For your convenience in reading: Subject lines are printed in RED and Moderator replies when issued appear in BROWN.
Previous Issue (just one)
TD Extra News


TELECOM Digest     Wed, 13 Apr 2005 15:10:00 EDT    Volume 24 : Issue 160

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Comcast Digital Voice - Boston and Hartford (Monty Solomon)
    Trade Groups to Sue People Who Share Files (Telecom DailyLead from USTA)
    Re: Book Review: Echelon (Charles G Gray)
    Re: Harrasing Annoying Ex Boyfriend Phone Calls CALLER ID (Dave Garland)
    Re: Harrasing Annoying Ex Boyfriend Phone Calls CALLER ID (-mhd)
    Re: Harrasing Annoying Ex Boyfriend Phone Calls CALLER ID (M. Sullivan)
    Re: Harrasing Annoying Ex Boyfriend Phone Calls CALLER ID (R. Bonomi)
    Re: Cellular Phone Harassment from '555-555-1212' (Anthony Bellanga)
    Re: Cellular Phone Harassment from '555-555-1212' (Joseph)
    Re: Why Must a Cordless Phone be Away From Electronic Devices? (UK)
    Re: Walkie Talkie (Justin Time)
    Re: Looking For Old Dialite Video (Tim@Backhome.org)
    Re: Study: Consumers Oppose Cell Phones in Flight (Paul Coxwell)
    Re: Warning! A Virus Attacked my System! (Dave Garland)

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:57:43 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Comcast Digital Voice - Boston and Hartford


     Comcast Chairman and CEO Brian Roberts Unveils Boston and
     Hartford Comcast Digital Voice Rollout Plans
     - Apr 13, 2005 10:35 AM (PR Newswire)

BOSTON, April 13 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Comcast Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer Brian L. Roberts today announced that Boston and
Hartford, CT are two of the next markets to launch Comcast Digital
Voice.  Roberts unveiled the company's plan to begin rolling out the
service next month during a speech before the Greater Boston Chamber
of Commerce.  Boston and Hartford are two of the 20 markets where the
product will be available this year.

     - http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=48337586

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:22:53 EDT
From: Telecom dailyLead from USTA  <usta@dailylead.com>
Subject: Trade Groups to Sue Students Who Swap Files on Internet2


Telecom dailyLead from USTA
April 13, 2005
http://www.dailylead.com/latestIssue.jsp?i=20790&l=2017006


		TODAY'S HEADLINES
	
NEWS OF THE DAY
* Trade groups to sue students who swap files on Internet2
BUSINESS & INDUSTRY WATCH
* America Online in talks to sell service over cable lines
* Cingular to offer latest music downloads
* Qwest outfits Denver development with FTTH technology
* Vonage expected to lose grip on VoIP market
* China on pace to take broadband access top spot
USTA SPOTLIGHT 
* USTA VoIP 101: "How to Deploy IPTV" Webinar Tomorrow at 1 p.m. EST
EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
* Unmanned plane could provide broadband, mobile service
* Mobile sports services kick into high gear
* Special Report: Part III, the digital trailblazers
REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE
* Rep. Barton urges Telecom Act update

Follow the link below to read quick summaries of these stories and others.
http://www.dailylead.com/latestIssue.jsp?i=20790&l=2017006

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Book Review:  Re: Echelon
From: Charles G Gray <graycg@okstate.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:25:58 -0500


In his review of "Chatter", by Patrick Radden Keefe, Mr. Saffire says
"What to do about Echelon?" Quoting Keefe, he says '"We don't know
whether Echelon exists"'.  I call your attention to a 194 page report
prepared by the European Parliament, entitled "Report on the existence
of a global system for the interception of private and commercial
communications (ECHELON interception system)".  In addition, a Google
search for "Echelon NSA" will turn up over 93,000 entries.  The
European Parliament report can be found at:

http://www2.europarl.eu.int/omk/sipade2?PUBREF=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A5-2001-0264+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&L=EN&LEVEL=2&NAV=S&LSTDOC=Y

You can see photographs of the Menwith Hill (UK) monitoring station at 
www.fas.org/irp/facility/menwith.htm.

Regards,

Charles G. Gray
Senior Lecturer, Telecommunications
Oklahoma State University - Tulsa
(918)594-8433

------------------------------

From: Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com>
Subject: Re: Harrasing Annoying Ex Boyfriend Phone Calls CALLER ID Manager
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:12:55 -0500
Organization: Wizard Information


It was a dark and stormy night when PAT wrote:

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Maybe you, or someone can explain to me
> how to use Google search on multiple word expressions... single or double
> quoting the entire expression does not seem to help and with clusters
> of numbers it seems to act like a calculator. What are the rules on
> Google Searches and where can I find them?  Anyone?   PAT]

Double quoting *should* work.  Or click on "Advanced search" and put it
in the "exact phrase" box.

Lots more info at: http://www.google.com/help/

------------------------------

From: -mhd <not_real@invalid.com>
Subject: Re: Harrasing Annoying Ex Boyfriend Phone Calls CALLER ID Manager
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:13:20 -0400


TELECOM Digest Editor  noted in response to -mhd <not_real@invalid.com>:

> For example, if I Google for 'Patrick Townson' I get a jillion
> entries, but not all of them for that entire name: I get many
> entries for 'Patrick' this and 'Patrick' that; ditto for various
> Townson(s), only occassionally in the desired context of 'Patrick
> Townson'. Either single or double quoting the entire expression does
> not seem to help and with clusters of numbers it seems to act like a
> calculator. What are the rules on Google Searches and where can I
> find them?  Anyone?  PAT]

I think matching pairs in quotes get higher ranking then Google
includes other results in case someone had a web page that mentioned a
"Townson who goes by the name Patrick".

-mhd

------------------------------

From: Michael D. Sullivan <userid@camsul.example.invalid>
Subject: Re: Harrasing Annoying Ex Boyfriend Phone Calls CALLER ID Manager
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:16:20 GMT


-mhd wrote:

> Steve Stone <zpfleck@zitlink.zet> wrote:

>> Phonetray free works for me in these situations.  A nice addition to
>> my 'always on' home file server.  All you need is an old voice modem
>> that does callerid decode.

>> http://phonetray.traysoft.com/freecalleridsoftware_features.htm

>> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Exactly how does Phonetray work? Can
>> you explain your experience with it in more detail for us?   PAT]

> There are tons of similar programs such as Identafone. Just Google for
> 'caller id software'.

> -mhd

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Maybe you, or someone can explain to me
> how to use Google search on multiple word expressions. For example, if
> I Google for 'Patrick Townson' I get a jillion entries, but not all of
> them for that entire name: I get many entries for 'Patrick' this and
> 'Patrick' that; ditto for various Townson(s), only occassionally in
> the desired context of 'Patrick Townson'. Either single or double
> quoting the entire expression does not seem to help and with clusters
> of numbers it seems to act like a calculator. What are the rules on
> Google Searches and where can I find them?  Anyone?   PAT]

Put it in double quotes:  "Patrick Townson".  Otherwise, Google will 
assume you mean Patrick AND Townson.


Michael D. Sullivan
Bethesda, MD (USA)
(Replace "example.invalid" with "com" in my address.)

------------------------------

From: bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com (Robert Bonomi)
Subject: Re: Harrasing Annoying Ex Boyfriend Phone Calls CALLER ID Manager
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:15:09 -0000
Organization: Widgets, Inc.


In article <telecom24.159.5@telecom-digest.org>,

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Maybe you, or someone can explain to me
> how to use Google search on multiple word expressions. For example, if
> I Google for 'Patrick Townson' I get a jillion entries, but not all of
> them for that entire name: I get many entries for 'Patrick' this and
> 'Patrick' that; ditto for various Townson(s), only occassionally in
> the desired context of 'Patrick Townson'. Either single or double
> quoting the entire expression does not seem to help and with clusters
> of numbers it seems to act like a calculator. What are the rules on
> Google Searches and where can I find them?  Anyone?   PAT]

See that button that says "advanced search"?    *USE*IT*

Then "read and follow label directions".

The "help" button also has useful information.

If all else fails, ask the neighborhood 6-year old.   <grin>

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 05:55:15 -0600
From: Anthony Bellanga <anthonybellanga@withheld_on_request>
Subject: Re: Cellular Phone Harassment from '555-555-1212'


In an ongoing effort to TRY to eliminate or at least reduce $pam,
please REMOVE my email address from display in the "from" line,
AS WELL AS in the "reply to" line.

Dale Showers first wrote:

> I have been receiving calls on my cell phone and the caller id is
> 15555551212 but there is no one on the phone when I pick up.

Steve Sobol replied:

> Considering that 555 isn't a valid area code and xxx-555-1212 is
> Directory Assistance, why do you even bother answering that number?

And then Pat rang in with:

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Because, if I understood Dale
> correctly in our phone call mid-day Tuesday, his phone just keeps
> on ringing until he _does_ answer.   PAT]

I don't remember Dale mentioning that his (cellular) phone "just
keeps on ringing until he does answer". And I looked at the original
and full message that he sent to see if he specifically said that,
at least in the post. (I do remember you mentioning that he also
called and spoke with you on the phone as well). So, here is the
remainder of Dale's post as it previously appeared in Telecom Digest:

> I try to call back to that number and it is not a good number.
> There is no area code of 555.  If any one knows what this and how
> to stop it please let me know at [address suppressed].
> Thank you very much!

Unfortunately, it does appear that the harrassing caller does "keep
CALLING BACK", but that's not the same as the (cellular) phone "just
keeps on ringing until he answers".

Also, considering that Dale is on a CELLULAR phone as stated in the
original subject line, most of us SHOULD already know that if one
doesn't answer their cellular phone within a relatively short period
of time (3-5 standard ring cycles in most cases, approximately 30
seconds), the calling party is then transferred to either VOICEMAIL,
or else a "subscriber not available or is out of the area" message
from the serving cellular switch.

Also, unfortuantely, as Pat has stated several times in the past
regarding Caller-ID and Privacy options from SBC, the serving
telephone company on the called party's end doesn't really "block"
incoming calls from KNOWN BOGUS area and/or office codes, or known
bogus "formats" of same codes.

- Anthony

------------------------------

From: Joseph <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Cellular Phone Harassment from '555-555-1212'
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:37:19 -0700
Reply-To: JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.com


On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 22:14:12 -0700, Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net>
wrote:

>> I have been receiving calls on my cell phone and the caller id is
>> 15555551212 but there is no one on the phone when I pick up.  

> Considering that 555 isn't a valid area code and xxx-555-1212 is
> Directory Assistance, why do you even bother answering that number?

Unless he's turned off his voicemail why would it continue to ring?
After 4 to 6 rings at the most it should roll to voicemail.  Most cell
phones will let you press the "end" key to immediately silence the
phone's ringer or send it to voicemail.

------------------------------

From: Alan Burkitt-Gray <ABurkitt@EUROMONEYPLC.COM>
Subject: Why Must a Cordless Phone be Away From Electronic Devices?
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:29:04 +0100


 <javascript:ol('news');> news:telecom24.157.7@telecom-digest.org:

> I just got a 900 MHz DSS cordless phone, and I had the perfect spot
> for it, right on top of my tower computer case.  But then I noticed
> that the manual says that the base unit must be placed away from all
> electronic equipment, including PCs, stereos, TVs, and microwaves.
> What is the reasoning for this?  Could the magnetic fields generated
> by the speakers in the phone cause any problems?

I have a DAB radio (digital audio broadcasting, works on the old TV
band III) next to my PC at home. When I turn the PC off, the radio
switches itself on.
 
Alan B-G

Alan Burkitt-Gray, Editor, Global Telecoms Business
<http://www.globaltelecomsbusiness.com/>
http://www.globaltelecomsbusiness.com
<http://www.globaltelecomsbusiness.comemail/> 
email  <mailto:aburkitt@euromoneyplc.com> aburkitt@euromoneyplc.com; tel +44
20 7779 8518 or +1 212 224 3880; fax +44 20 7779 8248. 

------------------------------

From: Justin Time <a_user2000@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Walkie Talkie
Date: 13 Apr 2005 05:19:08 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Pat,

I see two things in Jason's post.  The first was the statement it was a
simple walkie-talkie while the second had to do with engineering and
physics.  The reason is also two-fold; one - to keep it simple, and
second; because not physics, but cost drove the engineering.

Rodgers Platt

------------------------------

From: Tim@Backhome.org
Subject: Re: Looking For Old Dialite Video
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 05:20:48 -0700
Organization: Cox Communications


Jim wrote:

> About 20+ years ago, when I worked for GTE, we had a list of video
> tapes we could request from GTE's main headquarters in Stamford,
> Conneticut. Most of the tapes were educational or safety tapes, meant
> to be shown for training and during employee meetings.

> But I remeber one tape I requested that was a short tongue in cheek
> video to "educate" the general public about where dial tone comes
> from. The tape started out showing a rock quarry, mining type
> operation. It went on to explain how "dialite" was extracted from the
> rocks and refined into dial tone. I don't know if dialite is the word
> used in the video, but it was something important sounding.

> Has anyone ever seen this, or know how I might get a copy of it again?
> Thanks.

> Jim

As bad as those GTE steppers got in the LA outer areas in the 1960s
and 1970s they could have just as well mined dial tone out of a rock
quarry.  ;-)

Back then when I'd see a GTE service truck on the road, I would
comment, "Ah, another search for the missing dial tone."

------------------------------

From: Paul Coxwell <paulcoxwell@tiscali.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Study: Consumers Oppose Cell Phones in Flight
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:09:54 +0100


> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I _used to_ find flying sort of
> enjoyable. Back in the 1960's I flew on various occassions to New York
> City for weekends (leave ORD on Friday night, return on Sunday
> afternoon or evening. To me, it was a lot of fun to be at 20-30
> thousand feet, staring out the window at night in black nothingness,
> with a scotch and soda, and listening on the in-flight sound system to
> {.......}

> I don't think it is nearly as nice these days, with people being
> herded like cattle through checkpoints; having your stuff dumped out
> all over a conveyor belt to be searched, etc. And I think the
> stewardesses are sort of rude now, aren't they? PAT]

Pat,

I haven't flown for several years, but I always enjoyed the actual
flight.  One little story which being ex-Chicago you might appreciate
happened about 1993 when I had to change planes at O'Hare Airport.

We'd had a very good flight from London, no hitches at all, and landed
at O'Hare right on time.  Then we sat waiting for the retractible
walkway to be extended.  After about 15 minutes the captain made an
announcement that they were having technical problems and the city
engineer had been called.  There were audible groans from around the
cabin, and a fellow passenger in the next seat said something like
"That'll fix it, we'll be here for hours."

Turns out he he could actually see his house from the runway and was
all too familiar with the problems in the city engineer's dept.  I
don't know if you might have some tales of the Chicago City
Engineering, but I gather from your previous posts that Chicago
government doesn't always run smoothly.

I think it took nearly an hour in the end.  Why they couldn't have
wheeled up some steps and let everybody just walk down onto the
asphalt and into the terminal building, I don't know.

- Paul.


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I do not think they were allowed to do
that (wheel up some stairs) because of the labor union to which they
belong. I know that if you go to any convention or trade show at
McCormick Place, you are _not_ allowed to carry in any tools to 
possibly be used to set up your exhibit. For example, a light bulb,
an electrical extension cord, a connecting cord for a printer or
monitor, etc. All that stuff is verbotin. You have to put in a work
order (and Lord only knows when it will be done) to get those things
attached in your exhibition booth. If they catch you with a light bulb
or a multiple outlet cord, etc, the union workers take it away from 
you. Regards the City Engineering Department, like everything else in
Chicago, it is so full of corruption. The Great Flood, back in about
1991 is a good example: Do you recall when one of the several
underground tunnels (one of them which crosses under the Chicago
River) sprang a leak? A city inspector, whose job it is (or was, he
got fired afterward, then rehired when he appealed to the union) to
walk through the tunnels frequently looking for water leakage, etc
at the various points where the tunnels cross under the river, noted
strenuously in a written report that someone had bored a hole in the
tunnel wall, and a _small_ drip at that point was leaking, and it
needed to be patched up _immediatly, ASAP_. His report was totally
ignored; in fact he was humiliated when the 'authorities' (his
supervisors, etc) questioned his credentials to know anything about
anything. That's how they do things in Chicago; they never act on
advice from experts, they always make the expert out to be a damn 
fool with an axe of some kind to grind instead. Anyway, three or four
days later the tiny leak in the wall had turned into a major flood as
the Chicago River started draining itself and much of Lake Michigan
into the tunnel system and the basements and sub-basements of every
single downtown building. (The old tunnel system years ago had been
used to carry coal around to the furnaces in the buildings, etc, and
carry garbage out; a tiny, narrow guage old fashioned railroad going
past every older building downtown had a sub-basement entrance to the
tunnel system for that reason.)

At street level you could see nothing, of course, but all those
buildings had much water (eight to ten feet high) in their basements
and many of them had underground, sealed electrical transformer units
supplying electric to themselves and other nearby buildings. It took
the city several days to find out _exactly where_ the leak was coming
from (all they knew for sure was all the underground tunnels [which
are _not_ open to the public at all] were eight to ten feet under
rushing water going into basements everywhere), meanwhile the water
kept rushing in. Every building downtown had to be evacuated, even
City Hall; all the stores had to close to protect their customers and
employees. Phone service all over downtown was disrupted for three
days; most electrical service was out; the banks and financial places
all had to evacuate all their workers, their attornies, etc. City Hall
completely lost their phone service for a few hours until they were
able to set up an emergency outpost for the fire department
dispatchers and other 'essential' workers (such as the centrex operators)
a block down the street at the Chicago Temple Building. 

Finally, the _source_ of the 'leak' was discovered by a reporter for
the Chicago Tribune who was crossing the river on the Clark Street
bridge. He noticed something he thought 'very odd'; at one point below
in the water, there was a 'whirlpool' effect, much like a bathtub
would empty into a drain. He notified the City Engineering Department;
after they, and Mayor Daley had properly abused and vilified him, like
they do anyone who knows nothing about anything, they went to look for
themselves. Their maps showed them there was a branch on the old tunnel
system there, and an underwater diver confirmed that was the spot
where the river and the lake were emptying out into the basements and
sub-basements of downtown Chicago. With several tons of concrete
powder mix poured over the Clark Street bridge into the water below at
the point where the 'whirlpool' was seen, they managed to block the
leak, or at least slow it down considerably, so that underwater divers
could go through the tunnel to that spot and do the job right. Mayor
Daley went on television later that Sunday about noon to announce to
everyone 'we found the leak, and have stopped the flood.'

For the next few days, everywhere downtown was an uproar, as the
office workers came back from their unexpected week long holiday.  Any
place you walked on the sidewalk you had to navigate these huge hoses
snaking out of office buildings attached to very noisy gasoline driven
pumps sitting on the sidewalks disgorging their filthy river/lake
water into street sewers. The office buildings were able to get maybe
one or two out of their bank of elevators running; all the downtown
restaurants had to stay closed for a couple of days until the Board of
Health could inspect their utensils, drinking water, etc. The subway
trains were only partially operating; over all it was a terrible
mess. Mayor Daley promptly fired the Engineering Department employee
he said had 'caused the problem' and a few maintainence people he said
were 'lazy' and 'corrupt' and had ignored the Engineering Department
memo. 

All the fired city workers appealed and got their jobs back except the
one who it was alleged had bored the hole in the tunnel wall that got
the whole mess started and he got his job back a few years later when
the city was unable to prove who did what, despite a one year-long
inquiry by the city council which found several individuals in
contempt of city council for refusing to testify as to who did what,
etc. Eventually they all became friends once again; that's how it goes
in Chicago.  PAT]

------------------------------

From: Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com>
Subject: Re: Warning! A Virus Attacked my System!
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 11:02:34 -0500
Organization: Wizard Information


It was a dark and stormy night when William Warren
<william_warren_nonoise@comcast.net> wrote:

> FWIW, the free version of AVG Anti-Virus is really hard to find on the
> GRISOFT site

That is true.  Fortunately, once you find it, the url is
straightforward:

http://free.grisoft.com

------------------------------


TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************

Visit http://www.mstm.okstate.edu and take the next step in your
career with a Master of Science in Telecommunications Management
(MSTM) degree from Oklahoma State University (OSU). This 35
credit-hour interdisciplinary program is designed to give you the
skills necessary to manage telecommunications networks, including
data, video, and voice networks.

The MSTM degree draws on the expertise of the OSU's College
of Business Administration; the College of Arts and Sciences; and the
College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology. The program has
state-of-the-art lab facilities on the Stillwater and Tulsa campus
offering hands-on learning to enhance the program curriculum.  Classes
are available in Stillwater, Tulsa, or through distance learning.

Please contact Jay Boyington for additional information at
405-744-9000, mstm-osu@okstate.edu, or visit the MSTM web site at
http://www.mstm.okstate.edu

              ************************

   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V24 #160
******************************

Return to Archives**Older Issues