheric scatter radio systems were still in use. There were two satellite stations (not sure if that has changed any) as well as sub-sea cable off the island. Also, the US Air Force had installed a telephone system that was available for personal use though out the island. This include family housing and single enlisted housing (barracks). It was at that time about $15.00 a month and calls to the US were about 0.45 per minute. One last note, I too went before the board as a NCO. Just before I went before them it they drop the main award, a back seat ride in a Air Force F15 around the island. Now that would have been a blast. Chip Cryderman ------------------------------ TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm- unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums. It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. Contact information: Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest Post Office Box 50 Independence, KS 67301 Phone: 620-402-0134 Fax 1: 775-255-9970 Fax 2: 530-309-7234 Fax 3: 208-692-5145 Email: editor@telecom-digest.org Subscribe: telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/ (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives) RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308 and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest ************************************************************************* * TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from * * Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate * * 800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting. * * http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com * * Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing * * views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc. * ************************************************************************* ICB Toll Free News. Contact information is not sold, rented or leased. One click a day feeds a person a meal. Go to http://www.thehungersite.com Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA. ************************ DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO YOUR CREDIT CARD! REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST AND EASY411.COM SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest ! ************************ Visit http://www.mstm.okstate.edu and take the next step in your career with a Master of Science in Telecommunications Management (MSTM) degree from Oklahoma State University (OSU). This 35 credit-hour interdisciplinary program is designed to give you the skills necessary to manage telecommunications networks, including data, video, and voice networks. The MSTM degree draws on the expertise of the OSU's College of Business Administration; the College of Arts and Sciences; and the College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology. The program has state-of-the-art lab facilities on the Stillwater and Tulsa campus offering hands-on learning to enhance the program curriculum. Classes are available in Stillwater, Tulsa, or through distance learning. Please contact Jay Boyington for additional information at 405-744-9000, mstm-osu@okstate.edu, or visit the MSTM web site at http://www.mstm.okstate.edu ************************ --------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization. End of TELECOM Digest V24 #563 ****************************** | |