For your convenience in reading: Subject lines are printed in RED and
Moderator replies when issued appear in BROWN.
Previous Issue (just one)
TD Extra News
Add this Digest to your personal
or  
TELECOM Digest Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:46:00 EDT Volume 24 : Issue 344 Inside This Issue: Editor: Patrick A. Townson Norvergence Forfeits $47 Million to FTC (Consumer.com News) Massive AT&T Internet Service Failure in Five States (AP News Wire) Court Bars Executive From Google Employment (Elizabeth Gillespie) Google Mapping: Taking Browsers to the Limit (Renai LeMay) Emergency Alerts Coming to Your Cell Phone (Lesley McCullough) Re: Credit Reports, was Re: AT&T Customers Taken Over By AllTel (Sobol) Last Laugh! Scamming the 419 Scammers (Aunty Spammer) Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using -any name or email address- included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the email. =========================== Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without explicit written consent. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome. We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. Geoffrey Welsh =========================== See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Consumer News <consumer@telecom-digest.org> Subject: Norvergence Forfeits $47 Million to FTC Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:42:54 -0500 Norvergence Forfeits $47 Million In FTC Settlement Consumers Billed for Worthless Telecom Services The Federal District Court in Newark, New Jersey, has entered a final default judgment against NorVergence, Inc., that will immediately result in the cancellation of 1,600 contracts with the company valued at more than $47 million. The judgment is the result of a November 2004 Federal Trade Commission complaint charging NorVergence with defrauding consumers through misleading claims that it would provide them with dramatic savings on their monthly telephone, cellular, and Internet bills. The court found that consumers signed a set of applications and agreements with a total price equal to the promised monthly payments over five years. Most of the total payments were allocated to rental agreements for a "Matrix" or "Matrix Soho" device that supposedly would provide the promised costs savings. In reality, the Matrix was just a standard integrated access device (IAD), commonly used to connect telephone equipment to a long-distance provider's lines. The Matrix Soho was essentially a firewall. The Matrix boxes cost between $200 and $1,550. The total cost to the consumer was $7,000 to $340,000, with an average cost of $29,291. The price of the rental agreement had nothing to do with the cost of the Matrix, which itself was an incidental part of the promised services. NorVergence had an estimated 9,400 Matrix rental agreements totaling over $275 million. Other than the 1,600 contracts cancelled by this judgment, NorVergence sold its rental agreements shortly after they were signed to over 40 finance companies for cash. These sold contracts are not immediately affected by the default judgment. An unknown minority of these contracts were sold to finance companies for only a part of their typical five-year term. The default judgment makes these contracts void and unenforceable as of the end of the partial term when they are due to come back to NorVergence. The court also found that NorVergence failed to tell consumers that it did not have a long-term commitment from any service provider for the services it was promising to provide. NorVergence also failed to tell consumers that the Matrix boxes covered by the rental agreement would be of little or no value to them if NorVergence failed to provide the promised telecommunications services. Finally, the court found that NorVergence had furnished the finance companies who purchased its contracts with the means and instrumental- ities to commit deceptive and unfair acts or practices violating the FTC Act. It provided those finance companies with rental agreements that allowed the finance companies to: 1) misrepresent that consumers owe money on the rental agreements, regardless of whether NorVergence provided the promised telecommunications services; and 2) file collection suits against consumers in courts far from where the consumers are located. The FTC worked cooperatively on this matter with various state attorney generals' offices, which also have investigated NorVergence's business practices. More than 20 states also have reached settlements with some of the finance companies that purchased and are collecting on NorVergence rental agreements. Consumers in these states should contact their attorney general directly for further information on the state settlements. The states include: New Jersey, New York, Florida, Massachusetts, Illinois, California, Maryland, Rhode Island, Delaware, Georgia, Connecticut, Kansas, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Indiana, Ohio, Virginia, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, West Virginia, North Carolina, and the District of Columbia. Copyright 2003-2005 ConsumerAffairs.Com Inc. All Rights Reserved. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner, in this instance, Consumer Affairs.com. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ------------------------------ From: AP Newswire <ap@telecom-digest.org> Subject: Massive AT&T Internet Service Failure in Five States Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:36:16 -0500 Subscribers to AT&T Corp.'s DSL Internet service in five Western states lost their connections for several hours Thursday after the telecommunications company experienced a problem with equipment that routes data over its network. The service went down about 6 a.m. PDT, and about 50 percent of customers were restored by Thursday evening, said AT&T spokesman Andy Backover. The company confirmed homes and businesses in California and four other Western states were affected, but it would not provide the total number of subscribers who lost service or name the other states. Backover said AT&T received more than 2,000 reports of trouble. "We're working as hard as we can to restore the service," he said. "We're very apologetic to any customers who were inconvenienced." Backover added the problem stemmed from a problematic router that's been identified and was being repaired. But he did not know when all affected customers would be restored. The outage affected only customers of digital subscriber line, or DSL, service, and not other portions of the network for T1 service and other Internet backbone functions that AT&T maintains. Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. ------------------------------ From: Elizabeth M. Gillespie <ap@telecom-digest.org> Subject: Ex-Microsoft Exec Barred From Googe Job Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:29:02 -0500 By ELIZABETH M. GILLESPIE, Associated Press Writer A former Microsoft Corp. executive who defected to Google Inc. cannot immediately perform the job Google hired him to do, a judge ruled Thursday, saying Microsoft has a well-grounded fear that leaked trade secrets could hurt its business. Superior Court Judge Steven Gonzalez granted a temporary restraining order barring Kai-Fu Lee from working at Google on any product, service or project similar to those he worked on at Microsoft, including Internet and desktop search technology. Google, which hired Lee to lead a research and development center it will soon open in China, asked for a more specific list of tasks Lee can and cannot perform. Microsoft agreed to provide the court with a recommended list by Monday. In a statement e-mailed after the ruling, Google lawyer Nicole Wong called the judge's decision "only a temporary measure to maintain the status quo and to give the court more time to fully consider the parties' positions. "We are confident that once the judge has done so he will side with Google and Dr. Lee. Microsoft will not prevail in their intimidation campaign." Microsoft spokeswoman Stacy Drake said the ruling would stand until Sept. 6, the date Gonzalez set for a hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction that could make the restrictions on Lee's work at Google last until the case goes to trial. "We felt we needed to take this step to protect our sensitive business information and to ensure that Google and Dr. Lee honor the confidentiality and noncompetition agreements he made when he started working here," Drake said. Gonzalez set the trial for Jan. 9. Microsoft sued Lee and Google last week, claiming that by taking the Google job, Lee was violating an agreement he signed in 2000, barring him from working for a direct competitor in an area that overlapped with his roles at Microsoft. Lee and Google, which countersued, say he is not a search expert and that he had only limited involvement in Microsoft's China operations since 2000, the year he signed the agreements at the heart of the dispute. Most recently a vice president working on speech recognition in Microsoft's server and tools division, Lee headed up the creation of the company's research center in Beijing in the late 1990s and later worked in the MSN search unit. Microsoft said it paid Lee handsomely and would not have hired him if he had not promised to honor confidentiality and noncompetition agreements. The company said Lee made more than $3 million over nearly five years, and that he earned more than $1 million last year. Google claims that Lee has not disclosed any Microsoft secrets, and that it has repeatedly told Lee not to betray Microsoft's confidence. In court documents, Google said a conversation Lee had with Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates suggests that the software company is becoming increasingly concerned about Google siphoning away talent - and perhaps intellectual property. In a July 15 meeting, Lee said, Gates told him, "Kai-Fu, (CEO) Steve (Ballmer) is definitely going to sue you and Google over this. He has been looking for something like this, someone at a VP level to go to Google. We need to do this to stop Google." Drake earlier declined to comment on Gates' statement directly, saying that the company's concern is that Lee has knowledge of highly sensitive information. Microsoft and Google, along with Yahoo Inc., are locked in a fierce battle to dominate Internet search technology, both online and through desktop search programs. Google has launched new services, including e-mail, that compete with Microsoft offerings. Microsoft: http://www.microsoft.com Google: http://www.google.com Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. ------------------------------ From: Renai LeMay <newswire@telecom-digest.org> Subject: Google Mapper: Take Browsers to the Limit Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:30:50 -0500 http://www.news.com/ By Renai LeMay http://news.com.com/Google+mapper+Take+browsers+to+the+limit/2100-1038_3-5808658.html SYDNEY -- The only way to transform the Web into the desktop platform of the future is to fully embrace bleeding-edge features in browser software. This advice came from the lead engineer of the Google Maps project, Lars Rasmussen. Speaking at a conference on Web engineering here, Rasmussen cited Google Maps' use of the XSL+ (Extensible Stylesheet Language) standard and Microsoft's Vector Markup Language, which he said were useful technologies seldom used by Web developers. Both are supported only by certain browsers. If a Web application takes advantage of the best technologies a user's browser can offer, then "each individual gets the sexiest experience in their browser," he said. "Go beyond browsers' lowest common denominator," he advised developers. For example, Maps can command Internet Explorer to use VML (Vector Markup Language) to display a blue line between geographical points, but use the PNG (Portable Network Graphics) format and a linear description for the Firefox browser. The Sydney-based developer said the release of Maps created a critical mass of interest from the programming community in the development of AJAX (Asynchronous JavaScript and XML) applications, or Web applications with sophisticated graphics. "Google Maps was originally a C++ app intended to be downloaded separately," he recalled, harking back to the days before the acquisition of his start-up company, Where 2 Technologies, by Google last October. However, that changed when Rasmussen and his colleagues--looking for some venture capital -- pitched their mapping expertise to Google. At that point, the team changed their development model and started focusing on the Web instead. "We were surprised by the things you could do in a Web browser," he said. First, the Web allows rapid deployment and there is no software for users to install. It's also much easier to make sure code runs on multiple browsers compared with multiple operating systems like Mac OS X and Windows. The downside is that browsers don't give programmers full access to a computer's resources such as memory, process power and hard disk space. This is a bottleneck the engineer sees being removed in future, although he thinks the simplicity of the current Web-browsing experience needs to be maintained. As such, Rasmussen remains disappointed with Google Earth, which is similar to Maps but utilizes three-dimensional modeling and has to be downloaded before use. "Much as we have tried, we haven't been able to do this in JavaScript," he said, expressing hope that Google Earth and Maps would eventually be merged into one Web application. According to Rasmussen, Google is looking for Web mapping experts to beef up its Sydney office. The primary driver to obtaining resources is somewhat unique at Google -- the bottom line is whether users will find its projects useful or otherwise, Rasmussen said. In addition, the company will not shy away from releasing unfinished products to its user base, who in turn provide valuable feedback -- when Maps first launched, it received 5,000 e-mails a day. Recalling an incident which took place early in his career at Google, Rasmussen said one day he was unexpectedly summoned into a meeting with the company's founders, Sergey Brin and Larry Page, and other executives. "I was preparing my defense," he said, for fear the immaturity of his project would come under fire. Instead, Page told him Maps worked well enough to launch immediately. Working for Google has other advantages, he said, adding that when a bug that caused Maps to malfunction with the Firefox browser was discovered, "we called up the Firefox (lead engineer) the weekend before launch, and he came around and plugged in his debugging code." While interest in the Maps project has always been relatively strong, the engineer said it skyrocketed when satellite imagery was added. Web traffic levels increased overnight by a factor of 10 to 15 times, Rasmussen said. Although life at Google is good, it's not always predictable. The company's moon mapping service -- which launched on the anniversary of the original moon landing -- turned out to be partly a practical joke on Rasmussen. "I was getting all these congratulatory e-mails and I didn't know what the heck was going on," he said, noting Moon was developed in the U.S. One e-mail was from a friend of astronaut Neil Armstrong, who apparently appreciated the software. Ultimately the engineer is extremely enthusiastic about his project, which has in recent times seen a myriad of third-party programmers use its now-public programming interfaces to add external functionality. Even Microsoft's competing Virtual Earth product -- released this week -- was praised by Rasmussen. "It's quite good," he grudgingly admitted. Renai LeMay of ZDNet Australia reported from Sydney. Copyright 1995-2005 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner, in this instance, CNET Networks, Inc. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ------------------------------ From: Lesley K. McCullough <medill@telecom-digest.org> Subject: Emergency Alerts: Coming to Your Cell Phone? Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:40:52 -0500 Feds consider a system to deliver warnings to the public via text messages. Lesley K. McCullough, Medill News Service WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Emergency alerts may soon be delivered by more than just your television set or old-fashioned radio: The federal government is considering alerting you via text message should a possible natural disaster or terrorist attack directly affect your area. The Senate Subcommittee on Disaster Prevention and Prediction met this week on Capitol Hill to discuss creating a national, integrated all-hazards alert system that uses digital technology to efficiently send public warnings to Americans. In case of a national emergency or natural disaster, the president already can communicate with the nation through the Emergency Alert System (EAS). However, during the last five decades the system has been in place, a national alert has never been fully activated --not even during the September 11 terrorist attacks. The current system, developed in the Cold War era, can transmit messages only to radios and televisions and is simply outdated, says Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), chair of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation committee. "It was a good system in its time, but I don't know many people that carry radios around in their pockets anymore," Stevens says. "Therefore, we need to be able to communicate with people on their cell phones and BlackBerries." The technology to deliver alerts to your PC or handheld device exists, but EAS primarily works at the state and local level to disperse regional messages, including AMBER alerts, hazardous-material incidents, and severe-weather warnings, Reynold Hoover, director of the office of National Security Coordination within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), told the committee. A national scheme must integrate the various regional systems and technologies in which municipalities have already invested millions of dollars across the country. Legislation Needed "A public-warning interoperability solution will not be achieved by the federal government purchasing a new national emergency alert network or buying a software application," said Richard Taylor, testifying on behalf of the National Emergency Alerting and Response System Initiative. "We need standards for interfacing existing programs." Hoover echoed that sentiment. "We need legislation to tell us exactly what the integration policy will be," he said. Noting that the threat of future terrorist attacks still looms, subcommittee chair Senator Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina) said government should play an important role in the creation of a national alert system. "The system is too important to the nation not to get it right," DeMint said. The federal government is still exploring options. Hoover said FEMA is planning to test a Geo-Targeted Alerting System that uses reverse 911 technologies to provide specific and targeted warnings to individual households and businesses, such as warning of an impending tornado. Once the infrastructure is in place and integration methods are resolved, Hoover said, FEMA may offer a consumer opt-in system; people could log on to a designated Web site and sign up for the types of alert messages they want to receive. But because the system is still in an early stage, he said, it is unclear what the cost, if any, would be to consumers. While an exact timeline for national implementation of an all-hazards alert system is still unknown, Hoover said FEMA should know more from the pilot studies next year. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. ------------------------------ From: Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> Subject: Re: Credit Reports, was: AT&T Customers Being Taken Over By AllTel Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:12:27 -0700 Organization: Glorb Internet Services, http://www.glorb.com Danny Burstein wrote: > Most of the US is already covered, but the east coasters have to wait > until September, 2005. Correct, and thanks for the correction. I caught that after going to annualcreditreport.com *after* I posted. I thought the deadline had passed already. The original poster, however, is in Texas, so they're already eligible. > [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: But by the time the original party > refuses to pay the thousand dollars, gets placed with an agency (if > that happens, which I doubt) we will be around to September already. That's true too. Steve Sobol, Professional Geek 888-480-4638 PGP: 0xE3AE35ED Company website: http://JustThe.net/ Personal blog, resume, portfolio: http://SteveSobol.com/ E: sjsobol@JustThe.net Snail: 22674 Motnocab Road, Apple Valley, CA 92307 ------------------------------ From: Aunty Spam's Net Patrol <aunty-spammer@web.site.com> Subject: Last Laugh! Scamming the 419 Scammers Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:46:28 -0500 Scam Baiting for Fun and ... Well, Just for Fun Aunty Spam's Net Patrol Spam, spyware, spoofing, security breaches, and other Internet nasties. Aunty Spam's Net Patrol gives you up-to-the minute reporting, along with a healthy dose of editorial commentary and pithy, witty remarks. Scam baiting -- the act of leading scammers on a wild goose chase -- has been raised to a new art form with the advent of the Internet, and Internet scammers. And none more so (or more deservingly) than the so-called 419 scammers. You know the ones: "I am Mariam Abacha.", and someone has always died with a lot of money hidden away, and they want you to help them get the money out of the country. But first you have to send them some earnest money. While some do it on their own, for the sheer joy of baiting a scammer, groups and even complete websites have sprung up, all dedicated to scamming 419 scammers. And unlike the controversial Mugu Marauder, which encourages untargeted users to churn bandwidth of websites which may themselves be innocent, the individuals involved with the 419 scam baiting sites are responding directly to 419 scammers who have targeted them. One of the more prolific, and certainly amusing, sites is the 419 Eater site. http://419Eater.com The 419 Eater site starts out with this warning: "Please remember that these people are CRIMINALS and should be treated as such. Under no circumstances must you enter into any communications with these people unless you feel you are adequately prepared to deal with them." Good advice, that. Clearly the people running 419 Eater feel adequately prepared, and indeed they seem to be. The 419 Eaters regularly send their pet 419 scammers on goose chases which involve filling out and returning bogus forms (" the bank said you must first fill out a Money Laundering and Fraud Suppression Certificate"), and even taking and returning photos of their scammy selves holding up hand-lettered signs for the camera ("Ohwa Tafu Kwit Iam"). Ok, so maybe it isn't getting these guys arrested, but hey, it's keeping them busy, and exposing them (in more ways than one!) And it's darned funny. Check out 419 Eater at http://419Eater.com. Every once in a while you have to just laugh at the 419 scammers who abound on the Internet. Ok, maybe twice in a while, as we all just had a good laugh looking at the pictures at the 419 Eater website. Anyways, a colleague, after reading about the 419 Eater site, sent Aunty the link to another scam slamming site, "Urgent & Confidential: Dean Cameron's Nigerian Spam Scam Scam" web site, at SpamScamScam.com. Dean, it seems, has not only honed the art of baiting scammers, but has in fact turned his art into . well . art. Not surprising, really, as Dean is an accomplished and oft-employed actor -- you may best remember him from Summer School, Ski School, or Rockula. No? Well, maybe not -- then take Aunty's word for it. He's also appeared on Will & Grace, and in Mad About You. In any event, Dean Cameron has put together a live multi-media show based on his own experiences in baiting a 419 scammer, in which he "assumed the identity of a sexually confused Florida millionaire, whose only companions are his houseboy and cats, and began a 9 month correspondence with the scammer," explains the web site. The show is based on the actual correspondence between Dean and his scammer, all of which is available on Cameron's website. But the thing to which I most want to direct your attention is actually Dean 's Scam-o-Matic 419 scam letter generator. It's a Mad Libs-style form -- it asks you for nouns (a bunch of them), adjectives, and numbers, and then when you press "submit" it spits out a 419 letter to rival the best -- only much funnier. In fact, generally, this is a very funny site, by a very funny man. Except for his guacamole, which is decidedly unfunny. I mean, who puts sour cream in their guacamole? Yuck! You can play with Dean's Scam-o-Matic here; Cameron's Nigerian Spam Scam Scam" web site, at SpamScamScam.com. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner, in this instance, Aunty Spam's Web Site. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ------------------------------ TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums. It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. Contact information: Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest Post Office Box 50 Independence, KS 67301 Phone: 620-402-0134 Fax 1: 775-255-9970 Fax 2: 530-309-7234 Fax 3: 208-692-5145 Email: editor@telecom-digest.org Subscribe: telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/ (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives) RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308 and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest ************************************************************************* * TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from * * Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate * * 800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting. * * http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com * * Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing * * views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc. * ************************************************************************* ICB Toll Free News. Contact information is not sold, rented or leased. One click a day feeds a person a meal. Go to http://www.thehungersite.com Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA. ************************ DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO YOUR CREDIT CARD! REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST AND EASY411.COM SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest ! ************************ Visit http://www.mstm.okstate.edu and take the next step in your career with a Master of Science in Telecommunications Management (MSTM) degree from Oklahoma State University (OSU). This 35 credit-hour interdisciplinary program is designed to give you the skills necessary to manage telecommunications networks, including data, video, and voice networks. The MSTM degree draws on the expertise of the OSU's College of Business Administration; the College of Arts and Sciences; and the College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology. The program has state-of-the-art lab facilities on the Stillwater and Tulsa campus offering hands-on learning to enhance the program curriculum. Classes are available in Stillwater, Tulsa, or through distance learning. Please contact Jay Boyington for additional information at 405-744-9000, mstm-osu@okstate.edu, or visit the MSTM web site at http://www.mstm.okstate.edu ************************ --------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization. End of TELECOM Digest V24 #344 ****************************** | |