For your convenience in reading: Subject lines are printed in RED and
Moderator replies when issued appear in BROWN.
Previous Issue (just one)
TD Extra News
Add this Digest to your personal
or  
TELECOM Digest Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:42:00 EDT Volume 24 : Issue 455 Inside This Issue: Editor: Patrick A. Townson AOL Buys Blogs (Kenneth Li and Eric Auchard) Court Rules in Favor of Anonymous Blogger (Randall Chase) Microsoft Says Windows Safer Than You Think (Georgina Prodhan) MCI Shareholders Approve Verizon Deal (USTelecom dailyLead) MCI Accepts Verizon Offer (Lisa Hancock) Re: United States Says No! Internet is Ours! (Kenneth P. Stox) Re: U.S. FTC Sues New Hampshire 'Spyware' Operation (Lisa Hancock) Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using -any name or email address- included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the email. =========================== Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without explicit written consent. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome. We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. Geoffrey Welsh =========================== See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Kenneth Li annd Eric Auchard <reuters@telecom-digest.org> Subject: AOL to Buys Weblogs, Courts Bloggers Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:58:21 -0500 By Kenneth Li and Eric Auchard America Online on Thursday said it will buy Weblogs Inc., a network of Web sites focused on topics ranging from scuba diving to gadgets, marking the biggest bet on unfiltered online commentary. The deal, which is expected to close next week, is worth about $25 million, one source said on Wednesday. Financial terms were not disclosed. AOL's agreement is the biggest price paid for a network of blogs, or Web journals, analysts said, although it is a smaller price compared with recent Internet acquisitions by media companies such as News Corp.'s $580 million deal to buy Intermix Media Inc. Weblogs is one of the more successful attempts at weaving together a network of individual blogs to attract a stable of advertisers and cash in on the blogging phenomenon. The purchase also marks the third acquisition in recent months for AOL after the online unit of Time Warner Inc. restructured its business this year to focus on boosting advertising revenue to offset a declining dial-up customer base. Once seen as the red-headed stepchild of Time Warner, whose portfolio includes HBO, the Warner Bros. movie studio, and CNN, top executives now view AOL as a major source of growth for the entire company. Over the summer, AOL has made more of its once proprietary services available for free on its Web site, including music videos and e-mail. It scored a victory in July when more viewers watched AOL.com's presentation of the Live8 concerts than on television in the United States. "AOL is strong at mass market programing. We needed to go down to the next level and do it in a scalable community based way," said Jim Bankoff, executive vice president of programing at AOL. Web logs adds 85 new Web sites, including the popular Engadget, Autoblog and Joystiq, with contributions from over 100 freelance bloggers to AOL's group of properties. The company will be managed separately from AOL, but will be featured throughout AOL and AOL.com's existing services. Engadget ranks as the Web's third most popular blog in terms of links from other sites, according to data on traffic measurement site Technorati (http://www.technorati.com/pop/blogs/) "We've reached a milestone in the development of citizen media," Jason Calacanis, co-founder and CEO of Weblogs Inc., said in a statement, citing AOL's advertising expertise as a reason for the sale. Calacanis is a dot-com impresario who in the second half of the 1990s acted as the unofficial mayor of Silicon Alley, a hub of Internet companies that formed in Manhattan's downtown. A rival network known as Gawker Media is backed by Nick Denton, another New York-based blog entrepreneur. The Gawker network focuses on a smaller number of highbrow, gossip-oriented sites, including Gawker and Wonkette. "The concept of unfiltered content being on same level of major media companies is revolutionary, but also appropriate," Calacanis said. AOL on Thursday also said it made its AOL Instant Messenger software and services available on several blogs and social network Web sites. They include: Facebook, an online directory of high school and college users; LinkedIn, a social network for job seekers; Six Apart, which makes blogging software; and Glam.com, a fashion and beauty site. Copyright 2005 Reuters Limited. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. ------------------------------ From: Randall Chase <ap@telecom-digest.org> Subject: Court Rules in Favor of Anonymous Blogger Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:59:57 -0500 By RANDALL CHASE, Associated Press Writer In a decision hailed by free-speech advocates, the Delaware Supreme Court on Wednesday reversed a lower court decision requiring an Internet service provider to disclose the identity of an anonymous blogger who targeted a local elected official. In a 34-page opinion, the justices said a Superior Court judge should have required Smyrna town councilman Patrick Cahill to make a stronger case that he and his wife, Julia, had been defamed before ordering Comcast Cable Communications to disclose the identities of four anonymous posters to a blog site operated by Independent Newspapers Inc., publisher of the Delaware State News. In a series of obscenity-laced tirades, the bloggers, among other things, pointed to Cahill's "obvious mental deterioration," and made several sexual references about him and his wife, including using the name "Gahill" to suggest that Cahill, who has publicly feuded with Smyrna Mayor Mark Schaeffer, is homosexual. In June, the lower court judge ruled that the Cahills had established a "good faith basis" for contending that they were victims of defamation and affirmed a previous order for Comcast to disclose the bloggers' identities. One of the bloggers, referred to in court papers only as John Doe No. 1 and his blog name, "Proud Citizen," challenged the ruling, arguing that the Cahills should have been required to establish a prima facie case of defamation before seeking disclosure of the defendants' identities. The Supreme Court agreed, reversing and remanding the case to Superior Court with an order to dismiss the Cahills' claims. "Because the trial judge applied a standard insufficiently protective of Doe's First Amendment right to speak anonymously, we reverse that judgment," Chief Justice Myron Steele wrote. Steele described the Internet as a "unique democratizing medium unlike anything that has come before," and said anonymous speech in blogs and chat rooms in some instances can become the modern equivalent of political pamphleteering. Accordingly, a plaintiff claiming defamation should be required to provide sufficient evidence to overcome a defendant's motion for summary judgment before a court orders the disclosure of a blogger's identity. "We are concerned that setting the standard too low will chill potential posters from exercising their First Amendment right to speak anonymously," Steele wrote. "The possibility of losing anonymity in a future lawsuit could intimidate anonymous posters into self-censoring their comments or simply not commenting at all." The standard adopted by the court, the first state Supreme Court in the country to consider the issue, is based on a 2000 New Jersey court ruling. Under the standard adopted by the Supreme Court, a plaintiff must first try to notify the anonymous poster that he is the subject of subpoena or request for a court to disclose his identity, allowing the poster time to oppose the request. The plaintiff would then have to provide prima facie evidence of defamation strong enough to overcome a summary judgment motion. "The decision of the Supreme Court helps provide protection for anonymous bloggers and anonymous speakers in general from lawsuits which have little or no merit and are filed solely to intimidate the speaker or suppress the speech," said David Finger, a Wilmington attorney representing John Doe No. 1. "Delaware cases are generally respected in other states, and we'll have to see if this trend continues with these types of lawsuits, but I expect the decision of the Delaware Supreme Court to be influential," Finger added. Robert Katzenstein, a lawyer representing the Cahills, did not immediately return a telephone message left at his home. "This is the first state Supreme Court to squarely decide the standards to govern John Doe subpoena cases," said Paul Alan Levy, an attorney for Public Citizen, a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization, who helped argue the case for John Doe No. 1. "The court's determination to require sufficient evidence before a critic is outed will go a long way toward reassuring citizens that they remain free to anonymously criticize public officials." Steele noted in his opinion that plaintiffs in such cases can use the Internet to respond to character attacks and "generally set the record straight," and that, as in Cahill's case, blogs and chatrooms tend to be vehicles for people to express opinions, not facts. "Given the context, no reasonable person could have interpreted these statements as being anything other than opinion. ... The statements are, therefore, incapable of a defamatory meaning," he wrote. Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. Other news and headlines from Associated Press available at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/AP.html ------------------------------ From: Georgina Prodhan <reuters@telecom-digest.org> Subject: Microsoft Says Wwindows is Ssafer Than You Think Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 14:01:41 -0500 By Georgina Prodhan Microsoft Corp. launched a trust-building initiative on Thursday designed to show its commitment and progress to date in making its frequently attacked Windows computer operating system more secure from hackers. Microsoft, which is moving increasingly into the territory of specialist security software companies such as McAfee Inc. and Symantec Corp., said it planned a string of product launches designed to combat cybercrime. The world's biggest software company said it planned to release a preliminary, or beta, version by the end of this year of new software to protect corporate computers running Windows against viruses, worms and other attacks. "It's a unified product. You don't have to pick whose anti-virus solution you think is the best," Chief Executive Steve Ballmer told a news conference in Munich. "The threats we see do need more than secure software." Redmond, Washington-based Microsoft, which already offers security software for networked server computers and desktops, said the new software, called Client Protection, would be aimed at large companies. It will offer tools for system administrators to keep users' computers from being infected by viruses and other malicious software and would be integrated with Microsoft's technology used to track user accounts and logons. But Mike Nash, Microsoft's vice president for security technology, said the new software would not eliminate the need for other security products. "Does it mean that we're going to solve all problems immediately? No," he told Reuters in an interview. "There are customers that will choose to use competitors' products." Microsoft currently offers server-based security software to protect corporate networks from hackers and is testing an anti-virus and security software service called Windows OneCare. The company also said it had set up an alliance of 30 firms including Symantec and VeriSign to work on security products for the Microsoft platform, uniting and expanding on previous partnerships. CULTURE SHIFT Microsoft has battled for years against the perception that its software is not secure. It also presented data on Thursday which it said showed Microsoft was safer than rival open-source operating system Linux. "This is an area we'll continue to invest in the long term," Nash said. He added he had seen a culture change since Chairman Bill Gates said three years ago security would be a top priority. "I used to be begging people to pay attention to security. Now they get it. Security is part of everyone's job." He said the Blaster worm outbreak of 2003, which targeted Microsoft software and devastated hundreds of thousands of computers worldwide, was also a spur to action. "When Blaster happened, I spent a lot of time on the phone. It was very focusing for the company," he said. In the last year, Microsoft has also bought a series of companies including anti-virus software maker Sybari to shore up security in its Windows and e-mail software. Asked whether more acquisitions were in the works, Nash said: "There's nothing specific in a plan." But he said Microsoft asks the question: "Are there great things out there that are important to our portfolio?" Nash also said he was seeing cybercrime increasingly motivated by financial gain rather than by pure vandalism as hackers use more and more sophisticated tools to trick users into revealing personal information or simply to steal data. "Look at the guy who wrote the Sasser worm. He did it to see if he could," Nash said. "It's different now." (Additional reporting by Reed Stevenson in Seattle) Copyright 2005 Reuters Limited. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 13:44:13 EDT From: USTelecom dailyLead <ustelecom@dailylead.com> Subject: MCI Shareholders Approve Verizon Deal USTelecom dailyLead October 6, 2005 http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/vohUatagCrheyVibXt TODAY'S HEADLINES NEWS OF THE DAY * MCI shareholders approve Verizon deal BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH * Telcos' mergers could shake up wireless business * Eircom denies Swisscom reports * Motorola pares work force * Spat between ISPs cuts off some customers * Telephone, cable study blasts citywide Wi-Fi projects USTELECOM SPOTLIGHT * Legg Mason to present financial conference at TELECOM '05 TECHNOLOGY TRENDS * Company launches BPL service in Virginia REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE * India says gear makers must set up shop there * European telcos oppose ICANN proposal Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others. http://r.smartbrief.com/resp/vohUatagCrheyVibXt ------------------------------ From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com Subject: MCI Accepts Verizon Offer Date: 6 Oct 2005 09:49:18 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com MCI agreed to be bought by Verizon. See: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/V/VERIZON_MCI?SITE=1010WINS&SECTION=BUSINESS&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT "MCI Inc. shareholders voted overwhelmingly Thursday to approve an $8.4 billion acquisition by Verizon Communications Inc., despite some lingering shareholder resentment over the company's rejection of a higher bid." I have no regrets to see MCI disappear. IMHO, the company developed its business unfairly by making up its own rules and litigating itself customers instead of earning them. Imagine two restaurants. One follows rigid and expensive govt regulations regarding sanitation and service, e.g. being open 24/7, serving low-income customers below cost, having a wide variety of foods available at all times, high quality food, have high capacity for large crowds, all under prices set by the govt. The other restaurant is only open during peak hours, sells only profitable foods when it can get them, uses the first restaurant's parking lot, and ignores the govt mandates to provide comprehensive service at all times to all comers. Obviously the second restaurant has a lot of advantages. Or as someone correctly noted in this newsgroup, how many microwwave towers atop mountains in heavy snow did MCI install and maintain? I particularly object to people calling MCI the "hero" in taking on AT&T. The record is clear that long distance rates were continually falling as a result of new technologies. Interstate toll calls were as low as 5c per minute. Calls from payphones, collect, and calling cards, conversely, have shot up to ridiculous levels. While other retail products require price labels, there is no such requirement for toll calls. The old AT&T gladly told you the rate before you made a call, I could never get that info out of MCI and certainly not today. But supposedly I, as a consumer, am better off. No, the people who are really better off are new folks in the telecom industry. It should be noted that over the years MCI lost a number of lawsuits as to its business practices. Most recently: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/MCI_SETTLEMENT?SITE=1010WINS&SECTION=BUSINESS&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2005-10-03-19-29-17 MCI Inc. has agreed to pay $331 million to 16 states and the District of Columbia to settle accusations that it engaged in accounting fraud, the company and the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office said Monday. ------------------------------ From: Kenneth P. Stox <ken@stox.org> Organization: Ministry of Silly Walks Subject: Re: United States Says No! Internet is Ours! Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 14:39:32 GMT Am I the only one who is ROFLMAO about this? There is nothing preventing other nations and/or organizations from setting up their own root servers. It amazes me how much press this issue has gotten recently. ------------------------------ From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com Subject: Re: U.S. FTC Sues New Hampshire 'Spyware' Operation Date: 6 Oct 2005 09:19:43 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Reuters News Wire wrote: > Those infected with Odysseus' spyware have their search results > corrupted as well, the FTC said. When they try to use a search engine > like Yahoo or Google, they are steered to a look-alike page that > prominently lists Odysseus clients in the results. > Those who use an Odysseus software tool to remove the spyware only > draw more unwanted programs on to their computers, the FTC said. The practices described are outright fraud. I wonder what kind of people work as programmers for these kinds of outfits. I used to think -- obviously incorrectly -- that computer programmers had some level of ethics and would use their skills and gifts for good, not evil. It's too bad the programming profession never developed widely recognized codes of ethics and professional standards like CPAs or PEs. I think the programmers ought to be prosecuted as accomplices in creating of fraud. Likewise for those who create spam systems. Can anyone make a case to defend the programmers who do such garbage? [public replies please] ------------------------------ TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecomm- unications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums. It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. Contact information: Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest Post Office Box 50 Independence, KS 67301 Phone: 620-402-0134 Fax 1: 775-255-9970 Fax 2: 530-309-7234 Fax 3: 208-692-5145 Email: editor@telecom-digest.org Subscribe: telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/ (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives) RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308 and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest ************************************************************************* * TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from * * Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate * * 800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting. * * http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com * * Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing * * views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc. * ************************************************************************* ICB Toll Free News. Contact information is not sold, rented or leased. One click a day feeds a person a meal. Go to http://www.thehungersite.com Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA. ************************ DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO YOUR CREDIT CARD! REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST AND EASY411.COM SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest ! ************************ Visit http://www.mstm.okstate.edu and take the next step in your career with a Master of Science in Telecommunications Management (MSTM) degree from Oklahoma State University (OSU). This 35 credit-hour interdisciplinary program is designed to give you the skills necessary to manage telecommunications networks, including data, video, and voice networks. The MSTM degree draws on the expertise of the OSU's College of Business Administration; the College of Arts and Sciences; and the College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology. The program has state-of-the-art lab facilities on the Stillwater and Tulsa campus offering hands-on learning to enhance the program curriculum. Classes are available in Stillwater, Tulsa, or through distance learning. Please contact Jay Boyington for additional information at 405-744-9000, mstm-osu@okstate.edu, or visit the MSTM web site at http://www.mstm.okstate.edu ************************ --------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization. End of TELECOM Digest V24 #455 ****************************** | |