For your convenience in reading: Subject lines are printed in RED and
Moderator replies when issued appear in BROWN.
Previous Issue (just one)
TD Extra News
Add this Digest to your personal
or  
TELECOM Digest Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:27:00 EDT Volume 24 : Issue 297 Inside This Issue: Editor: Patrick A. Townson Film, Music Companies Hail Grokster Ruling (Lisa Minter) Sony Eyes Grokster Despite the Court Ruling (Lisa Minter) Ex-Enron Internet Chief Describes Losing Power (Lisa Minter) 50 Year Unisys Employee Retires (Lisa Hancock) G3 for Dialup Users! (Patrick Townson) Softswitch Switch Type In LERG? (essay182@gmail.com) Vonage and E911: Customer Service Response (RodneyG) Foreign Listings, Again (Fred Atkinson) VOIP and PSTN to Single Handset (Marc Popek) Re: Have You Yet Started Using VOIP? (Dennis G. Rears) Re: Cardholders Kept in Dark After Breach (David Harmon) Re: Beginning of the End for AT&T (Tony P.) Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using -any name or email address- included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the email. =========================== Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without explicit written consent. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome. We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. Geoffrey Welsh =========================== See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com> Subject: Film, Music Companies Hail Grokster Ruling Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 20:53:20 -0500 By Bob Tourtellotte Hollywood studios and music companies hailed a ruling by the U.S Supreme Court on Monday backing their position in a landmark copyright case, saying it could spur the development of the Internet as a commercial platform for distribuing movies and songs. In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that file-trading networks like Grokster and Morpheus can be held liable when their users trade copyrighted material without permission, clearing the way for a trial at a lower court. Legal experts cautioned that it could still take years for the trial, if it takes place, to work its way through a verdict and appeals. But entertainment executives said the strength of the Supreme Court decision in the case against Grokster could prompt file sharing networks to begin using filtering software that would ensure songs and videos downloaded across their networks are not illegal copies. They also hope the Supreme Court decision will lead to greater use of current, legal download services like Napster and iTunes for music or Movielink and CinemaNow for films, industry representatives said. "If the Supreme Court ... can come to a unanimous decision about this case, surely the content industries like movies and music and the high-tech sector can come together," said Dan Glickman, chief of the Motion Picture Association of America. "This decision will help spur that process," he told reporters. An MPAA spokesman said the industry trade group would take a "wait-and-see" approach to filing new lawsuits but would reserve the right to file them. Mitch Bainwol, chief of the Recording Industry Association of America, said the groups also would not immediately approach the U.S. Congress with proposals for new laws. In recent years, content providers have sued computer networks that offer software for downloading and trading songs and videos that have been copied without paying a fee. Through the MPAA and the Recording Industry Association of America, movie and music companies also sued individuals and sought new laws to bar illegal downloads. Content providers argue that illegal copying and swapping costs them billions of dollars in lost revenues annually. Technology advocates contend that shutting down file-sharing networks will stifle innovation. The Supreme Court decision means the lower court can go ahead with a trial, and technology companies said they welcomed the chance to argue their case in the lower court. "We are confident it will be proven that Morpheus does not promote or encourage copyright infringement," said Michael Weiss, who heads StreamCast Networks Inc, which was also a defendant in the Grokster case. Jennifer Urban, a specialist in intellectual property law with the University of Southern California, said a trial could take years if fully tried and the outcome is appealed. "This ruling says that if you actively promote (illegal downloading), you might be liable. Now we have to find out exactly what that means," she said. Attorney Carey Ramos, who had argued the case on appeal for songwriters and publishers, said the Supreme Court's decision was so strong that the lower court might bypass a full trial. Copyright 2005 Reuters Limited. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. ------------------------------ From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com> Subject: Sony Eyes Grokster Version Despite Court Ruling Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 20:54:32 -0500 By Derek Caney Sony BMG's chief executive said on Monday the record label wants to move forward with a legal version of the Grokster file sharing service, despite a U.S. Supreme Court decision that holds the service and others like it responsible for the copyright infringement of its users. The highest court in the United States set aside a lower court ruling that Grokster and Morpheus, which allow millions of Internet users to copy music and movies for free from each others' computers, were not liable for infringement since the services could also be used for legitimate purposes. "I'm hopeful we will move forward with a legitimate version of Grokster," Andy Lack, chief executive of Sony BMG Music Entertainment, said in an interview. "It won't be called Grokster, and it certainly won't be what Grokster is today," he added. A Grokster spokesman said, "File sharing is not going away regardless of today's developments so talks like this only make sense and seemingly further validate its popularity in the marketplace." Sony BMG's Lack said the ruling in the MGM vs. Grokster case would open up opportunities for different technologies that use so called peer-to-peer networks, which allow digital media files o be shared between individual computer users without a centralized server. "There's an opportunity to employ lots of different technologies that legitimize these file sharing services," Lack said. "A lot of them didn't want to come to the table until this ruling." Asked if the ruling would lead to a rash of lawsuits against peer-to-peer networks, he said, "If I were a lawyer representing those clearly illegal services, I'd be advising my clients either make a dramatic change in the way those companies are doing business or get out of business." Lack said the most striking aspects of the decision were that it was unanimous and transparent. "Everyone on both sides of the debate -- be it content companies or Grokster -- feared there would be no clarity. The most challenging concern is that the decision would be open to interpretation. This decision pre-empts that kind of debate." Sony BMG, home to such artists as Bruce Springsteen and Britney Spears, is working with several other technology companies to create a legal file sharing network. One such company, Snocap, makes software that can block unauthorized songs from being copied through peer-to-peer services. The technology is the latest venture of Shawn Fanning, who created Napster, the grandfather of all peer-to-peer sites. Sony BMG is also working with Mashboxx, a peer-to-peer network that offers authorized songs for download. Its chief executive, Wayne Rosso, is a founder of Grokster. Sony BMG is a 50-50 joint venture between Japan's Sony Corp. and Germany's Bertelsmann AG. Copyright 2005 Reuters Limited. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Did I read correctly earlier today that the Supreme Court has stated even techologies for which legitimate uses are available are not excused from lawsuits if they (the technologies) are misused? PAT] ------------------------------ From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com> Subject: Ex-Enron Internet Chief Describes Losing Power Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 20:55:57 -0500 By Mark Babineck The former Oregon-based co-chief executive of Enron Corp.'s broadband unit watched helplessly as the Houston home office gradually assumed control and shaped the division, he said on Monday in his fraud and conspiracy trial. Joseph Hirko, under questioning by his defense lawyer that began last week, explained how Enron started taking greater control of Enron Communications Inc. (ECI) in 1999, first by appointing Enron insider Kenneth Rice to be his co-CEO. By the end of 1999, most of ECI's leadership roles had been filled by people from Houston-based Enron Corp. "(Rice) brought in new people and new departments as well," Hirko said. Hirko, along with former Internet unit executives Rex Shelby, Scott Yeager, Kevin Howard and Michael Krautz, is on trial for conspiracy and fraud. Hirko, Shelby and Yeager also are accused of insider trading and money laundering. All five men have pleaded innocent. Rice was a fellow co-defendant until he entered into a plea agreement and testified against his former co-workers, saying they conspired to illegally promote the broadband division even though they knew it could not back up their promises. On cross-examination Monday afternoon, prosecutor Ben Campbell pressed Hirko about a scathing January 2000 analysis of the unit's network security that Rice testified was a sign "the network was in disarray." Hirko dismissed the appraisal, saying the problems were limited and he was told at the time they were being addressed. Campbell later showed jurors several slides Hirko used in 1999 presentations that implied many of ECI's capabilities were operational. Hirko disputed the characterization, saying his overlaying oral descriptions of the business were accurate. Hirko told jurors he felt his power diminishing in 2000 and he eventually was forced out of the company by Rice and Enron Chief Operating Officer Jeffrey Skilling, who went on to be corporate CEO and stands charged in a separate indictment. Skilling has pleaded innocent and awaits trial next year. According to Hirko, Skilling said Hirko needed to move from Portland, Oregon, to Houston to remain atop of the unit, which by mid-2000 was called Enron Broadband Services (EBS). Hirko refused, citing a contract clause that called for him to remain in Portland with his adolescent son. "(Skilling) said, 'Frankly, I think the reason you didn't want to move is stupid,"' Hirko said. Ultimately, Hirko said he agreed to commute to Houston on weekdays, but it was too late. Skilling appointed Rice to lead EBS in July 2000 and "involuntarily terminated" Hirko. Hirko quoted Skilling as saying: "I've decided to go with Ken. I'm more confident he'll build the business I want." EBS imploded about a year later. Enron Corp. declared bankruptcy in December 2001. Nevertheless, Hirko told jurors he always believed in the unit and even held onto between $8 million and $9 million in Enron stock that ultimately became worthless. "I was very proud of what the company and the people accomplished," Hirko said. "This was probably the most exciting time of my career." Lawyers estimated the trial, which began in April and originally was forecast to be winding down by now, probably would go until mid-July. Copyright 2005 Reuters Limited. NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new articles daily. ------------------------------ From: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com Subject: 50 Year Unisys Employee Retires Date: 27 Jun 2005 13:44:41 -0700 The Philadelphia Inquirer did a feature article on a man, age 68, who was retiring from Unisys after 50 years of service. (He started with Unisys precedessor Burroughs). It's extremely rare today for someone to work 50 years for the same corporation. In 1986 Unisys had 123,000 employees, now it has 36,400. Only 15% of Americans 65 and over are still working and the average person retiring today has been with his employer 10 years, not 50. The man, Bill Brown, started out with Burroughs in 1955 as an errand boy in Detroit. He went to college at night then designed adding machine parts -- it took two weeks for two men to design the curves for a cam, then computers cut the time to 18 hours. After Burroughs and Univac merged he moved to Blue Bell PA. He said the first 35 years were a lot of fun, but the last 15 were tougher with the changes. In the future, more workers will have to retire later because they won't be able to afford to stop. (for full article see www.philly.com "50 years at one firm"). Before divesture there were a great many long-time employees in the Bell System. Probably quite a few 50 year ones who perhaps started while in high school and stayed with the company their whole working life, or kept working past 65. Now seniority means nothing. I heard Verizon laid off a group of long time employees without regard to seniority-- they just shut down a particular sub-unit and fired everyone in it; many had started when it was still Bell Telephone. Likewise AT&T let many long time employees go. I know some consultants who have made a very great deal of money being hired to clean up the mess companies made after doing the above. They think their only eliminating 'fat' by these mass layoffs, but they're actually getting rid of critically needed muscle. It hits the news when sales drop dramatically and consumer groups file lawsuits over horrendus service. How stupid are the managers who come up with and authorize these actions? All they do is lose business; they don't save any money at all. Were the managers so damn cynical they thought the whole workforce was playing computer games or looking at porn all day long? Unlike government, generally the idiotic miskakes of the private sector -- that ruin people's lives by mass firings -- aren't widely reported in the media. The stock market seems to applaud such moves. [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: One important reason companies do not keep around 40-50 year employees any longer is because that employee's benefits package is usually so extravagant. For example, I recall one fellow who had worked for Standard Oil more than twenty years back in the 1960's, when I was there. Working there that long, he was entitled to five weeks paid vacation every year, and first choice of the available times for vacation. He _always_ managed to parlay that five week vacation into _six_ weeks by scheduling his vacation times around weeks which had holidays in them, which entitled him to an extra vacacation day. For example, vacation during the week which contained Memorial Day, also the week which contained Independence Day and Labor Day got him _three extra days_ right there. So he would then take those three extra days vacation and either use them for the Monday <-> Wednesday of Thanksgiving Week when the entire office got two days (Thursday and Friday) off anyway. Or, depending on how the calendar worked out that year, maybe he would take those three days during Christmas/New Years week. Needless to say, Standard Oil got quite annoyed at having to legally pay him for not being there for large gaps of time. Eventually, they had a whole bunch of people in that situation and of course, if you can find an excuse for letting the person go, then you also have to pay them for the _company's share_ of their 401-K plan or whatever, _plus_ their severance pay, _plus_ their pension, etc. And there is absolutely no reason a good supervisor cannot find an excuse -- _any_ lawful excuse will do, to can you if they wish to do so. That is one reason most companies do not like to have employees around that long; to their way of thinking, the person has gotten just to expensive for them. And ditto with the telephone company over the years. I recall a complaint I heard from a couple of very old, long term 'inside plant' technicians who got laid off by Illinois Bell just a week or two prior to some milestone for them (such as maybe reaching the point they were entitled to that very coveted fifth week of vacation each year). This was right around the time Wabash was cutting over to ESS, in 1974 or thereabouts. They both said Bell was extremely secretive about the new system. Although they both, by virtue of their longevity, had the run of the whole inside plant, the frames, etc, Bell kept the area where the computers for ESS were located totally 'off limits' with locked doors, to most of the older guys. "The only guys allowed to go in that area were the real young smart-alecks who knew something about computers. Those of us who knew nothing about computers were _not_ allowed to go in that area at all." PAT] ------------------------------ Subject: G3 for Dialup Users From: Patrick Townson <ptownson@telecom-digest.org> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 19:33:38 -0300 There have been some commercials on television lately I do not understand at all. The announcer says, 'first there was dial up, then there was accelerated dial up, now there is G3, which is about the fastest you can go _without_ being on DSL or cable.' Exactly what is G3 for dialup users? If I decided my cable internet was too expensive, and decided to resort to 'G3 for dialup' what would I get different than what I have now? PAT The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made. -Groucho Marx (1890-1977) ------------------------------ From: essay182@gmail.com Subject: Softswitch Switch Type In LERG? Date: 27 Jun 2005 15:50:10 -0700 I remember seeing that a lot of Verizon end offices in California were being upgraded from DMS switches to the new Nortel Succession Soft Switches. I was just curious to what the "Equipment Type" listing for these packet based switches is in LERG now. If its any help, I think "MTVRWAXXDS1" was the first of these Nortel Succession Soft Switches deployed by Verizon. Thanks! ------------------------------ From: RodneyG <rodneyg@carolina.rr.com> Subject: Vonage and E911: Customer Service Response Date: 27 Jun 2005 18:56:08 -0700 I wrote to Vonage Customer Service today (I am a customer) and told them I found out that another VoIP provider (Time-Warner RoadRunner) in my city (Charlotte, NC) could provide me with true E911. I asked why Vonage could not. I further asked when I could expect true E911 from Vonage. Below is the response, a direct quotation. I admit I haven't been following all the twists and turns 100%, but isn't this reply a bit of a stretch (or worse) from what we know? Or did I miss something? Thanks, rodney ---------- begin response from Vonage Customer Service ---------- Dear customer, In response to your email, we are supposed to be E911 compliant by the end of the summer. I hope I have answered your question and thank you for contacting customer care. Sincerely, Kristen ---------- end response from Vonage Customer Service ---------- [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: That was their entire response? I guess technically, they are correct. FCC gave them all 90 days to comply, as of mid-May. So mid-June (1), mid-July (2) and mid-August (3) gets us to 90 days, around to approximatly the end of the summer. You'd think that Kristen might have elaborated on it just a little; but who knows, maybe the bosses told Kristen to avoid any conversations with customers on the topic while they (the bosses) try to worm their way into an extension of time, either formally or informally. Maybe they told Kristen to be most careful about saying anything which could be construed as a 'promise' or a 'commitment'. PAT] ------------------------------ From: Fred Atkinson <fatkinson@mishmash.com> Subject: Foreign Listings Again Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:30:15 -0400 Well, Some of you may remember that last year (when I switched over to VOIP) that I went round and round with Bellsouth trying to get my VOIP number listed with directory assistance. Bellsouth doesn't properly inform their CSRs that they do list numbers with directory assistance and in the phone book for phones that are not provided by Bellsouth. It is called a foreign listing. They create what is called a special account to bill you for it. Bellsouth charges me $2.20 per month and bill it annually. I understand that the rate varies depending upon the call center that you are listed in. To refresh memories and inform those who are just now hearing about this, Bellsouth kept telling me they were transfering me to 'someone who could help me' and then transfered me blindly back into the queue. I went through person after person who couldn't help me. Once I went through fifteen people and still couldn't get it done. Some of them had the nerve to tell me it couldn't be done. I knew that wasn't true. So, I escalated to the South Carolina Public Service Commission. I was very promptly contacted by someone at Bellsouth who immediately took my information and got my number listed in directory assistance. It's been listed with directory assistance for over a year now. Call directory assistance and ask for Fred Atkinson in Columbia, SC and you will get my Vonage number. Positive proof. Well, I just accepted a position in western North Carolina. I will be living in a small city called Sylva, NC. As Vonage doesn't provide service there, I had to go with one of three alternate VOIP providers. I chose a company called Voicepulse. Even though I haven't moved into the house I've rented up there yet, I've already got my telephone service and my phone number for the Sylva area. The local provider is Verizon. I had corresponded with their customer service via email. They had told me that it was no problem to get my number listed as soon as I had it. They even quoted the rate for it (about $1.10 per month billed annually). After I got my Voicepulse number, I emailed them with the information they said they needed. They didn't answer, and didn't answer, and didn't answer. So I called their customer service number to get help. Several of them told me it couldn't be done. I insisted upon speaking to someone else. Unlike Bellsouth (who blindly transfers you to someone else who can't help you), Verizon puts you on music on hold and just leaves you there. After fifteen to thirty minutes, you figure you've been completely forgotten about and hang up and call back. After a couple of days of futility, I called the North Carolina PSC. They said they'd call Verizon and get this done for me. While waiting, I continued to try to get through to the customer service number. After one more customer service person incorrectly told me that it couldn't be done, I began to get a little upset. Turns out a supervisor was monitoring the call. She broke in and told me that she could help me. She took my information and said an order taker would call me in a few minutes to verify the information and give me an order number. Surprisingly, it actually happened. A few hours later, I got a call from a person that was with what I believe she called Verizon complaint investigation. I told her that I had finally gotten someone to take the order and gave her the order number asking that she make sure it actually got done. She did and called me back saying it was in the system and finalized. I thanked her for calling. I called directory assistance this morning and asked for Fred Atkinson in Sylva, North Carolina. Sure enough, they gave me my Voicepulse telephone number. It seems ridiculous that one should have to go through regulatory channels to get a simple telephone listing done. And it doesn't seem to matter which phone company you go to for this. However, if anyone here is trying to do that with either Verizon or Bellsouth, they can refer to my foreign residential listings when they tell you it 'can't be done'. Short of that, call the appropriate state PSC for help. <sigh>. Fred Atkinson ------------------------------ From: Marc Popek <LVMarc@att.net> Subject: VOIP and PSTN Many Line to Single Handset Answering Machine; Fax Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 03:03:13 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet There is a simple automatic switching device combine-a-line that routes PSTN and VOIP to a single line handset, answering machine, Fax, etc. This might work. Marco http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5785155151&rd=1&sspagename=STRK%3AMESE%3AIT&rd=1 ------------------------------ From: Dennis G. Rears <drears@runningpagespam.org.lga.highwinds-media.com> Subject: Re: Have You Yet Started Using VOIP? Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:57:45 -0400 Organization: Optimum Online TELECOM Digest Editor <ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu> wrote in message news:telecom24.290.4@telecom-digest.org: > Although many netters have tested out VOIP-style telephones there are > some guys who have not yet gotten their VOIP adapters and experimented > with this new method for making telephone calls. I just noticed that I > have not explained the Vonage system in detail for quite a while here, > so wanted to give the late-comers a chance to look into the program. > If you would like an e-coupon good for a month of free service from > Vonage, one of the premier VOIP services, please let me know. If > you like the plans you see offered at http://vonage.com then send me > email and ask for an e-coupon. You'll get a month of free service in > the process of signing up via this Digest. Send me email at > ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu and ask for your free month of Vonage. Hi Pat: I just want to put in a good word for Vonage. I got it in December and I love it. I have saved over $300 since I got it. There are some initial problems with getting your number transferred over, however, this is not due to Vonage but the LECs. I do international calling especially to Australia. Unlike the long distance companies they do not charge you exorbitant rates because you are not on a international long distance plan. There have been complaints about the 911 service but the complaints are unwarranted. You just go to the website and give them your correct address. Since Vonage is centered in NJ I have to pay all the taxes still my bill is less than $29 a month inclusive of taxes and everything else. I love the fact that when I go on travel I can forward to my cell phone. If you do go to Vonage, please sign up via this digest/newsgroup. It helps to pay the bills. Dennis It's only been a couple of weeks since I last posted as opposed to a decade for my previous post. Thanks for remembering me. It is through this digest that I got my interest stoked in telephony. [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: You know, and I know it is about that simple to sign up with Vonage and get _reasonable_ 911 service, even if not perfect, as in 'e-911'. And although there were some problems in general with VOIP sound quality (due to limits on bandwidth in the beginning, it has gotten much better in recent months). I still have Vonage e-coupons available for anyone who wants a month of free Vonage service. Just write me and ask for one, ptownson@massis.lcs.mit.edu and you will have it back in email a day or two later. And I notice it did not take you another decade to write to me again, and for that I thank you! But you never did tell me if you were still in the Milwaukee area, nor whatever happened to your newsgroup/Digest. PAT] ------------------------------ From: David Harmon <source@netcom.com> Subject: Re: Cardholders Kept in Dark After Breach Organization: This space inadvertently left blank. Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 03:02:26 GMT On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 11:06:01 -0400 in comp.dcom.telecom, TELECOM Digest Editor noted in response to mc <mc_no_spam@uga.edu>: > [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: One problem with your list of > requirements is that sometimes, in a family, one member of the family > -- let's say the husband for example -- likes to use the net to look > at some, well, 'perverted' stuff and charge his viewing of same to the > family credit card. I guess that shortly after the credit card companies are required to track and reproduce all that stuff we will see the news report on how some security breach disclosed details of the perverted buying habits of forty million customers. ------------------------------ From: Tony P. <kd1s@nospamplease.cox.reallynospam.net> Subject: Re: Beginning of the End for AT&T Organization: ATCC Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:48:37 -0400 In article <telecom24.295.17@telecom-digest.org>, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com says: > Too bad nobody builds telephone sets the way Western Electric used to. > (I have had good service from one Panasonic set and also their > answering machines, but are they still in the phone business? I don't > seem to see any of their traditional consumer electronic products as I > used to.) There are several people who have huge collections of older 500 and 2500 sets. They peddle them out at $25 to $50 a pop. [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Just think ... 500/2500 sets used to be as common (or more so) than Western Union clocks, and just as easy to come by ... walk in an office, walk out with one or two. Now clocks, as well as Genuine Bell telephones are getting quite hard to come by, and the people who sell them (for a slight fortune) are quite willing to pick your pockets in the process. I wish I could get one or two of the 2500 phones ... :( PAT] ------------------------------ TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and other forums. It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. Contact information: Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest Post Office Box 50 Independence, KS 67301 Phone: 620-402-0134 Fax 1: 775-255-9970 Fax 2: 530-309-7234 Fax 3: 208-692-5145 Email: editor@telecom-digest.org Subscribe: telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/ (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives) RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html For syndication examples see http://www.feedrollpro.com/syndicate.php?id=308 and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/TelecomDigest ************************************************************************* * TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from * * Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate * * 800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting. * * http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com * * Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing * * views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc. * ************************************************************************* ICB Toll Free News. Contact information is not sold, rented or leased. One click a day feeds a person a meal. Go to http://www.thehungersite.com Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA. ************************ DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO YOUR CREDIT CARD! REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST AND EASY411.COM SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest ! ************************ Visit http://www.mstm.okstate.edu and take the next step in your career with a Master of Science in Telecommunications Management (MSTM) degree from Oklahoma State University (OSU). This 35 credit-hour interdisciplinary program is designed to give you the skills necessary to manage telecommunications networks, including data, video, and voice networks. The MSTM degree draws on the expertise of the OSU's College of Business Administration; the College of Arts and Sciences; and the College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology. The program has state-of-the-art lab facilities on the Stillwater and Tulsa campus offering hands-on learning to enhance the program curriculum. Classes are available in Stillwater, Tulsa, or through distance learning. Please contact Jay Boyington for additional information at 405-744-9000, mstm-osu@okstate.edu, or visit the MSTM web site at http://www.mstm.okstate.edu ************************ --------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization. End of TELECOM Digest V24 #297 ****************************** | |